Lisa K. Jennings

Consensus and Future Directions on the Definition of High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Adenosine Diphosphate

The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin treatment reduces ischemic events in a wide range of patients with cardiovascular disease. However, recurrent ischemic event occurrence during dual antiplatelet therapy, including stent thrombosis, remains a major concern. Platelet function measurements during clopidogrel treatment demonstrated a variable and overall modest level of P2Y(12) inhibition. High on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was observed in selected patients. Multiple studies have now demonstrated a clear association between high on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP measured by multiple methods and adverse clinical event occurrence. However, the routine measurement of platelet reactivity has not been widely implemented and recommended in the guidelines. Reasons for the latter include: 1) a lack of consensus on the optimal method to quantify high on-treatment platelet reactivity and the cutoff value associated with clinical risk; and 2) limited data to support that alteration of therapy based on platelet function measurements actually improves outcomes. This review provides a consensus opinion on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP based on various methods reported in the literature and proposes how this measurement may be used in the future care of patients.

Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist Vorapaxar in Acute Coronary Syndromes

BACKGROUND Vorapaxar is a new oral protease-activated-receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist that inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation. METHODS In this multinational, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared vorapaxar with placebo in 12,944 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization. RESULTS Follow-up in the trial was terminated early after a safety review. After a median follow-up of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667), the primary end point occurred in 1031 of 6473 patients receiving vorapaxar versus 1102 of 6471 patients receiving placebo (Kaplan-Meier 2-year rate, 18.5% vs. 19.9%; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.01; P=0.07). A composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 822 patients in the vorapaxar group versus 910 in the placebo group (14.7% and 16.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P=0.02). Rates of moderate and severe bleeding were 7.2% in the vorapaxar group and 5.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.58; P<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78 to 6.45; P<0.001). Rates of nonhemorrhagic adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute coronary syndromes, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but significantly increased the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. (Funded by Merck; TRACER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00527943.).

Safety and tolerability of SCH 530348 in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study

BACKGROUND An antithrombotic drug is needed that safely reduces cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore assessed the tolerability and safety of SCH 530348-an oral platelet protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist. METHODS We randomly assigned patients aged 45 years or older and undergoing non-urgent PCI or coronary angiography with planned PCI to an oral loading dose of SCH 530348 (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) or matching placebo in a 3:1 ratio in a multicentre international study. Those in the SCH 530348 group who subsequently underwent PCI (primary PCI cohort) continued taking an oral maintenance dose (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, or 2.5 mg per day), and patients in the placebo group continued placebo for 60 days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically significant major or minor bleeding according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) scale. Both investigators and patients were unaware of treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00132912. FINDINGS 257 patients were assigned to placebo and 773 to SCH 530348. The primary endpoint occurred in 2 (2%) of 129, 3 (3%) of 120, and 7 (4%) of 173 patients, respectively, in the SCH 530348 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg groups compared with 5 (3%) of 151 patients in the placebo group (p=0.5786). TIMI major plus minor bleeding occurred in 3 (2%) of 136, 5 (4%) of 139, and 4 (3%) of 138 patients given SCH 530348 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, and 2.5 mg once per day, respectively (p=0.7561). INTERPRETATION Oral SCH 530348 was generally well tolerated and did not cause increased TIMI bleeding, even when administered concomitantly with aspirin and clopidogrel. Further testing in phase III trials to accurately define the safety and efficacy of SCH 530348 is warranted.

Effect of Ca2+ on GP IIb-IIIa Interactions With Integrilin Enhanced GP IIb-IIIa Binding and Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation by Reductions in the Concentration of Ionized Calcium in Plasma Anticoagulated With Citrate

BACKGROUND Integrilin (eptifibatide), a potent inhibitor of the fibrinogen binding function of GP IIb-llla, has been shown to reduce the thrombotic complications of angioplasty and of acute coronary syndromes. The present study was designed to determine whether the reduced Ca2+ concentrations in plasma anticoagulated with citrate affect Integrilin binding to GP IIb-IIIa and the ex vivo pharmacodynamic measurements for this drug. METHODS AND RESULTS Lower concentrations of Integrilin were found to inhibit platelet aggregation in plasma anticoagulated with citrate (for ADP, mean+/-SD IC(50)=140+/-40 nmol/L, n=6; Ca2+ =40 to 50 micromol/L) than with PPACK (IC(50)=570+/-70 nmol/L, P<.0001, n=6; Ca2+ approximately 1 mmol/L). Chelation of Ca2+ with EDTA or citrate caused a similar degree of enhancement in the inhibitory activity of Integrilin. Measurements of D3 LIBS epitope expression showed that the enhanced inhibitory activity was caused by enhanced GP IIb-IIIa occupancy by Integrilin. Citrate anticoagulation decreased the amounts of Integrilin required to inhibit the binding of PAC1, a monoclonal antibody that mimics the GP IIb-IIIa binding activity of fibrinogen. Reduced Ca2+ also increased Integrilin inhibition of the binding of biotinylated fibrinogen to purified, immobilized GP IIb-IIIa. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that citrate anticoagulation removes Ca2+ from GP IIb-IIIa and enhances the apparent inhibitory activity of Integrilin. This finding indicates that the inhibitory activity of Integrilin is overestimated in blood samples collected with citrate, suggesting that it may be possible to achieve greater antithrombotic efficacy beyond that observed in clinical trials to date with Integrilin.

Mechanisms of platelet activation: Need for new strategies to protect against platelet-mediated atherothrombosis

Platelets are central mediators of haemostasis at sites of vascular injury, but they also mediate pathologic thrombosis. Activated platelets stimulate thrombus formation in response to rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque or endothelial cell erosion, promoting atherothrombotic disease. They also interact with endothelial cells and leukocytes to promote inflammation, which contributes to atherosclerosis. Multiple pathways contribute to platelet activation, and current oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist target the thromboxane A(2) and ADP pathways, respectively. Both can diminish activation by other factors, but the extent of their effects depends upon the agonist, agonist strength, and platelet reactivity status. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, residual morbidity and mortality remain high. Neither agent is effective in inhibiting thrombin, the most potent platelet activator. This lack of comprehensive inhibition of platelet function allows continued thrombus formation and exposes patients to risk for recurrent thrombotic events. Moreover, bleeding risk is a substantial limitation of antiplatelet therapy, because these agents target platelet activation pathways critical for both protective haemostasis and pathologic thrombosis. Novel antiplatelet therapies that provide more complete inhibition of platelet activation without increasing bleeding risk could considerably decrease residual risk for ischemic events. Inhibition of the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 platelet activation pathway stimulated by thrombin is a novel, emerging approach to achieve more comprehensive inhibition of platelet activation when used in combination with current oral antiplatelet agents. PAR-1 inhibition is not expected to increase bleeding risk, as this pathway does not interfere with haemostasis.

Integrin-mediated signal transduction

Abstract. Integrins, expressed on virtually every cell type, are proteins that mediate cellular interactions with components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell surface integral plasma membrane proteins. In addition, integrins interact with the cytoskeleton and through this process participate in cell migration, tissue organization, cell growth, haemostasis, inflammation, target recognition of lymphocytes and the differentiation of many cell types. Signals generated from ligand-integrin interactions are propagated via the integrin cytoplasmic tails to signal transduction pathways within the cell (outside-in signalling). Information from within the cell can also be transmitted to the outside via integrin affinity modulation (inside-out signalling). Protein tyrosine phosphorylation has a central role in integrin-initiated cell signalling, leading to cytoskeletal organization and focal adhesion formation. This review will examine the current understanding of integrin function, focusing on the intracellular consequences of integrin-ligand interaction.

Role of Platelets in Atherothrombosis

Platelets play a pivotal role in atherothrombosis and therefore are primary targets of antithrombotic therapy. They release an array of agonists, such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP); adhesive molecules, such as P-selectin, thrombospondin, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor; coagulation factors; and growth factors. In turn, they present transmembrane receptors for a plethora of agonists and ligands. Heterodimeric glycoproteins of the integrin family bind extracellular matrix and plasma proteins; mediate adhesion, activation, spreading, and aggregation; and facilitate intercellular bidirectional signal transduction. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa is the most abundant platelet integrin and membrane surface glycoprotein. Glycolipids, heparins, proteoglycans, tetraspanins, and a multitude of other molecules, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, CD40L, growth arrest-specific 6, Eph receptor tyrosine kinases, and signaling lymphocytic activation molecule receptors, have been implicated in atherothrombosis. ADP promotes platelet aggregation by binding to platelet surface receptors P2Y(1) and P2Y(12); the thienopyridines inhibit aggregation by binding covalently to P2Y(12). Thrombin, a potent initiator of platelet aggregation, activates platelets by cleaving protease-activated receptors (PARs) PAR-1 and PAR-4 and further propagates its effect by activating nearby platelets. A number of pharmacologic agents with antiplatelet actions have been developed, but the search continues for agents that strike an optimal balance between control of thrombosis and serious bleeding.

Intracoronary Eptifibatide Bolus Administration During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Acute Coronary Syndromes With Evaluation of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Occupancy and Platelet Function The Intracoronary Eptifibatide (ICE) Trial

Background— Eptifibatide reduces major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intracoronary bolus administration of eptifibatide may result in higher levels of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy in the local coronary bed, disaggregate thrombus in the epicardial artery and microvasculature, and thereby improve coronary flow. Methods and Results— Patients undergoing PCI for an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either intracoronary or intravenous bolus administration of eptifibatide. The primary end point was the local glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy measured in the coronary sinus. There were no angiographic, electrophysiological, or other adverse findings attributable to intracoronary eptifibatide. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy was significantly greater with intracoronary versus intravenous administration: first bolus, 94±9% versus 51±15% (P<0.001); and second bolus, 99±2% versus 91±4% (P=0.001), respectively. Microvascular perfusion was significantly improved as measured by the corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) with intracoronary versus intravenous administration: pre-PCI, 36 (median) (25th and 75th percentiles, 16 and 64) versus 31 (25th and 75th percentiles, 23 and 45; P=0.8); and post-PCI, 18 (25th and 75th percentiles, 10 and 22) versus 25 (25th and 75th percentiles, 22 and 35; P=0.007), respectively. The only multivariate predictor associated with a post-PCI cTFC rank score was the first bolus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy (P<0.001). Conclusions— Intracoronary bolus administration of eptifibatide during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes results in higher local platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy, which is associated with improved microvascular perfusion demonstrated by an improved cTFC.

Dosing of clopidogrel for platelet inhibition in infants and young children: primary results of the Platelet Inhibition in Children On cLOpidogrel (PICOLO) trial.

Background— Infants and young children with certain types of heart disease are at increased risk for thromboses. Clopidogrel 75 mg/d is used in adults to prevent thrombotic events. The dose to achieve similar platelet inhibition in children is unknown. The objectives of the present study were (1) to determine the dose of clopidogrel needed in infants and young children to achieve a mean 30% to 50% inhibition of 5-&mgr;mol/L ADP–induced platelet aggregation (ie, inhibition similar to that observed with 75 mg in adults) and (2) to assess the safety and tolerability of clopidogrel in infants and young children. Methods and Results— We performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in children (0 to 24 months) with a cardiac condition at risk for arterial thrombosis. Patients were randomized to clopidogrel versus placebo in a 3:1 ratio in 4 sequential groups (0.01, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.15 mg/kg) for ≥7 and ≤28 days. Platelet aggregation was assessed at baseline and steady state by light-transmission aggregometry. Of 116 patients enrolled, 92 (50% neonates, 50% infants/toddlers) were randomized, and 73 completed the study. A total of 79% of the randomized and treated patients were taking aspirin. Compared with placebo, clopidogrel 0.20 mg · kg−1 · d−1 resulted in a mean 49.3% (95% confidence interval 25.7% to 72.8%) inhibition of the maximum extent of platelet aggregation and a mean 43.9% (95% confidence interval 18.6% to 69.2%) inhibition of the rate of platelet aggregation. There was marked interpatient variability in the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition within each treatment-dose group and age group. No serious bleeding events occurred. Conclusions— Clopidogrel 0.20 mg · kg−1 · d−1 in children 0 to 24 months of age achieves a platelet inhibition level similar to that in adults taking 75 mg/d. Clopidogrel is well tolerated in infants and young children at this dose.

Clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention (the PRIDE study).

This study describes the dose-exploration phase of the PRIDE trial, an investigation of the clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes of treatment with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were dependent upon proper dosing selection. In this multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical study, 127 patients were randomized 1:1:2:2 into 1 of the following treatment groups: placebo; eptifibatide as a 135 microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.75 microg/kg/min infusion; eptifibatide as a 180 microg/kg bolus with a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion; or eptifibatide as a 250 microg/kg bolus with a 3.0 microg/kg/min infusion. Light transmission aggregometry was used to determine platelet aggregation in response to 20 microM adenosine diphosphate, and platelet receptor occupancy was also determined. Eptifibatide exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was greater in samples collected in sodium citrate compared with those collected in D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone. The 180/2.0 dosing regimen achieved 90% inhibition of platelet aggregation immediately (5 minutes) and at steady state (8 to 24 hours). At 1 hour, mean inhibition of platelet aggregation was 80%. Eptifibatide exhibited dose-dependent pharmacodynamics that were dependent upon choice of anticoagulant. A 180 microg/kg bolus followed by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion at steady state achieved >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation. With the single-bolus regimen, however, there was an early loss of the inhibition of platelet aggregation before steady state was reached. Additional dose-exploration studies may further optimize eptifibatide dosing.