Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lisa M. Goddard is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lisa M. Goddard.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1999

Importance of the Indian Ocean for simulating rainfall anomalies over eastern and southern Africa

Lisa M. Goddard; Nicholas E. Graham

The relative contributions of the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean sea surface temperatures (SSTs) to the rainfall variability over eastern central, and southern Africa during the austral spring-summer are examined. The variability of African rainfall is statistically related to both oceans, but the variability in the two oceans is also related. To separate the effects of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, a suite of numerical model simulations is presented: GOGA, the atmosphere is forced by observed SSTs globally; IOGA, the atmosphere is forced by observed SSTs only in the Indian Ocean basin; and POGA, the atmosphere is forced by observed SSTs only in the tropical Pacific basin. While the SST variability of the tropical Pacific exerts some influence over the African region, it is the atmospheric response to the Indian Ocean variability that is essential for simulating the correct rainfall response over eastern, central, and southern Africa. Analyses of the dynamical response(s) seen in the numerical experiments and in the observations indicate that the Pacific and Indian Oceans have a competing influence over the Indian Ocean/African region. This competition is related to the influence of the two oceans on the Walker circulation and the consequences of that variability on low-level fluxes of moisture over central and southern Africa. Finally, given the high correlation found between SST variability in the Indian and Pacific Oceans with the Pacific leading by ∼3 months, we speculate on an approach to long-lead dynamical climate prediction over central-east and southern Africa.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2014

Decadal climate prediction: An update from the trenches

Gerald A. Meehl; Lisa M. Goddard; G. J. Boer; Robert J. Burgman; Grant Branstator; Christophe Cassou; Susanna Corti; Gokhan Danabasoglu; Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes; Ed Hawkins; Alicia Karspeck; Masahide Kimoto; Arun Kumar; Daniela Matei; Juliette Mignot; Rym Msadek; Antonio Navarra; Holger Pohlmann; Michele M. Rienecker; T. Rosati; Edwin K. Schneider; Doug Smith; Rowan Sutton; Haiyan Teng; Geert Jan van Oldenborgh; Gabriel A. Vecchi; Stephen Yeager

This paper provides an update on research in the relatively new and fast-moving field of decadal climate prediction, and addresses the use of decadal climate predictions not only for potential users of such information but also for improving our understanding of processes in the climate system. External forcing influences the predictions throughout, but their contributions to predictive skill become dominant after most of the improved skill from initialization with observations vanishes after about 6–9 years. Recent multimodel results suggest that there is relatively more decadal predictive skill in the North Atlantic, western Pacific, and Indian Oceans than in other regions of the world oceans. Aspects of decadal variability of SSTs, like the mid-1970s shift in the Pacific, the mid-1990s shift in the northern North Atlantic and western Pacific, and the early-2000s hiatus, are better represented in initialized hindcasts compared to uninitialized simulations. There is evidence of higher skill in initialize...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2001

Probabilistic Precipitation Anomalies Associated with ENSO

Simon J. Mason; Lisa M. Goddard

Extreme phases of the El Nino–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon have been blamed for precipitation anomalies in many areas of the world. In some areas the probability of above-normal precipita...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2003

Multimodel Ensembling in Seasonal Climate Forecasting at IRI

Anthony G. Barnston; Simon J. Mason; Lisa M. Goddard; David G. DeWitt; Stephen E. Zebiak

The International Research Institute (IRI) for Climate Prediction seasonal forecast system is based largely on the predictions of ensembles of several atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) forced by two versions of an SST prediction—one consisting of persisted SST anomalies from the current observations and one of evolving SST anomalies as predicted by a set of dynamical and statistical SST prediction models. Recently, an objective multimodel ensembling procedure has replaced a more laborious and subjective weighting of the predictions of the several AGCMs. Here the skills of the multimodel predictions produced retrospectively over the first 4 years of IRI forecasts are examined and compared with the skills of the more subjectively derived forecasts actually issued. The multimodel ensemble predictions are generally found to be an acceptable replacement, although the precipitation forecasts do benefit from inclusion of empirical forecast tools. Planned pattern-level model output statistics (MOS) c...


