Lisa Fosdick

Reliability and comparability of three dietary assessment methods for estimating fruit and vegetable intakes

Although fruits and vegetables have been evaluated in numerous epidemiologic studies, few validation studies have examined fruits and vegetables. We examined the reproducibility and comparability of fruit and vegetable intakes estimated by diet records, food frequency questionnaires, and modules (brief food frequency questionnaires) in 101 control participants of a 1‐year diet intervention trial. For each method, mean intakes at baseline and 3 months were generally within 0.3 serving per day for juice, fruits, vegetables, and total fruits and vegetables. In addition, Pearson correlations for the two time periods generally exceeded 0.55 for these four groups for each method. We evaluated comparability of intakes for 15 days of diet records, 1‐year food frequency questionnaires, and modules, respectively. Mean total fruit and vegetable intakes were 6.3, 6.5, and 3.8 servings per day for diet records, food frequency questionnaires, and modules. For each pair‐wise combination of methods, Pearson correlations exceeded 0.45 for juice, fruits, and total fruits and vegetables; correlations were lower for vegetables. Exact agreement in quintile assignment was less than 45%, however. These results indicate that estimates of fruit and vegetable intakes and disease associations may differ depending on the method used to assess fruit and vegetable intake.

A randomized controlled 24-week study of intermittent subcutaneous interleukin-2 in HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand.

ObjectivesTo assess the immunological and virological effects, safety profile and feasibility of subcutaneous interleukin-2 (scIL-2) therapy in an HIV-infected Thai population. DesignSeventy-two patients with baseline CD4 cell count of ⩾ 350 × 106/l and no history of opportunistic infection were randomized to receive antiretroviral therapy plus scIL-2 (scIL-2 group) or antiretroviral therapy alone (control group). scIL-2 was administered at one of three doses for at least 24 weeks. The main measure of treatment efficacy was change in CD4 cell count. ResultsThe time-weighted mean change in CD4 cell count from baseline to week 24 was + 252 × 106/l for the scIL-2 group compared with + 42 × 106/l for the control group (P < 0.0001). Changes in plasma HIV RNA were not significantly different between the groups over the same time period: there was a 0.83 log10 copies/ml decrease for the scIL-2 group and a 0.70 log copies/ml decrease for the control group (P = 0.362). ConclusionsThis study provides the most extensive experience of scIL-2 therapy in HIV-1 infected women and Asians, and demonstrates the immunological efficacy, tolerability and feasability of scIL-2 therapy in this population. Data from this study were instrumental in guiding the selection of the scIL-2 dosing regimen for ongoing phase III trials.

CD4 Cell Response to 3 Doses of Subcutaneous Interleukin 2: Meta-analysis of 3 Vanguard Studies

BACKGROUND In advance of a large clinical end point trial evaluating the effectiveness of subcutaneous interleukin 2 (scIL-2) for treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, 3 identically designed Vanguard trials were conducted in Buenos Aires, Argentina; Bangkok, Thailand; and Houston, Texas. To more precisely quantitate the effect on CD4 cell response of 3 different doses of scIL-2 that were administered twice daily for 5 days every 8 weeks, the results of these 3 trials were pooled in a meta-analysis. METHODS Two hundred eighteen HIV-1-infected subjects who were receiving antiretroviral therapy and who had a baseline CD4 cell count of > or =350 cells/mm3 were consecutively randomized to receive scIL-2 at a dose of 1.5 mIU (n=36) or a control regimen (n=36); or scIL-2 at a dose of 4.5 mIU (n=36) or a control regimen (n=36); or scIL-2 at a dose of 7.5 mIU (n=37) or a control regimen (n=37). After completion of 3 cycles of therapy, the subjects were enrolled in an extension phase (months 6-12). Subjects were encouraged to receive additional cycles of scIL-2 to maintain a CD4 cell count of more than twice the baseline count or >1000 cells/mm3. RESULTS After completion of 3 cycles of scIL-2, the mean CD4 cell count changes from baseline (calculated as changes from baseline in a scIL-2 group minus changes from baseline in its contemporaneous control group) were 67 (P=.14), 339 (P<.0001), and 605 cells/mm3 (P<.0001) for the 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 mIU dose groups, respectively (P<.0001 for differences among dose groups). Between months 6 and 12, a total of 78%, 39%, and 32% of subjects assigned to the 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 mIU dose groups, respectively, needed at least 1 additional cycle to achieve the CD4 cell count goal. At 12 months, the differences in the mean change in CD4 cell count from baseline between each scIL-2 dose group and its contemporaneous control group were 184, 369, and 432 cells/mm3, respectively (P=.01 for differences among dose groups). CONCLUSIONS Although CD4 cell count increases were seen in all 3 dose groups, higher scIL-2 doses resulted in greater CD4 cell count changes after 6 months, compared with control groups.

A Randomised Trial of Subcutaneous Intermittent Interleukin-2 without Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients: The UK-Vanguard Study

Objective: The objective of the trial was to evaluate in a pilot setting the safety and efficacy of interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy when used without concomitant antiretroviral therapy as a treatment for HIV infection. Design and Setting: This was a multicentre randomised three-arm trial conducted between September 1998 and March 2001 at three clinical centres in the United Kingdom. Participants: Participants were 36 antiretroviral treatment naïve HIV-1-infected patients with baseline CD4 T lymphocyte counts of at least 350 cells/mm3. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive IL-2 at 15 million international units (MIU) per day (12 participants) or 9 MIU/day (12 participants) or no treatment (12 participants). IL-2 was administered by twice-daily subcutaneous injections for five consecutive days every 8 wk. Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was the change from baseline CD4 T lymphocyte count at 24 wk. Safety and plasma HIV RNA levels were also monitored every 4 wk through 24 wk. The two IL-2 dose groups were combined for the primary analysis. Results: Area under curve (AUC) for change in the mean CD4 T lymphocyte count through 24 wk was 129 cells/mm3 for those assigned IL-2 (both dose groups combined) and 13 cells/mm3 for control participants (95% CI for difference, 51.3–181.2 cells/mm3; p = 0.0009). Compared to the control group, significant increases in CD4 cell count were observed for both IL-2 dose groups: 104.2/mm3 (p = 0.008) and 128.4 cells/mm3 (p = 0.002) for the 4.5 and 7.5 MIU dose groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the IL-2 (0.13 log10 copies/ml) and control (0.09 log10 copies/ml) groups for AUC of change in plasma HIV RNA over the 24-wk period of follow-up (95% CI for difference, −0.17 to 0.26; p = 0.70). Grade 4 and dose-limiting side effects were in keeping with those previously reported for IL-2 therapy. Conclusions: In participants with HIV infection and baseline CD4 T lymphocyte counts of at least 350 cells/mm3, intermittent subcutaneous IL-2 without concomitant antiretroviral therapy was well tolerated and produced significant increases in CD4 T lymphocyte counts and did not adversely affect plasma HIV RNA levels.

Long-term clinical and surrogate marker effects of subcutaneous intermittent interleukin-2 without antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVES Subcutaneous administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been shown to increase CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. It remains unclear whether this effect is associated with a clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a long-term follow-up in the cohort of the UK-Vanguard study in which three groups of 12 antiretroviral-naive subjects with CD4 cell counts >350 cells/mm(3) received no treatment or IL-2 at either 4.5 or 7.5 MIU twice daily in 5 day cycles, respectively. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 376 weeks. IL-2 therapy was associated with a higher area under the curve of CD4 cell count change from baseline at week 48 but not thereafter. HIV-RNA levels were unaffected. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was initiated after a mean of 172, 175 and 152 weeks in the control group, low-dose and high-dose IL-2 treatment group, respectively, a statistically non-significant difference. There was a tendency to start HAART soon after discontinuation of IL-2 therapy which may have been triggered by the steep decay of CD4 counts. There were two serious adverse events in the control group, seven in the low-dose IL-2 group and eight in the high-dose IL-2 group. No pattern of disease was detected, making an association with IL-2 therapy unlikely. CONCLUSIONS We could detect neither a benefit of IL-2 therapy after week 48 nor delayed initiation of HAART. This is currently the longest follow-up data comparing IL-2 therapy with no therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients and does not show a persistent benefit of the intervention.