Livia Luciana Gheorghe

Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Chronic Total Occlusions

Background—There is little evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) for the percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusions. Methods and Results—We performed a multicenter registry of consecutive chronic total occlusion patients treated with BRS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular) and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) at 5 institutions. Long-term target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization) was the primary end point. Inverse probability of treatment weight–adjusted Cox regression was used to account for pretreatment differences between the 2 groups. A total of 537 patients (n=153 BRS; n=384 DES) were included. BRS patients were younger and had lower prevalence of comorbidities. Overall mean Japan-Chronic Total Occlusion (J-CTO) score was 1.43±1.16, with no differences between groups. Procedural success was achieved in 99.3% and 96.6% of BRS- and DES-treated patients, respectively (P=0.07). At a median follow-up of 703 days, there were no differences in target-vessel failure between BRS and DES (4.6% versus 7.7%; P=0.21). By adjusted Cox regression analysis, there were still no significant differences between BRS and DES (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.69–3.72; P=0.34). However, secondary analyses suggested a signal toward higher ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization with BRS. Conclusions—Implantation of BRS versus second-generation DES in chronic total occlusion was associated with similar risk of target-vessel failure at long-term follow-up. However, a signal toward increased ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization with BRS was observed. Large randomized studies should confirm these findings.

Long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy for the percutaneous treatment of chronic total occlusions

Objectives. To study the long‐term outcomes of rotational atherectomy (RA) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

One Versus 2-stent Strategy for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions in the Context of a Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion. A Multicenter Registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES There is little evidence on the optimal strategy for bifurcation lesions in the context of a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO). This study compared the procedural and mid-term outcomes of patients with bifurcation lesions in CTO treated with provisional stenting vs 2-stent techniques in a multicenter registry. METHODS Between January 2012 and June 2016, 922 CTO were recanalized at the 4 participating centers. Of these, 238 (25.8%) with a bifurcation lesion (side branch ≥ 2mm located proximally, distally, or within the occluded segment) were treated by a simple approach (n=201) or complex strategy (n=37). Propensity score matching was performed to account for selection bias between the 2 groups. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisted of a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS Angiographic and procedural success were similar in the simple and complex groups (94.5% vs 97.3%; P=.48 and 85.6% vs 81.1%; P=.49). However, contrast volume, radiation dose, and fluoroscopy time were lower with the simple approach. At follow-up (25 months), the MACE rate was 8% in the simple and 10.8% in the complex group (P=.58). There was a trend toward a lower MACE-free survival in the complex group (80.1% vs 69.8%; P=.08). After propensity analysis, there were no differences between the groups regarding immediate and follow-up results. CONCLUSIONS Bifurcation lesions in CTO can be approached similarly to regular bifurcation lesions, for which provisional stenting is considered the technique of choice. After propensity score matching, there were no differences in procedural or mid-term clinical outcomes between the simple and complex strategies.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Hypothyroidism

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Thyroid hormone affects the metabolism of all tissues in the body. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and implications of thyroid disorders in a cohort of consecutive patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). METHODS A total of 73 patients with SCAD were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between euthyroid and hypothyroid patients. Subsequently, the prevalence of thyroid function abnormalities and the clinical characteristics of SCAD patients were compared with those in 73 patients with acute coronary syndrome but without SCAD, matched by age, sex, and presentation. RESULTS Mean age was 55 ± 12 years and 26% had hypothyroidism. Compared with patients with normal thyroid function, patients with SCAD and hypothyroidism were all women (100% vs 69%, P = .01), more frequently had dissection in distal (74% vs 41%, P = .03) and tortuous coronary segments (68% vs 41%, p = .03), and more frequently received conservative medical management (79% vs 41%, P = .007). During a mean clinical follow-up of 4.1 ± 3.8 years, 23% of the patients had adverse cardiac events irrespective of thyroid function status. The prevalence of hypothyroidism was higher in patients with SCAD than in matched patients with acute coronary syndrome without SCAD (26% vs 8%, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS There is a high prevalence of hypothyroidism in patients with SCAD. Patients with SCAD and hypothyroidism are more frequently women, more frequently have distal dissections in tortuous vessels, and are more frequently managed with a conservative medical strategy.

TCT-418 Procedural and mid-term outcomes of Bioresorbable scaffOlds versus drug-elutiNg stents In chronic Total Occlusions: the BONITO Registry

There is little evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) for the percutaneous treatment ofchronic total occlusions (CTO). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with a CTO treated with BRS or drug-eluting stents (DES). We