Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lisa Vaccaro is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lisa Vaccaro.


Behaviour Research and Therapy | 2009

No evidence of attentional bias in obsessive compulsive checking on the dot probe paradigm.

Emily L. Harkness; Lynne M. Harris; Mairwen K. Jones; Lisa Vaccaro

Attentional biases have been proposed as maintaining and causal factors in anxiety, and it has been suggested that training attentional bias can impact on emotional responding. Given the severity of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and the considerable number of clients who do not respond to traditional therapies, understanding the factors that maintain anxiety in OCD is critical for the development of effective treatments. This study investigated attentional biases in a homogenous group of OCD patients whose primary concern was checking (OCD-Check; n=18) compared to a Control group individually matched for age, gender and level of education (Control; n=18) using a dot probe task. No evidence of attentional bias, or of differences in orienting to or disengaging from checking-relevant stimuli, was found in the OCD group compared to the matched Control group. From this data, it would appear that attentional bias may not be a feature of obsessive compulsive checking. The limitations of the present study and future research directions are discussed.


Anz Journal of Surgery | 2002

Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct stenting in the management of common bile duct stones

Christopher J. Martin; Michael R. Cox; Lisa Vaccaro

Background: The management of patients with common bile duct stones associated with stones in the gall bladder remains controversial.


Oncologist | 2015

Migrant Health in Cancer: Outcome Disparities and the Determinant Role of Migrant-Specific Variables

Ming Sze; Phyllis Butow; Melanie L. Bell; Lisa Vaccaro; Skye Dong; Maurice Eisenbruch; Michael Jefford; Afaf Girgis; Madeleine King; Joshua A. McGrane; Weng Ng; Ray Asghari; Phillip Parente; Winston Liauw; David Goldstein; Linguistically Diverse (Cald) Team

BACKGROUND Multiethnic societies face challenges in delivering evidence-based culturally competent health care. This study compared health-related quality of life and psychological morbidity in a hospital-based sample of first-generation migrants and Australian-born Anglo cancer patients, controlling for potential confounders related to migrant status. Further, it explored the relative contribution of ethnicity versus migrant-related variables. METHODS Eligible participants, recruited via 16 oncology clinics in Australia, included those over the age of 18, diagnosed with cancer (any type or stage) within the previous 12 months and having commenced treatment at least 1 month previously. RESULTS In total, 571 migrant patients (comprising 145 Arabic, 248 Chinese, and 178 Greek) and a control group of 274 Anglo-Australian patients participated. In multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since diagnosis, and type of cancer, migrants had clinically significantly worse health-related quality of life (HRQL; 3.6-7.3 points on FACT-G, p < .0001), higher depression and anxiety (both p < .0001), and higher incidence of clinical depression (p < .0001) and anxiety (p = .003) than Anglo-Australians. Understanding the health system (p < .0001 for each outcome) and difficulty communicating with the doctor (p = .04 to .0001) partially mediated the impact of migrancy. In migrant-only analyses, migrant-related variables (language difficulty and poor understanding of the health system), not ethnicity, predicted outcomes. CONCLUSION Migrants who develop cancer have worse psychological and HRQL outcomes than Anglo-Australians. Potential targets for intervention include assistance in navigating the health system, translated information, and cultural competency training for health professionals.


Encyclopedia of Psychotherapy | 2002

Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy

Mairwen K. Jones; Ross G. Menzies; Lisa Vaccaro; T. St Clare

This article presents a brief description of the expectancy model that underpins Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy and outlines the empirical findings related to this account. It also provides a description of the treatment components of the two Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy (DIRT) packages that have been developed; DIRT for Obsessive Compulsive Washing (OC-W) and the more recently developed DIRT package for people with Obsessive Compulsive Checking (OC-C). The therapeutic effectiveness of DIRT for OC-W and DIRT for OC-C will be discussed by reviewing the treatment trials that have been conducted to date.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry | 2012

The impact of climate change on obsessive compulsive checking concerns

Mairwen K. Jones; Bethany M. Wootton; Lisa Vaccaro; Ross G. Menzies

Objective: To investigate whether climate change has impacted on the nature of the obsessions or compulsions experienced by patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods: The sample comprised 50 patients with OCD checking subtype who had presented at the Anxiety Disorders Clinic at The University of Sydney seeking treatment during the period March 2008 to November 2009. Details of the type of obsessions and compulsions directly related to climate change phenomena were identified. Results: Fourteen of the 50 participants (28%) were identified as having OCD concerns directly related to climate change. The most frequent concerns involved electricity, water and gas wastage. Less frequent concerns included pets dying of thirst and one participant was concerned about house damage due to floors cracking, pipes leaking; roof problems and white ant activity. Compulsions included checking and rechecking pet water bowls, light switches, taps, stoves, skirting boards, pipes, roofs and wooden structures. While these behaviours are not particularly unusual for people with this condition, it was the rationale they provided for carrying them out that was surprising. Instead of checking and rechecking so as to prevent fire or flood, the rituals were specifically performed so as to reduce their global footprint, or respond to climate change-induced negative events. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the types of obsessions and compulsions experienced by 28% of our sample were directly aligned with the current issue of climate change and the perceived dangers associated with this phenomenon. To our knowledge this represents the first documentation of the significant impact of climate change on the nature of the concerns experienced by people with OCD checking subtype. We suggest that mental health professionals need to be aware of, and assess for the presence of such concerns.


Cognitive Behaviour Therapy | 2010

Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy for Obsessive–Compulsive Checking: Preliminary Findings

Lisa Vaccaro; Mairwen K. Jones; Ross G. Menzies; Bethany M. Wootton

Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy (DIRT) is a cognitive treatment package developed in the mid-1990s to treat obsessive–compulsive (OC) washing. DIRT is solely directed at decreasing threat expectancies and does not involve direct or indirect exposure. The effectiveness of the DIRT package for OC washers has been examined, and to date a number of publications, including two randomised controlled trials, support its efficacy. Recently, the DIRT package was modified to treat people with the OC checking subtype. In the current study, three adult OC checkers received DIRT in 12 to 14 individual 1-hr sessions conducted by a clinical psychologist. At posttreatment, substantial and clinically significant reductions in scores on a range of standardized outcome measures of obsessive–compulsive disorder symptom severity were apparent for all three participants. Crucially, these improvements were maintained at 4-month follow-up. Although further research is clearly warranted, these preliminary findings suggest that DIRT for checkers may prove as effective as DIRT for OC washers.


British Journal of Cancer | 2018

A randomised controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer

Stephanie Johnson; Phyllis Butow; Melanie L. Bell; Karen Detering; Josephine Clayton; William Silvester; Belinda E. Kiely; Stephen Clarke; Lisa Vaccaro; Martin R. Stockler; Phillip Beale; Natalie Fitzgerald; Martin H. N. Tattersall

BackgroundWe modified and evaluated an advance care planning (ACP) intervention, which had been shown to improve compliance with patient’s end of life (EoL) wishes, in a different patient population.MethodsPatients with incurable cancer, and a Family Member (FM), were randomised one-to-one to usual care or usual care plus an ACP intervention, between April 2014 and January 2017. Oncologists and participants were non-blinded. ACP was based on the Respecting Patient Choices model, with an offer to provide individualised ranges for typical, best-case and worst-case scenarios for survival time. Seven facilitators (two oncology nurses, two nurses and three allied health professionals) delivered the intervention within 2 weeks of study enrolment. The primary outcome measure, assessed by interviewing the FM 3 months after patient death, was the FM perception that the patient’s wishes were discussed, and met.ResultsSix hundred and sixty-five patients from seven Australian metropolitan oncology centres were referred for consideration by their oncologists, 444 (67%) met the study inclusion criteria and were approached by a study researcher. Two hundred and eight patients (47%) and their FM entered the trial as dyads. Fifty-three (46%) dyads in the ACP group and 63 (54%) dyads in the usual-care group had complete primary outcome data (p = 0.16). Seventy-nine patients and 53 FMs attended an ACP discussion. Mean length of discussion was 57 min. FMs from 23 (43%) dyads allocated to ACP and 21 (33%) dyads allocated usual care reported the patient’s EoL wishes were discussed and met (difference 10%, 95% CI: −2 to 8, p = 0.27). There were no differences in EoL care received, patient satisfaction with care; FM satisfaction with care or with death; or FM well being. Rates of palliative care referral were high in both groups (97% vs 96%).ConclusionsA formal ACP intervention did not increase the likelihood that EoL care was consistent with patients’ preferences.


Case reports in psychiatry | 2012

The Efficacy of Exposure and Response Prevention for Geriatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Clinical Case Illustration

Mairwen K. Jones; Bethany M. Wootton; Lisa Vaccaro

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is one of the most frequently occurring psychiatric conditions in older adults. While exposure and response prevention (ERP) is considered the most effective psychological treatment for children and adults with OCD, research investigating its effectiveness for older adults is scarce. This clinical case study investigates the effectiveness of ERP in an 80-year-old man with a 65-year history of OCD. The client received 14 individual, 50-minute ERP treatment sessions. Clinician-based Y-BOCS scores reduced by 65% from 20 (moderate) at pretreatment to 7 (subclinical) at 7-month posttreatment followup. OCI-R total scores reduced by 45% from 38 at baseline to 21 at 7-month follow-up. Despite his long history of the disorder, ERP was effective and well tolerated. The application of ERP for older adults with OCD, including age-specific modifications that may be required for this treatment approach, is discussed.


Annals of Oncology | 2014

Immigrants' perceptions of the quality of their cancer care: an Australian comparative study, identifying potentially modifiable factors

David Goldstein; Melanie L. Bell; Phyllis Butow; Ming Sze; Lisa Vaccaro; Skye Dong; Winston Liauw; Rina Hui; Martin H. N. Tattersall; Weng Ng; Ray Asghari; Christopher Steer; Janette Vardy; Phillip Parente; Marion Harris; Narayan V Karanth; Madeleine Trudy King; Afaf Girgis; Maurice Eisenbruch; Michael Jefford


Behaviour Change | 2010

Evidence of Impaired Event-Based Prospective Memory in Clinical Obsessive–Compulsive Checking

Lynne M. Harris; Lisa Vaccaro; Mairwen K. Jones; Georgina M. Boots

Collaboration


Dive into the Lisa Vaccaro's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Afaf Girgis

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Goldstein

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynne M. Harris

Australian College of Applied Psychology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Jefford

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ming Sze

University of Sydney

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Phyllis Butow

University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge