Lester J. Peters

Prevention of Second Primary Tumors with Isotretinoin in Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

BACKGROUND Patients with head-and-neck cancers who are free of disease after local therapy remain at high risk for both recurrent and second primary tumors. Retinoids have proved efficacious in the treatment of premalignant oral lesions and are promising agents for the prevention of epithelial carcinogenesis. METHODS We prospectively studied 103 patients who were disease-free after primary treatment for squamous-cell cancers of the larynx, pharynx, or oral cavity. After completion of surgery or radiotherapy (or both), these patients were randomly assigned to receive either isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) (50 to 100 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day) or placebo, to be taken daily for 12 months. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of local, regional, or distant recurrences of the primary cancers. However, the isotretinoin group had significantly fewer second primary tumors. After a median follow-up of 32 months, only 2 patients (4 percent) in the isotretinoin group had second primary tumors, as compared with 12 (24 percent) in the placebo group (P = 0.005). Multiple second primary tumors occurred in four patients, all of whom were in the placebo group. Of the 14 second cancers, 13 (93 percent) occurred in the head and neck, esophagus, or lung. CONCLUSIONS Daily treatment with high doses of isotretinoin is effective in preventing second primary tumors in patients who have been treated for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, although it does not prevent recurrences of the original tumor.

Prognostic Significance of p16INK4A and Human Papillomavirus in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated on TROG 02.02 Phase III Trial

PURPOSE To determine the prognostic importance of p16 and human papillomavirus (HPV) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on a phase III concurrent chemoradiotherapy trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage III or IV head and neck squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin with or without tirapazamine. In this substudy, analyses were restricted to patients with oropharyngeal cancer. p16 was detected by immunohistochemistry, and HPV was detected by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Slides were available for p16 assay in 206 of 465 patients, of which 185 were eligible, and p16 and HPV were evaluable in 172 patients. One hundred six (57%) of 185 were p16-positive, and in patients evaluable for both p16 and HPV, 88 (86%) of 102 p16-positive patients were also HPV-positive. Patients who were p16-positive had lower T and higher N categories and better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. p16-positive tumors compared with p16-negative tumors were associated with better 2-year overall survival (91% v 74%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.74; P = .004) and failure-free survival (87% v 72%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.74; P = .003). p16 was a significant prognostic factor on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.96; P = .04). p16-positive patients had lower rates of locoregional failure and deaths due to other causes. There was a trend favoring the tirapazamine arm for improved locoregional control in p16-negative patients (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.24; P = .13). CONCLUSION HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is a distinct entity with a favorable prognosis compared with HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer when treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.

Prognostic Significance of [18F]-Misonidazole Positron Emission Tomography–Detected Tumor Hypoxia in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Randomly Assigned to Chemoradiation With or Without Tirapazamine: A Substudy of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 98.02

PURPOSE To determine the association between tumor hypoxia, treatment regimen, and locoregional failure (LRF) in patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck randomly assigned to radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks) plus either tirapazamine and cisplatin in weeks 1, 4, and 7 and tirapazamine alone in weeks 2 and 3 (TPZ/CIS) or cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil during weeks 6 and 7 (chemoboost). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-five patients were enrolled onto a hypoxic imaging substudy of a larger randomized trial. Pretreatment and midtreatment [18F]-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography scans (FMISO-PET) were performed 2 hours after tracer administration, with qualitative scoring of uptake in both primary tumors and nodes. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (71%) had detectable hypoxia in either or both primary and nodal disease. In patients who received chemoboost, one of 10 patients without hypoxia had LRF compared with eight of 13 patients with hypoxia; the risk of LRF was significantly higher in hypoxic patients (exact log-rank, P = .038; hazard ratio [HR] = 7.1). By contrast, in patients who received the TPZ/CIS regimen, only one of 19 patients with hypoxic tumors had LRF; risk of LRF was significantly higher in chemoboost patients (P = .001; HR = 15). Similarly, looking at the primary site alone, in patients with hypoxic primaries, zero of eight patients treated with TPZ/CIS experienced failure locally compared with six of nine patients treated with chemoboost (P = .011; HR = 0). CONCLUSION Hypoxia on FMISO-PET imaging, in patients receiving a nontirapazamine-containing chemoradiotherapy regimen, is associated with a high risk of LRF. Our data provide the first clinical evidence to support the experimental observation that tirapazamine acts by specifically targeting hypoxic tumor cells.

