Leung Li

Colorectal cancer in Chinese patients: Current and emerging treatment options

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in Hong Kong and its incidence is rising in economically developed Chinese cities, including Hong Kong and Shanghai. Several studies conducted in the People’s Republic of China have characterized the unique molecular epidemiology of familial colorectal cancer syndromes and molecular biomarkers such as microsatellite instability and genetic mutations (eg, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERCC1) in Chinese populations. Interethnic differences in anticancer drug response and toxicity have been well described in many cancers, and this review examined the literature with regard to the tolerance of Chinese patients to commonly used chemotherapeutic regimens and targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer. Studies on the pharmacogenomic differences in drug metabolizing and DNA repair enzymes between Chinese, North Asians, and Caucasian patients were also reviewed.

Applicability of BALAD score in prognostication of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

The BALAD score is developed to provide an objective determination of prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by incorporating five serum markers, namely albumin, bilirubin, alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP), agglutinin‐reactive alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP‐L3), and des‐γ‐carboxy prothrombin. We aim to study the applicability of BALAD score and prognostication of the three tumor markers in hepatitis B virus‐related HCC.

Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data

BackgroundHealth-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 was prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with advance-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no data existed for early-stage patients. The HCC-specific QLQ-HCC18 has not been evaluated for prognostic value in HCC patients. Utilization of raw HRQOL data in clinical setting has been impractical and non-meaningful. Therefore we developed index scores of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 in an attempt to enable clinical utilization of these HRQOL measurements. This study investigates the prognostic significance of QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18 and C30/HCC18 index-scores in patients with newly diagnosed HCC which encompasses all stages.MethodsFrom 2007–2011, 517 patients were prospectively recruited. HRQOL was assessed at diagnosis using QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18; C30 and HCC18 index-scores were calculated from raw HRQOL data. Cox regression was performed using continuous, dichotomized QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 variables, or index-scores, together with clinical factors to identify independent factors for OS. Various multivariate models were validated with c-index and bootstrapping for 1000 replications.ResultsFour hundred and seventy two patients had complete HRQOL data. Their median OS was 8.6 months. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic HRQOL variables for OS were QLQ-C30 pain (HR 1.346 [1.092–1.661], p = 0.0055), QLQ-C30 physical functioning (HR 0.652 [0.495–0.860], p = 0.0024); QLQ-HCC18 pain (HR 1.382 [1.089–1.754], p = 0.0077) and QLQ-HCC18 fatigue (HR 1.441 [1.132–1.833], p = 0.0030). C30 index-score (HR 2.143 [1.616–2.841], p < 0.0001) and HCC18 index-score (HR 1.957 [1.411–2.715], p < 0.0001) were highly significant factors for OS. The median OS of patients with C30 index-score of 0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–100 were 16.4, 7.3, 3.1, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001); while for HCC18 index-score: 16.4, 6.0, 2.8, 1.8 months respectively (p < 0.0001). All the multivariate models were validated, with mean optimism <0.01. The bootstrap validated c-index was 0.78.ConclusionsQLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 were prognostic for OS in patients with newly diagnosed HCC irrespective of stage. Both C30 and HCC18 index-scores were highly significant prognostic factors for OS in newly diagnosed HCC patients. Index-scoring provides an effective way to summarize, analyze and interpret raw HRQOL data, and renders QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 meaningful and communicable in clinical practice. Index-scores could potentially serve as a standardized tool for future HRQOL research.

Phase I, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study of sonidegib in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors.

Sonidegib is a selective inhibitor of Smoothened receptor, which is a key regulator of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose based on dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose (RD) of sonidegib in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors. This was an open‐label, single‐arm, multicenter, two‐group, parallel, dose‐escalation, phase I study undertaken in Asian patients; group 1 included patients from Japan and group 2 included patients from Hong Kong and Taiwan. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model dependent on DLTs in cycle 1 and other safety findings. A total of 45 adult Asian patients with confirmed advanced solid tumors were enrolled. Group 1 included 21 patients (12 treated with 400 mg q.d. [once daily] and 9 treated with 600 mg q.d.) and group 2 included 24 patients (12 treated with 400 mg q.d., 8 treated with 600 mg q.d., and 4 treated with 800 mg q.d.). Elevation in creatine kinase was the DLT in both groups. The most common adverse events suspected to be related to sonidegib in both patient groups were increase in creatine kinase levels, myalgia, fatigue, and abnormal hepatic function. The RD of 400 mg q.d. was defined in both groups. Difference in tolerability was noted between the East Asian patients and Western population. The RD in East Asian patients (400 mg q.d.) was lower than in patients from Europe and the USA (800 mg q.d. and 250 mg twice daily). (Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01208831.)

