Letícia Carnaz
Federal University of São Carlos
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Letícia Carnaz.
Manual Therapy | 2009
Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Letícia Carnaz; Luciana C. C. B. Silva; Luis Ernesto Bueno Salasar; Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
This study presents data on the intra- and inter-rater reliability of palpation on normal and overweight subjects and shows the influence of palpation discrepancy on angular variability for a collected data set, using computer simulation. Thirty healthy males were recruited. Two physiotherapists identified 12 anatomical landmarks that enabled measurement of eight joint angles. Palpation discrepancy was determined by photographic recordings under ultraviolet light. Angular discrepancies were determined from photos of the subjects orthostatic posture. A computer simulation was developed to predict expected angular variation according to observed palpation discrepancy. The results showed that the inter-rater reliability was lower than the intra-rater reliability for both palpation and angle measurements. Palpation of the greater trochanter (GT), anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), seventh cervical vertebra (C7) and femoral epicondyle (FE) showed larger discrepancies. The overweight group presented a significant difference in palpation discrepancy for ASIS (P<0.03). Angular variations were associated with palpation discrepancies for trunk flexion (TF), hip flexion (HF) and pelvic inclination (PI). Therefore, measurements should be performed by a single rater, rather than by different raters, if reliable angular measurements are intended. Specific anatomical landmarks require careful identification. Simulation was useful for providing estimates of variations due to palpation discrepancy.
Applied Ergonomics | 2013
Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Letícia Carnaz; Kaj Bo Veiersted; Therese Nordberg Hanvold; Liv Berit Hæg; Gert-Åke Hansson; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
The aim of this study is to record, objectively describe and compare working postures of Brazilian and Norwegian construction electricians. Postures of the upper arms, head, and neck during work and breaks were quantified by means of inclinometry for a representative sample of 12 Brazilian and 12 Norwegian electricians in the construction industry during a full work-shift. Despite that differences were found between specific work-related factors, Brazilian and Norwegian workers revealed a high and very similar level and pattern of postures for all evaluated body regions, suggesting that results could be extrapolated to other electricians. Upper arm elevation was high and similar for both groups and head flexion and extension was pronounced compared to other occupations. Thus, extreme postures were identified for construction electricians in both countries, with similar exposure pattern also for defined tasks (planning, support and wiredraw), suggesting that this job is risky regardless organizational differences.
Medical Engineering & Physics | 2013
Letícia Carnaz; Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Ana Beatriz Oliveira; Paulo Roberto Pereira Santiago; Glauco A. P. Caurin; Gert-Åke Hansson; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
This study compared neck range of movement recording using three different methods goniometers (EGM), inclinometers (INC) and a three-dimensional video analysis system (IMG) in simultaneous and synchronized data collection. Twelve females performed neck flexion-extension, lateral flexion, rotation and circumduction. The differences between EGM, INC, and IMG were calculated sample by sample. For flexion-extension movement, IMG underestimated the amplitude by 13%; moreover, EGM showed a crosstalk of about 20% for lateral flexion and rotation axes. In lateral flexion movement, all systems showed similar amplitude and the inter-system differences were moderate (4-7%). For rotation movement, EGM showed a high crosstalk (13%) for flexion-extension axis. During the circumduction movement, IMG underestimated the amplitude of flexion-extension movements by about 11%, and the inter-system differences were high (about 17%) except for INC-IMG regarding lateral flexion (7%) and EGM-INC regarding flexion-extension (10%). For application in workplace, INC presents good results compared to IMG and EGM though INC cannot record rotation. EGM should be improved in order to reduce its crosstalk errors and allow recording of the full neck range of movement. Due to non-optimal positioning of the cameras for recording flexion-extension, IMG underestimated the amplitude of these movements.
Ergonomics | 2012
Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Letícia Carnaz; Luiz Carlos Miranda Júnior; Richard W. Marklin; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
Many ergonomics studies are conducted in laboratory-simulated work environments to assess risks for the development of musculoskeletal disorders under more controlled conditions. However, the simulated conditions could be of questionable validity with respect to reproduction of field conditions involving risk factors. The objective of this study was to verify whether the postures recorded for neck extension/flexion and upper arm elevation of overhead electric utility workers in a simulated environment were similar to those recorded in a field environment. Of the three frequently performed tasks analysed, two presented similar exposure in both conditions. However, differences were identified for a more complex task (relay replacement). These results suggest that simulated tasks may be more representative for more standardised tasks. This may indicate that researchers investigating risks should avoid simplifying complex tasks when reproducing field posture exposure in laboratories, since omitting extra subtasks may lead to an inaccurate reproduction of field exposure. Practitioner Summary: Studies comparing results from field and simulated environments are necessary to evaluate to what degree postural exposure reproduced in laboratory is representative of the exposure occurring in real work situations. This is particularly relevant for tasks involving training in simulated environment due to safety constraints.
Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia | 2008
Letícia Carnaz; Ana Beatriz Oliveira; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato; Gert-Åke Hansson; Hjcg Coury
INTRODUCTION: Different sources of variations, such as electrogoniometer characteristics and procedures, may affect the accuracy and precision of movement measurements during gait. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the variations and compare the effects produced by different sources of variation in electrogoniometric gait recordings: the sensors, procedures (trials) and the knee joint. METHODS: Knee flexion/extension and valgus/varus movements were recorded during gait on the treadmill. The recordings were partitioned into strides and normalized in time using a routine developed in MatLab. Mean curves for the knee during gait were derived from 50 strides, and seven conditions were evaluated: one comparing pairs of sensors; two comparing pairs of different trials (including variations due to sensors); and four comparing the right and left knees (including variations due to sensors and trials). Mean standard deviations of the differences were calculated. To estimate the variations relating to the trial and the knee joint, the compound standard deviations were transformed into variances and split into their components. RESULTS: The variation introduced by pairs of sensors in the same model applied in one trial was smaller than the variation introduced by the same sensor used in two consecutive trials. Furthermore, the variation introduced by the difference between the right and left knees was greater than the variation introduced by the difference between sensors (A and B) and trials (1 and 2). CONCLUSIONS: It is, therefore, preferable to use different sensors in the same data recording (simultaneous) than use the same sensor in two different recordings (consecutive).
Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation | 2012
Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Letícia Carnaz; Luiz Carlos de Miranda Junior; Richard W. Marklin; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
Loading/unloading a ladder on vehicles are frequent tasks and involve overhead handling that may expose workers to risk factors of shoulder musculoskeletal disorders. The objective of the present study was to evaluate posture, forces required and perceived exertion when loading and unloading the ladder on a utility truck. Thirteen male overhead line workers from an electric utility in Brazil participated in this study. Shoulder elevation angle was measured using inclinometers. The required force to load/unload the ladder was measured by dynamometer. Subjective assessment of the perceived exertion was recorded to compare the exertion reported during the test conditions to the field conditions. The task of loading/unloading the ladder presented risks of shoulder musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) to workers because it requires high levels of force (approximately 60% of the maximal force) combined with overhead posture of the shoulders (more than 100° from the neutral posture). Age and height presented to interfere in biomechanical risks presented in load/unload task. There was no significant difference between the subjective exertion during the test conditions and handling the ladder in the field. Ergonomic intervention is recommended to reduce these risks for shoulder MSDs.
Sensors | 2010
Letícia Carnaz; Mariana Vieira Batistão; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
No guidelines are available to orient researchers on the availability and applications of equipment and sensors for recording precise neck movements in occupational settings. In this study reports on direct measurements of neck movements in the workplace were reviewed. Using relevant keywords two independent reviewers searched for eligible studies in the following databases: Cinahal, Cochrane, Embase, Lilacs, PubMed, MEDLINE, PEDro, Scopus and Web of Science. After applying the inclusion criteria, 13 articles on direct neck measurements in occupational settings were retrieved from among 33,666 initial titles. These studies were then methodologically evaluated according to their design characteristics, exposure and outcome assessment, and statistical analysis. The results showed that in most of the studies the three axes of neck movement (flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation) were not simultaneously recorded. Deficiencies in available equipment explain this flaw, demonstrating that sensors and systems need to be improved so that a true understanding of real occupational exposure can be achieved. Further studies are also needed to assess neck movement in those who perform heavy-duty work, such as nurses and electricians, since no report about such jobs was identified.
Gait & Posture | 2006
Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury; J. S. Brasileiro; T. F. Salvini; P. R. Poletto; Letícia Carnaz; Gert-Åke Hansson
Industrial Health | 2011
Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Letícia Carnaz; Jeronimo Farias de Alencar; Luiz Carlos Miranda Júnior; Lothy Granqvist; Gert-Åke Hansson; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury
Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica | 2014
Mariana Vieira Batistão; Letícia Carnaz; Luis Felipe Barbosa; Gislaine Cristina da Motta; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato