Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Linus Chuang is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Linus Chuang.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2009

Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcome

Farr Nezhat; Mohammad Ezzati; Linus Chuang; Alireza A. Shamshirsaz; Jamal Rahaman; Herb Gretz

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of laparoscopy for staging of early ovarian cancers. STUDY DESIGN Case series conducted at the University Hospital with 36 patients who had presumed early-stage adnexal cancers. Laparoscopic staging/restaging was performed. RESULTS Cases included 20 invasive epithelial tumors, 11 borderline tumors, and 5 nonepithelial tumors. Mean number of peritoneal biopsies, paraaortic nodes, and pelvic nodes were 6, 12.23, and 14.84, respectively. Eighty-three percent of the patients had laparoscopic omentectomy. On final pathology, 7 patients were upstaged. Postoperative complications included 1 small bowel obstruction, 2 pelvic lymphoceles, and 1 lymphocele cyst. Mean duration of follow-up is 55.9 months. Three patients had recurrences. All patients are alive without evidence of the disease. CONCLUSION This represents 1 of the largest series and longest follow-ups of laparoscopic staging for early-stage adnexal tumors. Laparoscopic staging of these cancers appears to be feasible and comprehensive without compromising survival when performed by gynecologic oncologists experienced with advanced laparoscopy.


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2007

A case‐controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program

K. Zakashansky; Linus Chuang; Herbert Gretz; Nimesh P. Nagarsheth; Jamal Rahaman; Farr Nezhat

To determine whether total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) is a feasible alternative to an abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in a gynecologic oncology fellowship training program. We prospectively collected cases of all of the patients with cervical cancer treated with TLRH and pelvic lymphadenectomy by our division from 2000 to 2006. All of the patients from the TLRH group were matched 1:1 with the patients who had ARH during the same period based on stage, age, histological subtype, and nodal status. Thirty patients were treated with TLRH with a mean age of 48.3 years (range, 29–78 years). The mean pelvic lymph node count was 31 (range, 10–61) in the TLRH group versus 21.8 (range, 8–42) (P < 0.01) in the ARH group. Mean estimated blood loss was 200 cc (range, 100–600 cc) in the TLRH with no transfusions compared to 520 cc in the ARH group (P < 0.01), in which five patients required transfusions. Mean operating time was 318.5 min (range, 200–464 min) compared to 242.5 min in the ARH group (P < 0.01), and mean hospital stay was 3.8 days (range, 2–11 days) compared to 5.6 days in the ARH group (P < 0.01). All TLRH cases were completed laparoscopically. All patients in the TLRH group are disease free at the time of this report. In conclusion, it is feasible to incorporate TLRH training into the surgical curriculum of gynecologic oncology fellows without increasing perioperative morbidity. Standardization of TLRH technique and consistent guidance by experienced faculty is imperative.


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2008

Fertility-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Trachelectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Cervical Cancer

Linus Chuang; Dimitry Lerner; Connie Liu; Farr Nezhat

A combined pelvic lymphadenectomy with radical vaginal trachelectomy is an alternative to radical hysterectomy in the treatment of young women with cervical cancer desiring fertility preservation. This technique requires advanced vaginal surgery skills not commonly acquired. In an attempt to simplify the procedure we preformed what we believe to be the first case of robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy. A 30-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 1, desiring fertility preservation was given the diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma on cervical cone excision. The patient was treated with robotic-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical trachelectomy. We hope robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy will become an option for select women with early-stage cervical cancer who desire fertility preservation.


Radiographics | 2011

Role of FDG PET/CT in Staging of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Hongju Son; Shahid Khan; Jamal Rahaman; Katherine L. Cameron; Monica Prasad-Hayes; Linus Chuang; Josef Machac; Sherif Heiba; Lale Kostakoglu

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States and has a high likelihood of recurrence despite aggressive treatment strategies. Detection and exact localization of recurrent lesions are critical for guiding management and determining the proper therapeutic approach, which may prolong survival. Because of its high sensitivity and specificity compared with those of conventional techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT is useful for detection of recurrent or residual ovarian cancer and for monitoring response to therapy. However, PET/CT may yield false-negative results in patients with small, necrotic, mucinous, cystic, or low-grade tumors. In addition, in the posttherapy setting, inflammatory and infectious processes may lead to false-positive PET/CT results. Despite these drawbacks, PET/CT is superior to CT and MR imaging for depiction of recurrent disease.


Journal of Gynecologic Oncology | 2011

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?

Enrique Soto; Yungtai Lo; Kathryn Friedman; Carlos Y. Soto; Farr Nezhat; Linus Chuang; Herbert Gretz

Objective To compare the outcomes of total laparoscopic to robotic approach for hysterectomy and all indicated procedures after controlling for surgeon and other confounding factors. Methods Retrospective chart review of all consecutive cases of total laparoscopic and da Vinci robotic hysterectomies between August 2007 and July 2009 by two gynecologic oncology surgeons. Our primary outcome measure was operative procedure time. Secondary measures included complications, conversion to laparotomy, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay. A mixed model with a random intercept was applied to control for surgeon and other confounders. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square and Fishers exact tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results The 124 patients included in the study consisted of 77 total laparoscopic hysterectomies and 47 robotic hysterectomies. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, indications for surgery and additional procedures performed. The difference between the mean operative procedure time for the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group (111.4 minutes) and the robotic hysterectomy group (150.8 minutes) was statistically significant (p=0.0001) despite the fact that the specimens obtained in the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group were significantly larger (125 g vs. 94 g, p=0.002). The robotic hysterectomy group had statistically less estimated blood loss than the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group (131.5 mL vs. 207.7 mL, p=0.0105) however no patients required a blood transfusion in either group. Both groups had a comparable rate of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Conclusion Total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed safely and in less operative time compared to robotic hysterectomy when performed by trained surgeons.


