Lidia Ghisdal

Cold ischemia is a major determinant of acute rejection and renal graft survival in the modern era of immunosuppression.

Background. The aim of our study was to examine, in a recent cohort of kidney transplant recipients who have received modern immunosuppressive therapy, the respective role of cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) on acute rejection (AR) rates and long-term graft survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 611 renal transplantations between 1996 and 2005. Most patients received a calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance therapy, either cyclosporine (43%) or tacrolimus (52%) and 76% of the patients received an antilymphocyte induction therapy. Study endpoints were DGF, first-year AR, and long-term graft survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors that may have influenced the study outcomes. Results. DGF was observed in 16.2% of patients. Both older donor age and longer CIT were significant risk factors for DGF. DGF rates were similar whether patients received a calcineurin inhibitor before transplantation or not. AR occurred in 16.5% of grafts during the first year. Independent predictors of AR by multivariate analysis were duration of dialysis, CIT, current panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5%, and the number of human leukocyte antigen-A, B, and DR mismatches. Each hour of cold ischemia increases the risk of rejection by 4%. With respect to death-censored graft survival, three pretransplant parameters emerged as independent predictors of graft loss: younger recipient age, peak panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibody more than 5% and longer CIT. The detrimental effect of CIT on graft survival was entirely because of its propensity to trigger AR. When AR was added to the multivariate Cox model, CIT was no longer significant whereas first-year AR became the most important predictor of graft loss (Hazards ratio, 4.6). Conclusion. Shortening CIT will help to decrease not only DGF rates but also AR incidence and hence graft loss. Patients with prolonged CIT should receive adequate immunosuppression, possibly with antilymphocyte preparations, to prevent AR occurrence.

Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine A for new-onset diabetes after transplantation: a single-centre experience in renal transplanted patients and review of the literature

Tacrolimus (TRL) increases the incidence of new‐onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT). Little is known about whether conversion from TRL to cyclosporine A (CsA) improves glucose metabolism in patients with NODAT. We retrospectively analysed glucose metabolism parameters in 54 TRL‐treated renal transplant patients who developed NODAT. Thirty‐four were converted to CsA whereas 20 patients continued TRL. After conversion, fasting plasma glucose decreased from 146 ± 64 to 104 ± 20 mg/dl (P < 0.0001) and HbA1c levels decreased from 6.8 ± 0.8% to 6.0 ± 0.6% (P < 0.0001) after 1 year of follow‐up. The remission rate of NODAT reached 42% (95% confidence interval 24–59%) 1 year after conversion versus 0% in the control group (P = 0.001). Blood pressure and lipid levels were stable after conversion although the use of statins significantly increased (P < 0.01). The conversion was safe in terms of graft function and acute rejection episodes. The 1‐year patient survival and graft survival rate were 100%. In conclusion, our results suggest a significant improvement of glucose metabolism after conversion to CsA in renal transplant patients with NODAT.

New-onset diabetes after renal transplantation: risk assessment and management.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious and frequent metabolic complication after renal transplantation. This entity is currently well defined since the publication of the International Consensus Guidelines in 2003. Here, we review the factors contributing to the risk of NODAT and the strategies related to modifiable factors, with emphasis on practical issues. Recognizing these factors may help clinicians to evaluate prospectively appropriate prevention strategies to minimize the risk of NODAT. Over the past 50 years, the concept of NODAT has evolved in terms of name and definition. Before 2003, de novo diabetes that developed after transplantation was described in various terms, most frequently “posttransplantation diabetes mellitus,” and suffered from a lack of consensus regarding its definition. The most commonly used clinical definition was the requirement of insulin for a minimum period posttransplantation (often 30 days). This definition, however, identified only the most severe cases, leaving out the majority of patients with glucose metabolism disorders. International Consensus Guidelines on NODAT were published in 2003. They recommended that the diagnosis of NODAT should be based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for type 2 diabetes published in 2003 (1,2). Since then, a follow-up report from the International Expert Committee further lowered the inferior limit of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (100 mg/dL) that corresponds to impaired fasting glucose (IFG), based on epidemiologic predictive data (3). In addition, since 2009, the International Expert Committee recommended the use of a standardized A1C assay for diabetes diagnosis (A1C level ≥6.5%), a position that has been endorsed by ADA in 2010 (4). The Expert Committee stated that A1C assay cannot be used in conditions that change red cell turnover. This is the case of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and newly transplanted kidney patients. For instance, the posttransplant period is frequently associated …

