Lillian Hayes
University of Sydney
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lillian Hayes.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2002
Lillian Hayes; Susan Quine; Richard Taylor; Geoffrey Berry
Objective: To examine trends in socio‐economic differentials in all‐cause mortality in Sydney over a 25‐year period (1970–94).
Journal of Biosocial Science | 1995
Susan Quine; Richard Taylor; Lillian Hayes
This ecological study examines trends in socioeconomic differentials in mortality in New South Wales, Australia, over a 20-year period (1970-89). The proportion unskilled was used as the indicator of socioeconomic status and its selection justified. Using census data aggregated by Local Government Area, the relationship between mortality and socioeconomic status was examined using quintiles based on the proportion unskilled in the population. Local Government Areas were also sorted into quintiles using mortality rates (0-74 years) to describe change in mortality differentials over time. Socioeconomic differentials were more evident in the relatively homogeneous Local Government Areas within the Sydney Statistical Division than in the remaining NSW Statistical Divisions which are more heterogeneous and predominantly rural. Although there has been an overall decline in mortality for males and females, and for high and low status groups, over this period the relative socioeconomic differentials have not declined. For the most recent period (1985-89) there appears to be some widening of differentials for males. The NSW state trends are generally similar to those reported for Britain and for other industrialised countries, suggesting that this is a common trend and that policies to reduce inequalities have not been effective.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2002
Jane Overland; Lillian Hayes; Dennis K. Yue
Objective: To use Medicare data to examine the impact of social disadvantage on the use of health services related to diabetes.
International Journal of Integrated Care | 2016
Heather McKenzie; Kate White; Lillian Hayes; Scott J. Fitzpatrick; Keith Cox; Jo River
Introduction : The integration of health and social care for individual patients depends, in many circumstances, on the involvement (as care providers) of their informal carers or primary support persons. This paper reports on an Australian study exploring the experiences of primary support persons of chemotherapy outpatients. Despite overt reliance on informal/family care provision, and the crucial role of carers in enabling integration of health and social care, little is understood of (i) the impact of this care provision on patient outcomes; (ii) the extent to which primary support persons of chemotherapy outpatients feel the care they provide is well integrated into the overall pattern of service delivery, and (iii) the social, emotional, economic, and physical effects for people providing this care. Theory/Methods : An exploratory, qualitative research design was utilised and a convenience sample of seventeen participants was recruited through the cancer centre at a large tertiary hospital. In face-to face, semi-structured interviews, participants were asked to identify issues of importance to them as a primary support person of someone receiving chemotherapy, and to provide specific information about their experience of the days following chemotherapy administration. Content analysis led to the emergence of three significant themes. Findings : These themes include: (i) frightened novice to reassuring expert – reflecting the urgency with which primary support persons feel they must develop cancer and chemotherapy related skills and knowledge in order to become an effective care provider; (ii) watching and waiting - encapsulating the range of experiences, from intense vigilance to secretive, monitoring of physical and emotional wellbeing, and (iii) discordance and invisibility – highlighting the extent to which participants felt their support role – although clearly critical to patient wellbeing – is not formally recognised by health professionals and not integrated into the overall pattern of service delivery. Discussion : The overarching conceptualisation of the informal carer role as a ‘shadowing’ role reflects the ways in which the three themes are connected. This study demonstrates that informal carers in this context do not experience their role as being well integrated into established care pathways, or recognised as a significant enabler in the integration of health and social care, including their role in supporting patient self-management strategies, provision of context-specific knowledge, and ensuring that care is person-centred and time efficient. Although this study focuses on one specific clinical area, many aspects of this informal carer experience are likely to be shared by carers of people with other serious health issues. Further research to determine strategies for better recognition of the potential contribution of informal carers to provision of effective integrated care is needed.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2011
Heather McKenzie; Lillian Hayes; Kathryn White; Keith Cox; Judith Fethney; Maureen Boughton; Jo Dunn
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2012
Susan Ronaldson; Lillian Hayes; Christina Aggar; Jennifer Green; Michele Carey
International Journal of Older People Nursing | 2008
Susan Ronaldson; Lillian Hayes; Michele Carey; Christina Aggar
Health & Social Care in The Community | 2007
Heather McKenzie; Maureen Boughton; Lillian Hayes; Sue Forsyth; Michelle Davies; Emma Underwood; Peta McVey
Australian Journal of Rural Health | 2005
Lillian Hayes; Susan Quine; Richard Taylor
Journal of Public Health | 2006
Lillian Hayes; Geoffrey Berry