Cancer | 2017

Cervical cancer: A global health crisis

William Small; Monica Bacon; Amishi Bajaj; Linus Chuang; Brandon J. Fisher; Matthew M. Harkenrider; Anuja Jhingran; Henry C Kitchener; Linda Mileshkin; Akila N. Viswanathan; David K. Gaffney

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy diagnosed in women worldwide. Nearly all cases of cervical cancer result from infection with the human papillomavirus, and the prevention of cervical cancer includes screening and vaccination. Primary treatment options for patients with cervical cancer may include surgery or a concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Cervical cancer causes more than one quarter of a million deaths per year as a result of grossly deficient treatments in many developing countries. This warrants a concerted global effort to counter the shocking loss of life and suffering that largely goes unreported. This article provides a review of the biology, prevention, and treatment of cervical cancer, and discusses the global cervical cancer crisis and efforts to improve the prevention and treatment of the disease in underdeveloped countries. Cancer 2017;123:2404–12.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016

American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Cancer Prevention

Howard H. Bailey; Linus Chuang; Nefertiti C. duPont; Cathy Eng; Lewis E. Foxhall; Janette K. Merrill; Dana S. Wollins; Charles D. Blanke

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the leading medical professional oncology society, is committed to lessening the burden of cancer and as such will promote underused interventions that have the potential to save millions of lives through cancer prevention. As the main providers of cancer care worldwide, our patients, their families, and our communities look to us for guidance regarding all things cancer related, including cancer prevention. Through this statement and accompanying recommendations, ASCO hopes to increase awareness of the tremendous global impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) -caused cancers, refocus the discussion of HPV vaccination on its likely ability to prevent millions of cancer deaths, and increase HPV vaccination uptake via greater involvement of oncology professionals in ensuring accurate public discourse about HPV vaccination and calling for the implementation of concrete strategies to address barriers to vaccine access and acceptance.


Jsls-journal of The Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons | 2010

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging and debulking of apparent advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers.

Farr Nezhat; S.M. DeNoble; Connie Liu; Jennifer E. Cho; D.N. Brown; Linus Chuang; Herbert Gretz; Prakash Saharia

The authors contend that laparoscopy can be used for diagnosis, triage and debulking of select patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2014

Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer

Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea; Amanda Shepherd; Mazdak Momeni; John Mandeli; Linus Chuang; Herbert Gretz; David A. Fishman; Jamal Rahaman; Thomas C. Randall

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the survival of women with endometrial cancer managed by robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted surgery. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective study conducted at 2 academic centers. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and disease recurrence. RESULTS From 2003 through 2010, 415 women met the study criteria. A total of 183 women had robotic and 232 women had laparoscopic-assisted surgery. Both groups were comparable in age, body mass index, comorbid conditions, histology, surgical stage, tumor grade, total nodes retrieved, and adjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 4-61 months) for the robotic and 58 months (range, 4-118 months) for the traditional laparoscopic group, there were no significant differences in survival (3-year survival 93.3% and 93.6%), DFS (3-year DFS 83.3% and 88.4%), and tumor recurrence (14.8% and 12.1%) for robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that surgery is not an independent prognostic factor of survival. CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted surgery yields equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial adenocarcinoma.


Radiographics | 2010

PET/CT Evaluation of Cervical Cancer: Spectrum of Disease

Hongju Son; Arpakorn Kositwattanarerk; M.P. Hayes; Linus Chuang; Jamal Rahaman; Sherif Heiba; Josef Machac; Konstantin Zakashansky; Lale Kostakoglu

The prognosis of invasive cervical cancer is based on the stage, size, and histologic grade of the primary tumor and the status of the lymph nodes. Assessment of disease stage is essential in determining proper management in individual cases. In the posttherapy setting, the timely detection of recurrence is essential for guiding management and may lead to increased survival. However, the official clinical staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics has inherent flaws that may lead to inaccurate staging and improper management. Combined positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) represents a major technologic advance, consisting of two integrated complementary modalities whose combined strength tends to overcome their respective weaknesses. PET/CT has higher sensitivity and specificity than do conventional anatomic modalities and is valuable in determining the extent of disease and detecting recurrent or residual tumor. The combination of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET with intravenous contrast material-enhanced high-resolution CT has proved useful for avoiding the interpretative weaknesses associated with either modality alone and in increasing the accuracy of staging or restaging. Nonetheless, accurate PET/CT interpretation requires a knowledge of the characteristics of disease spread or recurrence and an awareness of various imaging pitfalls if false interpretations are to be avoided.

Collaboration


Dive into the Linus Chuang's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Herbert Gretz

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jamal Rahaman

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Farr Nezhat

Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai Roosevelt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. Kolev

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Enrique Soto

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Fishman

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Zakashansky

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William T. Creasman

Medical University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge