Leslie K. Nathanson
University of Queensland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leslie K. Nathanson.
Annals of Surgery | 2005
Leslie K. Nathanson; Nicholas O'Rourke; I. Martin; George Fielding; Alistair E. Cowen; Roderick K. Roberts; Bradley J. Kendall; Paul Kerlin; Benedict M. Devereux
Objective:Prospectively evaluate whether for patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy with failed trans-cystic duct clearance of bile duct (BD) stones they should have laparoscopic choledochotomy or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). Summary Background Data:Clinical management of BD stones found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the last decade has focused on pre-cholecystectomy detection with ERCP clearance in those with suspected stones. This clinical algorithm successfully clears the stones in most patients, but no stones are found in 20% to 60% of patients and rare unpredictably severe ERCP morbidity can result in this group. Our initial experience of 300 consecutive patients with fluoroscopic cholangiography and intraoperative clearance demonstrated that, for the pattern of stone disease we see, 66% of patients’ BD stones can be cleared via the cystic duct with dramatic reduction in morbidity compared to the 33% requiring choledochotomy or ERCP. Given the limitations of the preoperative approach to BD stone clearance, this trial was designed to explore the limitations, for patients failing laparoscopic trans-cystic clearance, of laparoscopic choledochotomy or postoperative ERCP. Methods:Across 7 metropolitan hospitals after failed trans-cystic duct clearance, patients were intraoperatively randomized to have either laparoscopic choledochotomy or postoperative ERCP. Exclusion criteria were: ERCP prior to referral for cholecystectomy, severe cholangitis or pancreatitis requiring immediate ERCP drainage, common BD diameter of less than 7 mm diameter, or if bilio-enteric drainage was required in addition to stone clearance. Drain decompression of the cleared BD was used in the presence of cholangitis, an edematous ampulla due to instrumentation or stone impaction and technical difficulties from local inflammation and fibrosis. The ERCP occurred prior to discharge from hospital. Mechanical and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was available. Sphincter balloon dilation as an alternative to sphincterotomy to allow stone extraction was not used. Major endpoints for the trial were operative time, morbidity, retained stone rate, reoperation rate, and hospital stay. Results:From June 1998 to February 2003, 372 patients with BD stones had successful trans-cystic duct clearance of stones in 286, leaving 86 patients randomized into the trial. Total operative time was 10.9 minutes longer in the choledochotomy group (158.8 minutes), with slightly shorter hospital stay 6.4 days versus 7.7 days. Bile leak occurred in 14.6% of those having choledochotomy with similar rates of pancreatitis (7.3% versus 8.8%), retained stones (2.4% versus 4.4%), reoperation (7.3% versus 6.6%), and overall morbidity (17% versus 13%). Conclusions:These data suggest that the majority of secondary BD stones can be diagnosed at the time of cholecystectomy and cleared trans-cystically, with those failing having either choledochotomy or postoperative ERCP. However, because of the small trial size, a significant chance exists that small differences in outcome may exist. We would avoid choledochotomy in ducts less than 7 mm measured at the time of operative cholangiogram and severely inflamed friable tissues leading to a difficult dissection. We would advocate choledochotomy as a good choice for patients after Billroth 11 gastrectomy, failed ERCP access, or where long delays would occur for patient transfer to other locations for the ERCP.
Annals of Surgery | 1998
I. Martin; I S Bailey; Rhodes M; Nicholas O'Rourke; Leslie K. Nathanson; George Fielding
OBJECTIVE To establish a simple, reproducible, and safe technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (CBDE) with high clearance rates and low morbidity and mortality rates. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA For most general surgeons, laparoscopic CBDE appears an unduly complex and demanding procedure. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, many surgeons use endoscopic cholangiography (ERC) and endoscopic sphincterotomy as their only option in treating bile duct stones. ERC is more specific if used after surgery, but it carries an appreciable morbidity rate and has the disadvantage of requiring a second procedure to deal with bile duct stones. To this end, various methods of laparoscopic CBDE have been developed. METHODS Between August 1991 and February 1997, 300 consecutive unselected patients underwent laparoscopic CBDE. RESULTS Of 300 laparoscopic CBDE procedures, 173 (58%) were managed using a transcystic approach and 127 (42%) with choledochotomy. Successful laparoscopic stone clearance was achieved in 271 (90%). Of the 29 (10%) patients not cleared laparoscopically, 10 had an elective postsurgical ERC, 12 were converted to an open procedure early in the series, and 7 had unexpected retained stones. There was one death (mortality rate 0.3%) and major morbidity occurred in 22 patients (7%). The last 100 procedures were performed from July 1995 to February 1997, and stone clearance was unsuccessful in only two patients. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic transcystic basket extraction of common duct stones under fluoroscopic guidance is a relatively quick, successful, and safe technique. Choledochotomy, when required, is associated with a higher morbidity rate, particularly with T-tube insertion, and the authors advocate primary bile duct closure with or without insertion of a biliary stent as a more satisfactory technique for both surgeon and patient. Most patients with gallbladder and common duct calculi should expect a curative one-stage laparoscopic procedure without the need for external biliary drainage or ERC.
Annals of Surgery | 1995
Rhodes M; Rudd M; Nicholas O'Rourke; Leslie K. Nathanson; George Fielding
ObjectiveThe authors audit the introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy and laparoscopic intra-abdominal lymph node biopsy and compare outcomes with a parallel cohort of patients undergoing open splenectomy. Summary Background DataLaparoscopic splenectomy was first reported in 1992. It was introduced into clinical practice at the Royal Brisbane Hospital in 1991. Between June 1991 and March 1994, 24 patients have undergone laparoscopic splenectomies and 23 patients have had laparoscopic intra-abdominal lymph node biopsies. MethodsLaparoscopic splenectomy was performed using a four- or five-port technique. The splenic hilum was secured using a linear stapler cutter, and the spleen was removed after placing it in a laparoscopic bag. Lymph node biopsy was performed using a three- or four-port technique, depending on the site and size of the lymphadenopathy. ResultsLaparoscopic splenectomy was completed in 22 patients (92%). Median hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–7 days) and morbidity occurred in two patients (8%). Lymph node biopsy was completed teparoscopically in 21 of 23 patients (91 %), with morbidity in two cases (9%). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1–6 days), with a diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Comparison with open splenectomy revealed that the laparoscopic approach took significantly longer to perform (p = 0.0002). but resulted in a significantly shorter hospital stay (p = 0.0005). ConclusionsBoth laparoscopic splenectomy and laparoscopic lymph node biopsy currently are used as the treatments of choice for hematologic disease in our institution.
British Journal of Surgery | 2005
J. P. Byrne; B. M. Smithers; Leslie K. Nathanson; I. Martin; H. S. Ong; D. C. Gotley
The aim was to determine symptomatic and functional outcome after reoperative antireflux surgery for recurrent reflux, persistent dysphagia and severe gas bloat, using a primarily laparoscopic surgical approach.
Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2017
Kelvin Kam Fai Ho; Philip J. Walker; B. Mark Smithers; W. Foster; Leslie K. Nathanson; Nicholas O'Rourke; Ian Shaw; Timothy McGahan
Background: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a condition characterized by chronic abdominal symptoms associated with median arcuate ligament compression of the celiac artery. The selection of patients is difficult in the management of MALS. This study aimed to identify factors that predict outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment in these patients. Methods: Patients referred with a possible diagnosis of MALS between 1998 and 2013 were identified retrospectively. Only patients with chronic symptoms and radiologically confirmed celiac artery compression were included. The clinical features, investigations, and management were documented. Outcome was assessed using the Visick score, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey by telephone interview and review of medical records. Results: There were 67 patients, 43 (64%) treated surgically and 24 (36%) managed without surgery, with a median follow‐up of 25 months and 24 months, respectively. After surgical treatment, 16 (37%) were asymptomatic, 24 (56%) were partially improved, 3 (7%) had no changes in symptoms, and none had worsening of symptoms. Postexertional pain predicted improvement after surgery (P = .022). Vomiting (P = .046) and unprovoked pain (P = .006) were predictors of poor surgical outcome. After nonoperative management, 1 (4%) was asymptomatic, 7 (29%) were partially improved, 12 (50%) had no changes in symptoms, and 4 (17%) had worsening of symptoms. No outcome predictors of nonoperative treatment were identified. Conclusions: MALS was more likely to respond to decompression if patients had postexertional pain. Patients who presented with vomiting and unprovoked pain were unlikely to respond to surgery. In contrast with previous studies, postprandial pain was not found to be predictive of outcome.
Archives of Surgery | 2004
David I. Watson; Glyn G. Jamieson; Carolyn J Lally; Stephen Archer; J. R. Bessell; Michael Booth; Richard Cade; Graham Cullingford; Peter G. Devitt; David R. Fletcher; James C. Hurley; George Kiroff; Christopher J. Martin; I. Martin; Leslie K. Nathanson; John A. Windsor
British Journal of Surgery | 1998
I. S. Bailey; Michael J. C. Rhodes; N. O'rourke; Leslie K. Nathanson; G. Fielding
British Journal of Surgery | 1995
M. Rhodes; Leslie K. Nathanson; N. O'rourke; G. Fielding
Archives of Surgery | 1992
David W. Easter; Alfred Cuschieri; Leslie K. Nathanson; Michael Lavelle-Jones
British Journal of Surgery | 2000
J. R. Bessell; R. Finch; D. C. Gotley; B. M. Smithers; Leslie K. Nathanson; B. Menzies