Leticia M. Saucedo
University of California, Davis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Leticia M. Saucedo.
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences | 2000
Leticia M. Saucedo
This article provides an overview of the legal claims made by plaintiffs challenging the State’s required passage of the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) exit-level test for graduation in GI Forum et al. v. Texas Education Agency et al. The plaintiffs filed their case alleging that the State’s graduation requirement violated minority students’ equal protection and due process rights as well as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Educational Opportunity Act. Part 1 of the article summarizes the plaintiffs’ initial complaint and the effect of the court’s pretrial orders on the plaintiffs’ ability to introduce crucial expert evidence to support a pattern of discriminatory State educational policies. Part 2 of the article describes the role of the expert testimony provided at trial for the plaintiffs’ claims and also provides lessons for future litigation.
Human Organization | 2015
Maria Cristina Morales; Leticia M. Saucedo
In a recent campaign to organize immigrant workers in the male dominated residential construction industry, Latina immigrants spearheaded the demand for labor rights in Las Vegas, Nevada. To investigate these gendered phenomena, we use a politically engaged ethnography along with semi-structured interviews of seventy-one Latina/o immigrant construction workers and union leaders. This study finds that masculinity culture and structures that exclude Latina immigrants can facilitate their participation in labor organizing. Indeed, rather than enacting masculinities, these Latina immigrants upheld traditionally feminine norms that created a political opening for labor organizing.
Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law | 2016
Leticia M. Saucedo
Undocumented individuals with deferred action find themselves in a kafkaesque position, and neither scholars nor courts have persuasively addressed how their liminal immigration status affects their rights in the workplace. Many begin with the intuitive assumption that immigration and employment law are in a fundamental and unresolvable tension with each other. On one hand, anti-discrimination principles protect noncitizens from alienage discrimination in the workplace. On the other hand, Congress enacted employer sanctions precisely to keep undocumented noncitizens out of the workplace. In the face of this dilemma, the default approach is to conclude without analysis that employers (and states) must be able to deny rights and benefits to undocumented noncitizens. This creates a true dilemma for the employment-authorized undocumented worker, and challenges the federal government’s acknowledged power to authorize employment for noncitizens. In this Article, I argue that employment-authorized undocumented workers are protected from workplace discrimination even though they do not have legal status in the eyes of immigration law. If a purpose of employment law is to balance the “inherent inequality of bargaining power between employer and employee,” then employment authorization should offer protections that achieve bargaining equality, including protections for undocumented immigrants against discrimination based on their foreign-born status. On the other hand, in an increasingly anxious society concerned with growing numbers of undocumented noncitizens, the urge to limit rights and benefits that come with liminal immigration status such as deferred action is heightened. Recent Supreme Court holdings, both in and outside the immigration arena, however, support an evolving theory of workplace protection for workers in liminal immigration categories. I draw from these cases to suggest the revival of a theory that fuses liberty and equality principles with federalism and structuralism to protect noncitizens as historically disadvantaged groups. Toward this end, I explore three concepts – employment authorization, executive authority and alienage nondiscrimination principles – that together provide the foundation for protecting the employment authorized undocumented worker.
bepress Legal Series | 2006
Leticia M. Saucedo
Archive | 2013
Leticia M. Saucedo; Maria Cristina Morales
Archive | 2009
Raquel E. Aldana; Kevin R. Johnson; Ong Hing; Leticia M. Saucedo; Enid Turcios-Haynes
Buffalo Law Review | 2007
Raquel E. Aldana; Leticia M. Saucedo
The Journal of Gender, Race and Justice | 2012
Francis Joseph Mootz; Leticia M. Saucedo
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy | 2012
Leticia M. Saucedo; Maria Cristina Morales
SMU Law Review | 2016
Leticia M. Saucedo