Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Linda D. Cooley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Linda D. Cooley.


Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2007

Clear Cell Sarcoma of Tendons and Aponeuroses A Review

Daniel Dim; Linda D. Cooley; Roberto N. Miranda

Clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses, also referred to as malignant melanoma of soft parts, is a rare malignancy derived from neural crest cells. It usually presents in the distal lower extremities of young adults, frequently attached to tendons or aponeuroses. It behaves like a high-grade soft tissue sarcoma and is associated with poor overall survival. Magnetic resonance imaging studies of the lesion reveal T1 hypointensity, T2 hyperintensity, and gadolinium uptake. Grossly, the tumor is usually circumscribed with a histologic pattern of uniform polygonal to fusiform cells with clear to pale eosinophilic cytoplasm divided into variably sized clusters by fibrous septa. Immunohistochemical studies in most cases show that the neoplastic cells are positive with HMB-45 and react with antibody against S100 protein. Most cases show a reciprocal cytogenetic translocation t(12;22)(q13;q12) that creates a unique chimeric fusion EWSR1/ATF1 gene transcript. Metastasis occurs mainly to regional lymph nodes and lungs. Poor prognostic indicators include a tumor size equal to or more than 5 cm, presence of metastasis, and necrosis. The mainstay of treatment is wide excision of the tumor. The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy may become an important procedure in detecting occult regional metastasis and guiding the extent of surgery. The beneficial effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy have not been fully evaluated. This article provides a short overview of the current knowledge of clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses.


Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer | 2007

Specific extra chromosomes occur in a modal number dependent pattern in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Nyla A. Heerema; Susana C. Raimondi; James R. Anderson; Jaclyn A. Biegel; Bruce M. Camitta; Linda D. Cooley; Paul S. Gaynon; Betsy Hirsch; R. Ellen Magenis; Loris McGavran; Shivanand R. Patil; Hark J. Pettenati; Jeanette Pullen; Kathleen W. Rao; Diane Roulston; Nancy R. Schneider; Jonathan J. Shuster; Warren G. Sanger; Maxine J. Sutcliffe; Peter Van Tuinen; Michael S. Watson; Andrew J. Carroll

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and high hyperdiploidy (>50 chromosomes) are considered to have a relatively good prognosis. The specific extra chromosomes are not random; extra copies of some chromosomes occur more frequently than those of others. We examined the extra chromosomes present in high hyperdiploid ALL to determine if there were a relation of the specific extra chromosomes and modal number (MN) and if the extra chromosomes present could differentiate high hyperdiploid from near‐triploid and near‐tetraploid cases. Karyotypes of 2,339 children with ALL and high hyperdiploidy at diagnosis showed a distinct nonrandom sequential pattern of gain for each chromosome as MN increased, with four groups of gain: chromosomes 21, X, 14, 6, 18, 4, 17, and 10 at MN 51–54; chromosomes 8, 5, 11, and 12 at MN 57–60; chromosomes 2, 3, 9,16, and 22 at MN 63–67; chromosomes 1, 7 13, 15, 19, and 20 at MN 68–79, and Y only at MN ≥≥80. Chromosomes gained at lower MN were retained as the MN increased. High hyperdiploid pediatric ALL results from a single abnormal mitotic division. Our results suggest that the abnormal mitosis involves specific chromosomes dependent on the number of chromosomes aberrantly distributed, raising provocative questions regarding the mitotic mechanism. The patterns of frequencies of tetrasomy of specific chromosomes differs from that of trisomies with the exception of chromosome 21, which is tetrasomic in a high frequency of cases at all MN. These results are consistent with different origins of high hyperdiploidy, near‐trisomy, and near‐tetrasomy.


Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2009

Refining the 22q11.2 deletion breakpoints in DiGeorge syndrome by aCGH

Douglas C. Bittel; Shihui Yu; H. Newkirk; Nataliya Kibiryeva; A. Holt; Merlin G. Butler; Linda D. Cooley

Hemizygous deletions of the chromosome 22q11.2 region result in the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome also referred to as DiGeorge, Velocardiofacial or Shprintzen syndromes. The phenotype is variable but commonly includes conotruncal cardiac defects, palatal abnormalities, learning and behavioral problems, immune deficiency, and facial anomalies. Four distinct highly homologous blocks of low copy number repeat sequences (LCRs) flank the deletion region. Mispairing of LCRs during meiosis with unequal meiotic exchange is assumed to cause the recurrent and consistent deletions. The proximal LCR is reportedly located at 22q11.2 from 17.037 to 17.083 Mb while the distal LCR is located from 19.835 to 19.880 Mb. Although the chromosome breakpoints are thought to localize to the LCRs, the positions of the breakpoints have been investigated in only a few individuals. Therefore, we used high resolution oligonucleotide-based 244K microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to resolve the breakpoints in a cohort of 20 subjects with known 22q11.2 deletions. We also investigated copy number variation (CNV) in the rest of the genome. The 22q11.2 breaks occurred on either side of the LCR in our subjects, although more commonly on the distal side of the reported proximal LCR. The proximal breakpoints in our subjects spanned the region from 17.036 to 17.398 Mb. This region includes the genes DGCR6 (DiGeorge syndrome critical region protein 6) and PRODH (proline dehydrogenase 1), along with three open reading frames that may encode proteins of unknown function. The distal breakpoints spanned the region from 19.788 to 20.122 Mb. This region includes the genes GGT2 (gamma-glutamyltransferase-like protein 2), HIC2 (hypermethylated in cancer 2), and multiple transcripts of unknown function. The genes in these two breakpoint regions are variably hemizygous depending on the location of the breakpoints. Our 20 subjects had 254 CNVs throughout the genome, 94 duplications and 160 deletions, ranging in size from 1 kb to 2.4 Mb. The presence or absence of genes at the breakpoints depending on the size of the deletion plus variation in the rest of the genome due to CNVs likely contribute to the variable phenotype associated with the 22q11.2 deletion or DiGeorge syndrome.


American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2009

Validation of the Agilent 244K Oligonucleotide Array–Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Platform for Clinical Cytogenetic Diagnosis

Shihui Yu; Douglas C. Bittel; Nataliya Kibiryeva; David L. Zwick; Linda D. Cooley

High-resolution microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is being adopted for diagnostic evaluation of genomic disorders, but validation for clinical diagnosis has not yet been reported. We present validation data for the Agilent Human Genome Microarray Kit 244K for clinical application. The platform contains approximately 240,000 distinct 60-mer oligonucleotide probes spanning the entire human genome. We studied 45 previously characterized samples (43 abnormal, 2 normal), 32 with knowledge of prior results and 13 in a blinded manner with 11 performed in a reference laboratory providing microarray testing. Array analysis confirmed known aberrations in 43 samples and a normal result in 2. The array analysis corrected 1 karyotype and clarified 2 additional cases. Array data from 6 patients with 22q11.2 deletion found an average of 2.56 megabases (Mb; range, 2.49-2.62 Mb) with a common 2.43-Mb deleted region. Approximately 7 copy number variants from 400 base pairs to 1.6 Mb were identified per sample. Results demonstrate the usefulness of the aCGH-244K platform as a powerful diagnostic tool.


Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2006

HER-2 fluorescence in situ hybridization: results from the survey program of the College of American Pathologists.