RANDOMIZED TRIAL ADDRESSING RISK FEATURES AND TIME FACTORS OF SURGERY PLUS RADIOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER

Abstract Purpose: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial was undertaken in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to address ( 1 ) the validity of using pathologic risk features, established from a previous study, to determine the need for, and dose of, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); ( 2 ) the impact of accelerating PORT using a concomitant boost schedule; and ( 3 ) the importance of the overall combined treatment duration on the treatment outcome. Methods and Materials: Of 288 consecutive patients with advanced disease registered preoperatively, 213 fulfilled the trial criteria and went on to receive therapy predicated on a set of pathologic risk features: no PORT for the low-risk group ( n = 31); 57.6 Gy during 6.5 weeks for the intermediate-risk group ( n = 31); and, by random assignment, 63 Gy during 5 weeks ( n = 76) or 7 weeks ( n = 75) for the high-risk group. Patients were irradiated with standard techniques appropriate to the site of disease and likely areas of spread. The study end points were locoregional control (LRC), survival, and morbidity. Results: Patients with low or intermediate risks had significantly higher LRC and survival rates than those with high-risk features ( p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001, respectively), despite receiving no PORT or lower dose PORT, respectively. For high-risk patients, a trend toward higher LRC and survival rates was noted when PORT was delivered in 5 rather than 7 weeks. A prolonged interval between surgery and PORT in the 7-week schedule was associated with significantly lower LRC ( p = 0.03) and survival ( p = 0.01) rates. Consequently, the cumulative duration of combined therapy had a significant impact on the LRC ( p = 0.005) and survival ( p = 0.03) rates. A 2-week reduction in the PORT duration by using the concomitant boost technique did not increase the late treatment toxicity. Conclusions: This Phase III trial established the power of risk assessment using pathologic features in determining the need for, and dose of, PORT in patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer in a prospective, multi-institutional setting. It also revealed the impact of the overall treatment time in the combination of surgery and PORT on the outcome in high-risk patients and showed that PORT acceleration without a reduction in dose by a concomitant boost regimen did not increase the late complication rate. These findings emphasize the importance of coordinated interdisciplinary care in the delivery of combined surgery and RT.

Evaluation of the dose for postoperative radiation therapy of head and neck cancer: first report of a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE This study was designed to determine in a prospective randomized trial the optimal dose of conventionally fractionated postoperative radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer in relation to clinical and pathologic risk factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1983 and March 1991, 302 patients were enrolled on the study. This analysis is based on the first 240 patients entered through September 1989, of whom 221 (92%) had AJC Stage III or IV cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. The patients were stratified by postulated risk factors and randomized to one of three dose levels ranging between 52.2 Gy and 68.4 Gy, all given in daily doses of 1.8 Gy. Patients receiving > 57.6 Gy had a field reduction at this dose level such that boosts were only given to sites of increased risk. RESULTS The overall crude and actuarial 2-year local-regional recurrence rates were 25.4% and 26%, respectively. Patients who received a dose of < or = 54 Gy had a significantly higher primary failure rate than those receiving > or = 57.6 Gy (p = 0.02). No significant dose response could be demonstrated above 57.6 Gy except for patients with extracapsular nodal disease in the neck in whom the recurrence rate was significantly higher at 57.6 Gy than at > or = 63 Gy. Analysis of prognostic factors predictive of local-regional recurrence showed that the only variable of independent significance was extracapsular nodal disease. However, clusters of two or more of the following risk factors were associated with a progressively increased risk of recurrence: oral cavity primary, mucosal margins close or positive, nerve invasion, > or = 2 positive lymph nodes, largest node > 3 cm, treatment delay greater than 6 weeks, and Zubrod performance status > or = 2. Moderate to severe complications of combined treatment occurred in 7.1% of patients; these were more frequent in patients who received > or = 63 Gy. CONCLUSION With daily fractions of 1.7 Gy, a minimum tumor dose of 57.6 Gy to the whole operative bed should be delivered with a boost of 63 Gy being given to sites of increased risk, especially regions of the neck where extracapsular nodal disease is present. Treatment should be started as soon as possible after surgery. Dose escalation above 63 Gy at 1.8 Gy per day does not appear to improve the therapeutic ratio.