Prospective evaluation of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA clearance and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission scan in assessing early response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundPlasma Epstein–Barr virus (pEBV) DNA and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission (PET) reflect tumour burden in advanced NPC. This study hypothesised that a dual endpoint based on assessing pEBV DNA clearance and PET response could predict early drug response.MethodsEligible patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan and dual PET-CT at baseline, a PET-CT at 4 weeks, and then a CT scan at 10 weeks after starting palliative or induction chemotherapy. Plasma EBV DNA clearance was determined.ResultsFifty-eight out of 70 enrolled patients completed all imaging and 50/58 had falling pEBV DNA level, which allowed calculation of the clearance. At a median follow-up of 29.1 months, the dual endpoint (pEBV DNA clearance ≤ 10 days and > 50% drop in sum of SUVmax of target lesions) was an independent indicator of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.135, 95% CI = 0.039 to 0.466, p = 0.0015) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.136, 95% CI = 0.048 to 0.385, p = 0002). This dual endpoint could predict subsequent response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria at 10 weeks after chemotherapy.ConclusionsEarly PET-CT response and pEBV DNA clearance could predict survival and subsequent response. This dual endpoint is an innovative tool for assessing early drug response.

Value of quality of life analysis in liver cancer: A clinician’s perspective

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly recognized as an important clinical parameter and research endpoint in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HRQOL in HCC patients is multifaceted and affected by medical factor which encompasses HCC and its complications, oncological and palliative treatment for HCC, underlying liver disease, as well as the psychological, social or spiritual reaction to the disease. Many patients presented late with advanced disease and limited survival, plagued with multiple symptoms, rendering QOL a very important aspect in their general well being. Various instruments have been developed and validated to measure and report HRQOL in HCC patients, these included general HRQOL instruments, e.g., Short form (SF)-36, SF-12, EuroQoL-5D, World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment 100 (WHOQOL-100), World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment abbreviated version; general cancer HRQOL instruments, e.g., the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General, Spitzer Quality of Life Index; and liver-cancer specific HRQOL instruments, e.g., EORTC QLQ-HCC18, FACT-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep), FACT-Hep Symptom Index, Trial Outcome Index. Important utilization of HRQOL in HCC patients included description of symptomatology and HRQOL of patients, treatment endpoint in clinical trial, prognostication of survival, benchmarking of palliative care service and health care valuation. In this review, difficulties regarding the use of HRQOL data in research and clinical practice, including choosing a suitable instrument, problems of missing data, data interpretation, analysis and presentation are examined. Potential solutions are also discussed.

Quality of life of young Chinese breast cancer patients after adjuvant chemotherapy

Introduction Understanding of quality of life (QoL) of young Chinese breast cancer patients after adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy is limited. This study aims to assess the QoL of premenopausal Chinese breast cancer women after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and methods Eligibility criteria included stage I–III breast cancer, premenopausal and age ≤45 years at cancer diagnosis and having received adjuvant chemotherapy within 3–10 years before entry to the present study. Patients’ background demographics at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, together with tumor characteristics and anticancer treatments, were collected. At the time of study entry, the menopausal status based on menstrual history, body mass index, and QoL (assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast +4) were recorded. Results Two hundred and eighty patients were recruited. Ninety-five patients (33.9%) underwent breast-conserving surgery, and nearly all (98.6%) underwent axillary dissection. For adjuvant therapies, 249 patients (88.9%) received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and 79 (28.2%) received taxane-containing chemotherapy, while 68 (24.3%) received both. One hundred and eighty six patients (66.4%) received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 214 (76.4%) received adjuvant tamoxifen. The median time from breast cancer diagnosis to study entry was 5.01 years. QoL assessment at study entry revealed that older patients had worse social well-being (SWB; mean scores for age ≤40, 41–45, 46–50 and >50 years were 22.0, 19.3, 19.1 and 18.1, respectively, P=0.0442). Patients who underwent axillary dissection had worse scores for breast cancer sub-scale (BCS; mean score 22.2 vs. 28.3, P=0.0212). Patients who underwent taxane-containing chemotherapy had worse scores for arm subscale (mean score 13.8 vs. 15.3, P=0.0053). Conclusion At a median follow-up of 5 years post-diagnosis, patients who were younger had fewer disturbances in their SWB. Patients who had axillary dissection had worse BCS scores, while those who received taxane had worse scores for arm subscale. Further studies are warranted for breast-specific QoL to address the specific issues encountered by breast cancer patients.

