Linda F. Dawson

Activation of Cutaneous Immune Responses in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

UNLABELLED The pathogenesis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is unresolved, but tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are elevated in experimental skin blister fluid from CRPS-affected limbs, as is tryptase, a marker for mast cells. In the rat fracture model of CRPS, exaggerated sensory and sympathetic neural signaling stimulate keratinocyte and mast cell proliferation, causing the local production of high levels of inflammatory cytokines leading to pain behavior. The current investigation used CRPS patient skin biopsies to determine whether keratinocyte and mast cell proliferation occur in CRPS skin and to identify the cellular source of the up-regulated TNF-α, IL-6, and tryptase observed in CRPS experimental skin blister fluid. Skin biopsies were collected from the affected skin and the contralateral mirror site in 55 CRPS patients and the biopsy sections were immunostained for keratinocyte, cell proliferation, mast cell markers, TNF-α, and IL-6. In early CRPS, keratinocytes were activated in the affected skin, resulting in proliferation, epidermal thickening, and up-regulated TNF-α and IL-6 expression. In chronic CRPS, there was reduced keratinocyte proliferation, leading to epidermal thinning in the affected skin. Acute CRPS patients also had increased mast cell accumulation in the affected skin, but there was no increase in mast cell numbers in chronic CRPS. PERSPECTIVE The results of this study support the hypotheses that CRPS involves activation of the innate immune system, with keratinocyte and mast cell activation and proliferation, inflammatory mediator release, and pain.

Systemic Decreases in Cutaneous Innervation after Burn Injury

Innervation of the skin is important in order to maintain functional sensation and enable appropriate response to environmental stimuli. Injury to the skin may involve peripheral nerve damage. Previous studies have shown an initial loss of nerve fibers followed by an increase above normal fiber density, which is followed by apoptosis and ultimately reduced innervation and sensory function in scar tissue (Hermanson et al., 1987; Stella et al., Supp.(767) 1994; Altun et al., 2001; Ward et al., 2004; Nedelec et al., 2005). Although some studies have found an association between reduced nerve density and sensation (Stella et al., 1994; Ward et al., 2004), other studies have not (Griffin et al., 2001; Nedelec et al., 2005). The contradictory nature of these findings is at least in part due to small sample numbers, incomplete functional and anatomical assessment, and the variable timeframes between injury and analysis. Herein, to better understand the changes in cutaneous innervation and sensory function, we have analyzed neuroanatomy in a rat model of burn injury, and assessed neuroanatomy in patients with unilateral burn injuries at least 18 months post-injury, which is commonly defined as the end point for scar maturity (Nedelec et al., 2005). All animal experiments were approved by the institutional animal ethics committee and were performed in accordance with the NHMRC Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. The human study was carried out in accordance with the regulations outlined in the national statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans issued by the NHMRC and was approved by the Royal Perth Hospital ethics committee.

Expression of α1-adrenoceptors on peripheral nociceptive neurons

The purpose of this study was to determine whether α(1)-adrenoceptors are expressed on primary nociceptive afferents that innervate healthy skin. Skin and dorsal root ganglia were collected from adult male Wistar rats and assessed using fluorescence immunohistochemistry with antibodies directed against α(1)-adrenoceptors alone or in combination with specific labels including myelin basic protein and neurofilament 200 (markers of myelinated nerve fibres), protein gene product 9.5 (a pan-neuronal marker), tyrosine hydroxylase (sympathetic neurons), isolectin B(4) (IB(4): non-peptidergic sensory neurons), calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1) (peptidergic sensory neurons). Double labelling in dorsal root ganglia confirmed the expression of α(1)-adrenoceptors within sub-populations of CGRP, IB(4) and TRPV1 immunoreactive neurons. Myelinated and unmyelinated sensory nerve fibres in the skin expressed α(1)-adrenoceptors whereas sympathetic nerve fibres did not. The expression of α(1)-adrenoceptors on C- and A-delta nociceptive afferent fibres provides a histochemical substrate for direct excitation of these fibres by adrenergic agonists. This may help to explain the mechanism of sensory-sympathetic coupling that sometimes develops on surviving primary nociceptive afferents in neuropathic pain states.

Changes in cutaneous innervation in patients with chronic pain after burns

BACKGROUND Chronic pain is a common occurrence for burn patients and has significant impact on quality of life. However, the etiology is not well understood. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the restoration of sensory function and the development of chronic pain after burn is critical to improving long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine whether cutaneous innervation in burn patients with chronic pain is altered when compared to patients without chronic pain. METHODS Twelve patients with unilateral injury and who reported chronic pain were recruited. Each patient underwent sensory function testing and both scar and matched site uninjured skin biopsy. Biopsies were analyzed for total nerve density and nociceptive C-fiber density using immunohistochemistry. Results were compared to a control group of 33 patients with unilateral injury and no reported long-term pain. RESULTS Sensory function was significantly diminished in scar compared to uninjured tissue in both study groups, but chronic pain patients did not have significantly diminished function when compared to control. Total nerve density was not significantly different between scar and uninjured sites in either group, or between groups. However, the density of nociceptive nerve fibers was significantly elevated in both uninjured (p=0.0193) and scar sites (p=0.0316) of the patients with chronic pain when compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS This data suggests that differences in cutaneous innervation may contribute to chronic pain after burn. There also appears to be a systemic difference in cutaneous innervation extending to distal uninjured sites. Therefore efforts to affect cutaneous reinnervation after burn may lead to less patients experiencing chronic pain.

Increased Expression of Cutaneous α1-Adrenoceptors After Chronic Constriction Injury in Rats

UNLABELLED α1-Adrenoceptor expression on nociceptors may play an important role in sympathetic-sensory coupling in certain neuropathic pain syndromes. The aim of this study was to determine whether α1-adrenoceptor expression was upregulated on surviving peptidergic, nonpeptidergic, and myelinated nerve fiber populations in the skin after chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve in rats. Seven days after surgery, α1-adrenoceptor expression was upregulated in the epidermis and on dermal nerve fibers in plantar skin ipsilateral to the injury but not around blood vessels. This α1-adrenoceptor upregulation in the plantar skin was observed on all nerve fiber populations examined. However, α1-adrenoceptor expression was unaltered in the dorsal hind paw skin after the injury. The increased expression of α1-adrenoceptors on cutaneous nociceptors in plantar skin after chronic constriction injury suggests that this may be a site of sensory-sympathetic coupling that increases sensitivity to adrenergic agonists after nerve injury. In addition, activation of upregulated α1-adrenoceptors in the epidermis might cause release of factors that stimulate nociceptive signaling. PERSPECTIVE Our findings indicate that peripheral nerve injury provokes upregulation of α1-adrenoceptors on surviving nociceptive afferents and epidermal cells in the skin. This might contribute to sympathetically maintained pain in conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome, painful diabetic neuropathy, and postherpetic neuralgia.

Upregulation of α1-adrenoceptors on cutaneous nerve fibres after partial sciatic nerve ligation and in complex regional pain syndrome type II.