Critical Impact of Radiotherapy Protocol Compliance and Quality in the Treatment of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Results From TROG 02.02

PURPOSE To report the impact of radiotherapy quality on outcome in a large international phase III trial evaluating radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin plus tirapazamine for advanced head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The protocol required interventional review of radiotherapy plans by the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC). All plans and radiotherapy documentation underwent post-treatment review by the Trial Management Committee (TMC) for protocol compliance. Secondary review of noncompliant plans for predicted impact on tumor control was performed. Factors associated with poor protocol compliance were studied, and outcome data were analyzed in relation to protocol compliance and radiotherapy quality. RESULTS At TMC review, 25.4% of the patients had noncompliant plans but none in which QARC-recommended changes had been made. At secondary review, 47% of noncompliant plans (12% overall) had deficiencies with a predicted major adverse impact on tumor control. Major deficiencies were unrelated to tumor subsite or to T or N stage (if N+), but were highly correlated with number of patients enrolled at the treatment center (< five patients, 29.8%; > or = 20 patients, 5.4%; P < .001). In patients who received at least 60 Gy, those with major deficiencies in their treatment plans (n = 87) had a markedly inferior outcome compared with those whose treatment was initially protocol compliant (n = 502): -2 years overall survival, 50% v 70%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.99; P < .001; and 2 years freedom from locoregional failure, 54% v 78%; HR, 2.37; P < .001, respectively. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate the critical importance of radiotherapy quality on outcome of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Centers treating only a few patients are the major source of quality problems.

Radiation dose and second cancer risk in patients treated for cancer of the cervix

The risk of cancer associated with a broad range of organ doses was estimated in an international study of women with cervical cancer. Among 150,000 patients reported to one of 19 population-based cancer registries or treated in any of 20 oncology clinics, 4188 women with second cancers and 6880 matched controls were selected for detailed study. Radiation doses for selected organs were reconstructed for each patient on the basis of her original radiotherapy records. Very high doses, on the order of several hundred gray, were found to increase the risk of cancers of the bladder [relative risk (RR) = 4.0], rectum (RR = 1.8), vagina (RR = 2.7), and possibly bone (RR = 1.3), uterine corpus (RR = 1.3), cecum (RR = 1.5), and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (RR = 2.5). For all female genital cancers taken together, a sharp dose-response gradient was observed, reaching fivefold for doses more than 150 Gy. Several gray increased the risk of stomach cancer (RR = 2.1) and leukemia (RR = 2.0). Although cancer of the pancreas was elevated, there was no evidence of a dose-dependent risk. Cancer of the kidney was significantly increased among 15-year survivors. A nonsignificant twofold risk of radiogenic thyroid cancer was observed following an average dose of only 0.11 Gy. Breast cancer was not increased overall, despite an average dose of 0.31 Gy and 953 cases available for evaluation (RR = 0.9); there was, however, a weak suggestion of a dose response among women whose ovaries had been surgically removed. Doses greater than 6 Gy to the ovaries reduced breast cancer risk by 44%. A significant deficit of ovarian cancer was observed within 5 years of radiotherapy; in contrast, a dose response was suggested among 10-year survivors. Radiation was not found to increase the overall risk of cancers of the small intestine, colon, ovary, vulva, connective tissue, breast, Hodgkins disease, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. For most cancers associated with radiation, risks were highest among long-term survivors and appeared concentrated among women irradiated at relatively younger ages.

A new isoeffect curve for change in dose per fraction

A method is proposed for using survival curve parameters for calculating the change in total dose necessary to achieve an equal response in a tissue when the dose per fraction is varied. The method uses the ratio alpha/beta of the coefficients of the linear quadratic survival formula and accounts only for the effect of repair of cellular injury. Absolute values for alpha and beta are not required. The isoeffect curves vary for different tissues. A dose adjustment to account for differences in the regeneration of surviving cells that might result from changing a treatment regimen must be made separately and will also vary from tissue to tissue. Examples of the use of the curves are given. At present, the curves, particularly those for late effects, are uncertain and caution should be observed in using them until they are defined more accurately with additional data.

The influence of positive margins and nerve invasion in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and radiation

PURPOSE Surgery is the primary treatment for adenoid cystic carcinomas arising from major and minor salivary glands of the head and neck. However, local recurrence is frequent because of the infiltrative growth pattern and perineural spread associated with these tumors. At UTMDACC, we have had a longstanding policy of using postoperative radiotherapy to reduce the risk of local recurrence and to avoid the need for radical surgery; this 30-year retrospective study analyzes the results of this combined modality approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1962 and 1991, 198 patients ages 13-82 years, with adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck, received postoperative radiotherapy for known or suspected microscopic residual disease following surgery. Distribution of primary sites was: parotid: 30 patients; submandibular/sublingual: 41 patients; lacrimal: 5 patients; and minor salivary glands: 122 patients. Eighty-three patients (42%) had microscopic positive margins and an additional 55 (28%) had close (< or = 5 mm) or uncertain margins. One hundred thirty-six patients (69%) had perineural spread with invasion of a major (named) nerve in 55 patients (28%). Using radiation techniques appropriate to the primary site, a median dose of 60 Gy (range 50-69 Gy) was delivered to the tumor bed. Follow-up ranged from 5-341 months (median, 93 months). All surviving patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. RESULTS Twenty-three patients (12%) had local recurrences with 5-, 10-, and 15-year actuarial local control rates of 95%, 86%, and 79%, respectively. Fifteen of the 83 patients (18%) with positive margins developed local recurrences, compared to 5 of 55 patients (9%) with close or uncertain margins, and 3 of 60 patients (5%) with negative margins (p = 0.02). Patients with and without a major (named) nerve involved had crude failure rates of 18% (10 out of 55) and 9% (13 out of 143), respectively (p = 0.02). There was a trend toward better local control with increasing dose. This was significant in patients with positive margins, in whom crude control rates were 40 and 88% for doses of < 56 Gy and > or = 56 Gy, respectively (p = 0.006). Actuarial 5-, 10-, and 15-year freedom from relapse rates were 68%, 52%, and 45%, respectively. Base of skull and neck failures were uncommon with or without elective treatment, developing in 2 and 3% of patients, respectively. Distant metastases were the most common type of disease recurrence, developing in 74 patients (37%) of whom 62 (31%) were disease-free at the primary site. CONCLUSIONS Excellent local control rates were obtained in this population using surgery and postoperative radiotherapy and we recommend this combined approach for most patients with adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck. Perineural invasion was an adverse prognostic factor only when a major (named) nerve was involved. Microscopic positive margins was also an adverse prognostic factor, but even when present, local control was achieved in over 80% of our patients. We recommend a dose of 60 Gy to the tumor bed, supplemented to 66 Gy for patients with positive margins. Despite effective local therapy, one-third of patients fail systemically, and good treatment to address this problem is lacking.

Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of local and regional control.

PURPOSE This retrospective study was conducted to review the results of treatment and to identify prognostic factors for local and regional control in a population of 378 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomas treated in a single institution by radiation therapy alone. METHODS AND MATERIAL All patients were treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1954 and 1992 following a consistent treatment philosophy but with evolving technique. There were 286 males and 92 females with a median age of 52 years (range: 16-86 years). The majority of the patients were Caucasian (282 patients, 75%). Thirty-two patients (8%) had one or more cranial nerve deficits. Three-fourths of the patients presented with AJCC Stage IV disease (T4, N0-3, 118 patients; T1-3, N2-3 164 patients). Histologically, 193 tumors (51%) were squamous cell carcinomas, 154 (41%) lymphoepitheliomas, and 31 (8%) unclassified carcinomas. Average total dose varied with T-stage and ranged from 60.2 to 72.0 Gy. Median follow-up time was 10 years. RESULTS For the entire population the 5-, 10-, and 20-year actuarial survival rates were 48, 34, and 18%, respectively, with 184 patients (49%) dying of nasopharyngeal cancer. Actuarial control rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were 71, 66, and 66% for the primary site and 84, 83, and 83% for the neck. A total of 100 patients (26%) had local failures and 51 patients (13%) had regional failures with a median time to recurrence of 8.2 months and 13 months, respectively. Advanced T-stage, squamous histology, and presence of cranial nerve deficits were poor prognostic factors for local control in both univariate and multivariate analyses. N-stage and tumor histology were significant factors for neck control. Treatment year, total dose within the ranges used, and duration of treatment did not have any significant effect on local or regional control. The actuarial incidence of Grade 3-5 late complications was 16, 19, and 29% at 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. Twelve patients (3%) died of treatment-related complications; all but one fatal complication occurred before 1971 and the other in 1976. CONCLUSIONS This study shows very good long-term local and regional control rates for nasopharyngeal carcinomas after definitive radiotherapy and establishes a benchmark for newer treatment strategies. Improvements in treatment technique over the years have dramatically reduced the frequency of severe late complications. Patients with advanced stage tumors and differentiated squamous histology have a relatively poor prognosis when treated with conventional radiotherapy and are candidates for dose escalation or combined modality studies.