TCF7L2 Polymorphism Associates with New-Onset Diabetes after Transplantation

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious and frequent complication in transplant recipients. Whether NODAT shares the same susceptibility genes as type 2 diabetes is unknown. In this multicenter study, we genotyped 1076 white patients without diabetes at transplantation for 11 polymorphisms that associate with type 2 diabetes. We defined NODAT as a fasting plasma glucose > or =126 mg/dl on at least two occasions or de novo hypoglycemic therapy. We compared clinical and genetic factors between patients who developed NODAT within 6 mo of transplantation (n = 118; incidence 11%) and patients without diabetes (n = 958). In multivariate analysis, NODAT significantly associated with the following characteristics: TCF7L2 polymorphism (odds ratio [OR] 1.60 per each T allele; P = 0.002), age (OR 1.03 per year; P < 0.001), body mass index at transplantation (OR 1.09 per unit; P < 0.001), tacrolimus use (OR 2.26; P < 0.001), and the occurrence of a corticoid-treated acute rejection episode (OR 2.78; P < 0.001). In summary, our data show that the TCF7L2 rs7903146 polymorphism, a known risk factor for type 2 diabetes in the general population, also associates with NODAT.

HLA mismatches remain risk factors for acute kidney allograft rejection in patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies.

Background. New immunosuppressive drugs such as anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (aIL2R) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Whether matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens is still relevant in patients receiving modern immunosuppression has been questioned. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year and the impact of acute rejection on long-term graft survival in a cohort of 208 renal transplant patients treated with aIL2R (basiliximab, n=166; daclizumab, n=42), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, n=180; cyclosporin, n=28), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Graft and patient survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for acute rejection were analyzed by logistic regression modeling. Results. Twenty-seven patients were treated for acute rejection (26 biopsy-proven) during the first posttransplant year. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of first-year acute rejection was 13.2%. The number of HLA mismatches (odds ratio [OR] 1.65 per HLA mismatch) and long periods of dialysis before transplantation (OR 3.1 for more than 4 years of dialysis) were the only independent risk factors for first-year acute rejection. First-year acute rejection was associated with a significant reduction in overall and death-censored graft survival at 5 years after transplantation. Conclusions. Although infrequent in patients receiving modern immunosuppressive drugs, acute rejection remains an important risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. Our results suggest that better HLA matching and shorter periods of dialysis before transplantation could reduce acute rejection rates and further improve outcomes under current immunosuppressive regimens.

Evolution of immunoglobulin and mannose binding protein levels after renal transplantation: association with infectious complications.

Hypogammaglobulinemia (hypo‐Ig) and low mannose binding protein (MBP) levels might be involved in the infectious risk in renal transplantation. In 152 kidney transplant recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), during the first year, we prospectively recorded the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia, and low MBP levels. Their influence on infectious complications was evaluated in 92 patients at 3 and 12 months (T3 and T12). The proportion of deficiency increased significantly: hypo‐IgG: 6% (T0), 45% (T3), and 30% (T12) (P < 0.001); hypo‐MBP: 5%, 11%, and 12% (P = 0.035). Hypo‐IgG at T3 was not associated with an increased incidence of first‐year infections. A significantly higher proportion of patients with combined hypogammaglobulinemia [IgG+ (IgA and/or IgM)] at T3 and with isolated hypo‐IgG at T0 developed infections until T3 compared with patients free of these deficits (P < 0.05). Low MBP levels at T3 were associated with more sepsis and viral infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia is frequent during the first year after renal transplantation in patients treated with a CNI and MMF. Hypo‐IgG at T0 and combined Igs deficts at T3 were associated with more infections. MBP deficiency might emerge as an important determinant of the post‐transplant infectious risk.

Major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related antigen a antibodies: sensitizing events and impact on renal graft outcomes.