Climate Dynamics | 2013

A verification framework for interannual-to-decadal predictions experiments

Lisa M. Goddard; Arun Kumar; Amy Solomon; D. Smith; G. J. Boer; Paula Leticia Manuela Gonzalez; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; William J. Merryfield; Clara Deser; Simon J. Mason; Ben P. Kirtman; Rym Msadek; Rowan Sutton; Ed Hawkins; Thomas E. Fricker; Gabi Hegerl; Christopher A. T. Ferro; David B. Stephenson; Gerald A. Meehl; Timothy N. Stockdale; Robert J. Burgman; Arthur M. Greene; Yochanan Kushnir; Matthew Newman; James A. Carton; Ichiro Fukumori; Thomas L. Delworth

Decadal predictions have a high profile in the climate science community and beyond, yet very little is known about their skill. Nor is there any agreed protocol for estimating their skill. This paper proposes a sound and coordinated framework for verification of decadal hindcast experiments. The framework is illustrated for decadal hindcasts tailored to meet the requirements and specifications of CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5). The chosen metrics address key questions about the information content in initialized decadal hindcasts. These questions are: (1) Do the initial conditions in the hindcasts lead to more accurate predictions of the climate, compared to un-initialized climate change projections? and (2) Is the prediction model’s ensemble spread an appropriate representation of forecast uncertainty on average? The first question is addressed through deterministic metrics that compare the initialized and uninitialized hindcasts. The second question is addressed through a probabilistic metric applied to the initialized hindcasts and comparing different ways to ascribe forecast uncertainty. Verification is advocated at smoothed regional scales that can illuminate broad areas of predictability, as well as at the grid scale, since many users of the decadal prediction experiments who feed the climate data into applications or decision models will use the data at grid scale, or downscale it to even higher resolution. An overall statement on skill of CMIP5 decadal hindcasts is not the aim of this paper. The results presented are only illustrative of the framework, which would enable such studies. However, broad conclusions that are beginning to emerge from the CMIP5 results include (1) Most predictability at the interannual-to-decadal scale, relative to climatological averages, comes from external forcing, particularly for temperature; (2) though moderate, additional skill is added by the initial conditions over what is imparted by external forcing alone; however, the impact of initialization may result in overall worse predictions in some regions than provided by uninitialized climate change projections; (3) limited hindcast records and the dearth of climate-quality observational data impede our ability to quantify expected skill as well as model biases; and (4) as is common to seasonal-to-interannual model predictions, the spread of the ensemble members is not necessarily a good representation of forecast uncertainty. The authors recommend that this framework be adopted to serve as a starting point to compare prediction quality across prediction systems. The framework can provide a baseline against which future improvements can be quantified. The framework also provides guidance on the use of these model predictions, which differ in fundamental ways from the climate change projections that much of the community has become familiar with, including adjustment of mean and conditional biases, and consideration of how to best approach forecast uncertainty.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2003

Evaluation of the IRI'S “Net Assessment” Seasonal Climate Forecasts: 1997–2001

Lisa M. Goddard; Anthony G. Barnston; Simon J. Mason

Abstract The International Research Institute for Climate Prediction (IRI) net assessment seasonal temperature and precipitation forecasts are evaluated for the 4-yr period from October–December 1997 to October–December 2001. These probabilistic forecasts represent the human distillation of seasonal climate predictions from various sources. The ranked probability skill score (RPSS) serves as the verification measure. The evaluation is offered as time-averaged spatial maps of the RPSS as well as area-averaged time series. A key element of this evaluation is the examination of the extent to which the consolidation of several predictions, accomplished here subjectively by the forecasters, contributes to or detracts from the forecast skill possible from any individual prediction tool. Overall, the skills of the net assessment forecasts for both temperature and precipitation are positive throughout the 1997–2001 period. The skill may have been enhanced during the peak of the 1997/98 El Nino, particularly for t...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2011

Distinguishing the Roles of Natural and Anthropogenically Forced Decadal Climate Variability: Implications for Prediction

