Lester G. Carter
University of St Andrews
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lester G. Carter.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2005
Thomas S. Walter; Jonathan M. Diprose; C.J. Mayo; Christian Siebold; M.G. Pickford; Lester G. Carter; Geoffrey C. Sutton; Nick S. Berrow; James Brown; Ian Berry; Guillaume Stewart-Jones; Jonathan M. Grimes; David K. Stammers; Robert M. Esnouf; E.Y. Jones; Raymond J. Owens; David I. Stuart; Karl Harlos
Crystallization trials at the Division of Structural Biology in Oxford are now almost exclusively carried out using a high‐throughput workflow implemented in the Oxford Protein Production Facility. Initial crystallization screening is based on nanolitre‐scale sitting‐drop vapour‐diffusion experiments (typically 100 nl of protein plus 100 nl of reservoir solution per droplet) which use standard crystallization screening kits and 96‐well crystallization plates. For 294 K crystallization trials the barcoded crystallization plates are entered into an automated storage system with a fully integrated imaging system. These plates are imaged in accordance with a pre‐programmed schedule and the resulting digital data for each droplet are harvested into a laboratory information‐management system (LIMS), scored by crystal recognition software and displayed for user analysis via a web‐based interface. Currently, storage for trials at 277 K is not automated and for imaging the crystallization plates are fed by hand into an imaging system from which the data enter the LIMS. The workflow includes two procedures for nanolitre‐scale optimization of crystallization conditions: (i) a protocol for variation of pH, reservoir dilution and protein:reservoir ratio and (ii) an additive screen. Experience based on 592 crystallization projects is reported.
Journal of Applied Crystallography | 2003
James Brown; Thomas S. Walter; Lester G. Carter; Nicola G. A. Abrescia; A.R. Aricescu; T. D. Batuwangala; Louise E. Bird; N. Brown; P. P. Chamberlain; Simon J. Davis; E. Dubinina; J. Endicott; Janet A. Fennelly; Robert J. C. Gilbert; Maria Harkiolaki; W.C Hon; F. Kimberley; Christopher Anthony Love; Erika J. Mancini; Raquel Manso-Sancho; C.E. Nichols; R. A. Robinson; Geoffrey C. Sutton; N. Schueller; M. C. Sleeman; Guillaume Stewart-Jones; Mai Vuong; J. Welburn; Zhihong Zhang; David K. Stammers
An initial tranche of results from day-to-day use of a robotic system for setting up 100 nl-scale vapour-diffusion sitting-drop protein crystallizations has been surveyed. The database of over 50 unrelated samples represents a snapshot of projects currently at the stage of crystallization trials in Oxford research groups and as such encompasses a broad range of proteins. The results indicate that the nanolitre-scale methodology consistently identifies more crystallization conditions than traditional hand-pipetting-style methods; however, in a number of cases successful scale-up is then problematic. Crystals grown in the initial 100 nl-scale drops have in the majority of cases allowed useful characterization of x-ray diffraction, either in-house or at synchrotron beamlines. For a significant number of projects, full x-ray diffraction data sets have been collected to 3 A resolution or better (either in-house or at the synchrotron) from crystals grown at the 100 nl scale. To date, five structures have been determined by molecular replacement directly from such data and a further three from scale-up of conditions established at the nanolitre scale.
Structure | 2004
Geoff Sutton; Elizabeth E. Fry; Lester G. Carter; Sarah Sainsbury; Thomas S. Walter; Joanne E. Nettleship; Nick S. Berrow; Raymond J. Owens; Robert J. C. Gilbert; Andrew D. Davidson; Stuart G. Siddell; Leo L.M. Poon; Jonathan M. Diprose; David Alderton; Martin A. Walsh; Jonathan M. Grimes; David I. Stuart
As part of a high-throughput structural analysis of SARS-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) proteins, we have solved the structure of the non-structural protein 9 (nsp9). This protein, encoded by ORF1a, has no designated function but is most likely involved with viral RNA synthesis. The protein comprises a single β-barrel with a fold previously unseen in single domain proteins. The fold superficially resembles an OB-fold with a C-terminal extension and is related to both of the two subdomains of the SARS-CoV 3C-like protease (which belongs to the serine protease superfamily). nsp9 has, presumably, evolved from a protease. The crystal structure suggests that the protein is dimeric. This is confirmed by analytical ultracentrifugation and dynamic light scattering. We show that nsp9 binds RNA and interacts with nsp8, activities that may be essential for its function(s).
Nucleic Acids Research | 2008
Ian M. Overton; C. A. Johannes van Niekerk; Lester G. Carter; Alice Dawson; David M. A. Martin; Scott Cameron; Stephen A. McMahon; Malcolm F. White; William N. Hunter; James H. Naismith; Geoffrey J. Barton
TarO (http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/taro) offers a single point of reference for key bioinformatics analyses relevant to selecting proteins or domains for study by structural biology techniques. The protein sequence is analysed by 17 algorithms and compared to 8 databases. TarO gathers putative homologues, including orthologues, and then obtains predictions of properties for these sequences including crystallisation propensity, protein disorder and post-translational modifications. Analyses are run on a high-performance computing cluster, the results integrated, stored in a database and accessed through a web-based user interface. Output is in tabulated format and in the form of an annotated multiple sequence alignment (MSA) that may be edited interactively in the program Jalview. TarO also simplifies the gathering of additional annotations via the Distributed Annotation System, both from the MSA in Jalview and through links to Dasty2. Routes to other information gateways are included, for example to relevant pages from UniProt, COG and the Conserved Domains Database. Open access to TarO is available from a guest account with private accounts for academic use available on request. Future development of TarO will include further analysis steps and integration with the Protein Information Management System (PIMS), a sister project in the BBSRC ‘Structural Proteomics of Rational Targets’ initiative
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2008
Jodi D. Richards; Kenneth A. Johnson; Huanting Liu; Anne-Marie McRobbie; Stephen A. McMahon; Muse Oke; Lester G. Carter; James H. Naismith; Malcolm F. White
Hel308 is a superfamily 2 helicase conserved in eukaryotes and archaea. It is thought to function in the early stages of recombination following replication fork arrest and has a specificity for removal of the lagging strand in model replication forks. A homologous helicase constitutes the N-terminal domain of human DNA polymerase Q. The Drosophila homologue mus301 is implicated in double strand break repair and meiotic recombination. We have solved the high resolution crystal structure of Hel308 from the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus, revealing a five-domain structure with a central pore lined with essential DNA binding residues. The fifth domain is shown to act as an autoinhibitory domain or molecular brake, clamping the single-stranded DNA extruded through the central pore of the helicase structure to limit the helicase activity of the enzyme. This provides an elegant mechanism to tune the processivity of the enzyme to its functional role. Hel308 can displace streptavidin from a biotinylated DNA molecule, and this activity is only partially inhibited when the DNA is pre-bound with abundant DNA-binding proteins RPA or Alba1, whereas pre-binding with the recombinase RadA has no effect on activity. These data suggest that one function of the enzyme may be in the removal of bound proteins at stalled replication forks and recombination intermediates.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2009
Stephen A. McMahon; Gareth A. Roberts; Kenneth A. Johnson; Laurie P. Cooper; Huanting Liu; John H. White; Lester G. Carter; Bansi Sanghvi; Muse Oke; Malcolm D. Walkinshaw; Garry W. Blakely; James H. Naismith; David T. F. Dryden
The ardA gene, found in many prokaryotes including important pathogenic species, allows associated mobile genetic elements to evade the ubiquitous Type I DNA restriction systems and thereby assist the spread of resistance genes in bacterial populations. As such, ardA contributes to a major healthcare problem. We have solved the structure of the ArdA protein from the conjugative transposon Tn916 and find that it has a novel extremely elongated curved cylindrical structure with defined helical grooves. The high density of aspartate and glutamate residues on the surface follow a helical pattern and the whole protein mimics a 42-base pair stretch of B-form DNA making ArdA by far the largest DNA mimic known. Each monomer of this dimeric structure comprises three alpha–beta domains, each with a different fold. These domains have the same fold as previously determined proteins possessing entirely different functions. This DNA mimicry explains how ArdA can bind and inhibit the Type I restriction enzymes and we demonstrate that 6 different ardA from pathogenic bacteria can function in Escherichia coli hosting a range of different Type I restriction systems.
