Lindsay Tomlinson

Best practices for veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology, with emphasis on the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries

The purpose of this paper by the Regulatory Affairs Committee (RAC) of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) is to review the current regulatory guidances (eg, guidelines) and published recommendations for best practices in veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and to utilize the combined experience of ASVCP RAC to provide updated recommendations. Discussion points include (1) instrumentation, validation, and sample collection, (2) routine laboratory variables, (3) cytologic laboratory variables, (4) data interpretation and reporting (including peer review, reference intervals and statistics), and (5) roles and responsibilities of clinical pathologists and laboratory personnel. Revision and improvement of current practices should be in alignment with evolving regulatory guidance documents, new technology, and expanding understanding and utility of clinical pathology. These recommendations provide a contemporary guide for the refinement of veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology best practices.

Pooled Sample Strategy in Conjunction with High-Resolution Liquid Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry-Based Background Subtraction to Identify Toxicological Markers in Dogs Treated with Ibipinabant

Metabolomics with chromatography-mass spectrometry is often challenging and relies on statistical tools to discern changes in a metabolome. A pooled sample strategy was proposed, consisting of (1) identification of potential marker candidates by detecting changes of metabolites in a few pooled samples between treated and control groups and (2) validation of markers of statistically significant changes with a large set of individual samples. This strategy was enabled by applying a thorough background subtraction approach based on high-resolution mass spectrometry. In a proof-of-principle study, plasma samples were generated and pooled in a 6-week investigational study to identify potential toxicological markers for an observed muscle toxicity associated with the treatment of ibipinabant in dogs. With pooled control samples as backgrounds, potential marker candidates were revealed in the background-subtracted profiles of the pooled ibipinabant-treated samples. After further cleaning with the use of mass defect filtering to exclude drug metabolites and the comparison of profiles between pooled treated samples to eliminate inconsistent peaks, the major biomarker candidates in the profiles were identified to be 19 acylcarnitines. A total of 3 of the 19 acylcarnitines were measured on the set of individual samples to allow for statistical analysis. The results confirmed the significance of acylcarnitine elevations in ibipinabant-treated dogs and indicated that the acylcarnitines could be early markers for the dog-specific toxicity. The advantages of the pooled sample strategy and its potential limitations for metabolomics are discussed.

Genetic and gene expression studies implicate renin and endothelin-1 in edema caused by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists

Objective Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor &ggr; (PPAR&ggr;) agonists can cause peripheral edema in susceptible individuals. To investigate the mechanistic basis underlying this adverse event, we performed a candidate gene analysis of patients enrolled in clinical trials of muraglitazar, an investigational PPAR&agr;/&ggr; dual agonist, and developed a cell culture-based gene expression assay and nonhuman primate model of edema to study the edemagenic properties of PPAR&ggr; agonists. Methods A total of 213 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 63 genes were genotyped in 730 participants. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were used to test for association with edema. Transcriptional responses to PPAR&ggr; agonists were evaluated in Calu-6 cells using quantitative real-time PCR. Male Cynomolgus monkeys were treated with PPAR agonists and were evaluated for edema using MRI. Results SNPs in renin (rs2368564) and endothelin-1 (rs5370) were associated with reduced risk of edema (P=0.003 and P=0.028, respectively) and an SNP in &bgr;1 adrenergic receptor (rs1801253) was associated with increased susceptibility to edema (P=0.034). Gene expression studies revealed that renin and endothelin-1 were regulated by PPAR&ggr; in Calu-6 cells. A survey of 10 PPAR&ggr; agonists further revealed that a compounds in vitro potency was correlated with its edemagenic potential leading to the prediction that one of three previously uncharacterized PPAR&ggr; agonists would cause less edema. This prediction was validated in a nonhuman primate model of PPAR&ggr; agonist-induced edema. Conclusion Our results implicate a key role for renin and endothelin-1 in the edema caused by PPAR&ggr; agonists and demonstrate how knowledge gained from pharmacogenetic studies can be applied in drug discovery.

