Letícia Paula Leonart

A network meta-analysis of primary prophylaxis for invasive fungal infection in haematological patients

Antifungal prophylaxis is an option to reduce the incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in haematological patients. To date, no network meta‐analysis (NMA) of high‐quality evidence (double‐blind randomized controlled trials) has been performed on this subject. This systematic review and NMA aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different antifungal agents used for prophylaxis of IFI in patients with haematological disorders.

Simultaneous Quantification of Antidiabetic Agents in Human Plasma by a UPLC-QToF-MS Method.

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, gliclazide, glimepiride, metformin, nateglinide, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, and vildagliptin in human plasma was developed and validated, using isoniazid and sulfaquinoxaline as internal standards. Following plasma protein precipitation using acetonitrile with 1% formic acid, chromatographic separation was performed on a cyano column using gradient elution with water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% formic acid. Detection was performed in a quadrupole time-of-flight analyzer, using electrospray ionization operated in the positive mode. Data from validation studies demonstrated that the new method is highly sensitive, selective, precise (RSD < 10%), accurate (RE < 12%), linear (r > 0.99), free of matrix and has no residual effects. The developed method was successfully applied to volunteers’ plasma samples. Hence, this method was demonstrated to be appropriate for clinical monitoring of antidiabetic agents.

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted. OBJECTIVES To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands). RESULTS The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.

New Metabolites of Coumarin Detected in Human Urine Using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography/Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) is a natural compound whose metabolism in humans was established in the 1970s. However, a new metabolite was recently identified in human plasma, indicating that the metabolism of coumarin has not been completely elucidated. To complement the knowledge of its metabolism, a rapid and sensitive method using UPLC-QTOF-MS was developed. A total of 12 metabolites was identified using MetaboLynxTM software, including eight metabolites not previously reported in human urine. The identified biotransformation included hydroxylation, glucuronidation, sulfation, methylation, and conjugation with N-acetylcysteine. The present work demonstrates that the metabolism study of coumarin was incomplete, possibly due to limitations of old techniques. The identification of eight inedited metabolites of such a simple molecule suggests that the information regarding the metabolism of other drugs may also be incomplete, and therefore, new investigations are necessary.

Cost-effectiveness of acromegaly treatments: a systematic review

PurposeAcromegaly is a rare disease that results in the enlargement of body extremities and in organomegaly. Treatments include surgery, drugs, and radiotherapy, which are all onerous. Therefore, well-conducted cost-analyses are crucial in the decision-making process.MethodsA systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies on acromegaly therapies was performed following PRISMA and Cochrane recommendations. The search for records was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (May 2018). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joana Briggs Institute Tool.ResultsFrom initial 547 records, 16 studies were included in the review. The studies could present more than one economic evaluation, and encompassed cost-effectiveness (n = 13), cost-utility (n = 5), and cost-consequence (n = 1) analyses. All studies were model-based and evaluated only direct medical costs. Eleven records did not mention discounting and only 10 performed sensitivity analyses. The characteristic of the studies, the cost-effectiveness results and the studies’ conclusions are described and commented upon. The main limitation of the studies was discussed and aspects to improve in future studies were pointed out.ConclusionsCost-effectiveness studies on acromegaly have been performed in several scenarios, evaluating different phases of treatment. However, the studies present limitations and, overall, were considered of moderate quality. Further economic models should be developed following health economics guidelines recommendations, and must improve transparency.

Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review

Background We aimed to determine the methodological quality of network meta-analyses (NMAs) and their compliance with reporting guidelines. Methods A systematic review of NMAs comparing any pharmacological interventions was performed (searches in Medline and Scopus). The characteristics of NMAs were collected by two independent reviewers. We applied R-AMSTAR to all NMAs, generating a methodological quality score that could range from 11 to 44 points. PRISMA and PRISMA-NMA reporting checklists were converted into quantitative scores (maximum values of 27 and 32 points). To normalize the values between these two checklists, a third score (PRISMA-SCORE) of 0-1 was created. The correlation of the scores with NMA publication year, journal impact factor and most productive countries were calculated using non-parametric tests. Results We identified 477 NMAs. Only 36.1% of studies reported having followed PRISMA statements. The medians of R-AMSTAR, PRISMA and PRISMA-NMA scores were 28 (IQR 25-31), 21 (IQR 19-23) and 23 (IQR 19-26), respectively. Several problems were noted in NMAs (e.g. lack of study protocol, issues in literature searches, lack of raw data). NMAs from the most productive countries (USA and China) have similar methodological quality. Correlation analyses between R-AMSTAR and normalized PRISMA-SCORE revealed a strong positive correlation (Spearmans ρ = 0.776; P <0.001). A weak but positive correlation was found for PRISMA-SCORE and journal impact factor (0.193; P <0.001). Conclusions The important growth of NMA publication rate during the past 5 years is not associated with better methodological and reporting quality. Editors, peer reviewers, researchers and funding agencies should ensure that methodological and reporting standards are met before publication.

