Lindley A. Barbee
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lindley A. Barbee.
Cancer Causes & Control | 2010
Lindley A. Barbee; Erin Kobetz; Janelle Menard; Nicole Cook; Jenny Blanco; Betsy Barton; Pascale Auguste; Nathalie McKenzie
ObjectiveTo determine whether pairing self-sampling for HPV with community health workers (CHWs) is a culturally acceptable method for cervical cancer screening among Haitian immigrant women residing in Little Haiti, the predominately Haitian neighborhood in Miami, FL.MethodsAs part of a larger, ongoing community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative in Little Haiti, Haitian CHWs recruited 246 eligible women to this study. Participants provided self-collected cervical specimens for HPV testing and answered a series of questions about their experience with self-sampling for HPV.ResultsThe vast majority of women (97.6%) was comfortable using the self-sampler at home, would recommend this screening method to their friends and/or family members (98.4%), and described the sampler as easy to use (95.1%). Additionally, 97% of all self-collected specimens were deemed adequate for HPV testing.ConclusionsWhen paired with CHWs, who are of Haitian descent and well respected in Little Haiti, self-sampling is a highly acceptable method of cervical screening for Haitian women in this ethnic enclave. This approach addresses critical access barriers, including poverty, language difficulties, and sociocultural concerns about modesty, that may similarly affect Pap smear utilization among other immigrant or medically underserved population sub-groups. Coupled with generally positive reviews of the device, the low rate of insufficient specimens for testing suggests that this device is promising for use in non-clinical settings.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases | 2014
Christine M. Khosropour; Julia C. Dombrowski; Lindley A. Barbee; Lisa E. Manhart; Matthew R. Golden
Background Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend azithromycin or doxycycline for treatment of rectal chlamydial infection. Methods We created a retrospective cohort of male patients diagnosed as having rectal chlamydia between 1993 and 2012 at a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Seattle, Washington. Men were included in the analysis if they were treated with azithromycin (1 g single dose) or doxycycline (100 mg twice a day × 7 days) within 60 days of chlamydia diagnosis and returned for repeat testing 14 to 180 days after treatment. We compared the risk of persistent/recurrent rectal chlamydial infection among recipients of the 2 drug regimens using 4 follow-up testing time intervals (14–30, 60, 90, and 180 days). Results Of 1835 cases of rectal chlamydia diagnosed in the study period, 1480 (81%) were treated with azithromycin or doxycycline without a second drug active against Chlamydia trachomatis. Of these, 407 (33%) of 1231 azithromycin-treated men and 95 (38%) of 249 doxycycline-treated men were retested 14 to 180 days after treatment (P = 0.12); 88 (22%) and 8 (8%), respectively, had persistent/recurrent infection (P = 0.002). Persistent/recurrent infection was higher among men treated with azithromycin compared with doxycycline at 14 to 30 days (4/53 [8%] vs. 0/20 [0%]), 14 to 60 days (23/136 [17%] vs. 0/36 [0%]), and 14 to 90 days (50/230 [22%] vs. 2/56 [4%]). In multivariate analysis, azithromycin-treated men had a significantly higher risk of persistent/recurrent infection in the 14 to 90 days (adjusted relative risk, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–21.0) and 14 to 180 days (adjusted relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–4.8) after treatment. Conclusions These data suggest that doxycycline may be more effective than azithromycin in the treatment of rectal chlamydial infections.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases | 2014
Lindley A. Barbee; Julia C. Dombrowski; Roxanne P. Kerani; Matthew R. Golden
Background In 2010, the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention recommended using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for extragenital gonorrhea (GC) and chlamydia (CT) testing because of NAATs’ improved sensitivity compared with culture. Methods In 2011, the Public Health–Seattle & King County Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic introduced NAAT-based testing for extragenital GC and CT infection in men who have sex with men (MSM) using AptimaCombo2. We compared extragenital GC and CT test positivity and infection detection yields in the last year of culture-based testing (2010) to the first year of NAAT testing (2011). Results Test positivity of GC increased by 8% for rectal infections (9.0%–9.7%) and 12% for pharyngeal infections (5.8%–6.5%) from 2010 to 2011; CT test positivity increased 61% for rectal infections (7.4%–11.9%). Pharyngeal CT was identified in 2.3% of tested persons in 2011 (not tested in 2010). We calculated the ratio of extragenital cases per 100 urethral infections to adjust for a possible decline in GC/CT incidence in 2011; the GC rectal and pharyngeal ratios increased 77% and 66%, respectively, and the CT rectal ratio increased 127%. The proportion of infected persons with isolated extragenital infections (i.e., extragenital infections without urethral infection) increased from 43% in 2010 to 57% in 2011. Conclusions Extragenital testing with NAAT substantially increases the number of infected MSM identified with GC or CT infection and should continue to be promoted.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2014
Lindley A. Barbee; Olusegun O. Soge; King K. Holmes; Matthew R. Golden
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major public health threat. Current CDC treatment guidelines for uncomplicated gonorrhoea recommend only ceftriaxone plus either azithromycin or doxycycline. Additional treatment options are needed. METHODS We used antibiotic gradient synergy testing (the Etest) to evaluate antimicrobial combinations that included a third-generation cephalosporin (cefixime or ceftriaxone) plus azithromycin, doxycycline, gentamicin, rifampicin or fosfomycin. We tested each combination against 28 clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates and four control strains of varying susceptibility profiles, and compared the results with those obtained using combination antimicrobial testing using agar dilution. We calculated the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) for each combination to determine synergy, the results being interpreted as follows: FICI ≤ 0.5 = synergy; FICI > 4.0 = antagonism; and FICI > 0.5-4 = indifference. RESULTS The combinations of a third-generation cephalosporin plus azithromycin, doxycycline, rifampicin, gentamicin or fosfomycin produced FICIs of indifference. The Etest and agar dilution methods produced comparable results. CONCLUSIONS Combinations of ceftriaxone plus rifampicin, gentamicin or fosfomycin may warrant further clinical investigation as treatments for gonorrhoea. Using the Etest for synergy testing is a viable method that has practical advantages over agar dilution.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2013
Lindley A. Barbee; Roxanne P. Kerani; Julia C. Dombrowski; Olusegun O. Soge; Matthew R. Golden
BACKGROUND The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for pharyngeal gonorrhea treatment recommend dual therapy with intramuscular ceftriaxone and either azithromycin or doxycycline. Few clinical data exist to support this recommendation. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with pharyngeal gonorrhea during 1993-2011, at a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Seattle, Washington, and compared the proportion of repeat positive tests for pharyngeal gonorrhea 7-180 days following treatment among persons receiving different drug regimens. Associations of treatment regimens were assessed using relative risks through Poisson regression models with log link and robust standard errors. RESULTS A total of 1440 cases of pharyngeal gonorrhea were diagnosed during the study period, 25% of which (n = 360) underwent retesting. Among retested patients, the risk of repeat positive test was lowest among persons receiving an oral cephalosporin and azithromycin (7%, reference group), and highest among those receiving an oral cephalosporin alone (30%; relative risk [RR], 3.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-9.36) or in combination with doxycycline (33%; RR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.64-10.7). The risk of repeat test positivity did not significantly differ between persons treated with an oral cephalosporin and azithromycin and those treated with ceftriaxone alone (9.1%; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, .18-3.60) or ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin or doxycycline (11.3%; RR, 1.20; 95% CI, .43-3.33). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, dual therapy with an oral third-generation cephalosporin and azithromycin was comparable to ceftriaxone-based regimens in the treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhea. Combination oral therapy with doxycycline was associated with an elevated risk of persistent or recurrent infection.
Sexually Transmitted Infections | 2016
Lindley A. Barbee; Christine M. Khosropour; Julia C. Dombrowski; Lisa E. Manhart; Matthew R. Golden
Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) of the pharynx are common among men who have sex with men (MSM); the degree to which these infections are transmitted through oral sex is unknown. Methods We conducted a case–control study of MSM attending Public Health—Seattle & King County STD Clinic between 2001 and 2013 to estimate the proportion of symptomatic urethritis cases attributable to oral sex using two methods. First, we categorised men into the following mutually exclusive behavioural categories based on their self-reported sexual history in the previous 60 days: (1) only received oral sex (IOS); (2) 100% condom usage with insertive anal sex plus oral sex (PIAI); (3) inconsistent condom usage with anal sex (UIAI); and (4) no sex. We then determined the proportion of cases in which men reported the oropharynx as their only urethral exposure (IOS and PIAI). Second, we calculated the population attributable risk per cent (PAR%) associated with oral sex using Mantel–Haenszel OR estimates. Results Based on our behavioural categorisation method, men reported the oropharynx as their only urethral exposure in the past 60 days in 27.5% of gonococcal urethritis, 31.4% of chlamydial urethritis and 35.9% non-gonococcal, non-chlamydial urethritis (NGNCU) cases. The PAR%s for symptomatic gonococcal urethritis, chlamydial urethritis and NGNCU attributed to oropharyngeal exposure were 33.8%, 2.7% and 27.1%, respectively. Conclusions The pharynx is an important source of gonococcal transmission, and may be important in the transmission of chlamydia and other, unidentified pathogens that cause urethritis. Efforts to increase pharyngeal gonorrhoea screening among MSM could diminish STI transmission.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases | 2015
Lindley A. Barbee; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Susana A. Tat; Jeanne M. Marrazzo
Background Approximately 15% of HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) engaged in HIV primary care have been diagnosed as having a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the past year, yet STI testing frequency remains low. Methods We sought to quantify STI testing frequencies at a large, urban HIV care clinic, and to identify patient- and provider-related barriers to increased STI testing. We extracted laboratory data in aggregate from the electronic medical record to calculate STI testing frequencies (defined as the number of HIV-infected MSM engaged in care who were tested at least once over an 18-month period divided by the number of MSM engaged in care). We created anonymous surveys of patients and providers to elicit barriers. Results Extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was low (29%–32%), but the frequency of syphilis testing was higher (72%). Patients frequently reported high-risk behaviors, including drug use (16.4%) and recent bacterial STI (25.5%), as well as substantial rates of recent testing (>60% in prior 6 months). Most (72%) reported testing for STI in HIV primary care, but one-third went elsewhere for “easier” (42%), anonymous (21%), or more frequent (16%) testing. HIV primary care providers lacked testing and treatment knowledge (25%–32%) and cited lack of time (68%), discomfort with sexual history taking and genital examination (21%), and patient reluctance (39%) as barriers to increased STI testing. Conclusion Sexually transmitted infection testing in HIV care remains unacceptably low. Enhanced education of providers, along with strategies to decrease provider time and increase patient ease and frequency of STI testing, is needed.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2016
Christine M. Khosropour; Julia C. Dombrowski; Fred Swanson; Roxanne P. Kerani; David A. Katz; Lindley A. Barbee; James P. Hughes; Lisa E. Manhart; Matthew R. Golden
Background: Serosorting among men who have sex with men (MSM) is common, but recent data to describe trends in serosorting are limited. How serosorting affects population-level trends in HIV and other sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk is largely unknown. Methods: We collected data as part of routine care from MSM attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic (2002–2013) and a community-based HIV/sexually transmitted disease testing center (2004–2013) in Seattle, WA. MSM were asked about condom use with HIV-positive, HIV-negative, and unknown-status partners in the prior 12 months. We classified behaviors into 4 mutually exclusive categories: no anal intercourse (AI); consistent condom use (always used condoms for AI); serosorting [condom-less anal intercourse (CAI) only with HIV-concordant partners]; and nonconcordant CAI (CAI with HIV-discordant/unknown-status partners; NCCAI). Results: Behavioral data were complete for 49,912 clinic visits. Serosorting increased significantly among both HIV-positive and HIV-negative men over the study period. This increase in serosorting was concurrent with a decrease in NCCAI among HIV-negative MSM, but a decrease in consistent condom use among HIV-positive MSM. Adjusting for time since last negative HIV test, the risk of testing HIV positive during the study period decreased among MSM who reported NCCAI (7.1%–2.8%; P= 0.02), serosorting (2.4%–1.3%; P = 0.17), and no CAI (1.5%–0.7%; P = 0.01). Serosorting was associated with a 47% lower risk of testing HIV positive compared with NCCAI (adjusted prevalence ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.62). Conclusions: Between 2002 and 2013, serosorting increased and NCCAI decreased among Seattle MSM. These changes paralleled a decline in HIV test positivity among MSM.
Journal of Oncology | 2012
Erin Kobetz; Jonathan Kish; Nicole G. Campos; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Ian Bishop; Hannah Lipshultz; Betsy Barton; Lindley A. Barbee
Background. Haitian immigrant women residing in Little Haiti, a large ethnic enclave in Miami-Dade County, experience the highest cervical cancer incidence rates in South Florida. While this disparity primarily reflects lack of access to screening with cervical cytology, the burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) which causes virtually all cases of cervical cancer worldwide, varies by population and may contribute to excess rate of disease. Our study examined the prevalence of oncogenic and nononcogenic HPV types and risk factors for HPV infection in Little Haiti. Methods. As part of an ongoing community-based participatory research initiative, community health workers recruited study participants between 2007 and 2008, instructed women on self-collecting cervicovaginal specimens, and collected sociodemographic and healthcare access data. Results. Of the 242 women who contributed adequate specimens, the overall prevalence of HPV was 20.7%, with oncogenic HPV infections (13.2% of women) outnumbering nononcogenic infections (7.4%). Age-specific prevalence of oncogenic HPV was highest in women 18–30 years (38.9%) although the prevalence of oncogenic HPV does not appear to be elevated relative to the general U.S. population. The high prevalence of oncogenic types in women over 60 years may indicate a substantial number of persistent infections at high risk of progression to precancer.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2016
Christine M. Khosropour; Julia C. Dombrowski; Roxanne P. Kerani; David A. Katz; Lindley A. Barbee; Matthew R. Golden
Background:Among men who have sex with men (MSM) diagnosed with HIV, high-risk sexual behaviors may decline in the year after diagnosis. The sustainability of these changes is unknown. Methods:We created a retrospective cohort (Seroconversion Cohort) of MSM attending an STD clinic in Seattle, Washington who tested HIV positive between 2001 and 2013 and had a negative HIV test <2 years before diagnosis. We randomly selected 1000 HIV-negative controls (men who always tested HIV negative) who were frequency-matched to the Seroconversion Cohort based on HIV diagnosis year. 12-month sexual behavior data were collected at each clinic visit. We examined condomless anal intercourse (CAI) with HIV-negative, HIV-positive, and HIV unknown-status partners before diagnosis and up to 4 years thereafter. Results:Of the 26,144 clinic visits where MSM tested for HIV, there were 655 (2.5%) new HIV diagnoses. Of these, 186 (28%) men had previously tested HIV negative and were included in the Seroconversion Cohort. The proportion (of the 186) reporting CAI with HIV-negative partners declined from 73% at diagnosis to 12% after diagnosis (P < 0.001), whereas CAI with HIV-positive partners increased (11%–67%; P < 0.001). The proportion who serosorted (ie, CAI only with HIV-concordant partners) did not change before or after diagnosis (34%–40%; P = 0.65). These 3 behaviors remained stable for up to 4 years after diagnosis. Among HIV-negative controls, serosorting and CAI with HIV-positive and HIV-negative partners was constant. Conclusions:MSM substantially modify their sexual behavior after HIV diagnosis. These changes are sustained for several years and may reduce HIV transmission to HIV-uninfected men.