Diane L. Persons; Raymond R. Tubbs; Linda D. Cooley; Gordon W. Dewald; Patricia K. Dowling; Emma Du; James T. Mascarello; Kathleen W. Rao; Kathleen S. Wilson; Daynna J. Wolff; Gail Habegger-Vance

CONTEXT Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a common method used to determine HER-2 status in breast cancer. Limited information is available concerning reproducibility of FISH in determining HER-2 gene amplification. OBJECTIVE To present proficiency testing results of FISH for HER-2 conducted by the Cytogenetics Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics. DESIGN During the past 5 years, unstained sections from 9 invasive breast carcinomas were used for HER-2 FISH proficiency testing, allowing for comparison of FISH results among a large number of laboratories. Additional data were collected using an educational (ungraded) challenge and supplemental questions in the surveys. RESULTS The number of laboratories participating in HER-2 FISH proficiency testing has increased steadily during the past 5 years (from 35 in 2000 to 139 in 2004). Reproducibility of test results among laboratories was excellent for breast tumors with low copy number (no HER-2 amplification) and for breast tumors with high copy number (HER-2 amplification). However, there was considerable variation in interpretation of results for a tumor with low-level HER-2 amplification that was tested on 2 separate occasions. Responses to supplemental questions indicated that there was a need for consensus on the use of a separate equivocal/borderline interpretative category and the need for standardization of cutoff values used to define interpretative categories. CONCLUSIONS The College of American Pathologists proficiency survey programs provide useful information concerning the reproducibility of clinical testing for HER-2 by FISH and reflect clinical interpretation of HER-2 FISH analyses from laboratories across the country.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2011

Higher dose imatinib for children with de novo chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia: A report from the Children's Oncology Group†‡

Martin A. Champagne; Cecilia Fu; Myron Chang; Helen Chen; Robert B. Gerbing; Todd A. Alonzo; Linda D. Cooley; Nyla A. Heerema; Vivian G. Oehler; Charlotte Wood; Mary Ellen French; Robert J. Arceci; Franklin O. Smith; Mark Bernstein

To determine the efficacy of imatinib in children with newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).


Nature Genetics | 2015

MMP21 is mutated in human heterotaxy and is required for normal left-right asymmetry in vertebrates

Anne Guimier; George C. Gabriel; Fanny Bajolle; Michael Tsang; Hui Liu; Aaron Noll; Molly Schwartz; Rajae El Malti; Laurie Smith; Nikolai T. Klena; Gina Jimenez; Neil A. Miller; Myriam Oufadem; Anne Moreau de Bellaing; Hisato Yagi; Carol J. Saunders; Candice N. Baker; Sylvie Di Filippo; Kevin A. Peterson; Isabelle Thiffault; Christine Bole-Feysot; Linda D. Cooley; Emily Farrow; Cécile Masson; Patric Schoen; Jean-François Deleuze; Patrick Nitschké; Stanislas Lyonnet; Loïc de Pontual; Stephen A. Murray

Heterotaxy results from a failure to establish normal left-right asymmetry early in embryonic development. By whole-exome sequencing, whole-genome sequencing and high-throughput cohort resequencing, we identified recessive mutations in MMP21 (encoding matrix metallopeptidase 21) in nine index cases with heterotaxy. In addition, Mmp21-mutant mice and mmp21-morphant zebrafish displayed heterotaxy and abnormal cardiac looping, respectively, suggesting a new role for extracellular matrix remodeling in the establishment of laterality in vertebrates.


Genetics in Medicine | 2013

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics technical standards and guidelines: microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in neoplastic disorders

Linda D. Cooley; Matthew S. Lebo; Marilyn Li; Marilyn L. Slovak; Daynna J. Wolff

Microarray methodologies, to include array comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism–based arrays, are innovative methods that provide genomic data. These data should be correlated with the results from the standard methods, chromosome and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization, to ascertain and characterize the genomic aberrations of neoplastic disorders, both liquid and solid tumors. Over the past several decades, standard methods have led to an accumulation of genetic information specific to many neoplasms. This specificity is now used for the diagnosis and classification of neoplasms. Cooperative studies have revealed numerous correlations between particular genetic aberrations and therapeutic outcomes. Molecular investigation of chromosomal abnormalities identified by standard methods has led to discovery of genes, and gene function and dysfunction. This knowledge has led to improved therapeutics and, in some disorders, targeted therapies. Data gained from the higher-resolution microarray methodologies will enhance our knowledge of the genomics of specific disorders, leading to more effective therapeutic strategies. To assist clinical laboratories in validation of the methods, their consistent use, and interpretation and reporting of results from these microarray methodologies, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has developed the following professional standard and guidelines.Genet Med 2013:15(6):484–494


Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2006

Cytogenetic heteromorphisms: Survey results and reporting practices of Giemsa-band regions that we have pondered for years

Arthur R. Brothman; Nancy R. Schneider; Irene A. Saikevych; Linda D. Cooley; Merlin G. Butler; Shivanand R. Patil; James T. Mascarello; Kathleen W. Rao; Gordon W. Dewald; Jonathan P. Park; Diane L. Persons; Daynna J. Wolff; Gail H. Vance

CONTEXT Cytogenetic heteromorphisms (normal variants) pose diagnostic dilemmas. Common Giemsa-band heteromorphisms are not described in the literature, although Giemsa-banding is the method most frequently used in cytogenetic laboratories. OBJECTIVE To summarize the responses from more than 200 cytogeneticists concerning the definition and reporting of cytogenetic heteromorphisms, to offer these responses as a reference for use in clinical interpretations, and to provide guidance for interpretation of newly defined molecular cytogenetic heteromorphisms. DESIGN The Cytogenetics Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists and the American College of Medical Genetics administered a proficiency testing survey in 1997 to 226 participant cytogenetic laboratories. Supplemental questions asked whether participants considered particular Giemsa-banded chromosomal features to be heteromorphisms and if these would be described in a cytogenetic clinical report. RESULTS Responses were obtained from 99% of participants; 61% stated they would include selected heteromorphism data in a clinical report. More than 90% considered prominent short arms, large or double satellites, or increased stalk length on acrocentric chromosomes to be heteromorphisms; 24% to 36% stated that they would include these in a clinical report. Heterochromatic regions on chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y were considered heteromorphisms by 97% of participants, and 24% indicated they would report these findings. Pericentric inversions of chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 16, and Y were considered heteromorphisms with more than 75% of respondents indicating they would report these findings. CONCLUSIONS Responses were not unanimous, but a clear consensus is presented describing which Giemsa-band regions were considered heteromorphisms and which would be reported.


Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers | 2009

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Verification of Genomic Imbalances Detected by Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Shihui Yu; Matthew Kielt; Andrew L. Stegner; Nataliya Kibiryeva; Douglas C. Bittel; Linda D. Cooley

The American College of Medical Genetics guidelines for microarray analysis for constitutional cytogenetic abnormalities require abnormal or ambiguous results from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis be confirmed by an alternative method. We employed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) technology using SYBR Green I reagents for confirmation of 93 abnormal aCGH results (50 deletions and 43 duplications) and 54 parental samples. A novel qPCR protocol using DNA sequences coding for X-linked lethal diseases in males for designing reference primers was established. Of the 81 sets of test primers used for confirmation of 93 abnormal copy number variants (CNVs) in 80 patients, 71 sets worked after the initial primer design (88%), 9 sets were redesigned once, and 1 set twice because of poor amplification. Fifty-four parental samples were tested using 33 sets of test primers to follow up 34 CNVs in 30 patients. Nineteen CNVs were confirmed as inherited, 13 were negative in both parents, and 2 were inconclusive due to a negative result in a single parent. The qPCR assessment clarified aCGH results in two cases and corrected a fluorescence in situ hybridization result in one case. Our data illustrate that qPCR methodology using SYBR Green I reagents is accurate, highly sensitive, specific, rapid, and cost-effective for verification of chromosomal imbalances detected by aCGH in the clinical setting.

Collaboration


Dive into the Linda D. Cooley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen W. Rao

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daynna J. Wolff

Medical University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lei Zhang

Children's Mercy Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Betsy Hirsch

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas C. Bittel

University of Missouri–Kansas City

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elena Repnikova

University of Missouri–Kansas City

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge