Lisa Kitasato

Postprandial hyperglycemia and endothelial function in type 2 diabetes: focus on mitiglinide

The risk of cardiovascular complication in a diabetes patient is similar to that in a nondiabetic patient with a history of myocardial infarction. Although intensive control of glycemia achieved by conventional antidiabetic agents decreases microvascular complications such as retinopathy and nephropathy, no marked effect has been reported on macrovascular complications or all-cause mortality. Evidence from VADT, ACCORD, and ADVANCE would suggest that glycemic control has little effect on macrovascular outcomes. Moreover, in the case of ACCORD, intensive glycemic control may be associated with an increased risk of mortality. There is sufficient evidence that suggests that postprandial hyperglycemia may be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in diabetes patients. However, there are no prospective clinical trials supporting the recommendation that lowering postprandial blood glucose leads to lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Mitiglinide is a short-acting insulinotropic agent used in type 2 diabetes treatment. It has a rapid stimulatory effect on insulin secretion and reduces postprandial plasma glucose level in patients with type 2 diabetes. Because of its short action time, it is unlikely to exert adverse effects related to hypoglycemia early in the morning and between meals. Mitiglinide reduces excess oxidative stress and inflammation, plays a cardioprotective role, and improves postprandial metabolic disorders. Moreover, mitiglinide add-on therapy with pioglitazone favorably affects the vascular endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients. These data suggest that mitiglinide plays a potentially beneficial role in the improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients and can be used to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Although the results of long-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trials for determining the cardiovascular effects of mitiglinide on clinical outcomes are awaited, this review is aimed at summarizing substantial insights into this topic.

Long-term warfarin therapy and biomarkers for osteoporosis and atherosclerosis

Background Stroke prevention by warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, has been an integral part in the management of atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K-dependent matrix Gla protein (MGP) has been known as a potent inhibitor of arterial calcification and osteoporosis. Therefore, we hypothesized that warfarin therapy affects bone mineral metabolism, vascular calcification, and vascular endothelial dysfunction. Methods We studied 42 atrial fibrillation patients at high-risk for atherosclerosis having one or more coronary risk factors. Twenty-four patients had been treated with warfarin for at least 12 months (WF group), and 18 patients without warfarin (non-WF group). Bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and under carboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) were measured as bone metabolism markers. Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) index measured by Endo-PAT2000 was used as an indicator of vascular endothelial function. Results There were no significant differences in patient background characteristics and other clinical indicators between the two groups. In WF group, the ucOC levels were significantly higher than those in the non-WF group (10.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 0.9 ng/mL; P < 0.01), similarly, the RANKL levels in the WF group were higher than those in the non-WF group (0.60 ± 0.06 vs. 0.37 ± 0.05 ng/mL; P = 0.007). Moreover, RH-PAT index was significantly lower in the WF group compared to those in the non-WF group (1.48 ± 0.11 vs. 1.88 ± 0.12; P = 0.017). Conclusions Long-term warfarin therapy may be associated with bone mineral loss and vascular calcification in 60–80 year old hypertensive patients.

Rivaroxaban Inhibits Angiotensin II-Induced Activation in Cultured Mouse Cardiac Fibroblasts Through the Modulation of NF-κB Pathway

Cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) play a central role in cardiac fibrosis. Factor Xa (FXa)-dependent protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and PAR-2 have been reported as important targets in proinflammatory and fibroproliferative diseases. From this viewpoint, we aimed to investigate whether treatment of rivaroxaban, an approved oral direct FXa inhibitor, attenuates functional changes in angiotensin (Ang) II-induced mouse CFs.Confluent cultured mouse CFs were pretreated with or without rivaroxaban. Ang II-induced cell migration was decreased by 73% in rivaroxaban induced cells. Rivaroxaban inhibited Ang II-induced cell proliferation by 27% at 0.01 μg/ mL, 69% at 0.1 μg/mL, 71% at 1 μg/mL, and 69% at 5 μg/mL. In mouse cytokine array measuring 40 cytokines, the productions of interleukin-16, TIMP-1, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were significantly reduced with 0.1 μg/mL of rivaroxaban pretreatment (all P < 0.05). TIMP-1 levels in the culture supernatant measured by ELISA were also decreased by rivaroxaban pretreatment in Ang II-induced CFs (35% decrease at 0.01 μg/mL, 47% at 0.1 μg/mL, 47% at 1 μg/mL, and 57% at 5 μg/mL). In the dual reporter assay analysis, rivaroxaban inhibited various inflammatory signal pathways, including the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), active protein-1 (AP-1), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways (decreases of 82%, 78%, and 75%, respectively).These data suggest that rivaroxaban inhibits Ang II-induced functional activation in cultured mouse CFs via inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK/AP-1 signaling pathways, which may be a possible target of heart failure, through the antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of rivaroxaban in Ang II-stimulated cardiac fibroblasts.

Clinical outcomes of chronic kidney disease patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES).

BACKGROUND The target lesion revascularization of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) has been reported to be lower than that of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients on hemodialysis (HD). However, the comparison of PES and second generation drug-eluting stents in CKD patients has not been fully investigated. We compared clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and PES in CKD patients. METHODS Hundred and forty seven CKD patients (eGFR<60mLmin(-1)1.73m(-2)) treated with PES (n=74, from May 2007 to December 2009) and EES (n=73, from January 2010 to January 2013) were enrolled in the study. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS The incidence of 36-month MACE was significantly lower in EES, non-HD group compared to PES, non HD group (0% in EES group and 13.5% in PES group, respectively, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in MACE between EES and PES in HD patients (5.4% in PES group and 5.5% in EES group, P=0.98). In multivariate analysis, PES group and PES ISR were independent factors for worse incidence of MACE. CONCLUSIONS In CKD patients, PES was associated with worse clinical outcomes in non-HD patients as compared with EES.

Lower Level of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol is Associated with a Higher Increase in the Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Fixed-dose Rosuvastatin

Aim: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) reflects on the diffuse atherosclerosis per coronary artery. It is unknown whether the statin therapy affects long term FFR after stenting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long term FFR after stent implantation in patients who are intaking fixed-dose rosuvastatin. Methods: A total of 22 patients with stable angina pectoris were enrolled. The values of FFR were measured before, immediately after, and 18 months after (follow-up day) the implantation of everolimus eluting stent (EES; Promus Element™ or Promus Element Plus™). A fixed dose of rosuvastatin at 5 mg/day was administrated to all patients. Results: Of the 22 patients, 2 were excluded because of adverse effect of rosuvastatin and in-stent total occlusion after EES implantation. Overall, the values of FFR immediately after and 18 months after EES implantation did not show significant change (from 0.90 ± 0.05 to 0.88 ± 0.06, p = 0.16). However, there was a significant negative correlation between low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level at follow-up day and changes in the value of FFR (p = 0.01, r = −0.74). There was an increase in the FFR value after stenting in 8 out of 9 patients with LDL cholesterol level below 75 mg/dl (area under the curve 0.92, p = 0.0005). Conclusions: LDL cholesterol level was associated with the change in the FFR value in patients following stent implantation. Lower LDL cholesterol tended to improve in the long-term FFR, underscoring the importance of lowering LDL cholesterol to prevent the progression of coronary atherosclerosis.