Li-Ching Huang
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Li-Ching Huang.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2017
Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse; Taneya Y. Koonce; Sheila V. Kusnoor; Aric A. Prather; Laura Gottlieb; Li-Ching Huang; Sharon Phillips; Yu Shyr; Nancy E. Adler; William W. Stead
INTRODUCTION Social and behavioral factors are known to affect health but are not routinely assessed in medical practice. To date, no studies have assessed a parsimonious panel of measures of social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDs). This study evaluated the panel of SBD measures recommended by the Institute of Medicine and examined the effect of question order. METHODS Adults, aged ≥18 years, were recruited using ResearchMatch.org for this randomized, parallel design study conducted in 2015 (data analyzed in 2015-2016). Three versions of the SBD measures, sharing the same items but in different orders of presentation (Versions 1-3), were developed. Randomized to six groups, participants completed each version at least 1 week apart (Weeks 1-3). Version order was counterbalanced across each administration and randomization was stratified by gender, race, and age. Main outcomes were effect of question order, completion time, and non-response rates. RESULTS Of 781 participants, 624 (80%) completed the Week 1 questionnaire; median completion time for answering all SBD questions was 5 minutes, 583/624 participants answered all items, and no statistically significant differences associated with question order were observed when comparing responses across all versions. No significant differences in responses within assignment groups over time were found, with the exception of the stress measure for Group 5 (p=0.036). CONCLUSION Question order did not significantly impact participant responses. Time to complete the questionnaire was brief, and non-response rate was low. Findings support the feasibility of using the Institute of Medicine-recommended questionnaire to capture SBDs.
Molecular Cancer Research | 2017
Yong Antican Wang; Yunguang Sun; J.D. Palmer; Charalambos Solomides; Li-Ching Huang; Yu Shyr; Adam P. Dicker; Bo Lu
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) modulates cell growth through IGF-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Reports suggest that the serum levels of IGFBP3 are associated with various cancers and that IGFBP3 expression is significantly decreased in cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant lung cancer cells. Based on these findings, we investigated whether Igfbp3 deficiency accelerates mouse lung tumorigenesis and if expression of IGFBP3 enhances CDDP response by focusing on the IGF1 signaling cascade. To this end, an Igfbp3-null mouse model was generated in combination with KrasG12D to compare the tumor burden. Then, IGF-dependent signaling was assessed after expressing wild-type or a mutant IGFBP3 without IGF binding capacity in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Finally, the treatment response to CDDP chemotherapy was evaluated under conditions of IGFBP3 overexpression. Igfbp3-null mice had increased lung tumor burden (>2-fold) and only half of human lung cancer cells survived after expression of IGFBP3, which corresponded to increased cleaved caspase-3 (10-fold), inactivation of IGF1 and MAPK signaling. In addition, overexpression of IGFBP3 increased susceptibility to CDDP treatment in lung cancer cells. These results, for the first time, demonstrate that IGFBP3 mediates lung cancer progression in a KrasG12D mouse model. Furthermore, overexpression of IGFBP3 induced apoptosis and enhanced cisplatin response in vitro and confirmed that the suppression is in part by blocking IGF1 signaling. Implications: These findings reveal that IGFBP3 is effective in lung cancer cells with high IGF1 signaling activity and imply that relevant biomarkers are essential in selecting lung cancer patients for IGF1-targeted therapy. Mol Cancer Res; 15(7); 896–904. ©2017 AACR.
Surgery | 2018
David M. Krpata; Ajita S. Prabhu; Luciano Tastaldi; Li-Ching Huang; Michael J. Rosen; Benjamin K. Poulose
Background: Patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR) are at risk of an inadvertent enterotomy during surgery. Inadvertent enterotomies potentially contaminate the surgical field presenting a management dilemma for the surgeon. The aim of our study was to define the incidence and risk factors for a recognized inadvertent enterotomy and determine its impact on short‐term outcomes after ventral hernia repair. Methods: Using a nationwide hernia registry, the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative, we reviewed all ventral hernia repair performed between 2013 and 2017. Patients were assessed for full‐thickness inadvertent enterotomies at the time of surgery. Patients with inadvertent enterotomies and without enterotomies were compared to assess differences in 30‐day outcomes, using regression modeling. Results: A total of 5,916 patients were included. The incidence of inadvertent enterotomy was 1.9%, with no difference between open and laparoscopic approaches. Inadvertent enterotomies did not increase surgical site occurrences but there were more surgical site infections (OR: 2.20 [95% CI: 1.24–3.90], P=.007). Patients were less likely to receive mesh if there was an enterotomy. Inadvertent enterotomies led to higher rates of reoperations, readmission, enterocutaneous fistulas, and mortality. Conclusion: Inadvertent enterotomies are more common in complex cases of ventral hernia repair and have an overall incidence of 1.9%. These patients are at increased risk of surgical site infections, reoperations, readmission, and mortality. Although definitive hernia repair with mesh can be safely performed, surgeons should consider multiple factors, including type of mesh and location of mesh in the abdominal wall, before proceeding with definitive repair in any case of an enterotomy.
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2018
Steven Schneeberger; Sharon Phillips; Li-Ching Huang; Richard A. Pierce; Shervin A. Etemad; Benjamin K. Poulose
BACKGROUND Biologic and biosynthetic meshes typically cost more than synthetic meshes for use in ventral hernia repair (VHR), with unknown comparative effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN Cost-utility analysis was performed from a limited societal perspective assessing direct medical costs and outcomes for open, elective, retromuscular VHR. Short-term and 5-year major complications and costs were modeled using best available evidence from published studies, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data, and Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative data. Costs were analyzed in 2017 US dollars, and utilities were assessed using quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine threshold probabilities of long-term complications favoring particular mesh types. RESULTS Synthetic mesh was the preferred strategy, with a cost of
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2017
Ajita S. Prabhu; Eugene O. Dickens; Chad M. Copper; John W. Mann; Jonathan Yunis; Sharon Phillips; Li-Ching Huang; Benjamin K. Poulose; Michael J. Rosen
15,620 and QALYs of 18.85, assuming a baseline 5.6% rate of long-term complications for all meshes. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that biosynthetic and biologic mesh became the better choice as long-term complication rates for synthetic mesh increased to 15.5% and 26.2%, respectively. Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that biologic and biosynthetic meshes became favorable as the cost of biologic mesh decreased and long-term synthetic mesh complication rates increased. Biologic and biosynthetic meshes also became more cost-effective when their relative long-term complication rates decreased and long-term synthetic mesh complication rates increased. CONCLUSIONS Using modeling techniques, synthetic mesh is the best option for retromuscular VHR given currently available evidence. We established long-term complication thresholds, possibly justifying the higher up-front costs for biologic or biosynthetic meshes. This emphasizes the critical need to obtain long-term complication surveillance data to help individualize mesh choice in VHR.
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2017
Ajita S. Prabhu; David M. Krpata; Sharon Phillips; Li-Ching Huang; Ivy N. Haskins; Steven Rosenblatt; Benjamin K. Poulose; Michael J. Rosen
Annals of Surgery | 2017
Ajita S. Prabhu; David M. Krpata; Arielle J. Perez; Sharon Phillips; Li-Ching Huang; Ivy N. Haskins; Steven Rosenblatt; Benjamin K. Poulose; Michael J. Rosen
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2018
Steven Schneeberger; Sharon Phillips; Li-Ching Huang; Richard A. Pierce; Shervin A. Etemad; Benjamin K. Poulose
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2018
Shervin A. Etemad; Li-Ching Huang; Sharon Phillips; Thomas G. Stewart; Richard A. Pierce; Steven Schneeberger; Benjamin K. Poulose
BMC Public Health | 2018
Sheila V. Kusnoor; Taneya Y. Koonce; Suzanne T. Hurley; Kalonji M. McClellan; Mallory N. Blasingame; Elizabeth T. Frakes; Li-Ching Huang; Marcia Epelbaum; Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse