Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Levente Kriston is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Levente Kriston.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2010

High agreement of self-report and physician-diagnosed somatic conditions yields limited bias in examining mental-physical comorbidity.

Harald Baumeister; Levente Kriston; Jürgen Bengel; Martin Härter

OBJECTIVE To quantify the misclassification bias of self-reported somatic diseases and its impact on the estimation of comorbidity with mental disorders. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Data were drawn from the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey (N=7,124), which assessed both self-reported and physician-diagnosed somatic diseases. Eight chronic diseases were examined: coronary heart disease, heart failure, asthma, chronic bronchitis, diabetes, cancer, arthrosis, and arthritis. Mental disorders were assessed by means of the Munich-Composite International Interview. RESULTS The agreement of case ascertainment by patient self-report and physician diagnosis was high (kappa: 0.74-0.92), except for arthritis (0.53). False-positive and false-negative disease statuses were partly associated with age, sex, socioeconomic status, somatic comorbidities, marital status, and mood and anxiety disorders. In most conditions, the odds ratios (ORs) of comorbid mental disorders based on self-reported diseases were slightly overestimated with regard to mood disorders (relative OR: 0.91-1.38), whereas there proved to be no such trend regarding anxiety disorders (0.82-1.05). Substance disorders were partly biased without showing an interpretable trend across diseases (0.49-2.58). CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of mental-physical comorbidity based on self-reported and physician-diagnosed physical conditions yielded similar results, with modestly inflated ORs for mood disorders for several self-reported physical conditions.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2011

Risk factors for chronic depression — A systematic review

Lars P Hölzel; Martin Härter; Christina Reese; Levente Kriston

BACKGROUND One of five patients with an acute depressive episode develops chronic depression. Risk factors for a current depressive episode to become chronic are insufficiently known. This review was conducted to examine which factors represent a risk factor for the development of chronic depression for patients diagnosed with a depressive episode. METHOD Medline, Psycinfo, ISI Web of Science, CINHAL and BIOSIS Previews were searched up until September 2007, complemented by handsearching in the December 1987 to December 2007 issues of Journal of Affective Disorders and investigating reference lists of included articles and existing reviews. On the basis of a formal checklist, two investigators independently decided which studies to include or exclude. RESULTS 25 relevant primary studies with a total of 5192 participants were included in the systematic review. Overall the methodological quality of the included studies was found to be sufficient. Data synthesis was performed via vote counting. The following risk factors were identified: younger age at onset, longer duration of depressive episode, and family history of mood disorders. Psychological comorbidity i.e. anxiety disorders, personality disorders and substance abuse, low level of social integration, negative social interaction and lower severity of depressive symptoms repeatedly appeared concurrently with chronic depression. LIMITATIONS Most included studies were cross-sectional thus drawing causal conclusions with regard to risk factors proved to be difficult. CONCLUSION Risk factors for a current depressive episode to become chronic were identified. To date only few significant longitudinal studies on this topic are available.


Patient Education and Counseling | 2012

Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire – physician version (SDM-Q-Doc)

Isabelle Scholl; Levente Kriston; Jörg Dirmaier; Angela Buchholz; Martin Härter

OBJECTIVE To develop and psychometrically test a brief instrument for assessing the physicians perspective of the shared decision-making process in clinical encounters. METHODS We adapted the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for patients to generate a new version for physicians (SDM-Q-Doc). The physician version was tested in clinical encounters between 29 physicians and 324 patients in German outpatient care contexts. Analyses of the extent to which the instrument was accepted, the reliability of the instrument, and the factorial structure of the scale were performed. RESULTS Physicians showed a high level of acceptance toward the SDM-Q-Doc. Item discrimination parameters were above .4 for all but one item. An analysis of internal consistency yielded a Cronbachs α of .88. Factor analysis confirmed a one-dimensional structure. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that the SDM-Q-Doc is a well-accepted and reliable instrument for assessing the physicians perspective during SDM processes in clinical encounters. To our knowledge, the SDM-Q-Doc is the first psychometrically tested scale available for assessing the physicians perspective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The SDM-Q-Doc can be used in studies that analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of SDM and as a quality indicator in quality assurance programs and health service assessments.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2013

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in the acute treatment of chronic depression and dysthymia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A. von Wolff; Lars P Hölzel; Annika Westphal; Martin Härter; Levente Kriston

INTRODUCTION Chronic depression represents a substantial portion of depressive disorders and is associated with severe consequences. This review examined the efficacy and acceptability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of chronic depression. Additionally, the comparative effectiveness of the two types of antidepressants has been examined. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, BIOSIS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Primary efficacy outcome was a response to treatment; primary acceptance outcome was dropping out of the study. Only randomized controlled trials were considered. RESULTS We identified 20 studies with 22 relevant comparisons. 19 studies focused on samples with a majority of dysthymic patients. Both SSRIs and TCAs are efficacious in terms of response rates when compared to placebo (Benefit Ratio [BR]=1.49; p<0.001 for SSRIs and BR=1.74; p<0.001 for TCAs) and no statistically significant differences between the active drugs and placebo in terms of dropout rates could be found. No differences in effectiveness were found between SSRIs and TCAs in terms of response rates (BR=1.01; p=0.91), yet, SSRIs showed statistically better acceptability in terms of dropout rates than TCAs (Odds Ratio [OR]=0.41; p=0.02). LIMITATIONS The methodological quality of the primary studies was evaluated as unclear in many cases and more evidence is needed to assess the efficacy of SSRIs and TCAs in patients suffering from chronic forms of depression other than dysthymia. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review provides evidence for the efficacy of both SSRIs and TCAs in the treatment of chronic depression and showed a better acceptability of SSRIs.


Annals of Family Medicine | 2015

Efficacy and Acceptability of Pharmacological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Klaus Linde; Levente Kriston; Gerta Rücker; Susanne Jamil; Isabelle Schumann; Karin Meissner; Kirsten Sigterman; Antonius Schneider

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate whether antidepressants are more effective than placebo in the primary care setting, and whether there are differences between substance classes regarding efficacy and acceptability. METHODS We conducted literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PsycINFO up to December 2013. Randomized trials in depressed adults treated by primary care physicians were included in the review. We performed both conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence. Main outcome measures were response and study discontinuation due to adverse effects. RESULTS A total of 66 studies with 15,161 patients met the inclusion criteria. In network meta-analysis, tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI; venlafaxine), a low-dose serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor (SARI; trazodone) and hypericum extracts were found to be significantly superior to placebo, with estimated odds ratios between 1.69 and 2.03. There were no statistically significant differences between these drug classes. Reversible inhibitors of monoaminoxidase A (rMAO-As) and hypericum extracts were associated with significantly fewer dropouts because of adverse effects compared with TCAs, SSRIs, the SNRI, a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (NRI), and noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant agents (NaSSAs). CONCLUSIONS Compared with other drugs, TCAs and SSRIs have the most solid evidence base for being effective in the primary care setting, but the effect size compared with placebo is relatively small. Further agents (hypericum, rMAO-As, SNRI, NRI, NaSSAs, SARI) showed some positive results, but limitations of the currently available evidence makes a clear recommendation on their place in clinical practice difficult.


Viruses | 2016

Hepatitis E Seroprevalence in Europe: A Meta-Analysis

Johannes Hartl; Benjamin Otto; R.G. Madden; Glynn W. Webb; Kathy Louise Woolson; Levente Kriston; Eik Vettorazzi; Ansgar W. Lohse; Harry R. Dalton; Sven Pischke

There have been large numbers of studies on anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence in Europe, however, the results of these studies have produced high variability of seroprevalence rates, making interpretation increasingly problematic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a clearer understanding of anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence in Europe and identify risk groups for HEV exposure by a meta-analysis of published studies. Methods: All European HEV-seroprevalence studies from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Data were stratified by assay, geographical location, and patient cohort (general population, patients with HIV, solid-organ transplant recipients, chronic liver disease patients, and individuals in contact with swine/wild animals). Data were pooled using a mixed-effects model. Results: Four hundred thirty-two studies were initially identified, of which 73 studies were included in the analysis. Seroprevalence estimates ranged from 0.6% to 52.5%, increased with age, but were unrelated to gender. General population seroprevalence varied depending on assays: Wantai (WT): 17%, Mikrogen (MG): 10%, MP-diagnostics (MP): 7%, DiaPro: 4%, Abbott 2%. The WT assay reported significantly higher seroprevalence rates across all cohorts (p < 0.001). Individuals in contact with swine/wild animals had significantly higher seroprevalence rates than the general population, irrespective of assay (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between any other cohorts. The highest seroprevalence was observed in France (WT: 32%, MP: 16%) the lowest in Italy (WT: 7.5%, MP 0.9%). Seroprevalence varied between and within countries. The observed heterogeneity was attributed to geographical region (23%), assay employed (23%) and study cohort (7%). Conclusion: Seroprevalcence rates primarily depend on the seroassy that is used, followed by the geographical region and study cohort. Seroprevalence is higher in individuals exposed to swine and/or wild animals, and increases with age.


