Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Leslie M. Reid is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Leslie M. Reid.


Geomorphology | 2003

Magnitude and frequency of landsliding in a large New Zealand catchment

Leslie M. Reid; Mike Page

Knowledge of long-term average rates of erosion is necessary if factors affecting sediment yields from catchments are to be understood. Without such information, it is not possible to assess the potential influence of extreme storms, and, therefore, to evaluate the relative importance of various components of a sediment budget. A study of the sediment budget for the Waipaoa catchment, North Island, New Zealand, included evaluation of long-term rates of landsliding for six landslide-prone land systems in the catchment. The number of landslides per unit area generated by each of several storms was counted on sequential aerial photographs and correlated with the magnitude of the corresponding storm. The resulting relationships were combined with magnitude–frequency relationships derived for storms from 70- to 100-year rainfall records in the area to estimate a long-term magnitude–frequency relationship for landsliding for each land system. The long-term average values of the areal landslide frequency (number of slides per unit area per unit time) were then calculated from these relationships. The volumes of a sample of landslide scars were measured in the field, and the proportion of slides that deliver sediment to channels was determined from aerial photographs. These measurements then allowed calculation of the long-term average rate of sediment production to streams from landslides for different land systems and types of vegetation. Results suggest that shallow landslides currently contribute about 15±5% of the suspended sediment load in the Waipaoa River above the Kanakanaia gauging station, and that 75% of the sediment production from the landslides occurs during storms with recurrence intervals of less than 27 years. Reforestation of 6.3% (93 km2) of the slide-prone lands in the catchment between 1990 and 1995 resulted in a calculated decrease in slide-derived sediment of 10%. Calculations suggest that reforestation of an additional 3% (66 km2) of the catchment in areas with the most sensitive combinations of land system and storm regime could decrease the total sediment inputs from landsliding by about 20%.


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 1999

Influence of storm-related sediment storage on the sediment delivery from tributary catchments in the upper Waipaoa River, New Zealand

Tomomi Marutani; Mio Kasai; Leslie M. Reid; Noel A. Trustrum

Although much is known about overall sediment delivery ratios for catchments as components of sediment production and sediment yield, little is known about the component of temporary sediment storage. Sediment delivery ratios focused on the influence of storm-related sediment storage are measured at Matakonekone and Oil Springs tributaries of the Waipaoa River basin, east coast of New Zealand. The terrace deposits of both tributaries show abundant evidence of storm-related sedimentation, especially sediment delivered from Cyclone Bola, a 50 year return rainfall event which occurred in 1988. The sediment delivery ratio is calculated by dividing the volume of sediment transported from a tributary to the main stream by the volume of sediment generated at erosion sites in the tributary catchment. Because the sediment delivery volume is unknown, it can be calculated as the difference between sediment generation volume and sediment storage volume in the channel reach of the tributary. The volume of sediment generated from erosion sites in each tributary catchment was calculated from measurements made on aerial photographs dating from 1960 (1:44 000) and 1988 (1:27 000). The volume of sediment stored in the tributary can be calculated from measurements of cross-sections located along the tributary channel, which are accompanied by terrace deposits dated by counting annual growth rings of trees on terrace surfaces. Sediment delivery ratios are 0·93 for both Matakonekone catchment and Oil Springs catchment. Results indicate that Oil Springs catchment has contributed more than twice the volume of sediment to the Waipaoa River than the Matakonekone catchment (2·75 × 106 m3 vs 1·22 × 106 m3). Although large volumes of sediment are initially deposited during floods, subsequent smaller flows scour away much of these deposits. The sediment scouring rate from storage is 1·25 × 104 m3 a−1 for Matakonekone stream and 0·83 × 104 m3 a−1 for Oil Springs stream. Matakonekone and Oil Springs channels respond to extreme storms by instantaneously aggrading, then gradually excavating the temporarily stored sediment. Results from Matakonekone and Oil Springs streams suggest a mechanism by which event recurrence interval can strongly influence the magnitude of a geomorphic change. Matakonekone stream with its higher stream power is expected to excavate sediment deposits more rapidly and allow more rapid re-establishment of storage capacity. Copyright


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2001

Estimation of temporally averaged sediment delivery ratio using aggradational terraces in headwater catchments of the Waipaoa River, North Island, New Zealand

Mio Kasai; Tomomi Marutani; Leslie M. Reid; Noel A. Trustrum

The sediment delivery ratio was estimated for two periods (28 years and eight years) following reforestation of seven tributary catchments (0·33 to 0·49 km2) in the headwaters of the Waipaoa River basin, North Island, New Zealand. In these catchments, gully erosion, which largely resulted from clearance of the natural forest between 1880 and 1920, is the main source of sediment to streams. Reforestation commenced in the early 1960s in an attempt to stabilize hillslopes and reduce sediment supply. Efforts have been partially successful and channels are now degrading, though gully erosion continues to supply sediment at accelerated rates in parts of the catchment. Data from the area indicate that the sediment delivery ratio (SDR) can be estimated as a function of two variables, ψ (the product of catchment area and channel slope) and Ag (the temporally averaged gully area for the period). Sediment input from gullies was determined from a well defined relationship between sediment yield and gully area. Sediment scoured from channels was estimated from dated terrace remnants and the current channel bed. Terrace remnants represent aggradation during major floods. This technique provides estimates of SDR averaged over periods between large magnitude terrace-forming events and with the present channel bed. The technique averages out short-term variability in sediment flux. Comparison of gully area and sediment transport between two periods (1960–1988 and 1988–1996) indicates that the annual rate of sediment yield from gullies for the later period has decreased by 77 per cent, sediment scouring in channels has increased by 124 per cent, and sediment delivered from catchments has decreased by 78 per cent. However, average SDR for the tributaries was found to be not significantly different between these periods. This may reflect the small number of catchments examined. It is also due to the fact that the volume of sediment scoured from channels was very small relative to that produced by gullies. According to the equation for SDR determined for the Waipaoa headwaters, SDR increases with increasing catchment area in the case where Ag and channel slope are fixed. This is because the amount of sediment produced from a channel by scouring increases with increasing catchment area. However, this relationship does not hold for the main stem of the study catchments, because sediment delivered from its tributaries still continues to accumulate in the channel. Higher order channels are, in effect, at a different stage in the aggradation/degradation cycle and it will take some time until a main channel reflects the effects of reforestation and its bed adjusts to net degradation. Results demonstrate significant differences among even low order catchments, and such differences will need to be taken into consideration when using SDR to estimate sediment yields. Copyright


Water Resources Research | 1998

Calculation of average landslide frequency using climatic records

Leslie M. Reid

Aerial photographs are used to develop a relationship between the number of debris slides generated during a hydrologic event and the size of the event, and the long-term average debris-slide frequency is calculated from climate records using the relation. For a site in California with an average of 8.3 slides km−2 yr−1, a sequence of four photo sets (representing 10–15 years, 35–50 observed slides, and 4–6 large storms) is needed to estimate the long-term debris-slide frequency to within 30% of the actual value (p=0.90). If climatic records are used, a record length of 5–10 years (17–35 observed slides and 2–4 significant storms) is sufficient to provide the same accuracy. The climate-based model suggests that debris-slide frequency changed from approximately 1.6 to 8.3 slides km−2yr−1 during the late 1930s owing to an increased frequency of high-intensity storms. The model accurately predicts the change in slide-scar density observed on sequential aerial photographs following the climatic shift.


Water Resources Research | 2010

Comment on “Forest and floods: A new paradigm sheds light on age‐old controversies” by Younes Alila et al.

Jack Lewis; Leslie M. Reid; Robert B. Thomas

[1] The paper by Alila et al. [2009, hereafter referred to as AKSH] presents a technique for analyzing altered peak flow frequencies after logging. The paper suggests that the established method of chronologically pairing peak flows by corresponding hydrologic input at control and treated watersheds is inappropriate, leading to irrelevant research hypotheses and impeding scientific progress. In general, we agree that analyses of changes in flood frequency are useful for evaluating the effects of watershed disturbance, and that simple regression models often provide inadequate descriptions of posttreatment peak flow responses. However, the proposed method and accompanying discussion have several problems that undercut the strength of the paper’s conclusions: [2] 1. The recovery adjustment used by the method augments the effect the analysis is attempting to detect. [3] 2. Even in the absence of impacts, the frequency distribution of observed peaks is expected to have greater variance than that of predicted peaks, thereby introducing an artificial shift when comparing upper quantiles of observed and expected frequency distributions. [4] 3. A more appropriate analysis of uncertainty is needed if the utility of the method is to be validly assessed. [5] 4. Frequency pairing does not overcome the problem of low power in testing for changes in very large events prior to forest regrowth. [6] 5. The relative merits of alternative statistical approaches are mischaracterized.


General Technical Report FPL-GTR-182. Madison, WI: USDA-Forest Service, Forest Products | 2009

Experimental forests and ranges : 100 years of research success stories

Gail Wells; Deborah Hayes; Katrina Krause; Ann Bartuska; Susan LeVan-Green; Jim Anderson; Tivoli Gough; Mary Beth Adams; Thomas M. Schuler; Randy Kolka; Steve Sebestyen; Laura S. Kenefic; John C. Brissette; Keith Kanoti; Frederick J. Swanson; Sarah Greene; Margaret Herring; Martin W. Ritchie; Carl N. Skinner; Tom Lisle; Elizabeth T. Keppeler; Leslie M. Reid; Peter Wohlegemuth; Stanley Kitchen; Ward McCaughey; Jim Guldin; Don C. Bragg; Michael G. Shelton; David L. Loftis; Cathryn H. Greenberg

In 2008, Forest Service Research and Development celebrated the Centennial Anniversary of these Experimental Forests and Ranges. This publication celebrates the many scientists who over the course of decades conducted the long-term studies that began and are continuing to shed light on important natural resource issues. Story suggestions were solicited from the Experimental Forest and Range Working Group and were selected to demonstrate the array of research issues being addressed on these living laboratories. Gathering a wealth of information from her interviews with scientists, Gail Wells proceeded to write these “…wonderful success stories from 100 years of research.” Studies established decades ago on many of these sites are still going strong. Experimental forests and ranges provide a valuable, long-term stream of information about the land and its resources. Over the years, researchers have built an impressive body of science to support good land management and further understanding of natural processes. Their research sheds light on many important questions. These experimental forests serve as living laboratories that help us connect the future to the past.


Chapter Three, In: Ernest O. Salo and Terrance W. Cundy (eds.), Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, 12-2014 February 1986. Contribution no. 57, Institute of Forest Resources, Seattle, Washington. p. 39-97. | 1987

Stream channels: The link between forests and fishes

Kathleen Sullivan; Thomas E. Lisle; C. Andrew Dolloff; Gordon E. Grant; Leslie M. Reid


Archive | 2005

Sediment Budgets as an Organizing Framework in Fluvial Geomorphology

Leslie M. Reid; Thomas Dunne


Journal of Hydrology | 2009

Rates, timing, and mechanisms of rainfall interception loss in a coastal redwood forest.

Leslie M. Reid; Jack Lewis


Journal of The American Water Resources Association | 2001

THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF MONITORING1

Leslie M. Reid

Collaboration


Dive into the Leslie M. Reid's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jack Lewis

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas E. Lisle

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gordon E. Grant

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Beth Adams

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Hilton

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl N. Skinner

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge