Lisa Barbera

Does Delay in Starting Treatment Affect the Outcomes of Radiotherapy? A Systematic Review

PURPOSEnThe objective of this study was to synthesize what is known about the relationship between delay in radiotherapy (RT) and the outcomes of RT.nnnMETHODSnA systematic review of the world literature was conducted to identify studies that described the association between delay in RT and the probability of local control, metastasis, and/or survival. Studies were classified by clinical and methodologic criteria and their results were combined using a random-effects model.nnnRESULTSnA total of 46 relevant studies involving 15,782 patients met our minimum methodologic criteria of validity; most (42) were retrospective observational studies. Thirty-nine studies described rates of local recurrence, 21 studies described rates of distant metastasis, and 19 studies described survival. The relationship between delay and the outcomes of RT had been studied in diverse situations, but most frequently in breast cancer (21 studies) and head and neck cancer (12 studies). Combined analysis showed that the 5-year local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly higher in patients treated with adjuvant RT for breast cancer more than 8 weeks after surgery than in those treated within 8 weeks of surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 2.16). Combined analysis also showed that the LRR was significantly higher among patients who received postoperative RT for head and neck cancer more than 6 weeks after surgery than among those treated within 6 weeks of surgery (OR = 2.89; 95% CI, 1.60 to 5.21). There was little evidence about the impact of delay in RT on the risk of metastases or the probability of long-term survival in any situation.nnnCONCLUSIONnDelay in the initiation of RT is associated with an increase [corrected] in LRR in breast cancer and head and neck cancer. Delays in starting RT should be as short as reasonably achievable.

Trends in the Aggressiveness of End-of-Life Cancer Care in the Universal Health Care System of Ontario, Canada

PURPOSEnTo describe trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life (EOL) cancer care in a universal health care system in Ontario, Canada, between 1993 and 2004, and to compare with findings reported in the United States.nnnMETHODSnA population-based, retrospective, cohort study that used administrative data linked to registry data. Aggressiveness of EOL care was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following indicators: last dose of chemotherapy received within 14 days of death; more than one emergency department (ED) visit within 30 days of death; more than one hospitalization within 30 days of death; or at least one intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 30 days of death.nnnRESULTSnAmong 227,161 patients, 22.4% experienced at least one incident of potentially aggressive EOL cancer care. Multivariable analyses showed that with each successive year, patients were significantly more likely to encounter some aggressive intervention (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02). Multiple emergency department (ED) visits, ICU admissions, and chemotherapy use increased significantly over time, whereas multiple hospital admissions declined (P < .05). Patients were more likely to receive aggressive EOL care if they were men, were younger, lived in rural regions, had a higher level of comorbidity, or had breast, lung, or hematologic malignancies. Chemotherapy and ICU utilization were lower in Ontario than in the United States.nnnCONCLUSIONnAggressiveness of cancer care near the EOL is increasing over time in Ontario, Canada, although overall rates were lower than in the United States. Health system characteristics and patient or physician cultural factors may play a role in the observed differences.

Defining the need for radiotherapy for lung cancer in the general population: a criterion-based, benchmarking approach.

Background. We have previously used an evidence-based, epidemiologic approach to estimate the proportion of incident cases that should be treated with radiotherapy (RT) for lung cancer. The first objective of the present study was to compare this evidence-based estimate of the appropriate rate of use of RT with the rates observed in selected “benchmark” communities where there are no barriers to the appropriate use of RT and no incentives to the unnecessary use of RT. The second objective of the study was to compare the rates of use of RT in the general populations in the United States and Canada with the estimated appropriate rate. Methods. We established benchmark rates for the use of RT for lung cancer in Ontario, Canada, where: 1) residents make no direct payments for RT; 2) all RT is provided by site-specialized radiation oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer centers, and 3) radiation oncologists receive a salary in lieu of technical fees. Communities located close to cancer centers without long waiting lists for RT were selected to serve as benchmarks. Prospectively gathered electronic treatment records from all RT cancer centers were linked to the provincial cancer registry to describe the rate of use of RT in Ontario. The public use file of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registries (SEER) was used to describe the use of RT in the United States. Results. Overall, 41.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.9%, 42.7%) of incident cases of lung cancer received RT as part of their initial management in the benchmark communities compared with the evidence-based estimate of 41.6% (95% CI, 39.2%, 44.1%). The rate of use of RT in the initial management of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the benchmark communities was 49.3% (95% CI, 47.5%, 51.1%) compared with the evidence-based estimate of 45.9% (95% CI, 41.6%, 50.2%). The use of RT in the initial management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the benchmark communities was 47.0% (95% CI, 43.3%, 50.7%) compared with the evidence-based estimate of 45.4% (95% CI, 42.4%, 48.4%). In many counties of Ontario, the observed rates of RT use in the initial management of lung cancer were significantly lower than either the benchmark rate or the evidence-based estimate of the appropriate rate. In contrast, rates of use of RT in most counties in the SEER regions of the United States were close to, or higher than, the estimated appropriate rate. Conclusions. The observed benchmark rate converged on the evidence-based estimate of the appropriate rate of use of RT for lung cancer, suggesting that either measure might reasonably be used as a “standard” against which to compare rates observed in similar populations elsewhere.

Estimating the Need for Radiotherapy for Patients With Prostate, Breast, and Lung Cancers: Verification of Model Estimates of Need With Radiotherapy Utilization Data From British Columbia

PURPOSEnEstimates of the need for radiotherapy (RT) using different methods (criterion based benchmarking [CBB] and the Canadian [C-EBEST] and Australian [A-EBEST] epidemiologically based estimates) exist for various cancer sites. We compared these model estimates to actual RT rates for lung, breast, and prostate cancers in British Columbia (BC).nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnAll cases of lung, breast, and prostate cancers in BC from 1997 to 2004 and all patients receiving RT within 1 year (RT(1Y)) and within 5 years (RT(5Y)) of diagnosis were identified. The RT(1Y) and RT(5Y) proportions in health regions with a cancer center for the most recent year were then calculated. RT rates were compared with CBB and EBEST estimates of RT needs. Variation was assessed by time and region.nnnRESULTSnThe RT(1Y) in regions with a cancer center for lung, breast, and prostate cancers were 51%, 58%, and 33% compared with 45%, 57%, and 32% for C-EBEST and 41%, 61%, and 37% for CBB models. The RT(5Y) rates in regions with a cancer center for lung, breast, and prostate cancers were 59%, 61%, and 40% compared with 61%, 66%, and 61% for C-EBEST and 75%, 83%, and 60% for A-EBEST models. The RT(1Y) rates increased for breast and prostate cancers.nnnCONCLUSIONSnC-EBEST and CBB model estimates are closer to the actual RT rates than the A-EBEST estimates. Application of these model estimates by health care decision makers should be undertaken with an understanding of the methods used and the assumptions on which they were based.

Patient outcome study of concurrent chemoradiation, external beam radiotherapy, and high-dose rate brachytherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

Introduction: A regimen of concurrent chemoradiation for definitive treatment of cervical cancer is widely used. This retrospective review has been conducted to determine the outcomes and late toxic effect associated with the specific regimen of whole-pelvic external beam radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with parametrial boosts of 5.4 or 9 Gy and HDR brachytherapy (BT) of 30 Gy in 5 fractions to point A delivered by tandem and ring. This protocol is accepted by the Gynecological Oncology Group and endorsed by the American Brachytherapy Society, but no late toxic effect data have been reported. Materials and Methods: The electronic records of sequential patients treated definitively at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre between January 2006 and December 2008 were reviewed. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related details (including external beam radiotherapy, BT, and chemotherapy) were obtained. Outcome measures included disease-free status, dates and sites of first recurrence, survival, and grade 3/4 late toxic effect results (Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events 3.0 criteria). Exclusion criteria were no follow-up or a planned alternative regimen. Results: One hundred twenty-two patients (+11 excluded) were treated with a median follow-up of 18 months from diagnosis. The actuarial 2-year disease-free survival rate was 70%. The median time to recurrence was 8 months (range, 2-22 months). The median time to toxic effect was 10 months (range 4-27 months). Grade 3/4 toxic effect was observed in 13 patients (11%). The actuarial grade 3/4 toxic effect rate at 2 years was 14%. Conclusions: Despite a relatively short follow-up, the toxicity of this regimen seems high compared with other retrospective series, although pelvic control is good. Consideration should be given to a reduction in BT dose alternatively when feasible image-guided BT may allow maintenance of tumor dose with reduced dose to organs at risk.

Estimating the benefit and cost of radiotherapy for lung cancer

PURPOSEnTo estimate the benefit and cost of using radiotherapy (RT) in the initial management of lung cancer in the general population.nnnMETHODSnWe identified indications for RT in the initial management of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer through a review of the literature. The proportion of patients with each specific indication for treatment was determined using epidemiological observations from cancer registry data and from the literature. We estimated the benefit gained from RT use for each indication in the model using values published in the literature. We estimated the cost of RT for each indication using published Canadian data. The total benefit and cost was calculated for all indications combined. Results are reported in 2001 Canadian dollars.nnnRESULTSnThe mean benefit was 7 months of survival for each lung cancer patient treated with curative intent and 3 months of symptom control for each patient treated with palliative intent. The average cost was 9881 dollars per life year gained and 13,938 dollars per year of symptom control gained. Sensitivity analysis revealed values between 7905 dollars and 19,762 dollars per year of survival gain and between 10,368 dollars and 27,875 dollars per year of symptom control gained.nnnCONCLUSIONSnUsing RT in the initial management of lung cancer can provide considerable gains in survival and symptom control. The cost of RT for the initial management of lung cancer is inexpensive compared with a common cut off of 50,000 dollars per life year gained.

Performance of different radiotherapy workload models

PURPOSEnThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of different radiotherapy workload models using a prospectively collected dataset of patient and treatment information from a single center.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnInformation about all individual radiotherapy treatments was collected for 2 weeks from the three linear accelerators (linacs) in our department. This information included diagnosis code, treatment site, treatment unit, treatment time, fields per fraction, technique, beam type, blocks, wedges, junctions, port films, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. We evaluated the accuracy and precision of the original and revised basic treatment equivalent (BTE) model, the simple and complex Addenbrooke models, the equivalent simple treatment visit (ESTV) model, fields per hour, and two local standards of workload measurement.nnnRESULTSnData were collected for 2 weeks in June 2001. During this time, 151 patients were treated with 857 fractions. The revised BTE model performed better than the other models with a mean [observed -predicted] of 2.62 (2.44-2.80). It estimated 88.0% of treatment times within 5 min, which is similar to the previously reported accuracy of the model.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe revised BTE model had similar accuracy and precision for data collected in our center as it did for the original dataset and performed the best of the models assessed. This model would have uses for patient scheduling, and describing workloads and case complexity.

Involvement of Family Physicians in the Care of Cancer Patients Seen in the Palliative Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program

PURPOSEnIt is important for cancer patients to maintain continuity of care with their family physician (FP) while being followed at the cancer center. The primary objective of this study was to determine the perception of patients seen in the palliative Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) on FP involvement in their cancer care. Secondary objectives were to identify factors predicting for perceived FP involvement in patient cancer care.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnConsecutive patients were approached for study enrollment at the time of RRRP visit and asked to complete a 15-item survey.nnnRESULTSnThree hundred sixty-five patients were accrued over 15 months. Ninety-eight percent had an FP, and 43% felt their FP was involved in their cancer care. Eighty percent of patients were satisfied with the overall medical care provided by their FP, and 71% had been with their FP for > or = 5 years. The most common reason patients gave for perceiving limited FP involvement was the medical oncologist looking after all of their cancer needs. Multivariate analysis found that satisfaction with overall medical care provided by the FP, shorter time since last FP visit, seeing the FP since cancer diagnosis, and FP providing on-call service for after-hour emergencies all significantly predicted for patients perceiving FP involvement in their cancer care.nnnCONCLUSIONnLess than half of patients surveyed perceived their FP as involved in their cancer care. Encouraging continuity of care between patients and FPs may allow for easier transition of care back to the FP once palliative treatment at the cancer center has finished and help facilitate end-of-life planning.

Symptom Burden in the First Year After Cancer Diagnosis: An Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Purpose Improvement in the quality of life of patients with cancer requires attention to symptom burden across the continuum of care, with the use of patient-reported outcomes key to achieving optimal care. Yet there have been few studies that have examined symptoms in the early postdiagnosis period during which suboptimal symptom control may be common. A comprehensive analysis of temporal trends and risk factors for symptom burden in newly diagnosed patients with cancer is essential to guide supportive care strategies. Methods A retrospective observational study was performed of patients who were diagnosed with cancer between January 2007 and December 2014 and who survived at least 1 year. Patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scores, which are prospectively collected at outpatient visits, were linked to provincial administrative health care data. We described the proportion of patients who reported moderate-to-severe symptom scores by month during the first year after diagnosis according to disease site. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for moderate-to-severe symptom scores. Results Of 120,745 patients, 729,861 symptom assessments were recorded within 12 months of diagnosis. For most symptoms, odds of elevated scores were highest in the first month, whereas nausea had increased odds of elevated scores up to 6 months after diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, cancer site, younger age, higher comorbidity, female sex, lower income, and urban residence were associated with significantly higher odds of elevated symptom burden. Conclusion A high prevalence of moderate-to-severe symptom scores was observed in cancers of all sites. Patients are at risk of experiencing multiple symptoms in the immediate postdiagnosis period, which underscores the need to address supportive care requirements early in the cancer journey. Patient subgroups who are at higher risk of experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms should be targeted for tailored supportive care interventions.

Circulating Human Papillomavirus DNA as a Biomarker of Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation

PurposeTo determine whether plasma human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA predates clinical recurrence and compare its accuracy with 3-month fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsThis prospective multicenter study accrued 23 women with stage IB to IVA cervical cancer planned for definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Plasma HPV DNA was measured serially by digital polymerase chain reaction, and FDG-PET was performed at 3 months post-CRT.ResultsOf the 19 women with HPV+ cervical cancer included in this analysis, 32% were stage IB, 58% IIB, and 10% IIIB/IVA. Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 18 to 30 months). All patients had detectable plasma HPV DNA before treatment. Six patients had detectable plasma HPV DNA at the end of CRT, and three of them developed metastases at 3 months. Of the 13 patients with undetectable plasma HPV DNA at end of CRT, to date, only one has developed recurrence. Six of those 13 patients had a positive 3-month FDG-PET w...