Lisa Stagner

Bronchogenic carcinoma in lung transplant recipients

Although lung transplant recipients have a higher prevalence of non-melanoma skin cancers and lymphoma than the general population, the same has not been noted for bronchogenic carcinoma. If an increased prevalence of bronchogenic carcinoma exists, contributing factors may include the high rate of previous tobacco use in this population and/or the chronic immunosuppression used to prevent allograft rejection. With time, the incidence of bronchogenic carcinoma in the lung transplant population is likely to parallel the increasing longevity and number of transplanted individuals. We describe 2 cases of bronchogenic carcinoma in lung transplant recipients that demonstrate the morbidity associated with the discovery or development of bronchogenic carcinoma in this population.

Timing of basiliximab induction and development of acute rejection in lung transplant patients

BACKGROUND Acute rejection affects more than 36% of recipients within the first year post-transplantation. The interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor antagonist basiliximab has been associated with decreased frequency and severity of acute rejection. We investigated whether the timing of induction administration would impact the frequency and severity of acute rejection in the first year after transplantation. METHODS In this study we reviewed 119 patients who underwent lung transplantation at Henry Ford Hospital from October 1994 to January 2009. Prior to January 2000 no patients received induction. From January 2000 to March 2006 the initial dose was given after implantation, and from March 2006 to 2009 basiliximab was given prior to implantation. The primary outcome was cumulative acute rejection score (CAR) in the first post-operative year comparing post- vs pre-implant induction. RESULTS The CAR score for pre-implant basiliximab was 2.5 ± 2.3. This was significantly lower than CAR score of 4.6 ± 3.9 in the post-implant group (p = 0.025). The no-induction group had the highest CAR score at 6.3 ± 3.8 (p = 0.077 compared with the post group). The mean follow-up times in the post and pre group were 5.9 ± 2.3 and 2.3 ± 0.7 years, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference in freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), survival or invasive infections between pre- and post-implant induction groups. CONCLUSIONS Basiliximab prior to implant is associated with a lower cumulative acute rejection score over 1 year compared with induction post-implantation. Despite a lower cumulative acute rejection score, there was no significant difference in freedom from BOS or survival.