Lisanne Stadig
Ghent University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lisanne Stadig.
Open Access Journal | 2015
Lisanne Stadig; Bart Ampe; Suzy Van Gansbeke; Tom Van den Bogaert; Evelien D’Haenens; Jasper Heerkens; Frank Tuyttens
Simple Summary Until 2012, laying hens in the EU were often housed in conventional cages that offered limited space and few opportunities to perform highly motivated behaviors. Conventional cages are now banned in the EU in order to improve animal welfare. In this study, egg farmers were surveyed (winter 2013–2014) to assess whether they perceived any changes in animal welfare since changing housing systems, what role hen welfare played in choosing a new housing system, and which aspects of hen welfare they find most important. The data show that the answers differ depending on which housing system the farmers currently use and whether they had used conventional cages in the past. Abstract As of 2012, the EU has banned the use of conventional cages (CC) for laying hens, causing a shift in housing systems. This study’s aim was to gain insight into farmers’ opinions on hen health and welfare in their current housing systems. A survey was sent to 218 Belgian egg farmers, of which 127 (58.3%) responded, with 84 still active as egg farmer. Hen welfare tended to be less important in choosing the housing system for farmers with cage than with non-cage systems. Respondents currently using cage systems were more satisfied with hen health than respondents with non-cage systems. Reported mortality increased with farm size and was higher in furnished cages than in floor housing. Feather pecking, cannibalism, smothering and mortality were perceived to be higher in current housing systems than in CC, but only by respondents who shifted to non-cage systems from previously having had CC. Health- and production-related parameters were scored to be more important for hen welfare as compared to behavior-related parameters. Those without CC in the past rated factors relating to natural behavior to be more important for welfare than those with CC. This difference in opinion based on farmer backgrounds should be taken into account in future research.
Animal Behaviour | 2014
Frank Tuyttens; S. de Graaf; Jasper Heerkens; Leonie Jacobs; Elena Nalon; Sanne Ott; Lisanne Stadig; E. Van Laer; Bart Ampe
Poultry Science | 2016
Lisanne Stadig; Bart Ampe; S. Van Gansbeke; T. Van den Bogaert; E. D'Haenens; Jasper Heerkens; F Tuyttens
Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2017
Lisanne Stadig; T. Bas Rodenburg; Bart Ampe; Bert Reubens; Frank Tuyttens
Animal | 2017
Lisanne Stadig; T.B. Rodenburg; Bart Ampe; Bert Reubens; Frank Tuyttens
Poultry Science | 2016
Lisanne Stadig; T. Bas Rodenburg; Bert Reubens; Johan Aerts; Barbara Duquenne; Frank Tuyttens
Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2018
Lisanne Stadig; T. Bas Rodenburg; Bart Ampe; Bert Reubens; Frank Tuyttens
Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2016
Frank Tuyttens; Lisanne Stadig; Jasper Heerkens; Eva Van laer; Stephanie A F Buijs; Bart Ampe
Archive | 2017
Lisanne Stadig; Bas Rodenburg; Bart Ampe; Bert Reubens; Frank Tuyttens
Animal | 2017
Lisanne Stadig; T.B. Rodenburg; Bert Reubens; Bart Ampe; Frank Tuyttens