Lisa Doherty

Medical management of patients with brain tumors

The most common medical problems in brain tumor patients include the management of seizures, peritumoral edema, medication side effects, venous thromboembolism (VTE), fatigue and cognitive dysfunction. Despite their importance, there are relatively few studies specifically addressing these issues. There is increasing evidence that brain tumor patients who have not had a seizure do not benefit from prophylactic antiepileptic medications. Patients on corticosteroids are at greater risk of Pneumocystis jerovecii pneumonia and may benefit from prophylactic therapy. There is also growing evidence suggesting that anticoagulation may be more effective than inferior vena cava IVC) filtration devices for treating VTE in brain tumor patients and the risk of hemorrhage with anticoagulation is relatively small. Low-molecular weight heparin may be more effective than coumadin. Medications such as modafinil and methylphenidate have assumed an increasing role in the treatment of fatigue, while donepezil and memantine may be helpful with memory loss.

Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that has efficacy in recurrent malignant gliomas, particularly in combination with irinotecan. However, responses are rarely durable. Continuation of bevacizumab in combination with another chemotherapeutic agent may demonstrate some activity. In this article we present a retrospective review of 54 patients with recurrent malignant gliomas who progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen and were then treated with an alternate bevacizumab-containing regimen. All patients received intravenous bevacizumab (5-10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks alone or in combination with an additional chemotherapeutic agent, such as irinotecan. There was no limit on the number of prior therapies. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. Tumor progression was determined by a combination of clinical status and radiographic changes. Patients were 33 men, 21 women (median age, 50 years; range, 23-72 years) with a median KPS score of 80 prior to the first bevacizumab-containing regimen and 70 prior to the second regimen; median prior chemotherapy regimens including the first bevacizumab-containing regimen was 3 (range, 2-5). Median progression-free survival (PFS) on the first bevacizumab-containing regimen was 124 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 87-154 days); 6-month (6M)-PFS was 33%. Median PFS on the second bevacizumab-containing regimen was 37.5 days (95% CI, 34-42 days); 6M-PFS was 2%. Ten patients on the first regimen and 12 patients on the second regimen suffered grade 3/4 toxicities. Those patients with malignant gliomas who progressed despite a bevacizumab-containing regimen rarely responded to the second bevacizumab-containing chemotherapeutic regimen. In such patients, alternate therapies should be considered.

Phase II Study of Protracted Daily Temozolomide for Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults

Purpose: Resistance to temozolomide chemotherapy is partly mediated by O6-methylguanine-DNA methlytransferase (MGMT). Protracted treatment with temozolomide potentially overcomes MGMT resistance and improves outcome. We conducted a phase II study of protracted daily temozolomide in adults with low-grade gliomas. Experimental Design: Patients with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma or oligoastrocytoma with a MIB-1 index of >5% or recurrent low-grade gliomas received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day in 11-week cycles of 7 weeks on/4 weeks off). Treatment continued for a total of six cycles or until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was best overall response rate; secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. We correlated response with MGMT promoter methylation and chromosome 1p/19q deletion status. Results: Forty-four patients were treated (14 female, 30 male) with a median follow-up of 39.4 months. Median age was 43 years (range, 20-68 years) and median Karnofsky performance status was 90 (range, 70-100). The regimen was well tolerated. No patients had a complete response (0%), 9 had partial response (20%), 33 had stable disease (75%), and 2 had progressive disease (5%). A total of 21 patients eventually progressed with an overall median progression-free survival of 38 months. Patients with methylated MGMT promoter had a longer overall survival (P = 0.008). Deletion of either 1p or 19q chromosomes also predicted longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.93; log-rank P = 0.02). Conclusions: A protracted course of daily temozolomide is a well-tolerated regimen and seems to produce effective tumor control. This compares favorably with historical data on the standard 5-day temozolomide regimen.

Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy for recurrent malignant gliomas in adults.

Preclinical evidence suggests that continuous low-dose daily (metronomic) chemotherapy may inhibit tumor endothelial cell proliferation (angiogenesis) and prevent tumor growth. This phase II study evaluated the feasibility of this antiangiogenic chemotherapy regimen in adults with recurrent malignant gliomas. The regimen consisted of low-dose etoposide (35 mg/m2 [maximum, 100 mg/day] daily for 21 days), alternating every 21 days with cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg [maximum, 100 mg/day] daily for 21 days), in combination with daily thalidomide and celecoxib, in adult patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. Serum and urine samples were collected for measurement of angiogenic peptides. Forty-eight patients were enrolled (15 female, 33 male). Twenty-eight patients had glioblastoma multiforme (GBMs), and 20 had anaplastic gliomas (AGs). Median age was 53 years (range, 33-74 years), and median KPS was 70 (range, 60-100). Therapy was reasonably well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population. Two percent of patients had partial response, 9% had a minor response, 59% had stable disease, and 30% had progressive disease. For GBM patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 weeks, six-month PFS (6M-PFS) was 9%, and median overall survival (OS) was 21 weeks. For AG patients, median PFS was 14 weeks, 6M-PFS was 26%, and median OS was 41.5 weeks. In a limited subset of patients, serum and urine angiogenic peptides did not correlate with response or survival (p > 0.05). Although there were some responders, this four-drug, oral metronomic regimen did not significantly improve OS in this heavily pretreated group of patients who were generally not eligible for conventional protocols. While metronomic chemotherapy may not be useful in patients with advanced disease, further studies using metronomic chemotherapy combined with more potent antiangiogenic agents in patients with less advanced disease may be warranted.

Phase II study of temozolomide, thalidomide, and celecoxib for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults

We conducted a phase II study of the combination of temozolomide and angiogenesis inhibitors for treating adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients who had stable disease following standard radiation therapy received temozolomide for 5 days in 28-day cycles, in combination with daily thalidomide and celecoxib. Patients were treated until tumor progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Four-month progression-free survival (PFS) from study enrollment was the primary end point, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point. In addition, we sought to correlate response with O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status and serum levels of angiogenic peptides. Fifty patients with glioblastoma were enrolled (18 women, 32 men). Median age was 54 years (range, 29-78) and median KPS score was 90 (range, 70-100). From study enrollment, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2-8.0) and 4-month PFS was 63% (95% CI: 46%-75%). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.5-16.4) and 1-year OS was 47%. Of the 47 patients evaluable for best response, none had a complete response, five (11%) had partial response, four (9%) had minor response, 22 (47%) had stable disease, and 16 (34%) had progressive disease. Analysis of serial serum samples obtained from 47 patients for four angiogenic peptides failed to show a significant correlation with response or survival for three of the peptides; higher vascular endothelial growth factor levels showed a trend toward correlation with decreased OS (p=0.07) and PFS (p=0.09). The addition of celecoxib and thalidomide to adjuvant temozolomide was well tolerated but did not meet the primary end point of improvement of 4-month PFS from study enrollment.

Phase 2 study of dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Among patients with glioblastoma (GBM) who progress on standard temozolomide, the optimal therapy is unknown. Resistance to temozolomide is partially mediated by O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Because MGMT may be depleted by prolonged temozolomide administration, dose-intense schedules may overcome resistance. METHODS This was a multicenter, phase 2, single-arm study of temozolomide (75-100 mg/m(2)/day) for 21 days of each 28-day cycle. Patients had GBM in first recurrence after standard therapy. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). RESULTS Fifty-eight participants were accrued, 3 of whom were ineligible for analysis; one withdrew before response assessment. There were 33 men (61%), with a median age of 57 years (range, 25-79 years) and a median Karnofsky performance score of 90 (range, 60-100). Of 47 patients with MGMT methylation results, 36 (65%) had methylated tumors. There were 7 (13%) partial responses, and PFS6 was only 11%. Response and PFS did not depend on MGMT status; MSH2, MLH1, or ERCC1 expression; the number of prior temozolomide cycles; or the time off temozolomide. Treatment was well tolerated, with limited grade 3 neutropenia (n = 2) or thrombocytopenia (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS Dose-intense temozolomide on this schedule is safe in recurrent GBM. However, efficacy is marginal and predictive biomarkers are needed.

A Pilot Safety Study of Lenalidomide and Radiotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

PURPOSE To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide, an analogue of thalidomide with enhanced immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic properties and a more favorable toxicity profile, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) when given concurrently with radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed GBM received radiotherapy concurrently with lenalidomide given for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period and continued lenalidomide until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose escalation occurred in groups of 6. Determination of the MTD was based on toxicities during the first 12 weeks of therapy. The primary endpoint was toxicity. RESULTS Twenty-three patients were enrolled, of whom 20 were treated and evaluable for both toxicity and tumor response and 2 were evaluable for toxicity only. Common toxicities included venous thromboembolic disease, fatigue, and nausea. Dose-limiting toxicities were eosinophilic pneumonitis and transaminase elevations. The MTD for lenalidomide was determined to be 15 mg/m(2)/d. CONCLUSION The recommended dose for lenalidomide with radiotherapy is 15 mg/m(2)/d for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. Venous thromboembolic complications occurred in 4 patients, and prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered.

Phase II study of monthly pasireotide LAR (SOM230C) for recurrent or progressive meningioma

Objective: A subset of meningiomas recur after surgery and radiation therapy, but no medical therapy for recurrent meningioma has proven effective. Methods: Pasireotide LAR is a long-acting somatostatin analog that may inhibit meningioma growth. This was a phase II trial in patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or progressive meningioma designed to evaluate whether pasireotide LAR prolongs progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Patients were stratified by histology (atypical [World Health Organization grade 2] and malignant [grade 3] meningiomas in cohort A and benign [grade 3] in cohort B). Results: Eighteen patients were accrued in cohort A and 16 in cohort B. Cohort A had median age 59 years, median Karnofsky performance status 80, 17 (94%) had previous radiation therapy, and 11 (61%) showed high octreotide uptake. Cohort B had median age 52 years, median Karnofsky performance status 90, 11 (69%) had previous radiation therapy, and 12 (75%) showed high octreotide uptake. There were no radiographic responses to pasireotide LAR therapy in either cohort. Twelve patients (67%) in cohort A and 13 (81%) in cohort B achieved stable disease. In cohort A, PFS6 was 17% and median PFS 15 weeks (95% confidence interval: 8–20). In cohort B, PFS6 was 50% and median PFS 26 weeks (12–43). Treatment was well tolerated. Octreotide uptake and insulin-like growth factor–1 levels did not predict outcome. Expression of somatostatin receptor 3 predicted favorable PFS and overall survival. Conclusions: Pasireotide LAR has limited activity in recurrent meningiomas. The finding that somatostatin receptor 3 is associated with favorable outcomes warrants further investigation. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that in patients with recurrent or progressive meningioma, pasireotide LAR does not significantly increase the proportion of patients with PFS at 6 months.

Clinical implementation of integrated whole-genome copy number and mutation profiling for glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Multidimensional genotyping of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples has the potential to improve diagnostics and clinical trials for brain tumors, but prospective use in the clinical setting is not yet routine. We report our experience with implementing a multiplexed copy number and mutation-testing program in a diagnostic laboratory certified by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. METHODS We collected and analyzed clinical testing results from whole-genome array comparative genomic hybridization (OncoCopy) of 420 brain tumors, including 148 glioblastomas. Mass spectrometry-based mutation genotyping (OncoMap, 471 mutations) was performed on 86 glioblastomas. RESULTS OncoCopy was successful in 99% of samples for which sufficient DNA was obtained (n = 415). All clinically relevant loci for glioblastomas were detected, including amplifications (EGFR, PDGFRA, MET) and deletions (EGFRvIII, PTEN, 1p/19q). Glioblastoma patients ≤40 years old had distinct profiles compared with patients >40 years. OncoMap testing reliably identified mutations in IDH1, TP53, and PTEN. Seventy-seven glioblastoma patients enrolled on trials, of whom 51% participated in targeted therapeutic trials where multiplex data informed eligibility or outcomes. Data integration identified patients with complete tumor suppressor inactivation, albeit rarely (5% of patients) due to lack of whole-gene coverage in OncoMap. CONCLUSIONS Combined use of multiplexed copy number and mutation detection from FFPE samples in the clinical setting can efficiently replace singleton tests for clinical diagnosis and prognosis in most settings. Our results support incorporation of these assays into clinical trials as integral biomarkers and their potential to impact interpretation of results. Limited tumor suppressor variant capture by targeted genotyping highlights the need for whole-gene sequencing in glioblastoma.

Colon perforation during antiangiogenic therapy for malignant glioma

Antiangiogenic drugs have emerged as effective treatment options for patients with recurrent malignant gliomas (MGs). Though this class of drugs is generally well tolerated, rare life-threatening complications, including thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, are reported. We describe six cases of GI perforation among 244 glioma patients (2.5%) during treatment with antiangiogenic agents in combination with chemotherapy and corticosteroids. Two patients succumbed to this complication, and the others recovered. Because GI perforation is a life-threatening yet treatable complication, neurooncologists must have a low threshold to consider it in patients on antiangiogenic drug therapy who present with abdominal pain and other GI complaints.