Lisa C. Iacono

Phase I Trial of Temozolomide and Protracted Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors

Purpose: The purpose is to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule in 28-day courses to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. Experimental Design: Twelve heavily pretreated patients received 56 courses of oral temozolomide at 100 mg/m2/day for 5 days combined with i.v. irinotecan given daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks at either 10 mg/m2/day (n = 6) or 15 mg/m2/day (n = 6). We assessed toxicity, the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and irinotecan, and the DNA repair phenotype in tumor samples. Results: Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the higher dose level; one had grade 4 diarrhea, whereas the other had bacteremia with grade 2 neutropenia. In contrast, no patient receiving temozolomide and 10 mg/m2/day irinotecan experienced DLT. Myelosuppression was minimal and noncumulative. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. Drug metabolite exposures at the MTD were similar to exposures previously associated with single-agent antitumor activity. One complete response, two partial responses, and one minor response were observed in Ewing’s sarcoma and neuroblastoma patients previously treated with stem cell transplant. Responding patients had low or absent O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor tissue. Conclusions: The MTD using this schedule was temozolomide (100 mg/m2/day) and irinotecan (10 mg/m2/day), with DLT being diarrhea and infection. Drug clearance was similar to single-agent values, and clinically relevant SN-38 lactone and MTIC exposures were achieved at the MTD. As predicted by xenograft models, this combination and schedule appears to be tolerable and active in pediatric solid tumors. Evaluation of a 21-day schedule is planned.

Role of temozolomide after radiotherapy for newly diagnosed diffuse brainstem glioma in children: results of a multiinstitutional study (SJHG-98).

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed diffuse brainstem glioma is uncertain. In the current study, the authors tested the efficacy of temozolomide treatment after radiotherapy (RT) in this setting.

Results of a Phase II Upfront Window of Pharmacokinetically Guided Topotecan in High-Risk Medulloblastoma and Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor

PURPOSE To assess the antitumor efficacy of pharmacokinetically guided topotecan dosing in previously untreated patients with medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and to evaluate plasma and CSF disposition of topotecan in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS After maximal surgical resection, 44 children with previously untreated high-risk medulloblastoma were enrolled, of which 36 were assessable for response. The topotecan window consisted of two cycles, administered initially as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days, lasting 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted on day 1 to attain a topotecan lactone area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 120 to 160 ng/mL.h. After 10 patients were enrolled, the infusion was modified to 4 hours, with dosage individualization. RESULTS Of 36 assessable patients, four patients (11.1%) had a complete response and six (16.6%) showed a partial response, and disease was stable in 17 patients (47.2%). Toxicity was mostly hematologic, with only one patient experiencing treatment delay. The target plasma AUC was achieved in 24 of 32 studies (75%) in the 30-minute infusion group, and in 58 of 93 studies (62%) in the 4-hour infusion group. The desired CSF topotecan exposure was achieved in seven of eight pharmacokinetic studies when the topotecan plasma AUC was within target range. CONCLUSION Topotecan is an effective agent against pediatric medulloblastoma in patients who have received no therapy other than surgery. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing achieved the target plasma AUC in the majority of patients. This drug warrants testing as part of standard postradiation chemotherapeutic regimens. Furthermore, these results emphasize the importance of translational research in drug development, which in this case identified an effective drug.

Activation and antitumor activity of CPT-11 in plasma esterase-deficient mice

Purpose: To examine the antitumor activity and the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 (irinotecan, 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin) in a plasma esterase-deficient scid mouse model, bearing human tumor xenografts. Experimental design: Plasma carboxylesterase (CE)-deficient mice were bred with scid animals to develop a strain that would allow growth of human tumor xenografts. Following xenotransplantation, the effect of the plasma esterase on antitumor activity following CPT-11 administration was assessed. In addition, detailed pharmacokinetic studies examining plasma and biliary disposition of CPT-11 and its metabolites were performed. Results: In mice lacking plasma carboxylesterase, the mean SN-38 systemic exposures were approximately fourfold less than that observed in control animals. Consistent with the pharmacokinetic data, four to fivefold more CPT-11 was required to induce regressions in human Rh30 xenografts grown in esterase-deficient scid mice, as opposed to those grown in scid animals. Additionally, the route of elimination of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) was principally in the bile. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic profile for CPT-11 and its metabolites in the esterase-deficient mice more closely reflects that seen in humans. Hence, these mice may represent a more accurate model for antitumor studies with this drug and other agents metabolized by CEs.

Determination of plasma topotecan and its metabolite N-desmethyl topotecan as both lactone and total form by reversed-phase liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

Topotecan (TPT) undergoes hepatic N-demethylation forming N-desmethyl topotecan (NDS). To evaluate the effect of drug-drug interactions on NDS disposition in children receiving TPT we developed and validated a sensitive and specific HPLC-fluorescence detection method for lactone and total (lactone plus carboxylate) TPT and NDS. Deproteinized plasma is vortexed, centrifuged, and the methanolic extract diluted with water for the lactone form of NDS and TPT or diluted with 1.5% phosphoric acid for NDS and TPT total. A 100 microL sample is injected onto a Varian ChromGuard RP column attached to an Agilent SB-C(18) reversed-phase analytical column held at 50 degrees C. The mobile phase (flow-rate, 0.8 mL/min) consists of methanol-aqueous buffer (27:73, v/v) (75 mM potassium phosphate and 0.2% triethylamine, pH 6.5). TPT and NDS were detected with excitation and emission wavelengths set at 376 and 530 nm, respectively. The standard curves for both forms of TPT ranged from 0.25 to 80 ng/mL, and for NDS ranged from 0.10 to 8.0 ng/mL. Within-day and between-day precision (% RSD) was </=4% for TPT and </=6.2% for NDS, respectively. Within-day and between-day percentage error ranged from 1.4 to 6.3% and from 1.4 to 2.4% for TPT, and from 1.6 to 3.1% and from 0.0 to 3.7% for NDS, respectively. No significant on-column conversion from TPT or NDS lactone to carboxylate was observed. With one method we can measure lactone and total TPT and NDS with adequate sensitivity to allow for evaluation of the disposition of these compounds in children receiving TPT.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Topotecan in Pediatric Cancer Patients

Purpose: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of topotecan lactone in children with cancer and identify covariates related to topotecan disposition. Patients and Methods: The study population consisted of 162 children in seven clinical trials receiving single agent topotecan as a 30-min infusion. A population approach via nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to conduct the analysis. Results: A two-compartment model was fit to topotecan lactone plasma concentrations (n = 1874), and large pharmacokinetic variability was observed among studies, among individuals, and within individuals. We conducted a covariate analysis using demographics, biochemical data, trial effects, and concomitant drugs. The most significant covariate was body surface area, which explained 54% of the interindividual variability for topotecan systemic clearance. Interoccasion variability was considerable in both clearance and volume (20% and 22%, respectively), but was less than interindividual variability in both variables. Other covariates related to clearance were concomitant phenytoin, calculated glomerular filtration rate, and age (<0.5 years). Including them in the model reduced the interindividual variability for topotecan clearance by an additional 48% relative to the body surface area–normalized model. The full covariate model explained 76% and 50% of interindividual variability in topotecan clearance and volume, respectively. Conclusions: We developed a descriptive and robust population pharmacokinetic model which identified patient covariates that account for topotecan disposition in pediatric patients. Additionally, dosing topotecan based on the covariate model led to a more accurate and precise estimation topotecan systemic exposure compared with a fixed dosing approach, and could be a tool to assist clinicians to individualize topotecan dosing.

Cyclophosphamide disposition in an anephric child

Although limited data are available about cyclophosphamide disposition in patients with renal insufficiency, nothing has been reported in anephric patients. We characterized cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics in an anephric child with bilateral Wilms tumor, both on (day 1) and off (day 2) hemodialysis. The median cyclophosphamide clearance on and off hemodialysis was 5.34 and 3.82 L/hr*m2, respectively, demonstrating elimination of cyclophosphamide in this anephric child. The off hemodialysis clearance was similar to that in children with normal renal function. Hydroxycyclophosphamide (HCY) AUC was 20.6 and 8.77 µM*hr on and off hemodialysis. Carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard (CEPM) AUC obtained on hemodialysis (i.e., 194 µM*hr) was similar to that in children with normal renal function, although an elevated CEPM AUC was observed when hemodialysis was not received (i.e., 383 µM*hr). With the recent findings that clinical outcomes are related to CEPM AUC, further data are needed regarding the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and relevant metabolites in anephric children.

Determination of Gefitinib in Plasma by Liquid Chromatography with a C12 Column and Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry Detection

Abstract A highly sensitive liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐ESI‐MS/MS) method has been developed for the measurement of gefitinib (ZD1839) in human plasma. The method was validated over a linear range of 0.5–1000 ng/mL, using deuterated gefitinib (D8‐ZD1839) as the internal standard (IS). Compounds were extracted from 500 µL of sodium heparin plasma by 6.0 mL butyl methyl ether liquid–liquid extraction. The dried residue was reconstituted with 250 µL of 20% acetonitrile with 1.0% formic acid and 30 µL injected onto the LC‐ESI‐MS/MS system. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Phenomenex® Synergi 4µ MAX‐RP 80 Å C12 column (75 × 2.0 mm2) with an isocratic mobile phase of acetonitrile–1.0% formic acid (30:70, v/v). The analytes were detected with a PE Sciex API 365 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer using turbo ion spray® source with positive ionization. Ions monitored in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode were m/z 447.2 (precursor ion) to m/z 127.8 (product ion) for gefitinib and m/z 455.2 (precursor ion) to m/z 136.0 (product ion) for D8‐ZD1839. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of gefitinib was 0.30 ng/mL (S/N ≥ 10), and results from a 5‐day validation study demonstrated acceptable within‐day and between‐day precision (CV% values ≤6.0% and ≤5.2%, respectively) and accuracy (range 91.0–97.7%). This method is now used to analyze plasma samples from pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of ZD1839, and the wide linear range (∼4 log) of this method provides a distinct advantage, as shown by the results of a representative patient.

Using plasma topotecan pharmacokinetics to estimate topotecan exposure in cerebrospinal fluid of children with medulloblastoma.

The purpose of this study was to estimate ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) topotecan lactone (TPT) exposures in pediatric medulloblastoma patients from plasma concentration-time data by using a pharmacokinetic (PK) model. We studied children with high-risk medulloblastoma who received pharmacokinetically guided TPT (target plasma area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 120-160 ng/ml-h) and obtained serial vCSF samples to assess TPT exposure. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by using linear mixed-effects modeling via the two-stage approach. We simulated TPT vCSF exposure duration at plasma TPT AUC values of 120 to 200 ng/ml-h and determined percentages of studies meeting or exceeding the vCSF exposure duration threshold (EDT) of 1 ng/ml for 8 h. We then used bootstrap methods to estimate variability in vCSF EDT. Eighteen PK studies were conducted in six patients (median age, 4.8 years). In these patients, seven of nine studies attaining target plasma TPT AUC achieved the vCSF EDT. Given a plasma TPT AUC of 120 ng/ml-h, the median percentage of results meeting or exceeding EDT was 78% (95% CI, 61%-100%). One patient (four studies) with tumor blockage of CSF flow, which can alter CSF pharmacokinetics, was removed, and the bootstrap analysis was repeated. In this subset, a median 93% (95% CI, 79%-100%) of studies achieved vCSF EDT. Increasing plasma TPT AUC values resulted in increased ability to achieve vCSF EDT. We demonstrated that a plasma PK model could estimate vCSF TPT concentrations. Further, our results indicate that the TPT vCSF EDT can be achieved in more than 80% of studies targeted to a plasma TPT AUC of 120 ng/ml-h.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous epoetin alfa in children with cancer.

Epoetin alfa (EPO, PROCRIT®) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were evaluated in children with malignant solid tumors receiving chemotherapy.