Leslie M. Foertsch

A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation.

Skin sensitization is a key endpoint for cosmetic ingredients, with a forthcoming ban for animal testing in Europe. Four alternative tests have so far been submitted to ECVAM prevalidation: (i) MUSST and (ii) h‐Clat assess surface markers on dendritic cell lines, (iii) the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) measures reactivity with model peptides and (iv) the KeratinoSensTM assay which is based on detection of Nrf2‐induced luciferase. It is anticipated that only an integrated testing strategy (ITS) based on a battery of tests might give a full replacement providing also a sensitization potency assessment, but this concept should be tested with a data‐driven analysis. Here we report a database on 145 chemicals reporting the quantitative endpoints measured in a U937‐ test, the DPRA and KeratinoSensTM . It can serve to develop data‐driven ITS approaches as we show in a parallel paper and provides a view as to the current ability to predict with in vitro tests as we are entering 2013. It may also serve as reference database when benchmarking new molecules with in vitro based read‐across and find use as a reference database when evaluating new tests. The tests and combinations thereof were evaluated for predictivity, and overall a similar predictivity was found as before on three‐fold smaller datasets. Analysis of the dose–response parameters of the individual tests indicates a correlation to sensitization potency. Detailed analysis of chemicals false‐negative and false‐positive in two tests helped to define limitations in the tests but also in the database derived from animal studies. Copyright

The incorporation of lysine into the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay for skin sensitization assessments.

To establish further a practical quantitative in chemico reactivity assay for screening contact allergens, lysine peptide was incorporated into a liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry-based assay for reactivity assessments of hapten and pre-/pro-hapten chemical sensitizers. Loss of peptide was determined following 24 h coincubation with test chemical using a concentration-response study design. A total of 70 chemicals were tested in discrete reactions with cysteine or lysine peptide, in the presence and absence of horseradish peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide oxidation system. An empirically derived prediction model for discriminating sensitizers from nonsensitizers resulted in an accuracy of 83% for 26 haptens, 19 pre-/pro-haptens, and 25 nonsensitizers. Four sensitizers were shown to selectively react with lysine including two strong/extreme and two weak sensitizers. In addition, seven sensitizers were identified as having higher reactivity toward lysine compared with cysteine. The majority of sensitizing chemicals (27/45) were reactive toward both cysteine and lysine peptides. An estimate of the relative reactivity potency was determined based on the concentration of test chemical that depletes peptide at or above a threshold positive value. Here, we report the use of EC15 as one example to illustrate the use of the model for screening the skin sensitization potential of novel chemicals. Results from this initial assessment highlight the utility of lysine for assessing a chemicals potential to elicit sensitization reactions or induce hypersensitivity. This approach has the potential to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate an important mechanism in contact allergy for hazard and quantitative risk assessments without animal testing.

The Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay: Selectivity of Chemical Respiratory Allergens

It is well known that some chemicals are capable of causing allergic diseases of the skin and respiratory tract. Commonly, though not exclusively, chemical allergens are associated with the selective development of skin or respiratory sensitization. The reason for this divergence is unclear, although it is hypothesized that the nature of interactions between the chemical hapten and proteins is influential. The direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been developed as a screen for the identification of skin-sensitizing chemicals, and here we describe the use of this method to explore whether differences exist between skin and respiratory allergens with respect to their peptide-binding properties. Known skin and respiratory sensitizers were reacted with synthetic peptides containing either lysine (Lys) or cysteine (Cys) for 24 h. The samples were analyzed by HPLC/UV, and the loss of peptide from the reaction mixture was expressed as the percent depletion compared with the control. The potential for preferential reactivity was evaluated by comparing the ratio of Lys to Cys depletion (Lys:Cys ratio). The results demonstrate that the majority of respiratory allergens are reactive in the DPRA, and that in contrast to most skin-sensitizing chemicals, preferentially react with the Lys peptide. These data suggest that skin and respiratory chemical allergens can result in different protein conjugates, which may in turn influence the quality of induced immune responses. Overall, these investigations reveal that the DPRA has considerable potential to be incorporated into tiered testing approaches for the identification and characterization of chemical respiratory allergens.

Effects of Transplacental 17-α-Ethynyl Estradiol or Bisphenol A on the Developmental Profile of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein in the Rat Testis

Previous research from our laboratory has determined the transcript profiles for developing fetal rat female and male reproductive tracts following transplacental exposure to estrogens. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) or 17-α-ethynyl estradiol (EE) significantly affects steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein transcript levels in the developing male rat reproductive tract. The purpose of this study was to establish the intratesticular distribution and temporal expression pattern of StAR, a key gene involved in steroidogenesis. Beginning on gestation day (GD) 11, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed daily to 10μg/kg/day EE and fetal testes were harvested at GD16, 18, or 20. Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (QRT-PCR) demonstrated no significant difference in StAR transcript levels present at GD16. However, at GD18, StAR transcripts were significantly decreased following exposure. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated similar StAR protein levels in interstitial region of GD16 testes and an obvious decrease in StAR protein levels in the interstitial region of GD18 testes. Moreover, starting at GD11 additional dams were dosed with 0.001 or 0.1 μg/kg/day EE or 0.02, 0.5, 400 mg/kg/day BPA via subcutaneous injections. QRT-PCR validated previous microarray dose-related decreases in StAR transcripts at GD20, whereas immunohistochemistry results demonstrated decreases in StAR protein levels in the interstitial region at the highest EE and BPA doses only. Neither EE nor BPA exposure caused morphological changes in the developing seminiferous cords, Sertoli cells, gonocytes, or the interstitial region or Leydig cells at GD16-20. High levels of estrogens decrease StAR expression in the fetal rat testis during late gestation.

Toxic Shock Syndrome: Characterization of Human Immune Responses to TSST-1 and Evidence for Sensitivity Thresholds

Noninvasive vaginal infections by Staphylococcus aureus strains producing the superantigen TSST-1 can cause menstrual toxic shock syndrome (mTSS). With the objective of exploring the basis for differential susceptibility to mTSS, the relative responsiveness to TSST-1 of healthy women has been investigated. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were incubated with purified TSST-1 or with the T-cell mitogen phytohemmaglutinin (PHA), and proliferation was measured. The concentrations of TSST-1 and PHA required to elicit a response equivalent to 15% of the maximal achievable response (EC15) were determined. Although with PHA, EC15 values were comparable between donors, subjects could be classified as being of high, medium, or low sensitivity based on responsiveness to TSST-1. Sensitivity to TSST-1-induced proliferation was associated with increased production of the cytokines interleukin-2 and interferon-γ. When the entire T lymphocyte population was considered, there were no differences between sensitivity groups with respect to the frequency of cells known to be responsive to TSST-1 (those bearing CD3(+) Vβ2(+)). However, there was an association between sensitivity to TSST-1 and certain HLA-class II haplotypes. Thus, the frequencies of DR7DQ2, DR14DQ5, DR4DQ8, and DR8DQ4 haplotypes were greater among those with high sensitivity, a finding confirmed by analysis of responses to immortalized homozygous B cell lines. Collectively, the results reveal that factors other than neutralizing antibody and the frequency of Vβ2(+) T lymphocytes determine immunological responsiveness to TSST-1. Differential responsiveness of lymphocytes to TSST-1 may form the basis of interindividual variations in susceptibility to mTSS.

Utilization of Peptide Reactivity Assays for the Prediction of Skin Sensitization

Due to the current ban on animal testing, the need for robust and reliable animal alternative test methods is critical. Reactivity of chemical allergens with proteins has long been established as a key step in induction of skin sensitization. Based on this, two in chemico approaches have been developed: the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) and the Peroxidase Peptide Reactivity Assay (PPRA). Both assays utilize synthetic peptides which contain either a single cysteine or lysine amino acid as its nucleophilic center for assessing skin sensitization potential of chemicals. Chemical reactivity is determined by using analytical methods to measure the depletion of free peptide following a 24-h incubation of test chemical and peptide. By comparing reactivity data to local lymph node assay data, prediction models have been developed for both assays. These models allow for making hazard predictions and binning a chemical into reactivity categories. The DPRA has been thoroughly evaluated for its reproducibility, transferability, and accuracy under formal validation studies. The PPRA has not yet reached validated status but is undergoing interlaboratory evaluation. Although showing good correlation to established animal models, the data obtained from both of these assays should be considered in combination with other information in the context of integrated approaches such as weight of evidence or integrated testing strategies.