Summary This paper provides immunohistochemical evidence for heightened expression of &agr;1‐adrenoceptors on nociceptive afferent fibres after peripheral nerve injury and in complex regional pain syndrome. ABSTRACT After peripheral nerve injury, nociceptive afferents acquire an abnormal excitability to adrenergic agents, possibly due to an enhanced expression of &agr;1‐adrenoceptors (&agr;1‐ARs) on these nerve fibres. To investigate this in the present study, changes in &agr;1‐AR expression on nerve fibres in the skin and sciatic nerve trunk were assessed using immunohistochemistry in an animal model of neuropathic pain involving partial ligation of the sciatic nerve. In addition, &agr;1‐AR expression on nerve fibres was examined in painful and unaffected skin of patients who developed complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) after a peripheral nerve injury (CRPS type II). Four days after partial ligation of the sciatic nerve, &agr;1‐AR expression was greater on dermal nerve fibres that survived the injury than on dermal nerve fibres after sham surgery. This heightened &agr;1‐AR expression was observed on nonpeptidergic nociceptive afferents in the injured sciatic nerve, dermal nerve bundles, and the papillary dermis. Heightened expression of &agr;1‐AR in dermal nerve bundles after peripheral nerve injury also colocalized with neurofilament 200, a marker of myelinated nerve fibres. In each patient examined, &agr;1‐AR expression was greater on nerve fibres in skin affected by CRPS than in unaffected skin from the same patient or from pain‐free controls. Together, these findings provide compelling evidence for an upregulation of &agr;1‐ARs on cutaneous nociceptive afferents after peripheral nerve injury. Activation of these receptors by circulating or locally secreted catecholamines might contribute to chronic pain in CRPS type II.

A Preliminary investigation of the reinnervation and return of sensory function in burn patients treated with INTEGRA

BACKGROUND Loss of sensory function in scar after burn is common, although the basis for this loss is not clear. Additionally, little is known about the effects of different treatment modalities on sensory function and neuroanatomical outcomes in burn patients. Here, we investigated the effects of the use of the INTEGRA(®) dermal scaffold on neuroanatomy and sensory function in acute burn patients. HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that the use of artificial dermal templates would inhibit or reduce reinnervation after excision, since regrowth of nerves requires complex molecular interactions. Therefore the primary objective of this study was to identify whether there is regrowth of nerve fibres in the INTEGRA(®) dermal scaffold. The secondary objective was to identify whether the INTEGRA(®) dermal scaffold reduced nerve regrowth or limited sensory function outcomes in acute burn patients. METHODS Five patients treated with INTEGRA(®), cultured epithelial autograft spray (prepared using ReCell(®) (CEA)) and split skin graft (SSG) were assessed for sensory function in scar and uninjured contralateral control skin. Neuroanatomy of scar and control sites was assessed using immunohistochemistry for PGP9.5, CGRP and substance P neuronal markers. Nerve density and sensory function was also assessed in a comparative group (n=8) treated with CEA and SSG only. RESULTS Neuroanatomy was not significantly different in the INTEGRA(®) patients when compared to the CEA/SSG group only. The patients treated with INTEGRA(®) had worse sensory function than those with CEA/SSG only. CONCLUSIONS Peripheral nerves do reinnervate the INTEGRA(®) dermal scaffold. There is no statistically significant reduction in reinnervation observed when compared to a control group. It is possible that the use of artificial dermal constructs, while permissive for nerve regrowth, limit functionality when compared to nerves that regrow through dermal tissue. Further research to understand the causes of this, and into enhancing reinnervation in dermal scaffolds may improve sensory outcome in the most severely burned patients.

Up-Regulation of cutaneous α1-Adrenoceptors in complex regional pain syndrome Type I

BACKGROUND In a small radioligand-binding study of cutaneous α1 -adrenoceptors in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), signal intensity was greater in the CRPS-affected limb than in controls. However, it was not possible to localize heightened expression of α1 -adrenoceptors to nerves, sweat glands, blood vessels, or keratinocytes using this technique. METHODS To explore this in the present study, skin biopsies were obtained from 31 patients with CRPS type I and 23 healthy controls of similar age and sex distribution. Expression of α1 -adrenoceptors on keratinocytes and on dermal blood vessels, sweat glands, and nerves was assessed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS α1 -Adrenoceptors were expressed more strongly in dermal nerve bundles and the epidermis both on the affected and contralateral unaffected side in patients than in controls (P<0.05). However, expression of α1 -adrenoceptors in sweat glands and blood vessels was similar in patients and controls. α1 -Adrenoceptor staining intensity in the CRPS-affected epidermis was associated with pain intensity (P < 0.05), but a similar trend for nerve bundles did not achieve statistical significance. DISCUSSION Epidermal cells influence nociception by releasing ligands that act on sensory nerve fibers. Moreover, an increased expression of α1 -adrenoceptors on nociceptive afferents has been shown to aggravate neuropathic pain. Thus, the heightened expression of α1 -adrenoceptors in dermal nerves and epidermal cells might augment pain and neuroinflammatory disturbances after tissue injury in patients with CRPS type I.

Usefulness of [18F]-DA and [18F]-DOPA for PET imaging in a mouse model of pheochromocytoma

PURPOSE To evaluate the usefulness of [(18)F]-6-fluorodopamine ([(18)F]-DA) and [(18)F]-L-6-fluoro-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([(18)F]-DOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of subcutaneous (s.c.) and metastatic pheochromocytoma in mice; to assess the expression of the norepinephrine transporter (NET) and vesicular monoamine transporters 1 and 2 (VMAT1 and VMAT2), all important for [(18)F]-DA and [(18)F]-DOPA uptake. Furthermore, to compare tumor detection by micro-computed tomography (microCT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in individual mouse. METHODS SUV(max) values were calculated from [(18)F]-DA and [(18)F]-DOPA PET, tumor-to-liver ratios (TLR) were obtained and expression of NET, VMAT1 and VMAT2 was evaluated. RESULTS [(18)F]-DA detected less metastatic lesions compared to [(18)F]-DOPA. TLR values for liver metastases were 2.26-2.71 for [(18)F]-DOPA and 1.83-2.83 for [(18)F]-DA. A limited uptake of [(18)F]-DA was found in s.c. tumors (TLR = 0.22-0.27) compared to [(18)F]-DOPA (TLR = 1.56-2.24). Overall, NET and VMAT2 were expressed in all organ and s.c. tumors. However, s.c. tumors lacked expression of VMAT1. We confirmed [(18)F]-DAs high affinity for the NET for its uptake and VMAT1 and VMAT2 for its storage and retention in pheochromocytoma cell vesicles. In contrast, [(18)F]-DOPA was found to utilize only VMAT2. CONCLUSION MRI was superior in the detection of all organ tumors compared to microCT and PET. [(18)F]-DOPA had overall better sensitivity than [(18)F]-DA for the detection of metastases. Subcutaneous tumors were localized only with [(18)F]-DOPA, a finding that may reflect differences in expression of VMAT1 and VMAT2, perhaps similar to some patients with pheochromocytoma where [(18)F]-DOPA provides better visualization of lesions than [(18)F]-DA.

Up-regulation of cutaneous α1-adrenoceptors after a burn

Stimulation of α1-adrenoceptors evokes inflammatory cytokine production, boosts neurogenic inflammation and pain, and influences cellular migration and proliferation. As expression of α1-adrenoceptors increases on dermal nerves and keratinocytes after peripheral nerve injury, the aim of this study was to determine whether another form of tissue injury (a cutaneous burn) triggered a similar response. In particular, changes in expression of α1-adrenoceptors were investigated on dermal nerve fibres, keratinocytes and fibroblast-like cells using immunohistochemistry 2-12 weeks after a full thickness burn in Wistar rats. Within two weeks of the burn, local increases in α1-adrenoceptor expression were seen in the re-forming epidermis, in dense bands of spindle-shaped cells in the upper dermis (putatively infiltrating immune cells and fibroblasts), and on nerve fibres in the deep dermis. In addition, nerve fibre density increased approximately three-fold in the deep dermis, and this response persisted for several more weeks. In contrast, α1-adrenoceptor labelled cells and staining intensity in the upper dermis decreased contralateral to the burn, as did nerve fibre density in the deep dermis. These findings suggest that inflammatory mediators and/or growth factors at the site of a burn trigger the synthesis of α1-adrenoceptors on resident epidermal cells and nerve fibres, and an influx of α1-adrenoceptor labelled cells. The heightened expression of α1-adrenoceptors in injured tissue could shape inflammatory and wound healing responses.