Lina Engelen

Oral physiology and mastication.

Mastication is a sensory-motor activity aimed at the preparation of food for swallowing. It is a complex process involving activities of the facial, the elevator and suprahyoidal muscles, and the tongue. These activities result in patterns of rhythmic mandibular movements, food manipulation and the crushing of food between the teeth. Saliva facilitates mastication, moistens the food particles, makes a bolus, and assists swallowing. The movement of the jaw, and thus the neuromuscular control of chewing, plays an important role in the comminution of the food. Characteristics of the food, e.g. water and fat percentage and hardness, are known to influence the masticatory process. Food hardness is sensed during mastication and affects masticatory force, jaw muscle activity, and mandibular jaw movements. When we chew for instance a crispy food, the jaw decelerates and accelerates as a result of resistance and breakage of food particles. The characteristic breakage behaviour of food is essential for the sensory sensation. This study presents a short review of the influence of oral physiology characteristics and food characteristics on the masticatory process.

The role of intra-oral manipulation in the perception of sensory attributes.

To gain insight into the effect of oral processes on perception, we defined a set of five specific oral manipulations and investigated their effects on the perception of low and high fat versions of two semi-solid foodstuffs, vanilla custard desserts and mayonnaises. Behavior modifications ranged from simply placing the stimulus on the tip of the tongue to vigorously moving it around in the mouth. Sensory ratings for mouth-feel and flavor attributes were made 5s after placing the stimulus in the mouth, and after-feel attributes were rated immediately after swallowing. Most attributes showed a similar pattern, with lowest attribute ratings where the tongues movement was restricted and gradually increasing ratings with increasing complexity of the tongue movements. An individuals normal oral processing behavior typically resulted in the most intense sensations of flavor and mouth-feel. Residence time for all mouth-feel attributes, except prickling, was determined by the time required for tongue movements. The exact tongue movements required for sensations appeared to be related to food groups and individual foods, rather than to specific mouth-feel attributes.

The relation between saliva flow after different stimulations and the perception of flavor and texture attributes in custard desserts

Salivary flow rates were measured at rest and after three types of stimulation; odor, Parafilm chewing, and citric acid. The highest flow rate was elicited by citric acid followed by Parafilm and odor, while the lowest flow rate was unstimulated. In order to investigate whether and how the amount of saliva a subject produces influences the sensory ratings, the four types of salivary flow rates were correlated with sensory ratings of three different types of vanilla custard dessert. No significant correlation could be found between any of the salivary flow rates and the sensory ratings. A subject with a larger saliva flow rate during eating did not rate the foods differently from a subject with less saliva flow. The same pattern was seen for all types of stimulation. This finding could indicate that subjects are used to their respective amounts of saliva to such a degree that the differences in sensory ratings between subjects cannot be explained by the interindividual difference in saliva flow rate.

Relating particles and texture perception.

Practically all foods contain particles. It has been suggested that the presence of particles in food may affect the perception of sensory attributes. In the present study we investigated the effect of size and type (hardness and shape) of particles added to a CMC based vanilla custard dessert. The two types of particles included in the study were silica dioxide and polystyrene spheres, varying in size from 2 to 230 microm. Eighteen trained adults participated in the study. They rated the sensation of 17 sensory flavour and texture attributes on a 100-point visual analogue scale (VAS). The results indicate that the addition of particles increased the sensation of roughness attributes and decreased the ratings of a number of presumably favorable texture attributes (smoothness, creamy, fatty and slippery) significantly. These effects increased with increasing particle size up to 80 microm. Roughness ratings deceased for larger particles sizes. Surprisingly, even particles of 2 microm had significant effects: they increased perceived rough lip-tooth feel, and decreased slippery lip-tooth feel and smoothness of the product. The affected attributes had previously been related to lubricative properties of foods. Particles added to semi-solid foods with relatively low levels of fat seem to counteract the lubricating effects of the fat resulting in increased oral friction. In a separate study on size perception the silica dioxide particles were used. By sampling the stimuli between the tongue and palate, subjects rated the size of the particles on a 100-point scale in comparison to anchor stimuli containing no particles and particles of 250 microm. The perceived particle size significantly increased for larger particles. Furthermore, perceived particle size was negatively correlated with roughness ratings. Thus, subjects who were sensitive and perceived the particles as being relatively large reported the same stimuli to have less rough after-feel. In conclusion, particles added to a product induce large effects on texture sensations, and texture sensation is related to individual size perception.

Relationship between Oral Sensitivity and Masticatory Performance

The size of a bolus determines how it will be manipulated in the mouth and swallowed. We hypothesized that mucosal sensitivity would be important for masticatory function. The accuracy of solid object size perception, spatial acuity, and food particle size reduction during mastication were measured in 22 healthy adults with/without topical anesthesia of their oral mucosa. Topical anesthesia had no effect on the perception of sphere sizes, but significantly reduced spatial sensitivity. Without anesthesia, there was a correlation between an individual’s ability to perceive the sizes of steel spheres (diameter, 4–9 mm) and the sizes of food particles chewed for 15 cycles and at swallowing. There was no correlation between spatial sensitivity and food particle size. We suggest that the stimuli used to test two-point discrimination stimulates only superficial receptors, which involve light touch and are easily anesthetized, while the spheres might excite more deeply-set receptors. The latter appear to be more important for masticatory performance and swallowing.

The effect of oral and product temperature on the perception of flavor and texture attributes of semi-solids

This study examined the effect of oral and product temperature on the perception of texture and flavor attributes. A trained panel assessed 21 texture and flavor attributes in one high-fat and one low-fat product of two semi-solids: custard dessert and mayonnaise. The products were evaluated at 10, 22 or 35 degrees C in combination with oral temperatures of 27, 35 and 43 degrees C. Results showed that modulation of product and oral temperature had significant effects on a number of attributes. Flavor intensities, melting mouth feel, and fat after feel increased, while subjective thickness decreased with increasing product temperature. Neither product- nor oral temperature had an effect on over-all creaminess. Oral temperature affected a number of mouth feel attributes: melting, heterogeneous and smooth. Furthermore, large differences existed in ratings between the high- and low-fat products of custard and mayonnaise, and they were more prominent in mayonnaise. We conclude that the effect of oral temperature on the perception of sensory attributes in semi-solids was small, but present, while the product temperatures influenced the ratings greatly.

The influence of density and material on oral perception of ball size with and without palatal coverage

The size of a bolus determines how it will be manipulated in the mouth and swallowed. Ten healthy individuals assessed the size of ball bearings of five sizes (4-11 mm diameter) and four materials with different densities in order to investigate the effect of weight on oral size perception. To study the role of the tongue and palate, the experiment was performed with and without a custom-made plastic palate. The results revealed that size itself determines size perception, and that material and weight are negligible factors. An illusional effect in the direction of under-estimation was found for the ball bearings, especially for the small sizes up to 8 mm diameter. While wearing a plastic palate a significant improvement (P<0.05) occurred; the participants performed better and there was less under-estimation. An explanation for this could be that only a minor part of the total area of the ball bearing touches the palate and is hence detected, while the tongue alone is more compliant and thereby able to sense the balls whole size.

Mastication and swallowing: influence of fluid addition to foods

Introduction: The production of sufficient saliva is indispensable for good chewing. Recent research has demonstrated that salivary flow rate has little influence on the swallowing threshold. Objectives: The hypothesis examined in the present study was that adding fluids to foods will influence chewing physiology. Materials and Methods: Twenty subjects chewed on melba toast, cake, carrot, peanut and Gouda cheese. They also chewed on these foods after addition of different volumes of water or α-amylase solution. Jaw muscle activity, number of chewing cycles until swallowing and chewing cycle duration were measured. Repeated measures analysis of variance was applied to test the null hypothesis that there would be no statistically significant difference among the results obtained for the various food types and fluids. Subsequently, contrasts were determined to study the levels of intra-subjects factors (food type and fluid volume). Linear regression was used to determine the changes in muscle activity and cycle duration as a function of the chewing cycles. Results: Fluid addition significantly decreased muscle activity and swallowing threshold for melba, cake and peanut (p<0.05). The effect of α-amylase in the solutions was similar to that of water (p>0.05). Doubling the volume of tap water had a greater effect. Conclusions: Fluid addition facilitated chewing of dry foods (melba, cake), but did not influence the chewing of fatty (cheese) and wet products (carrot). This study is relevant to improve patients’ life quality and the management of chewing and feeding disorders caused by hyposalivation.