Lindsey Murray

Development of the EXAcerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT): a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure.

BACKGROUND This article describes the qualitative methods used to develop the EXAcerbation of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for evaluating frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS Focus groups and interviews were conducted in the United States with COPD patients treated for exacerbations during the past 6 months. Participants were asked to describe exacerbation attributes, care-seeking cues, and indications of progression and recovery. An iterative process was used to identify themes in the data to inform instrument content and structure. Cognitive debriefing interviews were performed to evaluate and revise the draft item pool. Experts in COPD, instrument development, and clinical research participated in the process. RESULTS Eighty-three subjects participated in elicitation focus groups or interviews (n=48); elicitation interviews with cognitive debriefing (n=23), or cognitive interviews alone (n=12). Mean age of the sample was 65 years (SD=10); 45% were male; mean FEV-1% predicted was 44% (SD=16). Participants characterized exacerbations as a persistent increase in the severity of respiratory symptoms and other systemic manifestations accompanied by a dramatic reduction in activity. Specific attributes included shortness of breath, chest congestion, cough, sputum, chest discomfort, feeling weak or tired, sleep disturbances, and concern or worry. The diary card of 23 candidate items was debriefed in booklet and electronic format. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative data from patients and input from experts formed the basis of the EXACTs structure and item pool, ready for empirically based item reduction and reliability and validity testing.

Measuring respiratory symptoms of COPD: performance of the EXACT- Respiratory Symptoms Tool (E-RS) in three clinical trials

BackgroundSymptomatic relief is an important treatment goal for patients with COPD. To date, no diary for evaluating respiratory symptoms in clinical trials has been developed and scientifically-validated according to FDA and EMA guidelines. The EXACT – Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) scale is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure designed to address this need. The E-RS utilizes 11 respiratory symptom items from the existing and validated 14-item EXACT, which measures symptoms of exacerbation. The E-RS total score quantifies respiratory symptom severity, and 3 domains assess breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms.MethodsThis study examined the performance of the E-RS in each of 3 controlled trials with common and unique validation variables: one 6-month (N = 235, US) and two 3-month (N = 749; N = 597; international). Subjects completed the E-RS as part of a daily eDiary. Tests of reliability, validity, and responsiveness were conducted in each dataset.ResultsIn each study, RS-Total score was internally consistent (Cronbach α) (0.88, 0.92, 0.92) and reproducible (intra-class correlation) in stable patients (2 days apart: 0.91; 7 days apart: 0.71, 0.74). RS-Total scores correlated significantly with the following criterion variables (Spearmans rho; p < 0.01, all comparisons listed here): FEV1% predicted (-0.19, -0.14, -0.15); St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (0.65, 0.52, 0.51); Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS) (0.89, 0.89); modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC) (0.40); rescue medication use (0.43, 0.42); Functional Performance Inventory Short-Form (FPI-SF) (0.43); 6-minute walk distance (6-MWT) (-0.30, -0.14) and incremental shuttle walk (ISWT) (-0.18) tests. Correlations between these variables and RS-Breathlessness, RS-Cough and Sputum, RS-Chest Symptoms scores supported subscale validity. RS-Total, RS-Breathlessness, and RS-Chest Symptoms differentiated mMRC levels of breathlessness severity (p < 0.0001). RS-Total and domain scores differentiated subjects with no rescue medication use and 3 or more puffs (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity to changes in health status (SGRQ), symptoms (BCSS), and exercise capacity (6MWT, ISWT) were also shown and responder definitions using criterion- and distribution-based methods are proposed.ConclusionsResults suggest the E-RS is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of respiratory symptoms of COPD suitable for use in natural history studies and clinical trials.Trial registrationMPEX: NCT00739648; AZ1: NCT00949975; AZ 2: NCT01023516

Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures for Clinical Trials of COPD: The EXACT and E-RS

Abstract The precise assessment of treatment efficacy in clinical trials requires scientific instruments that are not only relevant to the target population and treatment, but have been shown to be reliable, valid, and sensitive to change within the intended context of use. This paper describes the background, procedures, and current status of 2 patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments developed for use in clinical trials of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The first measure, the EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool (EXACT), was developed under the EXACT-PRO Initiative, a multi-year, multi-sponsor project involving experts in pulmonary medicine, instrument development, and drug development regulatory issues, dedicated to the development of a single, standardized instrument for evaluating the effects of treatment on acute exacerbations of COPD. The second measure, the EXACT-Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) scale, is a derivative instrument comprising a subset of EXACT items to test the effect of treatment on the severity of respiratory symptoms in stable COPD. The EXACT-PRO Initiative was the first PRO instrument development consortia, and the EXACT and E-RS are the first PRO measures to undergo qualification review by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Performance of the EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool Patient-reported Outcome Measure in Three Clinical Trials of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

RATIONALE The EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) is a patient-reported outcome measure to standardize the symptomatic assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, including reported and unreported events. The instrument has been validated in a short-term study of patients with acute exacerbation and stable disease; its performance in longer-term studies has not been assessed. OBJECTIVES To test the EXACTs performance in three randomized controlled trials and describe the relationship between resource-defined medically treated exacerbations (MTEs) and symptom (EXACT)-defined events. METHODS Prespecified secondary analyses of data from phase II randomized controlled trials testing new drugs for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: one 6-month trial (United States) (n = 235) and two 3-month, multinational trials (AZ 1 [n = 749], AZ 2 [n = 597]). In each case, the experimental drugs were found to be ineffective, permitting assessment of the EXACTs performance in three independent studies of moderate to severe high-risk patients on maintenance therapies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The mean age of subjects was 62 to 64 years; 48 to 76% were male. Mean FEV1 % predicted was 42 to 59%. EXACT scores exhibited internal consistency (Cronbachs α ≥ 0.90), reproducibility (intraclass correlation ≥ 0.70), correlation with St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (Spearman rho [rs] = 0.62, 0.46, 0.46 in the three trials; P < 0.001), and Breathlessness Cough and Sputum Scale (AZ 1, rs = 0.83; AZ 2, rs = 0.83; P < 0.001). EXACT-defined events had a high correspondence with alternative indicators of worsening (94, 88, and 93%). In each trial, unreported events were similar in severity (mean EXACT score, 56, 57, 61 vs. 53, 54 [P < 0.05], 57 [P < 0.05], respectively; 100-point scale) and longer (median, 9, 8, 7 vs. 8, 7 [P < 0.01], 6 days, respectively) than moderate MTEs. CONCLUSIONS Data generated through the EXACT offers insight into the symptomatic nature of MTEs and the frequency, severity, and duration of unreported symptom-defined events. Clinical trials registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (MPEX: NCT00739648; AZ 1: NCT00949975; AZ 2: NCT01023516).

A Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Effect of Exacerbations on Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND Physical inactivity is common in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and independently predicts poor outcomes. Longitudinal assessments of physical activity in outpatients with COPD, covering periods of stability and exacerbations, have not been evaluated previously. METHODS Patients with clinically stable COPD and a history of two or more clinical exacerbations in the preceding 12 months were recruited. Physical activity was measured using a triaxial accelerometer worn continuously on the nondominant wrist. Mean minutes per day of higher level physical activity was the primary outcome variable. Symptom-defined exacerbations were assessed using the 14-item Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) daily dairy. Clinically reported exacerbations were also captured. Minutes per day of higher level physical activity during exacerbation and nonexacerbation days were compared, using a mixed model analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Seventeen patients were monitored for 135 ± 18 days. Nine were male with a mean age of 63 ± 12 years and mean FEV1 of 52 ± 20%. Fifteen patients had 27 symptom (EXACT)-defined exacerbations, including 9 that were also clinically reported. Patients spent fewer minutes per day at a higher level physical activity level during exacerbation days than nonexacerbation days: 131 ± 14 versus 157 ± 14 minutes (P < 0.0001). The greatest reduction in physical activity was during the first week of the exacerbation; activity remained low for approximately 2 weeks after exacerbation resolution. CONCLUSIONS Physical activity decreased significantly during exacerbations. Reduction in activity occurs early during an exacerbation and persists for about 2 weeks after symptomatic recovery.

Identifying cases of undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD in primary care: Qualitative insight from patients in the target population

Background:Many cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are diagnosed only after significant loss of lung function or during exacerbations.Aims:This study is part of a multi-method approach to develop a new screening instrument for identifying undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD in primary care.Methods:Subjects with varied histories of COPD diagnosis, risk factors and history of exacerbations were recruited through five US clinics (four pulmonary, one primary care). Phase I: Eight focus groups and six telephone interviews were conducted to elicit descriptions of risk factors for COPD, recent or historical acute respiratory events, and symptoms to inform the development of candidate items for the new questionnaire. Phase II: A new cohort of subjects participated in cognitive interviews to assess and modify candidate items. Two peak expiratory flow (PEF) devices (electronic, manual) were assessed for use in screening.Results:Of 77 subjects, 50 participated in Phase I and 27 in Phase II. Six themes informed item development: exposure (smoking, second-hand smoke); health history (family history of lung problems, recurrent chest infections); recent history of respiratory events (clinic visits, hospitalisations); symptoms (respiratory, non-respiratory); impact (activity limitations); and attribution (age, obesity). PEF devices were rated easy to use; electronic values were significantly higher than manual (P<0.0001). Revisions were made to the draft items on the basis of cognitive interviews.Conclusions:Forty-eight candidate items are ready for quantitative testing to select the best, smallest set of questions that, together with PEF, can efficiently identify patients in need of diagnostic evaluation for clinically significant COPD.

Qualitative evaluation of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with severe asthma

PURPOSE Content validity is the extent to which a patient-reported outcome measure evaluates the concepts most relevant to a patients condition and treatment. The St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) has been validated in a range of respiratory conditions. This study evaluated the content validity of the SGRQ in patients with severe asthma. METHODS A qualitative study, guided by a protocol, which included concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing of the SGRQ, was conducted in patients aged ≥18 years with history of severe asthma and blood eosinophil counts of ≥150/μL (past month) or ≥300/μL (past 12 months). Patients were recruited until saturation for concept elicitation was achieved (i.e. no additional concepts identified). Concepts identified by the patients were then mapped to the SGRQ. RESULTS 18 patient interviews provided concept saturation. Concept elicitation confirmed that the SGRQ includes the commonly reported asthma symptoms and their impact on daily life. In total, 89-100% of patients routinely experienced cough, nighttime awakenings, shortness of breath, chest tightness, sleep difficulty, phlegm/mucus, and wheezing. Patients reported asthma impacting daily and physical activities, mood and sleep. Cognitive interviewing confirmed that patients understood the instructions, items and response options in the SGRQ. Nearly half of the concepts in the SGRQ were endorsed by ≥12 patients; of the 17 items with scoring weights ≥85, 11 were mentioned by ≥12 patients. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that the SGRQ is a relevant, comprehensive and content-valid instrument to assess health status in patients with severe asthma.

Patient Reported Outcomes for the Detection, Quantification and Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations.

Abstract An exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an acute worsening of respiratory symptoms accompanied by a variable degree of physiological deterioration. The traditional assessment of an exacerbation consists of the reporting of symptoms by the patient to a clinician and subsequent clinical assessment. It would be valuable to also gather symptom reports directly from patients, and thus patient‐reported outcome (PRO) tools should be ideally suited to the evaluation of COPD exacerbations. However, most pharmaceutical industry‐ and large academy‐sponsored studies have used a healthcare resource use definition alone, which is based on sustained worsening of a patients condition from the stable state that requires a change in regular medication. This Review explores the use of PROs for the detection, quantification, and evaluation of COPD exacerbations. It examines symptom diary cards as exacerbation detection tools and their evolution into electronic diaries used in pharmaceutical trials. This paper also describes the development of specifically designed PROs that have been used in exacerbation settings, focusing on the Exacerbations and Symptoms in COPD e‐Diary, Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Tool, COPD Assessment Test, and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of these instruments. We describe the effectiveness of these tools to enhance exacerbation reporting; quantify exacerbation characteristics, including the frequency, duration, and severity of events; and evaluate the outcome. We also explore the potential use of PROs in future studies to discriminate the effect of therapies on different exacerbation phenotypes and thus enhance personalized therapeutic approaches.

The Short-term Impact of Symptom-defined COPD Exacerbation Recovery on Health Status and Lung Function

Background: This study examined the short-term effects of symptom-defined exacerbation recovery on health status and pulmonary function in moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Methods: Secondary analyses of pooled data from two 12-week Phase II international, randomized controlled trials using the EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT) to identify symptom-defined exacerbations were conducted. Recovery was categorized as recovered, unrecovered (persistent worsening), or censored. Multiple regression analyses were used to test the effect of recovery status on change in the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to Week 12. Evaluating Respiratory Symptom scale (E-RS) scores were used to evaluate change in stable-state respiratory symptoms from baseline to Week 12. Results: Of 1346 eligible patients, 414 (31%) experienced ≥1 symptom-defined exacerbation; 260 patients recovered from their events, 80 experienced an unrecovered event (persistent worsening), 74 patients had only censored events (excluded). Groups were similar at baseline, with the recovered group reporting significantly worse symptoms (p<0.01). Recovery group and baseline SGRQ were significant predictors of change in health status over 12 weeks (p=0.04; p<0.01); no effects were observed for lung function. Significant between-group differences in change in respiratory symptom severity from baseline to Week 12 were observed (p<0.01), with the persistent worsening group experiencing clinically meaningful deterioration in breathlessness and chest symptoms. Conclusions: Results suggest some patients have difficulty recovering from symptom-defined exacerbations, leading to a deterioration in health status, dyspnea, and chest symptoms without short-term effects on lung function. Further study of symptom-defined exacerbation recovery and health outcomes is warranted.