Liesa Dziggel

Scoring Systems to Estimate Intracerebral Control and Survival Rates of Patients Irradiated for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE To create and validate scoring systems for intracerebral control (IC) and overall survival (OS) of patients irradiated for brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this study, 1,797 patients were randomly assigned to the test (n = 1,198) or the validation group (n = 599). Two scoring systems were developed, one for IC and another for OS. The scores included prognostic factors found significant on multivariate analyses. Age, performance status, extracerebral metastases, interval tumor diagnosis to RT, and number of brain metastases were associated with OS. Tumor type, performance status, interval, and number of brain metastases were associated with IC. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month IC or OS rate (given in percent) by 10. The total score represented the sum of the scores for each factor. The score groups of the test group were compared with the corresponding score groups of the validation group. RESULTS In the test group, 6-month IC rates were 17% for 14-18 points, 49% for 19-23 points, and 77% for 24-27 points (p < 0.0001). IC rates in the validation group were 19%, 52%, and 77%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the test group, 6-month OS rates were 9% for 15-19 points, 41% for 20-25 points, and 78% for 26-30 points (p < 0.0001). OS rates in the validation group were 7%, 39%, and 79%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Patients irradiated for brain metastases can be given scores to estimate OS and IC. IC and OS rates of the validation group were similar to the test group demonstrating the validity and reproducibility of both scores.

Dose-escalation of whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastasis in patients with a favorable survival prognosis

Patients with brain metastases who have a favorable survival prognosis may benefit from intensive treatments, including neurosurgery and radiosurgery. However, many patients cannot receive such treatments, and whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone is their only option. The most common WBRT schedule is 30 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions. In this retrospective study, the authors investigated whether these patients benefit from a dose escalation beyond 30 Gy.

A new survival score for patients with brain metastases who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Survival scores for patients with brain metastasis exist. However, the treatment regimens used to create these scores were heterogeneous. This study aimed to develop and validate a survival score in homogeneously treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight-hundred-and-eighty-two patients receiving 10 × 3Gy of WBRT alone were randomly assigned to a test group (N=441) or a validation group (N=441). In the multivariate analysis of the test group, age, performance status, extracranial metastasis, and systemic treatment prior to WBRT were independent predictors of survival. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (in %) by 10. Scores were summed and total scores ranged from 6 to 19 points. Patients were divided into four prognostic groups. RESULTS The 6-month survival rates were 4% for 6-9 points, 29% for 10-14 points, 62% for 15-17 points, and 93% for 17-18 points (p<0.001) in the test group. The survival rates were 3%, 28%, 54% and 96%, respectively (p<0.001) in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS Since the 6-month survival rates in the validation group were very similar to the test group, this new score (WBRT-30) appears valid and reproducible. It can help making treatment choices and stratifying patients in future trials.

The first survival score for patients with brain metastases from small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

OBJECTIVE Survival scores can help physicians select appropriate treatment for patients with brain metastasis. Primary tumors have different biological behavior justifying separate scoring systems for different tumors. In this study, a survival score was developed for patients with brain metastasis from SCLC. METHODS Data of 172 patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy alone for brain metastasis from SCLC were included. Patients were assigned to a test (N=86) or a validation group (N=86). In the test group, Karnofsky Performance Score, number of brain metastases, and extracranial metastasis were associated with survival and included in the score. Scores for each factor were obtained from the 6-month survival rate divided by 10. According to the total scores, which represented the sum of the three scores, three prognostic groups were formed. RESULTS 6-Month survival rates in the test group were 3% for 5-8 points, 40% for 9-12 points, and 89% for 15 points (p<0.001). In the validation group, 6-month survival rates were 3%, 41%, and 89% (p<0.001). The comparisons between the three prognostic groups of the test group and the validation group did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS This new score appears valid and reproducible. It can be used to personalize the treatment to patients with brain metastasis from SCLC.

A matched-pair study comparing whole-brain irradiation alone to radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone in patients irradiated for up to three brain metastases

BackgroundThis matched-pair study was initiated to validate the results of a retrospective study of 186 patients published in 2007 that compared whole-brain irradiation (WBI) alone and radiosurgery (RS) alone for up to three brain metastases.MethodsOne-hundred-fifty-two patients receiving WBI alone for up to three brain metastases were matched with 152 patients treated with RS of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) alone 1:1 for each of eight factors (age, gender, Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group (ECOG)-performance score, nature of tumor, brain metastases number, extra-cerebral spread, period from cancer detection to irradiation of brain metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)-class. Groups were analyzed regarding intracerebral control (IC) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOn univariate analysis of IC, type of irradiation did not significantly affect outcomes (p = 0.84). On Cox regression, brain metastases number (p < 0.001), nature of tumor (p < 0.001) and period from cancer detection to irradiation of brain metastases (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with IC. On univariate analysis of OS, type of irradiation showed no significant association with outcomes (p = 0.63). On multivariate analyses, OS was significantly associated with ECOG performance score (p = 0.011), nature of tumor (p = 0.035), brain metastases number (p = 0.048), extra-cerebral spread (p = 0.002) and RPA-class (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this matched-pair study, RS/FSRT alone was not superior to WBI alone regarding IC and OS. These results can be considered a revision of the findings from our retrospective previous study without matched-pair design, where RS alone resulted in significantly better IC than WBI alone on multivariate analysis.

A New Tool to Predict Survival after Radiosurgery Alone for Newly Diagnosed Cerebral Metastases

Many patients with few cerebral metastases receive radiosurgery alone. The goal of this study was to create a tool to estimate the survival of such patients. To identify characteristics associated with survival, nine variables including radiosurgery dose, age, gender, Eastern cooperative oncology group performance score (ECOG-PS), primary tumor type, number/size of cerebral metastases, location of cerebral metastases, extra-cerebral metastases and time between cancer diagnosis and radiosurgery were analyzed in 214 patients. On multivariate analysis, age (p=0.03), ECOG-PS (p=0.02) and extra-cerebral metastases (p<0.01) had significant impacts on survival. Scoring points for each patient were obtained from 12-month survival rates (in %) related to the significant variables divided by 10. Addition of the scoring points of the three variables resulted in a patients total predictive score. Two groups were designed, A (10-14 points) and B (16-17 points). Twelve-month survival rates were 33% and 77%, respectively (p<0.001). Median survival times were 8 and 20 months, respectively. Because most patients of group A died from extra-cerebral disease and/or new cerebral lesions, early systemic treatment and additional WBI should be considered. As cause of death in group B was mostly new cerebral metastases, additional WBI appears even more important for this group.