Discontinuation of non-anti-TNF drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in interventional versus observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeAlthough randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for the assessment of clinical outcomes, long-term extension trials (LTEs) and observational cohorts may help generate evidence. Our goal was to compare the discontinuation rates of abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported in different study designs.MethodsA systematic review was conducted with searches in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, plus a manual search, for RCTs, LTEs, and observational cohorts reporting discontinuation rates by any of three causes (all-cause, inefficacy, adverse events). Meta-analyses with sensitivity analyses and meta-regressions were conducted.ResultsOf the 111 studies included, 74 were RCTs (n = 55) or LTEs (n = 17) reporting data on abatacept (n = 33), rituximab (n = 10), and tocilizumab (n = 31) and 37 were observational cohort studies (abatacept = 11, rituximab = 8, tocilizumab = 18). The follow-up duration did not differ among the study designs. Discontinuation rates were similar among the drugs but varied among the study designs. Discontinuation rates were significantly higher in cohort studies than those in interventional studies for the three drugs. Sensitivity analyses could not identify patient characteristics associated with these differences. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated no correlation between study follow-up duration and discontinuation rates.ConclusionsThe discontinuation rates reported for non-anti-TNF drugs varied relative to the study design in which they were investigated. Regulatory agencies, price-setting entities, and evidence-gathering researchers should consider the effect of the real-life environment in their decisions and conclusions.

Effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational longitudinal studies

PurposeAcromegaly is a rare disease that often requires drug treatment to achieve control, with pegvisomant being one of the most widely used therapies. In the present paper, we aimed to obtain evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant by reviewing real-world observational longitudinal studies.MethodsA systematic review was performed with a meta-analysis of event rates (95% confidence interval (CI)) using a random effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed (comprehensive meta-analysis 2.0). The systematic review was performed in accordance to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology, and Cochrane recommendations (PROSPERO register CRD 42017059880). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO were used to search for literature. Observational studies in patients using pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly were included.ResultsInitially, 552 papers were retrieved from the databases; and 31 articles were included in the qualitative analysis and 14 in the quantitative analysis. Eight primary meta-analyses were performed. The overall rate of patients with disease control was of 60.9% (51.8–69.3%; 95% CI). When considering patients under monotherapy, the control rate was 71.7% (64.0–78.4%; 95% CI). Tumor growth was estimated in 7.3% (4.7–11.1%; 95% CI) and elevation of transaminases in 3.0% (1.7–5.2%; 95% CI).ConclusionsThe real-world data showed that the effectiveness of pegvisomant is not as high as reported in interventional studies. Acromegaly appears to be better controlled when pegvisomant is used as a monotherapy. No serious adverse events were associated with the use of pegvisomant; however, given the high cost of this drug, further studies are required.

Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta-Analysis

BackgroundA broad range of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is available. However, the efficacy and safety of traditional DMTs compared with the recently developed DMTs remain unclear.ObjectiveTherefore, we have synthesised available evidence of clinical outcomes for DMTs in adults with RRMS.MethodsPubMed, Scopus and a manual search were performed. Bayesian network meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials assessing DMTs as monotherapies were conducted. SUCRA and GRADE were used to rank therapies and to assess quality of general evidence, respectively.ResultsThirty-three studies were included in the meta-analyses. The most effective therapies for the outcome of annualised relapse rate were alemtuzumab (96% probability), natalizumab (96%) and ocrelizumab (85%), compared with all other therapies (hazard ratio versus placebo, 0.31, 0.31 and 0.37, respectively; p < 0.05 for all comparisons) (high-quality evidence). However, no significant differences among these three therapies were found. Discontinuation due to adverse events revealed similarity across all therapies, except for alemtuzumab, which showed less discontinuation when compared with interferon-1a intramuscular (relative risk 0.37; p < 0.05).ConclusionHigh-quality evidence shows that alemtuzumab, natalizumab and ocrelizumab present the highest efficacy among DMTs, and other meta-analyses are required regarding adverse events frequency, to better understand the safety of therapies. Based on efficacy profile, guidelines should consider a three-category classification (i.e. high, intermediate and low efficacy).

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

on the literature on Best Practice (BMJ), Dynamed and UpToDate, being used the DeCS and MeSH indexed terms: “Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous” and “Thalidomide”. Results: According to the evidence on the BMJ, Thalidomide is indicated as a third-line treatment in systemic erythematosus lupus (LES) patients in the following situations: all patients for cutaneous erythematosus lupus (LEC) who do not respond to other treatments; including discoid erythematosus lupus (LED) lesions indicated in once a day doses of oral 50-200mg. On Dynamed, a update (2013) indicates the use of thalidomide in improving the recurrent (refractory) LEC but it was found high neurotoxicity. The UpToDate evidence synthesis reports that when one or more of first line agents is not successful, more aggressive therapy to reduce remission of the disease should be considered. Still, thalidomide is highly efficacious for LEC, but has potential for serious adverse effects, including teratogenicity and a relatively high risk of peripheral neuropathy. Thalidomide has a rapid onset of action, usually with response within the first month of treatment. This should be initiated at 50mg to 100mg daily doses, and reduced to the minimal effective dose after clinical improvement. ConClusions: Thalidomide can be used for the treatment of patients with LES, especially refractory and who did not respond to first-line treatments. Potential adverse effects of thalidomide make it more useful as short-term remission inducing agent and as maintenance treatment, concurrently with conventional medications or other systemic medicinal products for the refractory LEC.