Leslie Hebb
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leslie Hebb.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
Suzanne L. Hawley; James R. A. Davenport; Adam F. Kowalski; John P. Wisniewski; Leslie Hebb; Russell Deitrick; Eric J. Hilton
We analyzed Kepler short-cadence M dwarf observations. Spectra from the ARC 3.5m telescope identify magnetically active (H
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Benjamin J. Fulton; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Lauren M. Weiss; John Asher Johnson; Timothy D. Morton; Evan Sinukoff; Ian J. M. Crossfield; Lea Hirsch
alpha
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
James R. A. Davenport; Suzanne L. Hawley; Leslie Hebb; John P. Wisniewski; Adam F. Kowalski; Emily C. Johnson; Michael Malatesta; Jesus Peraza; Marcus Keil; Steven M. Silverberg; Tiffany Jansen; Matthew S. Scheffler; Jodi R. Berdis; Daniel M. Larsen; Eric J. Hilton
in emission) stars. The active stars are of mid-M spectral type, have numerous flares, and well-defined rotational modulation due to starspots. The inactive stars are of early-M type, exhibit less starspot signature, and have fewer flares. A Kepler to U-band energy scaling allows comparison of the Kepler flare frequency distributions with previous ground-based data. M dwarfs span a large range of flare frequency and energy, blurring the distinction between active and inactive stars designated solely by the presence of H
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
Rebekah I. Dawson; John Asher Johnson; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Daniel Foreman-Mackey; Ruth A. Murray-Clay; Lars A. Buchhave; Phillip A. Cargile; Kelsey I. Clubb; Benjamin J. Fulton; Leslie Hebb; Andrew W. Howard; Daniel Huber; Avi Shporer; Jeff A. Valenti
alpha
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
James R. A. Davenport; Leslie Hebb; Suzanne L. Hawley
. We analyzed classical and complex (multiple peak) flares on GJ 1243, finding strong correlations between flare energy, amplitude, duration and decay time, with only a weak dependence on rise time. Complex flares last longer and have higher energy at the same amplitude, and higher energy flares are more likely to be complex. A power law fits the energy distribution for flares with log
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Geoffrey W. Marcy; John Asher Johnson; Howard Isaacson; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb; Benjamin J. Fulton; Lauren M. Weiss; Timothy D. Morton; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch; Ian J. M. Crossfield
E_{K_p} >
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
John C. Lurie; James R. A. Davenport; Suzanne L. Hawley; Tessa D. Wilkinson; John P. Wisniewski; Adam F. Kowalski; Leslie Hebb
31 ergs, but the predicted number of low energy flares far exceeds the number observed, at energies where flares are still easily detectable, indicating that the power law distribution may flatten at low energy. There is no correlation of flare occurrence or energy with starspot phase; the flare waiting time distribution is consistent with flares occurring randomly in time; and the energies of consecutive flares are uncorrelated. These observations support a scenario where many independent active regions on the stellar surface are contributing to the observed flare rate.
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
John Asher Johnson; Erik A. Petigura; Benjamin J. Fulton; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Leslie Hebb; Phillip A. Cargile; Timothy D. Morton; Lauren M. Weiss; Joshua N. Winn; Leslie A. Rogers; Evan Sinukoff; Lea Hirsch
The size of a planet is an observable property directly connected to the physics of its formation and evolution. We used precise radius measurements from the California-Kepler Survey to study the size distribution of 2025 Kepler planets in fine detail. We detect a factor of ≥2 deficit in the occurrence rate distribution at 1.5–2.0 R⊕. This gap splits the population of close-in (P < 100 days) small planets into two size regimes: R_p < 1.5 R⊕ and R_p = 2.0-3.0 R⊕, with few planets in between. Planets in these two regimes have nearly the same intrinsic frequency based on occurrence measurements that account for planet detection efficiencies. The paucity of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 R⊕ supports the emerging picture that close-in planets smaller than Neptune are composed of rocky cores measuring 1.5 R⊕ or smaller with varying amounts of low-density gas that determine their total sizes.
The Astronomical Journal | 2017
Joshua N. Winn; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Leslie A. Rogers; Erik A. Petigura; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Kevin C. Schlaufman; Phillip A. Cargile; Leslie Hebb
We present the largest sample of flares ever compiled for a single M dwarf, the active M4 star GJ 1243. Over 6100 individual flare events, with energies ranging from
The Astronomical Journal | 2018
Lauren M. Weiss; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Erik A. Petigura; Benjamin J. Fulton; Andrew W. Howard; Joshua N. Winn; Howard Isaacson; Timothy D. Morton; Lea Hirsch; Evan Sinukoff; Andrew Cumming; Leslie Hebb; Phillip A. Cargile
10^{29}