Lieba Savitt

Sigmoidectomy syndrome? Patients' perspectives on the functional outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Bowel function following surgery for diverticulitis has not previously been systematically described. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to document the frequency, severity, and predictors of suboptimal bowel function in patients who have undergone sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis. SETTING: This study was conducted at a large, academic medical center. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with restoration of intestinal continuity for diverticulitis were included in the study population. Of these, 249 patients (76.6%) returned a 70-question survey incorporating the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and the Memorial Bowel Function Instrument. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey responders and nonresponders were compared with the use of &khgr;2 and t tests. Responders with suboptimal bowel function (fecal incontinence, urgency and/or incomplete emptying) were then compared with those with good outcomes by the use of logistic regression analysis to determine the predictors of poor function. RESULTS: Of the responders, 24.8% reported clinically relevant fecal incontinence (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index ≥24), 19.6% reported fecal urgency (Memorial Bowel Function Instrument Urgency Subscale ≥4), and 20.8% reported incomplete emptying (Memorial Bowel Function Instrument Emptying Subscale ≥4). On logistic regression analysis, fecal incontinence was predicted by female sex (OR = 2.3, p = 0.008) and the presence of a preoperative abscess (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05). Fecal urgency was associated with female sex (OR = 1.3, p < 0.05) and a diverting ileostomy (OR = 2.1, p < 0.001). Incomplete emptying was associated with female sex (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05) and postoperative sepsis (OR = 1.9, p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the fact that we did not use a nondiverticulitis control group and we had limited preoperative data on the history of bowel impairment symptoms. CONCLUSION: One-fifth of patients reported fecal urgency, fecal incontinence, or incomplete emptying after surgery for diverticulitis. Despite the limitations of our study, these results are concerning and should be investigated further prospectively.

In patients with rectoceles and obstructed defecation syndrome, surgery should be the option of last resort

BACKGROUND The indications for operation in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) with rectocele are not well defined. METHODS A total of 90 female patients with ODS and rectocele were prospectively evaluated and treated with fiber supplements and biofeedback training. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to determine factors predictive of failing medical management. RESULTS Obstructive symptoms were the most prevalent presenting complaint (82.2%). Ultimately, 71.1% of patients responded to medical management and biofeedback. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that the presence of internal intussusception was associated with a lower chance of undergoing surgery to address ODS symptoms [odds ratio 0.18; P = .05], whereas inability to expel balloon, contrast retention on defecography, and splinting were not (P ≥ .15). CONCLUSION Rectoceles with concomitant intussusception in patients with ODS appear to portend a favorable response to biofeedback and medical management. We argue that all patients considered for surgery for rectoceles because of ODS should first undergo appropriate bowel retraining.

Are rectoceles the cause or the result of obstructed defaecation syndrome? A prospective anorectal physiology study.

To determine the relationship between obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) and rectoceles.

Impact of Rising Grades of Internal Rectal Intussusception on Fecal Continence and Symptoms of Constipation.

BACKGROUND: A theory of rectal intussusception has been advanced that intrarectal intussusception, intra-anal intussusception, and external rectal prolapse are points on a continuum and are a cause of fecal incontinence and constipation. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the association among rectal intussusception, constipation, fecal incontinence, and anorectal manometry. DESIGN: Patients undergoing defecography were studied from a prospectively maintained database and classified according to the Oxford Rectal Prolapse Grade as normal or having intra-rectal, intra-anal, or external intussusception. Patient symptoms were assessed using the Constipation Severity Index and the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. Quality-of-life surveys were also used. Patients also underwent anorectal manometry. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care university medical center (Massachusetts General Hospital). PATIENTS: The study included 147 consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for evacuatory dysfunction and involved defecography, symptoms questionnaires, and anorectal physiology testing from January 2011 to December 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom severity and quality-of-life scores were measured, as well as anal manometry results. RESULTS: Increasing Oxford grade was associated with an increase in severity of fecal incontinence (median score: normal = 23.9, intrarectal = 21.0, intra-anal = 30.0, external prolapse = 35.3; &bgr; = 4.71; p = 0.009), which persisted in a multivariable model including age (&bgr; = 2.13; p = 0.03), and decreased sphincter pressures (median mean resting pressure: normal = 75.4, intra-rectal = 69.7, intra-anal = 64.3, external prolapse = 48.3; &bgr; = –8.57; p = 0.003), which did not persist in a multivariable model. Constipation severity did not increase with rising intussusception (mean score: normal = 37.4, intrarectal = 35.0, intra-anal = 41.4, external prolapse = 32.9; p = 0.79), and balloon expulsion improved rather than worsened (normal = 47.1%, intrarectal = 60.5%, intra-anal = 82.9%, external prolapse = 93.1%; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited because it was an observational study from a single center. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing grades of rectal intussusception are associated with increasing fecal incontinence but not constipation.

Does intramesorectal excision for ulcerative colitis impact bowel and sexual function when compared with total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND Proctectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) can be performed via intramesorectal (IME) or total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS We compared patient-reported bowel and sexual function among IME versus TME UC patients (September 2000 to March 2011) using the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function scale, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Female Sexual Function Instrument, and International Index of Erectile Dysfunction surveys. RESULTS Eighty-nine IME versus TME patients (35 ± 2 years, 57% male, 62% IME) had similar baseline characteristics, although IME patients had more open procedures (P ≤ .03). IME patients reported better fecal continence (P = .009) but similar fecal incontinence-related quality of life (P ≥ .44). For sexual function, there were no differences for either women (Female Sexual Function Instrument; P ≥ .20) or men (International Index of Erectile Dysfunction; P ≥ .22). CONCLUSIONS IME appears to be associated with better fecal continence but no difference in overall bowel or sexual function compared with TME in patients with UC.

Effect of Coexisting Pelvic Floor Disorders on Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scores: A Prospective, Survey-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The association between an objective measure of fecal incontinence severity and patient-reported quality of life is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients with various degrees of fecal incontinence to determine whether their quality of life as measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale is affected by coexisting pelvic floor disorders. DESIGN: This was a prospective, survey-based study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary pelvic floor disorders center. PATIENTS: Included patients were all of those presenting between January 2007 and March 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey data were analyzed to determine the association between Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, as well as scores from the Constipation Severity Instrument, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Organ Distress Inventory, and Urinary Distress Inventory. RESULTS: A total of 585 patients reported fecal incontinence ranging from none (n = 191) to mild/moderate (n = 159) to severe (n = 235). As expected, patients with severe fecal incontinence have worse scores on all fecal incontinence quality-of-life subscales (lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment) and worse colorectal/anal symptoms than those with mild/moderate or no fecal incontinence (p < 0.0001). Patients with severe fecal incontinence also have worse bladder/urinary symptoms (p ⩽ 0.0001). Pelvic organ prolapse and constipation symptoms were similar between groups (p ≥ 0.61). After correcting for baseline differences in patient comorbidities and bladder/urinary symptoms, a significant association persisted between Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and all of the subscales of the fecal incontinence quality-of-life instrument (p < 0.0001). However, urinary distress scores also remained significantly associated with all of the fecal incontinence quality-of-life subscales except for embarrassment after risk adjustment (p < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: Nongeneral population and a lack of patient data on previous medical management of fecal incontinence were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale correlates strongly with instruments measuring both fecal and urinary incontinence. This underscores the importance of quantifying the presence or absence of coexistent urinary leakage in studies where a drop in fecal incontinence quality of life is considered a primary end point.

Addition of a scripted pre-operative patient education module to an existing ERAS pathway further reduces length of stay

BACKGROUND While enhanced recovery pathways (ERAS) appear to be beneficial for post-operative outcomes, there have been no studies evaluating the specific role of patient education within an ERAS pathway. METHODS We identified all colectomies performed at our institution since initiation of an ERAS protocol, excluding for mortality and length of stay >30 days. Patients who received preoperative education by a nurse practitioner via a scripted telephone call were compared to patients who did not receive education using the NSQIP database. We then evaluated differences in surgical complications and length of stay among these cohorts. RESULTS Patients who received scripted education phone calls had a significantly shorter mean length of stay when compared to patients that receiving usual care (3.0 ± 2.2 vs 3.7 ± 3.2 days; p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis demonstrates strongest benefit in patients undergoing left colectomy and laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSIONS Scripted patient education modules may shorten length of stays and postoperative complications, even when added to an already existing ERAS bundle, which may translate into significant hospital cost savings.