Linda Lawrence

The plusoptiX S08 photoscreener as a vision screening tool for children with autism

PURPOSE Children with autism and related disorders reportedly have an increased prevalence (40%) of ocular disorders, and comprehensive eye examinations by a pediatric ophthalmologist are recommended. Examinations can be very time consuming, expensive, and stressful for the child. A photoscreener such as the plusoptiX S08 may be a cost-effective, time-saving, and less invasive method for testing patients with autism. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of photoscreening with the plusoptiX S08 in detecting amblyopia risk factors in children with autism. METHODS Photoscreening and complete ophthalmologic examinations were performed on 43 children with autism. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using ophthalmologic examination as the gold standard. RESULTS The gold standard examination used American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Vision Screening Committee guidelines for the definition of amblyopia risk factors. The plusoptiX S08 referred 29 (67%) of 43 children. On examination, 16 patients (37%) had amblyopia risk factors. The plusoptiX S08 had a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 0.68-0.99). The specificity was 48% (95% CI, 0.29-0.68), the positive predictive value was 52% (95% CI, 0.33-0.70), and the negative predictive value was 93% (95% CI, 0.64-0.99). CONCLUSIONS The plusoptiX S08 is sensitive but less specific at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with autism. The majority of children with autism and amblyopia risk factors were detected on screening; however, about half of all referrals had no amblyopia risk factors. The plusoptiX S08 reduced the need for a full examination in one-third of the children screened.

Functional and cognitive vision assessment in children with autism spectrum disorder

PURPOSE To assess functional vision in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with a cognitive visual function battery in addition to standard ophthalmic examinations. METHODS Subjects were recruited from a school for children with ASD. In addition to a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, all children underwent cognitive vision assessment at a tertiary ophthalmological care center in India. RESULTS A total of 30 children were included. The distribution of the number of children with mild to moderate versus severe ASD was nearly equal based on CARS autism scores. The majority of subjects had normal color vision (16/18), contrast (24), shape discrimination (26), and perception of directionality (28). Most were not able to identify optical illusions or differentiate tests of emotions. Ocular pursuits, saccades, and recognition of size differences were often abnormal. Poor visual closure was noted in (11) subjects. The duration of fixation to Heidi face target was inversely proportional to the severity of ASD. The study further established that cognitive visual impairment was present in children with ASD irrespective of their severity of ASD. CONCLUSIONS All subjects had some form of cognitive visual impairment independent of ASD severity.