Mechanistic Investigations of Test Article–Induced Pancreatic Toxicity at the Endocrine–Exocrine Interface in the Rat:

Pancreatic toxicity commonly affects the endocrine or exocrine pancreas. However, it can also occur at the endocrine–exocrine interface (EEI), where the capillary network of the islet merges with the capillaries of the surrounding acinar tissue, that is, the insulo-acinar portal system. The goal of this article is to describe a novel, test article–induced pancreatic toxicity that originated at the EEI and to summarize investigations into the mechanistic basis of the injury. This injury was initially characterized by light microscopy in 7/14 day-toxicity studies in Sprague-Dawley (Crl: CD®[SD]) rats with undisclosed test articles. Microvascular injury at the interface resulted in peri-islet serum exudation, fibrin deposition, hemorrhage, inflammation, and secondary degeneration/necrosis of surrounding exocrine tissue. More chronic injury presented as islet fibrosis and lobular atrophy. Direct cytotoxicity affecting the capillary endothelium at the EEI was confirmed ultrastructurally on day 4. Endothelial microparticle and blood flow studies further confirmed endothelial involvement. Similar lesions occurred less frequently in 2 other rat strains and not in the mouse, dog, or cynomolgus macaque. In summary, in vivo and investigative study data confirmed primary endothelial cytotoxicity in the pathogenesis of this lesion and suggested that the lesion may be rat/rat strain–specific and of uncertain relevance for human safety risk assessment.

Characterizing “Adversity” of Pathology Findings in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies Results from the 4th ESTP International Expert Workshop

The identification of adverse health effects has a central role in the development and risk/safety assessment of chemical entities and pharmaceuticals. There is currently a need for better alignment regarding how nonclinical adversity is determined and characterized. The European Society of Toxicologic Pathology (ESTP) therefore coordinated a workshop to review available definitions of adversity, weigh determining and qualifying factors of adversity based on case examples, and recommend a practical approach to define and characterize adversity in toxicology reports, to serve as a valuable prerequisite for future organ- or lesion-specific workshops planned by the ESTP.

CANNABINOID RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST-INDUCED STRIATED MUSCLE TOXICITY AND ETHYLMALONIC-ADIPIC ACIDURIA IN BEAGLE DOGS

Ibipinabant (IBI), a potent cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1R) antagonist, previously in development for the treatment of obesity, causes skeletal and cardiac myopathy in beagle dogs. This toxicity was characterized by increases in muscle-derived enzyme activity in serum and microscopic striated muscle degeneration and accumulation of lipid droplets in myofibers. Additional changes in serum chemistry included decreases in glucose and increases in non-esterified fatty acids and cholesterol, and metabolic acidosis, consistent with disturbances in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. No evidence of CB1R expression was detected in dog striated muscle as assessed by polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, and competitive radioligand binding. Investigative studies utilized metabonomic technology and demonstrated changes in several intermediates and metabolites of fatty acid metabolism including plasma acylcarnitines and urinary ethylmalonate, methylsuccinate, adipate, suberate, hexanoylglycine, sarcosine, dimethylglycine, isovalerylglycine, and 2-hydroxyglutarate. These results indicated that the toxic effect of IBI on striated muscle in beagle dogs is consistent with an inhibition of the mitochondrial flavin-containing enzymes including dimethyl glycine, sarcosine, isovaleryl-CoA, 2-hydroxyglutarate, and multiple acyl-CoA (short, medium, long, and very long chain) dehydrogenases. All of these enzymes converge at the level of electron transfer flavoprotein (ETF) and ETF oxidoreductase. Urinary ethylmalonate was shown to be a biomarker of IBI-induced striated muscle toxicity in dogs and could provide the ability to monitor potential IBI-induced toxic myopathy in humans. We propose that IBI-induced toxic myopathy in beagle dogs is not caused by direct antagonism of CB1R and could represent a model of ethylmalonic-adipic aciduria in humans.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider Review: Inclusion of Reproductive and Pathology End Points for Assessment of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity in Pharmaceutical Drug Development.

Standard components of nonclinical toxicity testing for novel pharmaceuticals include clinical and anatomic pathology, as well as separate evaluation of effects on reproduction and development to inform clinical development and labeling. General study designs in regulatory guidances do not specifically mandate use of pathology or reproductive end points across all study types; thus, inclusion and use of these end points are variable. The Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) formed a Working Group to assess the current guidelines and practices on the use of reproductive, anatomic pathology, and clinical pathology end points in general, reproductive, and developmental toxicology studies. The Working Group constructed a survey sent to pathologists and reproductive toxicologists, and responses from participating organizations were collected through the STP for evaluation by the Working Group. The regulatory context, relevant survey results, and collective experience of the Working Group are discussed and provide the basis of each assessment by study type. Overall, the current practice of including specific end points on a case-by-case basis is considered appropriate. Points to consider are summarized for inclusion of reproductive end points in general toxicity studies and for the informed use of pathology end points in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Review Review of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidance on the GLP Requirements for Peer Review of Histopathology

In 2014, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) issued guidance no. 16, Guidance on the GLP Requirements for Peer Review of Histopathology. The stated purpose of the guidance document is ‘‘to provide guidance to pathologists, test facility management, study directors and quality assurance personnel on how the peer review of histopathology should be planned, managed, documented, and reported in order to meet Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) expectations and requirements.’’ On behalf of and in collaboration with the global societies of toxicologic pathology, the Society of Toxicologic Pathology initiated a review of OECD guidance no. 16. The objectives of this review are to provide a unified interpretation of the guidance, to recommend compliant processes for organizations to implement, and to avoid inconsistent process adaptations across the industry. This review of the guidance document is the product of a global collaboration with other societies of toxicologic pathology and provides a section-by-section international consensus view and interpretation of the OECD guidance on peer review.In 2014, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) issued guidance no. 16, Guidance on the GLP Requirements for Peer Review of Histopathology. The stated purpose of the guidance document is “to provide guidance to pathologists, test facility management, study directors and quality assurance personnel on how the peer review of histopathology should be planned, managed, documented, and reported in order to meet Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) expectations and requirements.” On behalf of and in collaboration with the global societies of toxicologic pathology, the Society of Toxicologic Pathology initiated a review of OECD guidance no. 16. The objectives of this review are to provide a unified interpretation of the guidance, to recommend compliant processes for organizations to implement, and to avoid inconsistent process adaptations across the industry. This review of the guidance document is the product of a global collaboration with other societies of toxicologic pathology and provides a section-by-section international consensus view and interpretation of the OECD guidance on peer review.

Perspectives on Drug-induced Vascular Injury

Drug-induced vascular injury in nonclinical toxicity studies has been a difficult problem for the pharmaceutical industry for decades. Drugs associated with vascular injury include several classes of antibacterial agents, antimalarials, antivirals, antiinflammatory agents, and molecules manipulating multiple mechanisms for neurologic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes mellitus. While some mechanisms of action (e.g., dopamine receptor agonists or antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, adrenergic agonists and antagonists, endothelin antagonists, and compounds that modulate endothelial nitric oxide synthase) would be expected to have vasoactive properties, other compounds can produce vascular injury with no obvious mechanism. Acute or multidose cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies in animals often show no systemic effects on blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiographic data, or cardiac contractility for chemicals associated with vascular injury. Changes in vascular tone in regional arterial beds often are suspected but are difficult to demonstrate. The relevance of these findings in rats, dogs, or monkeys for human risk assessment is uncertain, and drug-induced vascular injury in humans related to vasoactive properties of chemicals is sparsely reported and poorly characterized. Human risk assessment is further complicated because vascular injury is difficult to detect or monitor in patients. Historically, drug-induced vascular injury has been a problem for small molecule pharmaceuticals, but more recently some monoclonal antibodies, other protein therapeutics, and oligonucleotide therapies have produced vascular injury in animal species through mechanisms that are likely different from those for small molecules. Further complicating risk assessment for vascular injury observed in nonclinical studies is the infrequent and sporadic nature of the findings in animals treated with some chemicals. Spontaneous arterial injury (arteriopathy) in control animals is uncommon, but not rare. The incidences of vascular injury in control rats, dogs, and cynomolgus monkeys from 2008 to 2013 in studies sponsored by Pfizer Inc. are shown in Table 1. Although the incidences vary considerably from year to year, it is unusual to find more than 1 control animal with vascular injury in any particular study, and very often the vascular injury in control animals is minimal in severity and limited to 1 or very few blood vessels. Unfortunately, vascular injury in the treated groups often is similarly limited to 1 or a few animals and only a few blood vessels. Based on the authors’ review of nonclinical toxicity studies over a 5-year period, vascular injury was reported in studies representing 114 small molecule drug candidates across many different mechanisms of action. Fifty-five of these compounds had vascular injury reported in only a single animal in just 1 study, and for 17 of these 55 molecules the vascular injury was limited to the nonrodent species with no vascular findings in rats. When the number of animals and number of blood vessels affected are very low in a study, the determination of whether these effects are test article related or incidental background noise can be difficult, particularly when there are limited historical data for the compound. When the interpretation of small exploratory studies is equivocal, one option is to move forward into larger studies to help provide more definitive information. However, due to the difficulties in differentiating spontaneous from drug-induced vascular injury, some sponsors may halt development of a drug candidate even though it may have benefit without causing vascular injury in patients. The pharmaceutical industry has been looking for decades for reliable noninvasive biomarkers of vascular injury in body fluids, other methods to detect or visualize vascular injury in humans, tools to identify mechanisms of vascular injury, and in vitro models that accurately predict human vascular injury. Progress has been frustratingly slow. Investigators representing many pharmaceutical companies are collaborating through the Vascular Injury Working Group within the Critical Path Institute’s Predictive Safety Testing Consortium (PSTC) to summarize the mechanisms of arterial injury in animals associated with vasodilation and vasoconstriction, establish a recommended histomorphologic lexicon based on anatomic site of vascular injury, propose a strategy to identify and qualify vascular injury biomarkers, and initiate early testing of multiple proposed biomarkers (see Mikaelian et al. in this issue). The Safer and Faster Evidence-based Translation (SAFE-T) collaboration within the Innovative Medicines Initiative sponsored by the European Commission and the The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Address correspondence to: Daniel Morton, Pfizer Inc., 200 Cambridge Park Drive, T4017C, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA; e-mail: dan.g.morton@pfizer.com. Abbreviations: EFPIA, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations; PSTC, Predictive Safety Testing Consortium; SAFE-T, Safer and Faster Evidence-based Translation.

Principles for Assessing Adversity in Toxicologic Clinical Pathology

There is limited direction in the literature or regulatory guidance on determination of adversity for clinical pathology (CP) biomarkers in preclinical safety studies. Toxicologic clinical pathologists representing the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology—Regulatory Affairs Committee and Society of Toxicologic Pathology—Clinical Pathology Interest Group identified principles, overall approach, and unique considerations for assessing adversity in CP data interpretation to provide a consensus opinion. Emphasized is the need for pathophysiologic context and a weight-of-evidence approach. Most CP biomarkers do not have the potential to be adverse in isolation, regardless of magnitude of change. Rather, they quantify or describe the impact of effects, provide adjunct or supportive information regarding a process or pathogenesis, and provide translational biomarkers of effect. Most often, CP changes are part of a constellation of findings that collectively are adverse. Thus, most CP changes must be interpreted in conjunction with other study findings and require contextual and integrative interpretation. Exceptions include critical CP changes without correlates that indicate a health risk in the tested species. Overall, CP changes should not be interpreted in isolation and their adversity is best addressed with an integrated approach.