Lisa M Cordes
National Institutes of Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lisa M Cordes.
Lancet Oncology | 2017
Christopher R. Heery; Geraldine O'Sullivan-Coyne; Ravi A. Madan; Lisa M Cordes; Arun Rajan; Myrna Rauckhorst; Elizabeth Lamping; Israel Oyelakin; Jennifer L. Marte; Lauren M. Lepone; Renee N. Donahue; Italia Grenga; Jean-Marie Cuillerot; Berend Neuteboom; Anja von Heydebreck; Kevin M. Chin; Jeffrey Schlom; James L. Gulley
BACKGROUND Avelumab (MSB0010718C) is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to PD-L1, inhibiting its binding to PD-1, which inactivates T cells. We aimed to establish the safety and pharmacokinetics of avelumab in patients with solid tumours while assessing biological correlatives for future development. METHODS This open-label, single-centre, phase 1a, dose-escalation trial (part of the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial) assessed four doses of avelumab (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg), with dose-level cohort expansions to provide additional safety, pharmacokinetics, and target occupancy data. This study used a standard 3 + 3 cohort design and assigned patients sequentially at trial entry according to the 3 + 3 dose-escalation algorithm and depending on the number of dose-limiting toxicities during the first 3-week assessment period (the primary endpoint). Patient eligibility criteria included age 18 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, metastatic or locally advanced previously treated solid tumours, and adequate end-organ function. Avelumab was given as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. Patients in the dose-limiting toxicity analysis set were assessed for the primary endpoint of dose-limiting toxicity, and all patients enrolled in the dose-escalation part were assessed for the secondary endpoints of safety (treatment-emergent and treatment-related adverse events according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles (immunological effects), best overall response by Response Evaluation Criteria, and antidrug antibody formation. The population for the pharmacokinetic analysis included a subset of patients with rich pharmacokinetic samples from two selected disease-specific expansion cohorts at the same study site who had serum samples obtained at multiple early timepoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01772004. Patient recruitment to the dose-escalation part reported here is closed. FINDINGS Between Jan 31, 2013, and Oct 8, 2014, 53 patients were enrolled (four patients at 1 mg/kg, 13 at 3 mg/kg, 15 at 10 mg/kg, and 21 at 20 mg/kg). 18 patients were analysed in the dose-limiting toxicity analysis set: three at dose level 1 (1 mg/kg), three at dose level 2 (3 mg/kg), six at dose level 3 (10 mg/kg), and six at dose level 4 (20 mg/kg). Only one dose-limiting toxicity occurred, at the 20 mg/kg dose, and thus the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. In all 53 enrolled patients (the safety analysis set), common treatment-related adverse events (occurring in >10% of patients) included fatigue (21 patients [40%]), influenza-like symptoms (11 [21%]), fever (8 [15%]), and chills (6 [11%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in nine (17%) of 53 patients, with autoimmune disorder (n=3), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (n=2), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=2) each occurring in more than one patient (autoimmune disorder in two patients at 10 mg/kg and one patient at 20 mg/kg, increased blood creatine phosphokinase in two patients at 20 mg/kg, and increased aspartate aminotransferase in one patient at 1 mg/kg, and one patient at 10 mg/kg). Six (11%) of 53 patients had a serious treatment-related adverse event: autoimmune disorder (two [13%]), lower abdominal pain (one [7%]), fatigue (one [7%]), and influenza-like illness (one [7%]) in three patients treated at 10 mg/kg dose level, and autoimmune disorder (one [5%]), increased amylase (one [5%]), myositis (one [5%]), and dysphonia (one [5%]) in three patients who received the 20 mg/kg dose. We recorded some evidence of clinical activity in various solid tumours, with partial confirmed or unconfirmed responses in four (8%) of 53 patients; 30 (57%) additional patients had stable disease. Pharmacokinetic analysis (n=86) showed a dose-proportional exposure between doses of 3 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg and a half-life of 95-99 h (3·9-4·1 days) at the 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg doses. Target occupancy was greater than 90% at doses of 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg. Antidrug antibodies were detected in two (4%) of 53 patients. No substantial differences were found in absolute lymphocyte count or multiple immune cell subsets, including those expressing PD-L1, after treatment with avelumab. 31 (58%) of 53 patients in the overall safety population died; no deaths were related to treatment on study. INTERPRETATION Avelumab has an acceptable toxicity profile up to 20 mg/kg and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Based on pharmacokinetics, target occupancy, and immunological analysis, we chose 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks as the dose for further development and phase 3 trials are ongoing. FUNDING National Cancer Institute and Merck KGaA.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2018
Julius Strauss; Christopher R. Heery; Jeffrey Schlom; Ravi A. Madan; Liang Cao; Zhigang Kang; Elizabeth Lamping; Jennifer L. Marte; Renee N. Donahue; Italia Grenga; Lisa M Cordes; Olaf Christensen; Lisa Mahnke; Christoph Helwig; James L. Gulley
Purpose: M7824 (MSB0011359C) is an innovative first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of a mAb against programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) fused to a TGFβ “trap.” Experimental Design: In the 3+3 dose-escalation component of this phase I study (NCT02517398), eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received M7824 at 1, 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal; in addition, a cohort received an initial 0.3 mg/kg dose to evaluate pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, followed by 10 mg/kg dosing. The primary objective is to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and best overall response. Results: Nineteen heavily pretreated patients with ECOG 0–1 have received M7824. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in four patients (skin infection secondary to localized bullous pemphigoid, asymptomatic lipase increase, colitis with associated anemia, and gastroparesis with hypokalemia). The MTD was not reached. M7824 saturated peripheral PD-L1 and sequestered any released plasma TGFβ1, -β2, and -β3 throughout the dosing period at >1 mg/kg. There were signs of efficacy across all dose levels, including one ongoing confirmed complete response (cervical cancer), two durable confirmed partial responses (PR; pancreatic cancer; anal cancer), one near-PR (cervical cancer), and two cases of prolonged stable disease in patients with growing disease at study entry (pancreatic cancer; carcinoid). Conclusions: M7824 has a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Early signs of efficacy are encouraging, and multiple expansion cohorts are ongoing in a range of tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1287–95. ©2018 AACR.
BJUI | 2016
Ravi A. Madan; Fatima Karzai; Yang-Min Ning; Bamidele Adesunloye; Xuan Huang; Nancy Harold; Anna Couvillon; Guinevere Chun; Lisa M Cordes; Tristan M. Sissung; Shaunna L. Beedie; Nancy A. Dawson; Marc R. Theoret; David G. McLeod; Inger L. Rosner; Jane B. Trepel; Min-Jung Lee; Yusuke Tomita; Sunmin Lee; Clara C. Chen; Seth M. Steinberg; Philip M. Arlen; James L. Gulley; William D. Figg; William L. Dahut
To determine the safety and clinical efficacy of two anti‐angiogenic agents, bevacizumab and lenalidomide, with docetaxel and prednisone.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2017
Christopher R. Heery; Claudia Palena; Sheri McMahon; Renee N. Donahue; Lauren M. Lepone; Italia Grenga; Ulrike Dirmeier; Lisa M Cordes; Jennifer L. Marte; William L. Dahut; Harpreet Singh; Ravi A. Madan; Romaine I. Fernando; Duane H. Hamilton; Jeffrey Schlom; James L. Gulley
Purpose: The transcription factor brachyury has been shown in preclinical studies to be a driver of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and resistance to therapy of human tumor cells. This study describes the characterization of a Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vector–based vaccine expressing the transgenes for brachyury and three human costimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3, designated TRICOM) and a phase I study with this vaccine. Experimental Design: Human dendritic cells (DC) were infected with MVA-brachyury-TRICOM to define their ability to activate brachyury-specific T cells. A dose-escalation phase I study (NCT02179515) was conducted in advanced cancer patients (n = 38) to define safety and to identify brachyury-specific T-cell responses. Results: MVA-brachyury-TRICOM-infected human DCs activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells specific against the self-antigen brachyury in vitro. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed due to vaccine in cancer patients at any of the three dose levels. One transient grade 3 adverse event (AE) possibly related to vaccine (diarrhea) resolved without intervention and did not recur with subsequent vaccine. All other AEs related to vaccine were transient and ≤grade 2. Brachyury-specific T-cell responses were observed at all dose levels and in most patients. Conclusions: The MVA-brachyury-TRICOM vaccine directed against a transcription factor known to mediate EMT can be administered safely in patients with advanced cancer and can activate brachyury-specific T cells in vitro and in patients. Further studies of this vaccine in combination therapies are warranted and planned. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6833–45. ©2017 AACR.
Current Opinion in Oncology | 2016
Lisa M Cordes; James L. Gulley; Ravi A. Madan
Purpose of review In recent clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents have demonstrated promising results for the treatment of prostate cancer. This review discusses emerging immunotherapies for prostate cancer and their evolving role in sequencing and combination therapy. Recent findings Therapeutic vaccines including PROSTVAC and DCVAC/PCa have completed promising phase 2 trials for the treatment of prostate cancer and phase 3 trials are underway. Recent evidence supports a synergistic relationship between immunotherapy agents themselves, antiandrogens and with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Prostate cancer patients with good prognostic factors, such as minimal disease burden, appear to achieve the optimal benefit from immunotherapy. Summary Therapeutic cancer vaccines and immunomodulating agents have demonstrated activity in the treatment of prostate cancer. Immunotherapies may alter the prostate tumor microenvironment and ongoing studies aim to provide guidance on effective sequencing and combination strategies.
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy | 2018
Mairead Baker; Lisa M Cordes; Isaac Brownell
ABSTRACT Introduction: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer. Although MCC is chemosensitive, responses to traditional chemotherapeutic agents are not durable. Avelumab, a novel anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, recently became the first FDA-approved agent for the treatment of metastatic MCC and represents a new option to improve patient survival. Areas covered: This article presents an overview of MCC and summarizes the development of avelumab in the treatment of metastatic MCC. Preclinical studies, phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials, and the safety profile of avelumab are reviewed. Future perspectives and ongoing studies are also discussed. Expert commentary: Avelumab demonstrated rapid and durable responses and a manageable safety profile in the treatment of metastatic MCC. Patient outcomes are favorable when compared to historical responses to standard chemotherapy. Ongoing clinical trials will continue to characterize avelumab and its optimal use in MCC therapy.
JAAD case reports | 2017
John W. Roman; Michelle A. Ojemuyiwa; Lisa M Cordes; Ravi A. Madan; Leonard C. Sperling
Fig 1. Clinical extravasation 3 weeks after docetaxel infusion. INTRODUCTION Extravasation of chemotherapy is a rare devastating, cutaneous complication associated with administration of intravenous chemotherapy. Extravasation of chemotherapeutic agents can cause significant morbidity to already arduous chemotherapy regimens. Traditional treatment of extravasation is largely conservative in nature using compression, elevation, and topical or systemic steroids as the primary therapeutic modalities with varying efficacy. We present a case of docetaxel extravasation successfully treated with intralesional steroids that clinically hastened the resolution of cutaneous symptoms.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
Andrea B. Apolo; Howard L. Parnes; Deneise C Francis; Lisa M Cordes; Marilise Berninger; Elizabeth Lamping; Rene Costello; Jane B. Trepel; Maria J. Merino; Les R. Folio; Maria Liza Lindenberg; William D. Figg; Seth M. Steinberg; John J. Wright; Ravi A. Madan; Yangmin M. Ning; James L. Gulley; Donald P. Bottaro; William L. Dahut; Piyush K. Agarwal
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Andrea B. Apolo; Amir Mortazavi; Mark N. Stein; Nicole N. Davarpanah; Rosa Nadal; Howard L. Parnes; Yangmin M. Ning; Deneise C Francis; Lisa M Cordes; Marilise Anne Berniger; Seth M. Steinberg; Piyush K. Agarwal; Mohammadhadi Bagheri; Swati Nanda; Paul Monk; Tiffany Lancaster; Tina Moore; Rene Costello; Donald P. Bottaro; Sumanta K. Pal
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Fatima Karzai; Ravi A. Madan; Helen Owens; Amy Hankin; Anna Couvillon; Nicole Houston; Farhad Fakhrejahani; Marijo Bilusic; Marc R. Theoret; Lisa M Cordes; Jane B. Trepel; Daniel C. Edelman; Paul S. Meltzer; James L. Gulley; William L. Dahut; Jung-Min Lee