Lillie R. Albert
Boston College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lillie R. Albert.
International Journal of Leadership in Education | 1999
Marilyn Cochran-Smith; Lillie R. Albert; Philip DiMattia; Sara Freedman; Richard Jackson; Jean F. Mooney; Otherine Neisler; Alec Peck; Nancy Zollers
Committed in a general way to the idea of teaching and teacher education for social justice, the nine co-authors of this paper embarked upon a multi-year collaborative research and professional development project that came to be known as ‘Seeking Social Justice’. The project was designed to allow group members (all faculty in the same department) to examine their own understandings of social justice issues as part of the process of helping their students do the same as well as to encourage students to work for social change and effectively meet the needs of the increasingly diverse K-12 school population. In this article the authors discuss the framework for the project and the first two years of collaborative work. They suggest that their work together provides a ‘proof of possibility’ for faculty groups attempting to emphasize or infuse social justice into pre-service teacher education despite profound differences in politics, disciplines and perspectives. They argue that part of what made this possibl...
Action in teacher education | 2000
Nancy Zollers; Lillie R. Albert; Marilyn Cochran-Smith
Abstract Recent demographic trends in American education have reaffirmed the need to teach prospective teachers about social justice issues such as race, class, and disability. With this goal in mind, fourteen members of the Boston College of Teacher Education faculty and three administrators engaged in a year-long series of conversations over the meaning of social justice. The goal of these “social justice conversations” was to investigate individual understandings of the meaning of social justice and find the commonality necessary to “teach for social justice” A sub-group of faculty, including the authors, studied these conversations. The authors found that participants unanimously embraced the goal of teaching for social justice but that their definitions of social justice ranged along a “continuum of beliefs” They identify three categories of divergence around the meaning of social justice: Definitions of fairness and equity; institutional vs. individual understandings of injustice; and the responsibility of individuals to advocate for social justice. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of these discussions for the Teacher Education faculty and individual faculty members.
Mediterranean journal of social sciences | 2014
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
In recent years social, economic and environmental considerations have led to a reevaluation of the factors that contribute to sustainable urban environments. Increasingly, urban green space is seen as an integral part of cities providing a range of services to both the people and the wildlife living in urban areas. The use of urban green space, and especially increasing the use, has become a hot topic for many green space managers during the past few years as the assumed link between use of urban green space and sustainable urban development is becoming more visible. Up to this time, there is little systematic information about urban green space including natural water bodies in the City of Kazan, Russia, its use and the main factors that influence this use. As green spaces play a crucial role in supporting urban ecological and social systems, it is important to make investigations in the amount of provision, the distribution and characteristics of urban green space in the city. The main concern of this paper is to address the importance of urban nature for citizens’ well being and for the sustainability of the city they inhabit. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n24p356
Education Practice and Innovation | 2014
Lillie R. Albert; Rina Kim; Na Young Kwon
The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for understanding teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics (MKT) by examining a hierarchy of 317 South Korean elementary teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. Through a web-based survey, the teachers were asked to rank order their beliefs about and use of knowledge subdomains for teaching mathematics. Findings show that teachers’ beliefs about knowledge for teaching mathematics are divergent from current research trends. Also, their beliefs about the subdomains of knowledge for teaching mathematics were ranked differently in comparison to their actual use of the subdomains. Their hierarchy for MKT presents suggestions for the type of curriculum that might be offered to teachers to develop their knowledge at the pre-and in-service level.
Archive | 2015
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
This literature reviewed in this chapter is an examination of conceptual and empirical studies in the area of elementary teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics; it includes a discussion of the implications and implementations emerging from the review. The literature review is divided into four major sections: sociocultural theory, a history of research on teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics, studies about elementary teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics, and an interpretive summary and critical analysis. Taken together, these sections of literature provide a historical and theoretical context for this study.
Archive | 2015
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
This chapter summarizes the study, emphasizing the importance of the findings, and discusses how they contribute to existing research about elementary teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. It also includes conclusions drawn from the findings and their implications as well as recommendations for future research.
Archive | 2015
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
This chapter explores the notion that mathematics pedagogical content knowledge is a conjunctive form of knowledge that intersects mathematics curriculum knowledge, mathematics learner knowledge, and fundamental mathematics conceptual knowledge. We put forth the claim that the intersection of the knowledge categories is where mathematics pedagogical content knowledge is located. Then drawing on this claim, the proposition that mathematics pedagogical procedural knowledge designates how the teachers’ knowledge is related to common procedures the teachers might use in the development of mathematics pedagogical content knowledge is discussed. From the analysis of lesson plans, we presented several multilayer models that illustrated how mathematics pedagogical content knowledge along with mathematics pedagogical procedural knowledge influenced planning and teaching.
Archive | 2015
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
The first € price and the £ and
Archive | 2015
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
price are net prices, subject to local VAT. Prices indicated with * include VAT for books; the €(D) includes 7% for Germany, the €(A) includes 10% for Austria. Prices indicated with ** include VAT for electronic products; 19% for Germany, 20% for Austria. All prices exclusive of carriage charges. Prices and other details are subject to change without notice. All errors and omissions excepted. R. Kim, L.R. Albert Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Archive | 2015
Rina Kim; Lillie R. Albert
Mathematics learner knowledge (MLK) is related to teachers’ understanding of the characteristics of mathematics learners and how that knowledge is used in mathematics instruction. This study demonstrated that there are key subcategories of MLK based on the analyses of the lesson plans: students’ mathematical knowledge, students’ mathematical skills, and students’ mathematical attitude. Therefore, students represent mathematics learners who are learning mathematics in formal classroom settings according to the National Mathematics Curriculum. In addition, students’ mathematical knowledge represents students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics, while mathematical skills indicate both students’ procedural understanding and skills needed to solve mathematics problems. Students’ mathematical attitude involves students’ preference for and value of mathematics. These three key subcategories were useful to the teachers participating when developing lesson plans, teaching the lesson, and assessing student learning.