Ablative Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase I Case-Control Comparison with Conventional Chemoembolization

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and treatment effectiveness of ablative chemoembolization (ACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compare with a similar patient cohort who underwent conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Materials and Methods This was a prospective phase I nonrandomized study conducted between March 2013 and October 2016 in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and Declaration Good Clinical Practice with written informed consent. There were 36 men and eight women (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 58-74] and 74.5 years [interquartile range, 70-80], respectively). The primary end points were treatment safety and tumor response. The secondary end points were time to progression, progression-free survival, conversion to partial hepatectomy, and viable HCC within the tumor specimen. The end points of the study group (n = 22) were compared with those of a case-matched control group (n = 22) of patients who underwent conventional cTACE during the same period by using a Pearson χ2 test. Results Treatment with ACE was successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The complete response (CR) rates by patient or by tumor were both 100%. The median time to progression and median progression-free survival were significantly longer in the study group than in the control group (both were 28 months vs 10 months, respectively; P < .001). The number of patient conversions to hepatectomy was seven for ACE and three for cTACE. In the tumor specimens, viable tumor was found in two of eight specimens that underwent ACE and three of three that underwent cTACE. Conclusion ACE is a feasible, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCC; it is highly effective and may be more effective than cTACE in achieving CR.

Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy after curative resection of gastric cancer in Chinese patients: assessment of treatment tolerability and associated risk factors

INTRODUCTION The use of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium) has been shown to improve the outcome of patients with gastric cancer. There are limited data on the tolerability of S-1 in Chinese patients. In this multicentre retrospective study, we assessed the toxicity profile in local patients. METHODS Patients with stage II-IIIC gastric adenocarcinoma who had undergone curative resection and who had received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the study. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, chemotherapy records, as well as biochemical, haematological, and other toxicity profiles were extracted from medical charts. Potential factors associated with grade 2-4 toxicities were identified. RESULTS Adjuvant S-1 was administered to 30 patients. Overall, 19 (63%) patients completed eight cycles. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropaenia (10%), anaemia (6.7%), septic episode (16.7%), diarrhoea (6.7%), hyperbilirubinaemia (6.7%), and syncope (6.7%). Dose reductions were made in 22 (73.3%) patients and 12 (40.0%) patients had dose delays. Univariate analyses showed that patients who underwent total gastrectomy were more likely to experience adverse haematological events (P=0.034). Patients with nodal involvement were more likely to report adverse non-haematological events (P=0.031). Patients with a history of regular alcohol intake were more likely to have earlier treatment withdrawal (P=0.044). Lower body weight (P=0.007) and lower body surface area (P=0.017) were associated with dose interruptions. CONCLUSIONS The tolerability of adjuvant S-1 in our patient population was similar to that in other Asian patient populations. The awareness of S-1-related toxicities and increasing knowledge of potential associated factors may enable optimisation of S-1 therapy.

730PA PHASE II STUDY ON COMBINATION OF AXITINIB AND TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION (TACE) FOR TREATMENT OF INOPERABLE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC)

ABSTRACT Aim: TACE is associated with an upregulation of VEGF leading to revascularization. Axitinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR1, 2 and 3. We hypothesized that the addition of axitinib to TACE has synergistic activity by abolishing the VEGF driven signal after TACE. To prove this concept, we designed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination for treatment of inoperable HCC. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated phase II single-arm study. The target sample size is 50. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of inoperable HCC; Childs A liver function; ECOG PS 0-2; absence of prior systemic nor TACE treatment; the absence of main portal vein thrombosis or distant metastases. Treatment consists of 8 weekly cycle of axitinib 5mg twice daily. In each cycle, TACE is administered at 5th week when there is radiologically viable tumour and absence of ≥grade 3 toxicity from axitinib. Axitinib is withheld 24h before each TACE, and resumed 24h after TACE when patients (pts) have preserved liver function. Reassessment imaging is done every 8 weeks. In the 1st year, each pt is treated with a maximum number of 6 cycles of TACE. Pt is put on maintenance axitinib alone if there is no PD after 1 year. Results: Total 50 pts have been accrued. Baseline characteristics: BCLC stage B 38; C 12. Median age 62.1years. At the time of data cutoff on 17 Apr 2014, the median follow-up was 1.32 years. 27 pts have PD, and the median TTP is 10.4 months (95% CI = 5.43-13.72). The median OS is 15.9 months (95% CI = 12.9-not reached). Amongst 42 evaluable pts, the response rate (mRECIST) is 48.8% (7 CR; 14 PR) and the disease control rate is 88.4% (21 CR/PR and 16 SD). Amongst the responders, 3 pts underwent hepatectomy after shrinkage of tumour, and surgical specimen showed extensive tumour necrosis; 2 pts just had portal vein embolization to induce left lobe hypertrophy, and is currently wait-listed for hepatectomy. Total 5 pts could proceed to the axitinib maintenance phase. Common ≥grade 3 toxicity events from axitinib include hypertension (20%), hand foot skin reaction (10%), fatigue (4%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (4%). The toxicity of TACE is not worsened by axitinib. Conclusions: Combination of axitinib and TACE is associated with high tumour response rate and efficacy in unresectable HCC. Further evaluation with randomized study is indicated. (NCT01352728) Disclosure: S.L. Chan: received research funding from Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.