Amy Solomon; Lisa M. Goddard; Arun Kumar; James A. Carton; Clara Deser; Ichiro Fukumori; Arthur M. Greene; Gabriele C. Hegerl; Ben P. Kirtman; Yochanan Kushnir; Matthew Newman; Doug Smith; Dan Vimont; Tom Delworth; Gerald A. Meehl; Timothy N. Stockdale

Abstract Given that over the course of the next 10–30 years the magnitude of natural decadal variations may rival that of anthropogenically forced climate change on regional scales, it is envisioned that initialized decadal predictions will provide important information for climate-related management and adaptation decisions. Such predictions are presently one of the grand challenges for the climate community. This requires identifying those physical phenomena—and their model equivalents—that may provide additional predictability on decadal time scales, including an assessment of the physical processes through which anthropogenic forcing may interact with or project upon natural variability. Such a physical framework is necessary to provide a consistent assessment (and insight into potential improvement) of the decadal prediction experiments planned to be assessed as part of the IPCCs Fifth Assessment Report.


Monthly Weather Review | 2004

Improved combination of multiple atmospheric GCM ensembles for seasonal prediction

Andrew W. Robertson; Upmanu Lall; Stephen E. Zebiak; Lisa M. Goddard

Abstract An improved Bayesian optimal weighting scheme is developed and used to combine six atmospheric general circulation model (GCM) seasonal hindcast ensembles. The approach is based on the prior belief that the forecast probabilities of tercile-category precipitation and near-surface temperature are equal to the climatological ones. The six GCMs are integrated over the 1950–97 period with observed monthly SST prescribed at the lower boundary, with 9–24 ensemble members. The weights of the individual models are determined by maximizing the log likelihood of the combination by season over the integration period. A key ingredient of the scheme is the climatological equal-odds forecast, which is included as one of the “models” in the multimodel combination. Simulation skill is quantified in terms of the cross-validated ranked probability skill score (RPSS) for the three-category probabilistic hindcasts. The individual GCM ensembles, simple poolings of three and six models, and the optimally combined mult...


Journal of Climate | 2006

Probabilistic Multimodel Regional Temperature Change Projections

Arthur M. Greene; Lisa M. Goddard; Upmanu Lall

Abstract Regional temperature change projections for the twenty-first century are generated using a multimodel ensemble of atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. The models are assigned coefficients jointly, using a Bayesian linear model fitted to regional observations and simulations of the climate of the twentieth century. Probability models with varying degrees of complexity are explored, and a selection is made based on Bayesian deviance statistics, coefficient properties, and a classical cross-validation measure utilizing temporally averaged data. The model selected is shown to be superior in predictive skill to a naive model consisting of the unweighted mean of the underlying atmosphere–ocean GCM (AOGCM) simulations, although the skill differential varies regionally. Temperature projections for the A2 and B1 scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios are presented.


Science | 2013

Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science

Richard H. Moss; Gerald A. Meehl; Maria Carmen Lemos; Joel B. Smith; J. R. Arnold; James C. Arnott; D. Behar; Guy P. Brasseur; S. B. Broomell; Antonio J. Busalacchi; Suraje Dessai; Kristie L. Ebi; James A. Edmonds; John Furlow; Lisa M. Goddard; Holly Hartmann; James W. Hurrell; John Katzenberger; Diana Liverman; Phil Mote; Susanne C. Moser; Akhil Kumar; Roger Pulwarty; E. A. Seyller; B.L. Turner; Warren M. Washington; Thomas J. Wilbanks

Adaptation requires science that analyzes decisions, identifies vulnerabilities, improves foresight, and develops options. Informing the extensive preparations needed to manage climate risks, avoid damages, and realize emerging opportunities is a grand challenge for climate change science. U.S. President Obama underscored the need for this research when he made climate preparedness a pillar of his climate policy. Adaptation improves preparedness and is one of two broad and increasingly important strategies (along with mitigation) for climate risk management. Adaptation is required in virtually all sectors of the economy and regions of the globe, for both built and natural systems (1).

Collaboration


Dive into the Lisa M. Goddard's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arun Kumar

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerald A. Meehl

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge