Lisa Renner

Are lateral compartment osteophytes a predictor for lateral cartilage damage in varus osteoarthritic knees?: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

We studied whether the presence of lateral osteophytes on plain radiographs was a predictor for the quality of cartilage in the lateral compartment of patients with varus osteoarthritic of the knee (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 to 3). The baseline MRIs of 344 patients from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) who had varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee on hip-knee-ankle radiographs were reviewed. Patients were categorised using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) osteophyte grading system into 174 patients with grade 0 (no osteophytes), 128 grade 1 (mild osteophytes), 28 grade 2 (moderate osteophytes) and 14 grade 3 (severe osteophytes) in the lateral compartment (tibia). All patients had Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3 arthritis of the medial compartment. The thickness and volume of the lateral cartilage and the percentage of full-thickness cartilage defects in the lateral compartment was analysed. There was no difference in the cartilage thickness or cartilage volume between knees with osteophyte grades 0 to 3. The percentage of full-thickness cartilage defects on the tibial side increased from < 2% for grade 0 and 1 to 10% for grade 3. The lateral compartment cartilage volume and thickness is not influenced by the presence of lateral compartment osteophytes in patients with varus OA of the knee. Large lateral compartment osteophytes (grade 3) increase the likelihood of full-thickness cartilage defects in the lateral compartment.

Is there a rationale to use highly cross-linked polyethylene in posterior—stabilized total knee arthroplasty?

The use of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial.

Imaging of ceramic liner fractures in total hip arthroplasty: the value of CT.

Fracture of a ceramic liner of a total hip arthroplasty is rare and is radiographically occult if not displaced. We report on two patients in whom ceramic liner fracture was radiographically occult but was diagnosed on subsequent CT scan through appropriate windowing.

Do Changes in the Production Process Affect the Outcome of Ceramic Liners: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND In 2011, the current liner was withdrawn from the market because of the potential risk for liner fracture secondary to increased pressures used to assemble the metal locking ring. The present study provides a short-term follow-up of patients with this implant. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 63 consecutive hips in 53 patients operated by a single surgeon using a recalled ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. There were 30 women and 23 men with an average age of 50.6 years (range 20.3-63.5 years). The mean follow-up was 36.8 months. RESULTS Six hips in 6 patients were revised (9.5%) because of a liner-fracture during the follow-up period. All liner fractures were identified on computer tomography imaging. Nine patients had self-reported episodes of squeaking (14.3%). All 6 patients that underwent revision surgery for liner fracture described squeaking before revision. There were no revisions for other causes. Two of the revised patients had a subsequent dislocation (33%). CONCLUSION The recalled ceramic liner lots have an increased liner fracture rate. Patients with mechanical symptoms or squeaking should undergo computer tomography to rule out liner facture.