Lily Yan

Light-Induced Resetting of a Mammalian Circadian Clock Is Associated with Rapid Induction of the mPer1 Transcript

To understand how light might entrain a mammalian circadian clock, we examined the effects of light on mPer1, a sequence homolog of Drosophila per, that exhibits robust rhythmic expression in the SCN. mPer1 is rapidly induced by short duration exposure to light at levels sufficient to reset the clock, and dose-response curves reveal that mPer1 induction shows both reciprocity and a strong correlation with phase shifting of the overt rhythm. Thus, in both the phasing of dark expression and the response to light mPer1 is most similar to the Neurospora clock gene frq. Within the SCN there appears to be localization of the induction phenomenon, consistent with the localization of both light-sensitive and light-insensitive oscillators in this circadian center.

Per1 and Per2 gene expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: circadian profile and the compartment-specific response to light.

Expression profiles of rPer1 and rPer2 messenger RNAs, rat homologues of the Drosophila clock gene period, were examined in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus, a main locus of circadian oscillation, with special reference to the topographical compartmentation of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Quantitative in situ hybridization of rPer1 and rPer2 messenger RNAs showed a robust circadian rhythm in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, with a characteristic peak/trough profile in each gene: the peak of rPer1 messenger RNA was in the daytime and that of rPer2 messenger RNA was at the transition time of day to night in both light-dark and constant dark conditions. Light exposure at circadian time 16 increased both rPer1 and rPer2 messenger RNAs in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. In a detailed histological analysis, we found that light exposure at circadian time 16 induced the expression of rPer1 and rPer2 genes in neurons limited to the ventrolateral part of the suprachiasmatic nucleus, although the usual circadian rPer1 and rPer2 messenger RNA oscillation in light-dark and constant dark conditions occurred strongly in neurons in the dorsomedial part but weakly in neurons in the ventrolateral part of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. These rPer expression profiles indicate that the two major subpopulations of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus play different roles in the generation of circadian rhythm: a strong autonomous expression ability with no light response in dorsomedial neurons and a strong light responsiveness with a weak autonomous expression in ventrolateral neurons.

A light-independent oscillatory gene mPer3 in mouse SCN and OVLT.

A new member of the mammalian period gene family, mPer3, was isolated and its expression pattern characterized in the mouse brain. Like mPer1, mPer2 and Drosophila period, mPer3 has a dimerization PAS domain and a cytoplasmic localization domain. mPer3 transcripts showed a clear circadian rhythm in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Expression of mPer3 was not induced by exposure to light at any phase of the clock, distinguishing this gene from mPer1 and mPer2. Cycling expression of mPer3 was also found outside the SCN in the organum vasculosum lamina terminalis (OVLT), a potentially key region regulating rhythmic gonadotropin production and pyrogen‐induced febrile phenomena. Thus, mPer3 may contribute to pacemaker functions both inside and outside the SCN.

Differential induction and localization of mPer1 and mPer2 during advancing and delaying phase shifts

The mechanism whereby brief light exposure resets the mammalian circadian clock in a phase dependent manner is not known, but is thought to involve Per gene expression. At the behavioural level, a light pulse produces phase delays in early subjective night, phase advances in late subjective night, and no phase shifts in mid‐subjective night or subjective day. To understand the relationship between Per gene activity and behavioural phase shifts, we examined light‐induced mPer1 and mPer2 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the mouse, in the subjective night, with a view to understanding SCN heterogeneity. In the VIP‐containing region of the SCN (termed ‘core’), light‐induced mPer1 expression occurs at all times of the subjective night, while mPer2 induction is seen only in early subjective night. In the remaining regions of the SCN (termed ‘shell’), a phase delaying light pulse produces no mPer1 but significant mPer2 expression, while a phase advancing light pulse produces no mPer2 but substantial mPer1 induction. Moreover, following a light pulse during mid‐subjective night, neither mPer1 nor mPer2 are induced in the shell. The results reveal that behavioural phase shifts occur only when light‐induced Per gene expression spreads from the core to the shell SCN, with mPer1 expression in shell corresponding to phase advances, and mPer2 corresponding to phase delays. The results indicate that the time course and the localization of light‐induced Per gene expression in SCN reveals important aspects of intra‐SCN communication.

Role of DBP in the Circadian Oscillatory Mechanism

ABSTRACT Transcript levels of DBP, a member of the PAR leucine zipper transcription factor family, exhibit a robust rhythm in suprachiasmatic nuclei, the mammalian circadian center. Here we report that DBP is able to activate the promoter of a putative clock oscillating gene,mPer1, by directly binding to the mPer1promoter. The mPer1 promoter is cooperatively activated by DBP and CLOCK-BMAL1. On the other hand, dbp transcription is activated by CLOCK-BMAL1 through E-boxes and inhibited by the mPER and mCRY proteins, as is the case for mPer1. Thus, a clock-controlled dbp gene may play an important role in central clock oscillation.

Gradients in the circadian expression of Per1 and Per2 genes in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the mammalian circadian pacemaker, which consists of thousands of oscillator cells. It is believed that the circadian oscillation in each cell is generated by the transcription/(post)‐translation feedback loop of a set of clock genes. However, little is known about how these oscillator cells are organized to produce the robust circadian rhythms in the SCN. In the present study, we examined the expression of the clock genes Per1 and Per2 paying particular attention to the topographic compartmentalization of the SCN. In the rat SCN, the dorsomedial (SCNDM) and ventrolateral (SCNVL) compartments are clearly delineated by chemical characteristics of neurons and neuronal afferents. In the SCNDM, Per1 mRNA was initially expressed at the most dorsomedial region along the third ventricle (SCNDMPV, periventricular part of the dorsomedial compartment of the SCN) at CT0, and then spread laterally to the central dorsomedial region (SCNDMCe, central part of the dorsomedial compartment of the SCN), reaching peaks at subjective day and troughs at subjective night. In contrast, in the SCNVL, Per1 expression showed a weak, two‐peak pattern in one circadian cycle. Per2 expression was also robust in the SCN, showing very similar circadian profiles among these three subdivisions with a slightly earlier phase in SCNDMPV than that in SCNDMCe. We also investigated the Per1 and Per2 expression in response to a light exposure at early subjective night. The light pulse induced both Per1 and Per2 expression, which was restricted in the SCNVL neurons. The present findings suggest that the phase and amplitude of the circadian expression of clock genes are not uniform, and there are topographic neuron groups that have different properties in the SCN.

Phenotype Matters: Identification of Light-Responsive Cells in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is the neural locus of the circadian clock. To explore the organization of the SCN, two strains of transgenic mice, each bearing a jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter, were used. In one, GFP was driven by the promoter region of the mouse Period1 gene (mPer1) (Per1::GFP mouse), whereas in the other, GFP was inserted in the promoter region of calbindin-D28K-bacterial artificial chromosome (CalB::GFP mouse). In the latter mouse, GFP-containing SCN cells are immunopositive for gastrin-releasing peptide. In both mouse lines, light-induced Per1 mRNA and Fos are localized to the SCN subregion containing gastrin-releasing peptide. Double-label immunohistochemistry reveals that most gastrin-releasing peptide cells (∼70%) contain Fos after a brief light pulse. To determine the properties of SCN cells in this light-responsive region, we examined the expression of rhythmic Period genes and proteins. Gastrin-releasing peptide-containing cells do not express detectable rhythms in these key components of the molecular circadian clock. The results support the view that the mammalian SCN is composed of functionally distinct cell groups, of which some are light induced and others are rhythmic with respect to clock gene expression. Furthermore, the findings suggest that gastrin-releasing peptide is a potential mediator of intercellular communication between light-induced and oscillator cells within the SCN.

Resetting the brain clock: time course and localization of mPER1 and mPER2 protein expression in suprachiasmatic nuclei during phase shifts.

The mechanism whereby brief light pulses reset the mammalian circadian clock involves acute Per gene induction. In a previous study we investigated light‐induced expression of mPer1 and mPer2 mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), with the aim of understanding the relationship between gene expression and behavioural phase shifts. In the present study, we examine the protein products of mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the core and shell region of SCN for 34 h following a phase‐shifting light pulse, in order to further explore the molecular mechanism of photic entrainment. The results indicate that, during the delay zone of the phase response curve, while endogenous levels of mPER1 and mPER2 protein are falling, a light pulse produces an increase in the expression of both proteins. In contrast, during the advance zone of the phase response curve, while levels of endogenous mPER1 and mPER2 proteins are rising, a light pulse results in a further increase in mPER1 but not mPER2 protein. The regional distribution of mPER1 and mPER2 protein in the SCN follows the same pattern as their respective mRNAs, with mPER1 expression in the shell region of SCN correlated with phase advances and mPER2 in the shell region correlated with phase delays.

Phase-dependent responses of Per1 and Per2 genes to a light-stimulus in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the rat.

Single brief and discrete light treatments are sufficient to reset the overt mammalian rhythms of nocturnal rodents. In the present study, we examined the phase-dependent response of the mammalian clock genes, Per1 and Per2, to a brief strong light-stimulus (1000 lux) in the circadian oscillator center, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of rats. Light-induced elevation of Per1 mRNA was observed through the subjective night (CT16, CT20 and CT0 (=CT24)) with a marked peak at the subjective dawn (CT0). However, the light influence was very limited for the induction of Per2; only weak elevation of Per2 mRNA was detected at CT16. The effect of light-stimulus on the Per1 gene was transient, and the effect was restricted to ventrolateral SCN neurons in both CT0 and CT16 after light exposure. Since it is known that these rats show a light-induced behavioral phase-shift throughout the subjective night with being strongest at subjective dawn, the present results suggest that the transient induction of Per1 in ventrolateral SCN neurons is a critical step in the resetting of the biological clock to environmental light-dark schedule.

Two Antiphase Oscillations Occur in Each Suprachiasmatic Nucleus of Behaviorally Split Hamsters

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCNs) control circadian rhythms of numerous behavioral and physiological responses. In hamsters, constant light causes “splitting” of circadian rhythms, such that a single daily bout of activity separates into two components, 12 h apart, with antiphase circadian oscillations in the left and right SCN. Given the phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of the SCN, in which ventrolateral but not dorsomedial neurons are retinorecipient, we asked how these two compartments respond to the constant lighting conditions that produce splitting, using three different phase markers of neuronal activity: PER1 (Period 1), c-FOS, and pERK (phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase). We report the emergence of a coherent novel network in which each side of the SCN exhibits two antiphase oscillating subregions, here termed “core-like” and “shell-like,” in addition to the known antiphase oscillation between the right and left SCN. The novel SCN response entails a coherent rhythm in a core-like region of the SCN, which otherwise is not cycling. A mathematical model is presented, and this model interprets the observed changes in the proportion of in-phase and antiphase populations of SCN oscillators and suggests novel testable hypotheses. Finally, the functional significance of this network was explored by investigating the adjacent hypothalamus. Activation of the paraventricular nucleus is in-phase with the ipsilateral core-like SCN, whereas activation of the lateral subparaventricular zone is in-phase with the ipsilateral shell-like SCN, pointing to a multiplicity of SCN output signals. These results suggest a neural basis for internal coincidence of SCN oscillators, and a novel mechanism of plasticity in SCN neural networks and outputs.