Acta Crystallographica Section F-structural Biology and Crystallization Communications | 2006
Gareth J. Williams; Kenneth A. Johnson; Jana Rudolf; Stephen A. McMahon; Lester G. Carter; Muse Oke; Huanting Liu; Garry L. Taylor; Malcolm F. White; James H. Naismith
The structure of the heterotrimeric PCNA complex from S. sulfataricus is reported to 2.3 Å.
Nature Chemical Biology | 2009
Stefan Schmelz; Nadia Kadi; Stephen A. McMahon; Lijiang Song; Daniel Oves-Costales; Muse Oke; Huanting Liu; Kenneth A. Johnson; Lester G. Carter; Catherine H. Botting; Malcolm F. White; Gregory L. Challis; James H. Naismith
Bacterial pathogens need to scavenge iron from their host for growth and proliferation during infection. They have evolved several strategies to do this, one being the biosynthesis and excretion of small, high-affinity iron chelators known as siderophores. The biosynthesis of siderophores is an important area of study, not only for potential therapeutic intervention, but also to illuminate new enzyme chemistries. Two general pathways for siderophore biosynthesis exist: the well-characterized nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)-dependent pathway and the NRPS-independent (NIS) pathway, which relies on a different family of sparsely-investigated synthetases. Here, we report structural and biochemical studies of AcsD from Pectobacterium (formerly Erwinia) chrysanthemi, a NIS synthetase involved in achromobactin biosynthesis. The structures of ATP and citrate complexes provide a mechanistic rationale for stereospecific formation of an enzyme-bound (3R)-citryl-adenylate, which reacts with L-serine to form a likely achromobactin precursor. AcsD is a novel acyl adenylate-forming enzyme with a new fold and chemical catalysis strategy.
Chemical Communications | 2008
Michael Fairhead; Kenneth A. Johnson; Thomas Kowatz; Stephen A. McMahon; Lester G. Carter; Muse Oke; Huanting Liu; James H. Naismith; Christopher F. van der Walle
Cathepsin L mutants with the ability to condense silica from solution have been generated and a 1.5 A crystal structure of one of these chimeras allows us to rationalise the catalytic mechanism of silicic acid condensation.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2009
Marine C. C. Raman; Kenneth A. Johnson; Beverley A. Yard; Jonathan Lowther; Lester G. Carter; James H. Naismith; Dominic J. Campopiano
Sphingolipid biosynthesis begins with the condensation of l-serine and palmitoyl-CoA catalyzed by the PLP-dependent enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT). Mutations in human SPT cause hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathy type 1, a disease characterized by loss of feeling in extremities and severe pain. The human enzyme is a membrane-bound hetereodimer, and the most common mutations are located in the enzymatically incompetent monomer, suggesting a “dominant” or regulatory effect. The molecular basis of how these mutations perturb SPT activity is subtle and is not simply loss of activity. To further explore the structure and mechanism of SPT, we have studied the homodimeric bacterial enzyme from Sphingomonas paucimobilis. We have analyzed two mutants (N100Y and N100W) engineered to mimic the mutations seen in hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathy type 1 as well as a third mutant N100C designed to mimic the wild-type human SPT. The N100C mutant appears fully active, whereas both N100Y and N100W are significantly compromised. The structures of the holoenzymes reveal differences around the active site and in neighboring secondary structure that transmit across the dimeric interface in both N100Y and N100W. Comparison of the l-Ser external aldimine structures of both native and N100Y reveals significant differences that hinder the movement of a catalytically important Arg378 residue into the active site. Spectroscopic analysis confirms that both N100Y and N100W mutants subtly affect the chemistry of the PLP. Furthermore, the N100Y and R378A mutants appear less able to stabilize a quinonoid intermediate. These data provide the first experimental insight into how the most common disease-associated mutations of human SPT may lead to perturbation of enzyme activity.