Annals of Family Medicine | 2015

Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Klaus Linde; Kirsten Sigterman; Levente Kriston; Gerta Rücker; Susanne Jamil; Karin Meissner; Antonius Schneider

PURPOSE We performed a systematic review of the currently available evidence on whether psychological treatments are effective for treating depressed primary care patients in comparison with usual care or placebo, taking the type of therapy and its delivery mode into account. METHODS Randomized controlled trials comparing a psychological treatment with a usual care or a placebo control in adult, depressed, primary care patients were identified by searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PsycINFO up to December 2013. At least 2 reviewers extracted information from included studies and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were performed using posttreatment depression scores as outcome. RESULTS A total of 30 studies with 5,159 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with control, the effect (standardized mean difference) at completion of treatment was −0.30 (95% CI, −0.48 to −0.13) for face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), −0.14 (−0.40 to 0.12) for face-to-face problem-solving therapy, −0.24 (−0.47 to −0.02) for face-to-face interpersonal psychotherapy, −0.28 (−0.44 to −0.12) for other face-to-face psychological interventions, −0.43 (−0.62 to −0.24) for remote therapist-led CBT, −0.56 (−1.57 to 0.45) for remote therapist-led problem-solving therapy, −0.40 (−0.69 to −0.11) for guided self-help CBT, and −0.27 (−0.44 to −0.10) for no or minimal contact CBT. CONCLUSIONS There is evidence that psychological treatments are effective in depressed primary care patients. For CBT approaches, substantial evidence suggests that interventions that are less resource intensive might have effects similar to more intense treatments.


Depression and Anxiety | 2014

EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF ACUTE TREATMENTS FOR PERSISTENT DEPRESSIVE DISORDER: A NETWORK META‐ANALYSIS

Levente Kriston; Alessa von Wolff; B A Annika Westphal; P B A Lars Hölzel; Martin Härter

We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the relative efficacy and acceptability of specific treatments for persistent depressive disorder.


The Journal of Sexual Medicine | 2010

Effect of Sexual Function on Health-Related Quality of Life Mediated by Depressive Symptoms in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Findings of the SPARK Project in 493 Patients

Levente Kriston; Cindy Günzler; Anja Agyemang; Jürgen Bengel; Michael M. Berner

INTRODUCTION Empirical evidence suggests associations between cardiovascular diseases, sexual functioning, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. However, to date, the interrelation of these constructs has not been examined simultaneously in a structural analysis. AIM To estimate the prevalence of sexual disorders and depressive symptoms and to examine the association between sexual disorders, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in patients in the rehabilitation of cardiovascular disorders. AIM A postal survey in five German inpatient rehabilitation centers for cardiovascular diseases was conducted. Prevalence of sexual disorders and depressive symptoms were assessed using psychometrically sound instruments. To analyze complex associations, structural equation modeling was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES For epidemiological questions, proportions with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The strength of association in structural equation models was expressed as a standardized regression coefficient. RESULTS Data from 493 patients were analyzed (response rate 22.7%). At least moderate erectile dysfunction proved to be present in 20.3% of men. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction lay at 43.1%. At least moderate depressive symptoms were present in 14.4% of men and 16.5% of women. A considerable association between sexual functioning and quality of life was found in both sexes, which was largely mediated by depressive symptoms. Major drawbacks of the study are imprecision of the estimates due to limited sample size and questionable generalizability of the findings due to possible self-selection bias. CONCLUSIONS Considering the high prevalence of depressive symptoms and their role as a mediating factor between sexual functioning and quality of life, it is recommended to routinely screen for depression in men and women with cardiac disease.


British Journal of Psychiatry | 2010

Effectiveness of systematic treatment selection for psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioural therapy: randomised controlled trial in routine mental healthcare

Birgit Watzke; Heinz Rüddel; Ralph Jürgensen; Uwe Koch; Levente Kriston; Barbara Grothgar; Holger Schulz

BACKGROUND Although cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT) are both effective treatments for mental disorders, they show clear dissimilarities concerning their therapeutic models and treatment rationales. AIMS To determine the effectiveness of systematic treatment selection (STS) to CBT or PDT in a mental healthcare setting compared with a control procedure of random treatment selection (RTS). METHOD A randomised controlled trial in a consecutive sample of 291 in-patients with at least one ICD-10 mental disorder was performed. The primary outcome was symptom severity (General Severity Index of the Symptom Checklist-14) at 6-month follow-up. Health-related quality of life was the secondary outcome, determined using the Short Form-8. RESULTS Analyses revealed no general effect for systematic treatment selection. However, there was a differential effect: systematic selection resulted in a better longer-term outcome for PDT, but not for CBT; STS-PDT patients showed a significantly larger reduction in symptom severity than RTS-PDT patients. This difference was not observed in CBT. CONCLUSIONS Since systematic treatment selection seems to be able to optimise treatment outcome, at least for PDT, pursuing systematic treatment assignment strategies in mental healthcare settings is a worthwhile endeavour.

Collaboration


Dive into the Levente Kriston's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Härter

University Medical Center Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael M. Berner

University Medical Center Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cindy Günzler

University Medical Center Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isaac Bermejo

University Medical Center Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge