Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lindsay E. Nicolle is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lindsay E. Nicolle.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2011

International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Pyelonephritis in Women: A 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Kalpana Gupta; Thomas M. Hooton; Kurt G. Naber; Richard Colgan; Loren G. Miller; Gregory J. Moran; Lindsay E. Nicolle; Raul Raz; Anthony J. Schaeffer; David E. Soper; Miami Florida

A Panel of International Experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) in collaboration with the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) to update the 1999 Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Guidelines by the IDSA. Co-sponsoring organizations include the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Urological Association, Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases-Canada, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. The focus of this work is treatment of women with acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis, diagnoses limited in these guidelines to premenopausal, non-pregnant women with no known urological abnormalities or co-morbidities. The issues of in vitro resistance prevalence and the ecological adverse effects of antimicrobial therapy (collateral damage) were considered as important factors in making optimal treatment choices and thus are reflected in the rankings of recommendations.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2005

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults

Lindsay E. Nicolle; Suzanne F. Bradley; Richard Colgan; James C. Rice; Anthony J. Schaeffer; Thomas M. Hooton

1. The diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria should be based on results of culture of a urine specimen collected in a manner that minimizes contamination (A-II) (table 1). • For asymptomatic women, bacteriuria is defined as 2 consecutive voided urine specimens with isolation of the same bacterial strain in quantitative counts 10 cfu/mL (B-II). • A single, clean-catch voided urine specimen with 1 bacterial species isolated in a quantitative count 10 cfu/mL identifies bacteriuria in men (BIII). • A single catheterized urine specimen with 1 bacterial species isolated in a quantitative count 10 cfu/mL identifies bacteriuria in women or men (A-II). 2. Pyuria accompanying asymptomatic bacteriuria is not an indication for antimicrobial treatment (A-II). 3. Pregnant women should be screened for bacteriuria by urine culture at least once in early pregnancy, and they should be treated if the results are positive (A-I). • The duration of antimicrobial therapy should be


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2010

Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Thomas M. Hooton; Suzanne F. Bradley; Diana D. Cardenas; Richard Colgan; Suzanne E. Geerlings; James C. Rice; Sanjay Saint; Anthony J. Schaeffer; Paul A. Tambayh; Peter Tenke; Lindsay E. Nicolle

Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and management of persons with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI), both symptomatic and asymptomatic, were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The evidence-based guidelines encompass diagnostic criteria, strategies to reduce the risk of CA-UTIs, strategies that have not been found to reduce the incidence of urinary infections, and management strategies for patients with catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria or symptomatic urinary tract infection. These guidelines are intended for use by physicians in all medical specialties who perform direct patient care, with an emphasis on the care of patients in hospitals and long-term care facilities.


American Journal of Infection Control | 1991

Definitions of infection for surveillance in long-term care facilities

Allison McGeer; Beverly Campbell; T.Grace Emori; Walter J. Hierholzer; Marguerite M. Jackson; Lindsay E. Nicolle; Carla Peppier; Amersolo Rivera; Debra Schollenberger; Andrew E. Simor; Philip W. Smith; Elaine E.-L. Wang

In the last decade, increasing attention has focused on the practice of infection control in long-term care facilities. It has become clear that much more data on rates, risk factors, and management of infections in residents of such facilities are needed if the quality of resident care and the cost-effectiveness of infection control programs are to be optimized. It is also clear that the standard definitions of nosocomial infections developed for use in acute care hospitals are not applicable in most long-term care facilities. Standard definitions of infections for use in long-term care facilities would be helpful, both as guidelines for surveillance and as outcome measures for studies of infections and infection control in these facilities. This set of definitions was developed at a consensus conference held in January 1989 and subsequently revised by a modified Delphi technique involving consensus conference participants. Discussion at the conference was based on definitions developed at Yale University (Checko P, et al., unpublished manuscript) and revised by the Co-operative Infection Control Committee and on detailed reviews of these definitions written by a sample of 62 infectious disease physicians, geriatricians, infection control practitioners from long-term care facilities, and authors of published research in the field. They are intended specifically for use in facilities that provide homes for elderly residents who require 24-hour personal care under professional nursing supervision. The majority of these residents will have some degree of cognitive impairment. All will require some assistance with activities of daily living, and some may require urinary catheters, sterile dressings, and/or tube feedings. However, neither intravenous therapy nor laboratory/radiology facilities will usually be available on the premises. We have no data as yet on the reliability or validity of these definitions, although they are the subject of an ongoing study. We hope, however, that they will stimulate thought and research, and we look forward to the development of uniform definitions and of infection surveillance and control programs in long-term care facilities.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008

Strategies to Prevent Catheter‐Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Acute Care Hospitals

Evelyn Lo; Lindsay E. Nicolle; David C. Classen; Kathleen M. Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J. Anderson; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Michael Klompas; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A. Mermel; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert J. Wise; Deborah S. Yokoe

Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention efforts. Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary and Introduction and accompanying editorial for additional discussion. 1. Burden of CAUTIs a. Urinary tract infection is the most common hospital-acquired infection; 80% of these infections are attributable to an indwelling urethral catheter. b. Twelve to sixteen percent of hospital inpatients will have a urinary catheter at some time during their hospital stay. c. The daily risk of acquisition of urinary infection varies from 3% to 7% when an indwelling urethral catheter remains in situ. 2. Outcomes associated with CAUTI a. Urinary tract infection is the most important adverse outcome of urinary catheter use. Bacteremia and sepsis may occur in a small proportion of infected patients. b. Morbidity attributable to any single episode of catheterization is limited, but the high frequency of catheter use in hospitalized patients means that the cumulative burden of CAUTI is substantial. c. Catheter use is also associated with negative outcomes other than infection, including nonbacterial urethral inflammation, urethral strictures, and mechanical trauma.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1983

Bacteriuria in Elderly Institutionalized Men

Lindsay E. Nicolle; Janet Bjornson; Godfrey K. M. Harding; J. A. MacDonell

Over a two-year period we obtained monthly urine samples from all noncatheterized male residents on two geriatric wards to determine the occurrence and optimal management of bacteriuria in this population. Among 88 men the prevalence of bacteriuria was 33 per cent, and the incidence was 45 infections per 100 patients per year. Outcomes after single-dose therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria with 43 courses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and 23 of tobramycin included 15 cures, 40 relapses, and 11 treatment failures. Thirty-six residents who had a relapse or in whom single-dose therapy failed were randomly assigned to receive therapy to eradicate bacteriuria or to receive no therapy. All 20 residents who received no therapy remained bacteriuric. The 16 residents who received therapy had fewer months of bacteriuria after randomization, but at the end of the study only one remained free of bacteriuria. Mortality and infectious morbidity after randomization were similar in the two groups. These data suggest that asymptomatic bacteriuria is common in elderly institutionalized men and that therapy is neither necessary nor effective.


The American Journal of Medicine | 1987

Prospective randomized comparison of therapy and no therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria in institutionalized elderly women

Lindsay E. Nicolle; W. James Mayhew; Lawrence E. Bryan

Fifty elderly (mean age, 83.4 +/- 8.8 years) institutionalized women with asymptomatic bacteriuria were randomly assigned either to receive therapy for treatment of all episodes of bacteriuria identified on monthly culture or to receive no therapy unless symptoms developed. Subjects were followed for one year. The therapy group had a mean monthly prevalence of bacteriuria 31 +/- 15 percent lower than those in the no-therapy group, but periods free of bacteriuria lasting six months or longer were documented for only five (24 percent) subjects. For residents receiving no therapy, 71 percent showed persistent infection with the same organism(s). Antimicrobial therapy was associated with an increased incidence of reinfection (1.67 versus 0.87 per patient-year) and adverse antimicrobial drug effects (0.51 versus 0.046 per patient-year) as well as isolation of increasingly resistant organisms in recurrent infection when compared with no therapy. No differences in genitourinary morbidity or mortality were observed between the groups. Thus, despite a lowered prevalence of bacteriuria, no short-term benefits were identified and some harmful effects were observed with treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. These data support current recommendations of no therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria in this population.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2008

A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals.

Deborah S. Yokoe; Leonard A. Mermel; Deverick J. Anderson; Kathleen M. Arias; Helen Burstin; David P. Calfee; Susan E. Coffin; Erik R. Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N. Gerding; Frances A. Griffin; Peter L. Gross; Keith S. Kaye; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Lindsay E. Nicolle; David A. Pegues; Trish M. Perl; Kelly Podgorny; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D. Salgado; Robert A. Weinstein; Robert J. Wise; David C. Classen

Preventable healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) occur in US hospitals. Preventing these infections is a national priority, with initiatives led by healthcare organizations, professional associations, government and accrediting agencies, legislators, regulators, payers, and consumer advocacy groups. To assist acute care hospitals in focusing and prioritizing efforts to implement evidence-based practices for prevention of HAIs, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America Standards and Practice Guidelines Committee appointed a task force to create a concise compendium of recommendations for the prevention of common HAIs. This compendium is implementation focused and differs from most previously published guidelines in that it highlights a set of basic HAI prevention strategies plus special approaches for use in locations and/or populations within the hospital when infections are not controlled by use of basic practices, recommends that accountability for implementing infection prevention practices be assigned to specific groups and individuals, and includes proposed performance measures for internal quality improvement efforts.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 1993

Urinary Tract Infections in Long-Term–Care Facilities

Lindsay E. Nicolle

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection occurring in residents of long-term-care facilities. It is a frequent reason for antimicrobial administration, but antimicrobial use for treating UTIs is often inappropriate. Achieving optimal management of UTI in this population is problematic because of the very high prevalence of bacteriuria, evidence that the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria is not beneficial, and the clinical and microbiological imprecision in diagnosing symptomatic UTI. This position paper has been developed, using available evidence, to assist facilities and healthcare professionals in managing this common problem.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 1996

Antimicrobial use in long-term-care facilities

Lindsay E. Nicolle; David W. Bentley; Richard A. Garibaldi; Neuhaus Eg; Philip W. Smith

There is intense antimicrobial use in long-term-care facilities (LTCF), and studies repeatedly document that much of this use is inappropriate. The current crisis in antimicrobial resistance, which encompasses the LTCF, heightens concerns of antimicrobial use. Attempts to improve antimicrobial use in the LTCF are complicated by characteristics of the patient population, limited availability of diagnostic tests, and virtual absence of relevant clinical trials. This article recommends approaches to management of common LTCF infections and proposes minimal standards for an antimicrobial review program. In developing these recommendations, the article acknowledges the unique aspects of provision of care in the LTCF.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lindsay E. Nicolle's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amin Kabani

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip W. Smith

University of Nebraska Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew E. Simor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge