Lisa G. Rider

Autoimmune-Associated Congenital Heart Block: Demographics, Mortality, Morbidity and Recurrence Rates Obtained From a National Neonatal Lupus Registry

OBJECTIVESnThe present study describes the demographics, mortality, morbidity and recurrence rates of autoimmune-associated congenital heart block (CHB) using information from the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus.nnnBACKGROUNDnIsolated CHB detected at or before birth is strongly associated with maternal autoantibodies to 48-kD SSB/La, 52-kD SSA/Ro and 60-kD SSA/Ro ribonucleoproteins and is a permanent manifestation of the neonatal lupus syndromes (NLS). Available data are limited by the rarity of the disease.nnnRESULTSnThe cohort includes 105 mothers whose sera contain anti-SSA/Ro or anti-SSB/La antibodies, or both, and their 113 infants diagnosed with CHB between 1970 and 1997 (56 boys, 57 girls). Of 87 pregnancies in which sufficient medical records were available, bradyarrhythmia confirmed to be CHB was initially detected before 30 weeks of gestation in 71 (82%) (median time 23 weeks). There were no cases in which major congenital cardiac anatomic defects were considered causal for the development of CHB; in 14 there were minor abnormalities. Twenty-two (19%) of the 113 children died, 16 (73%) within 3 months after birth. Cumulative probability of 3-year survival was 79%. Sixty-seven (63%) of 107 live-born children required pacemakers: 35 within 9 days of life, 15 within 1 year, and 17 after 1 year. Forty-nine of the mothers had subsequent pregnancies: 8 (16%) had another infant with CHB and 3 (6%) had a child with an isolated rash consistent with NLS.nnnCONCLUSIONSnData from this large series substantiate that autoantibody-associated CHB is not coincident with major structural abnormalities, is most often identified in the late second trimester, carries a substantial mortality in the neonatal period and frequently requires pacing. The recurrence rate of CHB is at least two- to three-fold higher than the rate for a mother with anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies who never had an affected child, supporting close echocardiographic monitoring in all subsequent pregnancies, with heightened surveillance between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation.

Magnetic resonance imaging detection of occult skin and subcutaneous abnormalities in juvenile dermatomyositis : Implications for diagnosis and therapy

OBJECTIVEnTo assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fascia in evaluating disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis (DM).nnnMETHODSnShort tau inversion recovery (STIR) MRI of the proximal thighs and buttocks, cutaneous assessment, and other measures of disease activity were prospectively obtained in 26 children meeting criteria for probable or definite juvenile DM. Also undergoing STIR MRI assessment were 8 subjects who were being evaluated for muscle disorders and who were not diagnosed as having juvenile DM.nnnRESULTSnSkin, subcutaneous, or fascial edema of the thighs and buttocks were seen on STIR MRI in up to 85% of juvenile DM patients at baseline evaluation compared with no more than 38% of the comparison group without juvenile DM. In juvenile DM, STIR MRI skin and subcutaneous edema scores correlated (r(s) = 0.51, P = 0.008), as did fascial and muscle edema scores (r(s) = 0.58, P = 0.002). Skin global disease activity scores correlated with MRI skin edema scores (r(s) = 0.41, P = 0.04), and serum aldolase levels correlated with both MRI skin and subcutaneous edema scores (r = 0.44 and 0.40, P = 0.03 and 0.05 respectively). The extent and severity of STIR MRI changes in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fascia were not predicted by most other measures of juvenile DM disease activity. Five juvenile DM patients with thigh MRI subcutaneous edema developed clinically apparent calcinosis at the same location within 9 months.nnnCONCLUSIONnEdema or inflammation in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fascia, found on STIR MRI, is common in juvenile DM patients and is often undetected by standard assessments. These MRI changes can precede the development of calcinosis. STIR MRI may be a useful adjunct for assessing disease activity and guiding the treatment of juvenile DM.

Development of validated disease activity and damage indices for the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: I. Physician, parent, and patient global assessments. Juvenile Dermatomyositis Disease Activity Collaborative Study Group.

OBJECTIVEnTo determine the reliability, content validity, and responsiveness of physician global assessments of disease activity and damage in the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and to investigate concordance among physician, parent, and patient global ratings.nnnMETHODSnSixteen pediatric rheumatologists rated 10 juvenile IIM paper patient cases for global disease activity and damage, and assessed the importance of 51 clinical and laboratory parameters in formulating their global assessments. Then, 117 juvenile IIM patients were enrolled in a protocol to examine the relationship between Likert and visual analog scale global assessments, their sensitivity to change, and the comparability of physician, parent, and patient global ratings.nnnRESULTSnPediatric rheumatologists demonstrated excellent interrater reliability in their global assessments of juvenile IIM disease activity and damage (97.7% and 94.7% agreement among raters, respectively), and agreed on a core set of clinical parameters in formulating their judgments. Likert scale ratings correlated with those on a visual analog scale, and both were comparable in responsiveness (standardized response means -0.56 for disease activity, 0.02 [Likert] and 0.14 [visual analog] for damage, measured over 8 months). Parent global ratings of disease activity correlated with physician assessments, but were not colinear (Spearmans correlation [r] = 0.41-0.45). Patient global disease activity assessments correlated with those done by parents (r = 0.57-0.84) and physicians (r = 0.37-0.63), but demonstrated less responsiveness (standardized response means -0.21 and -0.12, respectively, over 8 months).nnnCONCLUSIONnPhysician global assessments of juvenile IIM disease activity and damage demonstrated high interrater reliability and were shown to be comprehensive measures. Both physician and parent disease activity assessments should be considered valuable as quantitative measures for evaluating therapeutic responses in juvenile IIM patients.

2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups

Objective To develop and validate new classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and their major subgroups. Methods Candidate variables were assembled from published criteria and expert opinion using consensus methodology. Data were collected from 47 rheumatology, dermatology, neurology and paediatric clinics worldwide. Several statistical methods were used to derive the classification criteria. Results Based on data from 976 IIM patients (74% adults; 26% children) and 624 non-IIM patients with mimicking conditions (82% adults; 18% children), new criteria were derived. Each item is assigned a weighted score. The total score corresponds to a probability of having IIM. Subclassification is performed using a classification tree. A probability cut-off of 55%, corresponding to a score of 5.5 (6.7 with muscle biopsy) ‘probable IIM’, had best sensitivity/specificity (87%/82% without biopsies, 93%/88% with biopsies) and is recommended as a minimum to classify a patient as having IIM. A probability of ≥90%, corresponding to a score of ≥7.5 (≥8.7 with muscle biopsy), corresponds to ‘definite IIM’. A probability of <50%, corresponding to a score of <5.3 (<6.5 with muscle biopsy), rules out IIM, leaving a probability of ≥50u2009to <55% as ‘possible IIM’. Conclusions The European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for IIM have been endorsed by international rheumatology, dermatology, neurology and paediatric groups. They employ easily accessible and operationally defined elements, and have been partially validated. They allow classification of ‘definite’, ‘probable’ and ‘possible’ IIM, in addition to the major subgroups of IIM, including juvenile IIM. They generally perform better than existing criteria.

Progress report on development of classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Classification criteria are needed to aid recruitment of appropriate patients into research studies. The International Myositis Classification Criteria Project (IMCCP) was set up with support from ACR and EULAR.

EULAR/ACR classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups: a methodology report

Objective To describe the methodology used to develop new classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and their major subgroups. Methods An international, multidisciplinary group of myositis experts produced a set of 93 potentially relevant variables to be tested for inclusion in the criteria. Rheumatology, dermatology, neurology and paediatric clinics worldwide collected data on 976 IIM cases (74% adults, 26% children) and 624 non-IIM comparator cases with mimicking conditions (82% adults, 18% children). The participating clinicians classified each case as IIM or non-IIM. Generally, the classification of any given patient was based on few variables, leaving remaining variables unmeasured. We investigated the strength of the association between all variables and between these and the disease status as determined by the physician. We considered three approaches: (1) a probability-score approach, (2) a sum-of-items approach criteria and (3) a classification-tree approach. Results The approaches yielded several candidate models that were scrutinised with respect to statistical performance and clinical relevance. The probability-score approach showed superior statistical performance and clinical practicability and was therefore preferred over the others. We developed a classification tree for subclassification of patients with IIM. A calculator for electronic devices, such as computers and smartphones, facilitates the use of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria. Conclusions The new EULAR/ACR classification criteria provide a patient’s probability of having IIM for use in clinical and research settings. The probability is based on a score obtained by summing the weights associated with a set of criteria items.

P.21.5 Progress report on the development of new classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

On behalf of the members of the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project. An international, multidisciplinary collaboration, the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project (IMCCP), supported by ACR and EULAR, was established to develop and validate new classification criteria for adult and juvenile IIM and its major subgroups. Candidate variables were selected from published criteria and inclusion criteria in trials of myositis. Comparator conditions confused with IIM were defined. Clinical and laboratory data from IIM and comparator patients were collected from 47 rheumatology, dermatology, neurology and pediatrics clinics worldwide. Crude pair-wise associations among all measured variables and between each variable and clinicians’ diagnoses were assessed. Explored approaches were: 1. Traditional: case defined by specified number of items from a set. 2. Probability score: case assigned a probability score by summing score-points associated with a set of variables. 3. Classification tree: case defined by a decision tree Internal validation using bootstrap methods was performed. Data from 973 IIM patients (74% adults; 26% children) and 629 comparators (81% adults; 19% children) were obtained. Two probability score models were developed: Model 1 comprised clinical variables on muscles, skin, and laboratory measures; Model 2 additionally comprised muscle biopsy variables. Model 1 performed nearly as well as Model 2 (specificity 87% vs. 88%, sensitivity 89% vs 89%, and correctly classified 87% vs. 89%). Both models performed as well as, or better than, the classification tree that was developed (sensitivity 88%, specificity 72%, and correctly classified 84%) and published criteria. New classification criteria for IIM with readily assessable measurements and symptoms have been developed that generally show superior performance compared with existing criteria.