Background. Major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related antigen A (MICA) antibodies (Abs) have been associated with renal graft loss in one large cohort. The triggering factors for MICA Abs and their autologous or allogeneic specificity have not been well defined. More data on the impact of MICA on renal grafts outcome are needed. Methods. We tested sera from 494 controls and 597 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for MICA using Luminex. Forty CKD MICA+ patients were genotyped for MICA alleles to determine their auto- or allospecificity. We compared MICA+ with MICA− renal transplant recipients with regard to acute rejection episodes and long-term survival. Results. Blood transfusions, previous transplantation, and more than two pregnancies were independent risk factors for the presence of MICA Abs, as were CKD stage V status and male gender. Among the 40 genotyped patients, allo-Abs alone were present in 32 patients, both auto- and allo-Abs in 4 patients, and auto-Abs alone in 4 patients. When we compared MICA+ with MICA− patients, the incidence of acute rejection episodes during the first year (10.2% vs. 12.8%), as well as 1-year creatinine and proteinuria, were similar in both groups. At 10 years, actuarial patient (97.8% vs. 87.6%) and overall graft survival (76% vs. 72%) were similar between MICA+ and MICA− patients. Conclusions. In summary, (1) sensitizing events for MICA Abs are the same as for human leukocyte antigen Abs; (2) MICA Abs did not adversely affect renal graft outcomes in our cohort.

Thrombophilic factors in Stage V chronic kidney disease patients are largely corrected by renal transplantation

BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of acquired thrombophilic factors in Stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients according to dialysis modality, the rate of correction of these factors 1 month after renal transplantation and their impact on cardiovascular or thromboembolic events at 1 year. METHODS Three hundred and ten patients were prospectively screened for seven thrombophilic factors at transplantation; 215 of them were also assayed 1 month after. All the patients received prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid, started before transplantation. RESULTS The prevalence of thrombophilic factors was significantly higher in patients under dialysis (n = 289) than in patients not yet on dialysis (n = 21) (74 versus 52.4%; P = 0.03) but was similar in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients (74.2 versus 73.2%). One month after transplantation, the global prevalence of thrombophilic factors had dropped from 74.4 to 44.7% (P < 0.001). Most thrombophilic factors had disappeared after transplantation: antithrombin deficiency: 13.5 versus 0.9%; P < 0.001, protein C deficiency: 12.1 versus 1.9%; P < 0.001, protein S deficiency: 3.7 versus 1.4%; P = 0.1, lupus anticoagulant: 37.7 versus 8.4%; P < 0.001 and antiphospholipid antibodies: 29.3 versus 12.6%; P < 0.001. The prevalence of activated protein C resistance, which reflects inherited factor V (FV) Leiden, was unchanged (1.9%), while the prevalence of elevated factor VIIIc increased from 20.9 to 30.7%, P < 0.001. The incidence of cardiovascular or thromboembolic events 1 year after transplantation was similar in patients with more than or equal to one thrombophilic factor at 1 month (5.2%) versus thrombophilic-free patients (6.7%). CONCLUSION Acquired thrombophilic factors are highly prevalent among Stage V CKD patients. Most thrombophilic factors are corrected 1 month after transplantation.

Conversion to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: risk factors for graft loss and severe side effects

We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 45 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) that were switched from CNI to SRL, mainly for chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) (41/45). The mean serum creatinine at switch was 2.5 ± 0.8 mg/dl. At 1 year, patient survival was 93%. Death-censored graft survival was 67% at 1 year and 54% at 2 years. SRL was stopped because of severe side effects in 15 patients. Among these, eight patients developed ‘de novo’ high-grade proteinuria. Univariate analysis revealed that (1) a higher SRL level at 1 month was a predictor of SRL withdrawal due to severe side effects (P = 0.006), and (2) predictors of graft failure after SRL conversion were low SRL loading dose (P = 0.03) and a higher creatinine level at conversion (P = 0.003). In conclusion, the therapeutic index of SRL in patients suffering from CAD is narrow, with high exposure triggering serious adverse events that may mandate SRL discontinuation, while too low exposure may expose patients to under-immunosuppression and graft loss.

Genome-wide association study of acute renal graft rejection.

Acute renal rejection is a major risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction and long‐term graft loss. We performed a genome‐wide association study to detect loci associated with biopsy‐proven acute T cell–mediated rejection occurring in the first year after renal transplantation. In a discovery cohort of 4127 European renal allograft recipients transplanted in eight European centers, we used a DNA pooling approach to compare 275 cases and 503 controls. In an independent replication cohort of 2765 patients transplanted in two European countries, we identified 313 cases and 531 controls, in whom we genotyped individually the most significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the discovery cohort. In the discovery cohort, we found five candidate loci tagged by a number of contiguous SNPs (more than five) that was never reached in iterative in silico permutations of our experimental data. In the replication cohort, two loci remained significantly associated with acute rejection in both univariate and multivariate analysis. One locus encompasses PTPRO, coding for a receptor‐type tyrosine kinase essential for B cell receptor signaling. The other locus involves ciliary gene CCDC67, in line with the emerging concept of a shared building design between the immune synapse and the primary cilium.