Linda Snetselaar

The Risk of Developing Arm Lymphedema Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Factors

BackgroundAs more women survive breast cancer, long-term complications that affect quality of life, such as lymphedema of the arm, gain greater importance. Numerous studies have attempted to identify treatment and prognostic factors for arm lymphedema, yet the magnitude of these associations remains inconsistent.MethodsA PubMed search was conducted through January 2008 to locate articles on lymphedema and treatment factors after breast cancer diagnosis. Random-effect models were used to estimate the pooled risk ratio.ResultsThe authors identified 98 independent studies that reported at least one risk factor of interest. The risk ratio (RR) of arm lymphedema was increased after mastectomy when compared with lumpectomy [RR = 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.76], axillary dissection compared with no axillary dissection (RR = 3.47; 95% CI 2.34–5.15), axillary dissection compared with sentinel node biopsy (RR = 3.07; 95% CI 2.20–4.29), radiation therapy (RR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.61–2.28), and positive axillary nodes (RR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.32–1.80). These associations held when studies using self-reported lymphedema were excluded.ConclusionsMastectomy, extent of axillary dissection, radiation therapy, and presence of positive nodes increased risk of developing arm lymphedema after breast cancer. These factors likely reflected lymph node removal, which most surgeons consider to be the largest risk factor for lymphedema. Future studies should consider examining sentinel node biopsy versus no dissection with a long follow-up time post surgery to see if there is a benefit of decreased lymphedema compared with no dissection.

Oral Bisphosphonate Use and Breast Cancer Incidence in Postmenopausal Women

PURPOSE Emerging clinical evidence suggests intravenous bisphosphonates may inhibit breast cancer while oral bisphosphonates have received limited evaluation regarding breast cancer influence. PATIENTS AND METHODS The association between oral bisphosphonate use and invasive breast cancer was examined in postmenopausal women enrolled onto the Womens Health Initiative (WHI). We compared a published hip fracture prediction model, which did not incorporate bone mineral density (BMD), with total hip BMD in 10,418 WHI participants who had both determinations. To adjust for potential BMD difference based on bisphosphonate use, the hip fracture prediction score was included in multivariant analyses as a BMD surrogate. RESULTS Of the 154,768 participants, 2,816 were oral bisphosphonate users at entry (90% alendronate, 10% etidronate). As calculated hip fracture risk score was significantly associated with both BMD (regression line = 0.79 to 0.0478 log predicted fracture; P < .001; r = 0.43) and breast cancer incidence (P = .03), this variable was incorporated into regression analyses to adjust for BMD difference between users and nonusers of bisphopshonate. After 7.8 mean years of follow-up (standard deviation, 1.7), invasive breast cancer incidence was lower in bisphosphonate users (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.88; P < .01) as was incidence of estrogen receptor (ER) -positive invasive cancers (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.94, P = .02). A similar but not significant trend was seen for ER-negative invasive cancers. The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ was higher in bisphosphonate users (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.31; P = .02). CONCLUSION Oral bisphosphonate use was associated with significantly lower invasive breast cancer incidence, suggesting bisphosphonates may have inhibiting effects on breast cancer.

Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Positively Affect Dietitian Practices and Patient Outcomes

OBJECTIVES Assess the acceptance and ease of use of Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus by dietitians in a variety of settings; determine if nutrition care activities of dietitians change when practice guidelines are available; measure changes in patient control of blood glucose level, measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); compare patient satisfaction with care and perceptions about quality of life. DESIGN Using the approach of outcomes research, volunteer dietitians were recruited and assigned randomly to a usual care group or a practice guidelines group. Patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled by dietitians and followed up for a 3-month period. Outcome measures included dietitian care activities, changes in patient HbA1c levels, and patient satisfaction and perceptions about quality of life. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS Dietitians from across the United States who responded to a recruitment notice participated. Their work settings included diabetes referral centers, endocrinology clinics, primary care and community health clinics, hospitals, and a worksite clinic. They recruited patients from their setting for the study. Outcome data were available from dietitians providing care to 24 patients using the new practice guidelines and dietitians providing care to 30 patients using more traditional methods. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS chi 2 Test, t test, and analysis of covariance. RESULTS Dietitians in the practice guidelines group spent 63% more time with patients and were more likely to do an assessment and discuss results with patients than dietitians in the usual care group. Practice guidelines dietitians paid greater attention to glycemic control goals. Levels of HbA1c improved at 3 months in 21 (88%) of practice guidelines patients compared with 16 (53%) of usual care patients. Practice guidelines patients achieved greater reductions in HbA1c level than usual care patients (-1.00 vs -0.33). This difference was statistically significant and clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS Dietitians responded positively to practice guidelines for type 1 diabetes. Use of guidelines resulted in changes in dietitian practices and produced greater improvements in patient blood glucose outcomes at 3 months compared with usual care. Practice guidelines did not significantly influence patient satisfaction with care of perceived quality of life.

The dietary intervention study in children (DISC) : dietary assessment methods for 8- to 10-year-olds

OBJECTIVES The dietary assessment methods used in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) are described and the rationale, validity, and/or general usefulness of each are discussed. DESIGN DISC is the first multicenter, randomized, clinical trial to study the feasibility and long-term efficacy, safety, and acceptability of a fat-moderately diet in 8- to 10-year-old prepubescent children with moderately elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Final data collection for the original study (DISC I) occurred December 1, 1993; continued intervention and follow-up (DISC II) will extend beyond 1997. SETTING Six clinical centers across the country participate in DISC. SUBJECTS Preadolescent boys and girls with fasting LDL-C levels between the 80th and 98th age-specific and sex-specific percentiles established by the Lipid Research Clinics were eligible for the study. The feasibility phase included 140 children who were then enveloped into the full-scale trial. Baseline dietary data for 652 randomized children in the full-scale trial and 6-month results for the feasibility cohort are reported. INTERVENTIONS Dietary assessment involved several elements: (a) determining eligibility based on consumption of more than 30% of energy from total fat, (b) monitoring adherence to and adequacy of the intervention diet, (c) evaluating acceptability of the diet in the intervention group, and (d) determining appropriate foods for the intervention diet. Methods are described for each purpose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES LDL-C differences between the two groups and differences in total and saturated fat intakes as calculated from three 24-hour recalls were the primary outcome measures. Six-month dietary differences in the feasibility group are reported. STATISTICAL METHODS Baseline group means and 6-month differences in dietary intake are reported for the full-scale trial and feasibility study, respectively. RESULTS Baseline mean intake from three dietary recalls for the intervention (n = 328) and control (n = 324) groups, respectively, were as follows: energy = 1,759 kcal and 1,728 kcal; total energy from fat = 33.3% and 34.0%; total energy from saturated fat = 12.5% and 12.7%; and total dietary cholesterol = 209 mg and 195 mg. After 6 months of intervention, percentage of energy from total fat and saturated fat was reduced by 5.1% (P = .004) and 2.9% (P < .001), respectively, in this feasibility subset (n = 73) of the intervention group. Essentially no change in these parameters occurred in the control group (n = 67), which demonstrates a measurable difference in reporting between groups. APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS Results illustrate the feasibility of implementing a variety of dietary assessment methods among preadolescent children without relying primarily on parental reports.

Results of an adjunct dietary intervention program in the Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the efficacy of an intensive intervention program (IIP) based on motivational interviewing to motivate participants within the dietary study of the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) to meet the studys nutritional goals. SUBJECTS/DESIGN WHI dietary intervention participants (n=175) from 3 clinical centers were randomly assigned to either intervention or control status. Participants assigned to IIP intervention received 3 individual motivational interviewing contacts from a dietitian, plus the usual WHI Dietary Intervention. Participants randomly assigned to IIP control received the usual WHI dietary modification (DM) Intervention. Percent of energy from fat was estimated at study baseline and at follow-up (1 year later) using the WHI Food Frequency Questionnaire. RESULTS The change in percent energy from fat between IIP baseline and IIP 1-year follow-up was -1.2% for IIP intervention participants and +1.4% for IIP control participants, giving an overall difference of 2.6% (P<.001). Participants having the highest IIP baseline fat intake (>30% energy) showed the largest overall change in percent energy from fat between IIP baseline and IIP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that a protocol based on motivational interviewing and delivered through contacts with trained dietitians is an efficacious way to further lower dietary fat intake among participants exposed to ongoing intervention. These data will be useful in future intervention situations when there is a need to increase motivation to change.

Motivational Interviewing and Dietary Counseling for Obesity in Primary Care: An RCT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few studies have tested the impact of motivational interviewing (MI) delivered by primary care providers on pediatric obesity. This study tested the efficacy of MI delivered by providers and registered dietitians (RDs) to parents of overweight children aged 2 through 8. METHODS: Forty-two practices from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network of the American Academy of Pediatrics were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Group 1 (usual care) measured BMI percentile at baseline and 1- and 2-year follow-up. Group 2 (provider only) delivered 4 MI counseling sessions to parents of the index child over 2 years. Group 3 (provider + RD) delivered 4 provider MI sessions plus 6 MI sessions from a RD. The primary outcome was child BMI percentile at 2-year follow up. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, the adjusted BMI percentile was 90.3, 88.1, and 87.1 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The group 3 mean was significantly (P = .02) lower than group 1. Mean changes from baseline in BMI percentile were 1.8, 3.8, and 4.9 across groups 1, 2, and 3. CONCLUSIONS: MI delivered by providers and RDs (group 3) resulted in statistically significant reductions in BMI percentile. Research is needed to determine the clinical significance and persistence of the BMI effects observed. How the intervention can be brought to scale (in particular, how to train physicians to use MI effectively and how best to train RDs and integrate them into primary care settings) also merits future research.

Biomarker-calibrated Energy and Protein Consumption and Increased Cancer Risk Among Postmenopausal Women

The authors previously reported equations, derived from the Nutrient Biomarker Study within the Womens Health Initiative, that produce calibrated estimates of energy, protein, and percentage of energy from protein consumption from corresponding food frequency questionnaire estimates and data on other factors, such as body mass index, age, and ethnicity. Here, these equations were applied to yield calibrated consumption estimates for 21,711 women enrolled in the Womens Health Initiative dietary modification trial comparison group and 59,105 women enrolled in the observational study. These estimates were related prospectively to total and site-specific invasive cancer incidence (1993-2005). In combined cohort analyses that do not control for body mass, uncalibrated energy was not associated with total cancer incidence or site-specific cancer incidence for most sites, whereas biomarker-calibrated energy was positively associated with total cancer (hazard ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.10, 1.27, for 20% consumption increase), as well as with breast, colon, endometrial, and kidney cancer (respective hazard ratios of 1.24, 1.35, 1.83, and 1.47). Calibrated protein was weakly associated, and calibrated percentage of energy from protein was inversely associated, with total cancer. Calibrated energy and body mass index associations were highly interdependent. Implications for the interpretation of nutritional epidemiology studies are described.

Low-fat diet practices of older women: prevalence and implications for dietary assessment.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the importance of information on low-fat diet practices and consumption of reduced-fat foods for accurate assessment of energy and fat intakes using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). SUBJECTS Subjects were 7,419 women, aged 50 to 79 years, who filled out an FFQ as part of eligibility screening for a diet modification component and/or a hormone replacement trial in a multicenter study of chronic disease prevention in postmenopausal women (Womens Health Initiative). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS For 26 FFQ questions, we recoded the low-fat diet choices of participants to a high-fat counterpart and recalculated energy and fat intakes. We then determined the decrease in energy and nutrient estimates attributable to adding low-fat options to the FFQ. RESULTS Low-fat diet practices were widespread in this population. For example, 69% of respondents rarely or never ate skin on chicken, 76% rarely or never ate fat on meat, 36% usually drank nonfat milk, 52% usually ate low-fat or fat-free mayonnaise, 59% ate low-fat chips/snacks, and 42% ate nonfat cheese. These low-fat choices had substantial effects on energy and nutrient estimates. Absolute decreases (and mean percentage decreases) for energy and nutrient measures attributable to adding low-fat diet options to the FFQ were 196 kcal (11.4%) energy, 9 percentage points in percentage energy from fat (22.3%), 23.2 g fat (29.0%), and 9.6 g saturated fat (32.5%). Black and Hispanic women and women of lower socioeconomic status reported significantly fewer low-fat diet practices than white women and women of higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION Failure to collect information on low-fat diet practices with an FFQ will result in an upward bias in estimates of energy and fat intake, and the amount of error will vary by the personal characteristics of respondents.

Vitamin A and retinol intakes and the risk of fractures among participants of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study

BACKGROUND Excessive intakes of vitamin A have been shown to have adverse skeletal effects in animals. High vitamin A intake may lead to an increased risk of fracture in humans. OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate the relation between total vitamin A and retinol intakes and the risk of incident total and hip fracture in postmenopausal women. DESIGN A total of 75,747 women from the Womens Health Initiative Observational Study participated. The risk of hip and total fractures was determined using Cox proportional hazards models according to different intakes of vitamin A and retinol. RESULTS In the analysis adjusted for some covariates (age; protein, vitamin D, vitamin K, calcium, caffeine, and alcohol intakes; body mass index; hormone therapy use; smoking; metabolic equivalents hours per week; ethnicity; and region of clinical center), the association between vitamin A intake and the risk of fracture was not statistically significant. Analyses for retinol showed similar trends. When the interaction term was analyzed as categorical, the highest intake of retinol with vitamin D was significant (P = 0.033). Women with lower vitamin D intake (< or =11 microg/d) in the highest quintile of intake of both vitamin A (hazard ratio: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.37; P for trend: 0.022) and retinol (hazard ratio: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.29; P for trend: 0.056) had a modest increased risk of total fracture. CONCLUSIONS No association between vitamin A or retinol intake and the risk of hip or total fractures was observed in postmenopausal women. Only a modest increase in total fracture risk with high vitamin A and retinol intakes was observed in the low vitamin D-intake group.

Factors Associated with Adherence to the Dietary Protein Intervention in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study

OBJECTIVE To determine the characteristics and behaviors associated with adherence to dietary protein interventions among participants with chronic renal disease in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study. DESIGN Participants were categorized as consistent adherers or nonadherers on the basis of urinary urea nitrogen excretion and dietary protein intake data from self-reports. Psychosocial and behavioral factors were compared between groups. SUBJECTS Subgroups of consistently adherent and non-adherent participants in the MDRD Study. SETTING 15 clinical centers in the United States. INTERVENTION In the nutrition intervention program, participants were assigned randomly to a usual-, low-, or very-low-protein diet group. Each eating pattern also specified a phosphorus goal. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Analysis of variance. RESULT Psychosocial factors significantly related to adherence included participant knowledge, attitude, support, satisfaction, and self-perception of success. Behavioral strategies including participant self-monitoring of protein intake and the provision of feedback by the dietitian were also significantly related to adherence. APPLICATION Nutrition interventions for patients with renal disease should focus on psychosocial factors and behavioral approaches. Such approaches can be successfully incorporated into treatment programs and will assist the dietitian in promoting adherence to usual-, low-, and very-low-protein eating patterns.