Lidia Bosurgi

IL-22BP is regulated by the inflammasome and modulates tumorigenesis in the intestine

Chronic mucosal inflammation and tissue damage predisposes patients to the development of colorectal cancer. This association could be explained by the hypothesis that the same factors and pathways important for wound healing also promote tumorigenesis. A sensor of tissue damage should induce these factors to promote tissue repair and regulate their action to prevent development of cancer. Interleukin 22 (IL-22), a cytokine of the IL-10 superfamily, has an important role in colonic epithelial cell repair, and its levels are increased in the blood and intestine of inflammatory bowel disease patients. This cytokine can be neutralized by the soluble IL-22 receptor, known as the IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP, also known as IL22RA2); however, the significance of endogenous IL-22BP in vivo and the pathways that regulate this receptor are unknown. Here we describe that IL-22BP has a crucial role in controlling tumorigenesis and epithelial cell proliferation in the colon. IL-22BP is highly expressed by dendritic cells in the colon in steady-state conditions. Sensing of intestinal tissue damage via the NLRP3 or NLRP6 inflammasomes led to an IL-18-dependent downregulation of IL-22BP, thereby increasing the ratio of IL-22/IL-22BP. IL-22, which is induced during intestinal tissue damage, exerted protective properties during the peak of damage, but promoted tumour development if uncontrolled during the recovery phase. Thus, the IL-22–IL-22BP axis critically regulates intestinal tissue repair and tumorigenesis in the colon.

Inflammatory and alternatively activated human macrophages attract vessel-associated stem cells, relying on separate HMGB1- and MMP-9-dependent pathways.

Inflammatory macrophages recruited at the site of damaged muscles progressively acquire an alternative activation profile. Inflammatory (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages exert various and even opposite functions. M1 cells amplify tissue damage, and M2 cells dispose of necrotic fibers and deliver survival signals to myogenic precursors, finally supporting healing. A critical step in muscle healing is the recruitment of myogenic stem cells, including vessel‐associated stem cells (mesoangioblasts), which have been demonstrated to home to damaged skeletal muscle selectively and preferentially. Little information is available about the signals involved and the role played by infiltrating macrophages. Here, we report that the polarization of macrophages dramatically skews the secretion of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), TNF‐α, vascular endothelial growth factor, and metalloproteinase 9 (MMP‐9), molecules involved in the regulation of cell diapedesis and migration. All polarized macrophage populations were strikingly effective at inducing mesoangioblast migration. By means of specific inhibitors, we verified that the recruitment of mesoangioblasts requires the secretion of HMGB1 and TNF‐α by M1 cells and of MMP‐9 by M2 cells. Together, these data demonstrate a feature, unrecognized previously, of macrophages: their ability to attract stem cells, which is conserved throughout their polarization. Moreover, they open the possibility of novel strategies, aimed at interfering selectively with signals that recruit blood‐derived stem cells toward pro‐ or anti‐inflammatory macrophages.

Polarization dictates iron handling by inflammatory and alternatively activated macrophages

Background Macrophages play a key role in iron homeostasis. In peripheral tissues, they are known to polarize into classically activated (or M1) macrophages and alternatively activated (or M2) macrophages. Little is known on whether the polarization program influences the ability of macrophages to store or recycle iron and the molecular machinery involved in the processes. Design and Methods Inflammatory/M1 and alternatively activated/M2 macrophages were propagated in vitro from mouse bone-marrow precursors and polarized in the presence of recombinant interferon-γ or interleukin-4. We characterized and compared their ability to handle radioactive iron, the characteristics of the intracellular iron pools and the expression of molecules involved in internalization, storage and export of the metal. Moreover we verified the influence of iron on the relative ability of polarized macrophages to activate antigen-specific T cells. Results M1 macrophages have low iron regulatory protein 1 and 2 binding activity, express high levels of ferritin H, low levels of transferrin receptor 1 and internalize – albeit with low efficiency -iron only when its extracellular concentration is high. In contrast, M2 macrophages have high iron regulatory protein binding activity, express low levels of ferritin H and high levels of transferrin receptor 1. M2 macrophages have a larger intracellular labile iron pool, effectively take up and spontaneously release iron at low concentrations and have limited storage ability. Iron export correlates with the expression of ferroportin, which is higher in M2 macrophages. M1 and M2 cells activate antigen-specific, MHC class II-restricted T cells. In the absence of the metal, only M1 macrophages are effective. Conclusions Cytokines that drive macrophage polarization ultimately control iron handling, leading to the differentiation of macrophages into a subset which has a relatively sealed intracellular iron content (M1) or into a subset endowed with the ability to recycle the metal (M2).

HMGB1: a two-headed signal regulating tumor progression and immunity.

Cells of the innate immune system sense tissue damage recognizing in the extracellular environment bona fide intracellular moieties, like high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1). In the case of tumors, HMGB1 recognition has a paradoxical dual effect: it promotes tumor neoangiogenesis and triggers protective anti-neoplastic T-cell responses. Recent advances in the study of HMGB1 have identified candidate molecular mechanisms underlying these apparently contrasting outcomes. A surprising role for innate receptors, including toll like receptor 4 (TLR4), in the response to conventional cancer radio and chemotherapy has also recently emerged, providing new insight into the mechanisms by which these treatments actually work.

TAM receptor signaling in immune homeostasis.

The TAM receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)-TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK-together with their cognate agonists GAS6 and PROS1 play an essential role in the resolution of inflammation. Deficiencies in TAM signaling have been associated with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Three processes regulated by TAM signaling may contribute, either independently or collectively, to immune homeostasis: the negative regulation of the innate immune response, the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells, and the restoration of vascular integrity. Recent studies have also revealed the function of TAMs in infectious diseases and cancer. Here, we review the important milestones in the discovery of these RTKs and their ligands and the studies that underscore the functional importance of this signaling pathway in physiological immune settings and disease.

Requirement of HMGB1 for stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12-dependent migration of macrophages and dendritic cells

HMGB1 finely tunes the function of DCs, thus influencing their maturation program and eventually the establishment of adaptive, T cell–dependent immune responses. Moreover, it promotes the up–regulation of receptors for lymph node chemokines, regulates the remodeling of the cytoskeleton of migrating cells, and sustains their journey to secondary lymphoid organs via a RAGE–dependent pathway. The inflammatory properties of HMGB1 depend at least partially on the ability to complex with soluble moieties, including nucleic acids, microbial products, and cytokines. Here, we show that bone marrow–derived mouse DCs release HMGB1 during CXCL12–dependent migration in vitro. Macrophages share this property, suggesting that it may be a general feature of CXCL12–responsive leukocytes. The chemotactic response to rCXCL12 of DCs and macrophages abates in the presence of the HMGB1 antagonist BoxA. HMGB1 secreted from DCs and macrophages binds to CXCL12 in the fluid phase and protects the chemokine conformation and function in a reducing environment. Altogether, our data indicate that HMGB1 release is required for CXCL12 ability to attract myeloid–derived cells and reveal a functional interaction between the two molecules that possibly contributes to the regulation of leukocyte recruitment and motility.

Low hepcidin accounts for the proinflammatory status associated with iron deficiency

Hepcidin is an antimicrobial peptide that controls systemic iron homeostasis. Hepcidin binding to its receptor ferroportin reduces iron availability, thus controlling microbial growth. In parallel it triggers an anti-inflammatory response in macrophages. Hepcidin is transcriptionally regulated by iron, through the bone morphogenetic protein-son of mothers against decapentaplegic (BMP-SMAD) pathway and by inflammation, through IL6-mediated STAT3 signaling. To investigate the mechanisms linking iron and inflammation, we treated C57BL/6 iron-deficient mice with a sublethal dose of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and analyzed their inflammatory response in comparison with controls. We show that iron-deprived mice have a proinflammatory condition, exacerbated by LPS treatment leading to increased IL6 and TNFα mRNA in liver and spleen macrophages, and increased serum IL6 (482.29 ± 205.59 pg/mL) versus controls (69.01 ± 17.52 pg/mL; P < .05). Hepcidin was undetectable in iron-deficient mice but pretreatment with hepcidin normalized their response to LPS. Tmprss6(-/-) mice, characterized by iron deficiency and high hepcidin, show a blunted inflammatory response when challenged with LPS. Our data support a model in which the lack of hepcidin is responsible of the high inflammatory response to LPS in iron deficiency. The proinflammatory status associated with chronic iron deficiency could explain the resistance to infection seen in this condition.

Paradoxical role of the proto-oncogene Axl and Mer receptor tyrosine kinases in colon cancer

The receptor tyrosine kinases Axl and Mer, belonging to the Tyro3, Axl and Mer (TAM) receptor family, are expressed in a number of tumor cells and have well-characterized oncogenic roles. The therapeutic targeting of these kinases is considered an anticancer strategy, and various inhibitors are currently under development. At the same time, Axl and Mer are expressed in dendritic cells and macrophages and have an essential function in limiting inflammation. Inflammation is an enabling characteristic of multiple cancer hallmarks. These contrasting oncogenic and anti-inflammatory functions of Axl and Mer posit a potential paradox in terms of anticancer therapy. Here we demonstrate that azoxymethane (AOM) and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced inflammation-associated cancer is exacerbated in mice lacking Axl and Mer. Ablation of Axl and Mer signaling is associated with increased production of proinflammatory cytokines and failure to clear apoptotic neutrophils in the intestinal lamina propria, thereby favoring a tumor-promoting environment. Interestingly, loss of these genes in the hematopoietic compartment is not associated with increased colitis. Axl and Mer are expressed in radioresistant intestinal macrophages, and the loss of these genes is associated with an increased inflammatory signature in this compartment. Our results raise the possibility of potential adverse effects of systemic anticancer therapies with Axl and Mer inhibitors, and underscore the importance of understanding their tissue and cell type-specific functions in cancer.

Macrophage function in tissue repair and remodeling requires IL-4 or IL-13 with apoptotic cells

Local macrophage clean-up Infection, especially by helminths or bacteria, can cause tissue damage (see the Perspective by Bouchery and Harris). Minutti et al. studied mouse models of helminth infection and fibrosis. They expressed surfactant protein A (a member of the complement component C1q family) in the lung, which enhanced interleukin-4 (IL-4)-mediated proliferation and activation of alveolar macrophages. This activation accelerated helminth clearance and reduced lung injury. In the peritoneum, C1q boosted macrophage activation for liver repair after bacterial infection. By a different approach, Bosurgi et al. discovered that after wounding caused by migrating helminths in the lung or during inflammation in the gut of mice, IL-4 and IL-13 act only in the presence of apoptotic cells to promote tissue repair by local macrophages. Science, this issue p. 1076, p. 1072; see also p. 1014 Just as infection needs to be limited, so must healing responses be contained to reduce scarring and allergy. Tissue repair is a subset of a broad repertoire of interleukin-4 (IL-4)– and IL-13–dependent host responses during helminth infection. Here we show that IL-4 or IL-13 alone was not sufficient, but IL-4 or IL-13 together with apoptotic cells induced the tissue repair program in macrophages. Genetic ablation of sensors of apoptotic cells impaired the proliferation of tissue-resident macrophages and the induction of anti-inflammatory and tissue repair genes in the lungs after helminth infection or in the gut after induction of colitis. By contrast, the recognition of apoptotic cells was dispensable for cytokine-dependent induction of pattern recognition receptor, cell adhesion, or chemotaxis genes in macrophages. Detection of apoptotic cells can therefore spatially compartmentalize or prevent premature or ectopic activity of pleiotropic, soluble cytokines such as IL-4 or IL-13.

High-mobility group box 1 release and redox regulation accompany regeneration and remodeling of skeletal muscle.

High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules, favors tissue regeneration via recruitment and activation of leukocytes and stem cells. Here we demonstrate, in a model of acute sterile muscle injury, that regeneration is accompanied by active reactive oxygen species (ROS) production counterbalanced and overcome by the generation of antioxidant moieties. Mitochondria are initially responsible for ROS formation. However, they undergo rapid disruption with almost complete disappearance. Twenty-four hours after injury, we observed a strong induction of MURF1 and atrogin-1 ubiquitin ligases, key signals in activation of the proteasome system and induction of muscle atrophy. At later time points, ROS generation is maintained by nonmitochondrial sources. The antioxidant response occurs in both regenerating fibers and leukocytes that express high levels of free thiols and antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and thioredoxin. HMGB1, a protein thiol, weakly expressed in healthy muscles, increases during regeneration in parallel with the antioxidant response in both fibers and leukocytes. A reduced environment may be important to maintain HMGB1 bioactivity. Indeed, oxidation abrogates both muscle stem cell migration in response to HMGB1 and their ability to differentiate into myofibers in vitro. We propose that the early antioxidant response in regenerating muscle limits HMGB1 oxidation, thus allowing successful muscle regeneration.