Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Liyun Ni.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2015
Susanna Naggie; Curtis Cooper; Michael S. Saag; Kimberly A. Workowski; Peter Ruane; William Towner; Kristen M. Marks; Anne F. Luetkemeyer; Rachel Baden; Paul E. Sax; Edward Gane; Jorge Santana-Bagur; Luisa M. Stamm; Jenny C. Yang; Polina German; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Liyun Ni; Phillip S. Pang; John G. McHutchison; Catherine A. Stedman; Javier Morales-Ramirez; Norbert Bräu; Dushyantha Jayaweera; Amy E. Colson; Pablo Tebas; David Wong; Douglas T. Dieterich; Mark S. Sulkowski
BACKGROUND Effective treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) remains an unmet medical need. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, single-group, open-label study involving patients coinfected with HIV-1 and genotype 1 or 4 HCV receiving an antiretroviral regimen of tenofovir and emtricitabine with efavirenz, rilpivirine, or raltegravir. All patients received ledipasvir, an NS5A inhibitor, and sofosbuvir, a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, as a single fixed-dose combination for 12 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS Of the 335 patients enrolled, 34% were black, 55% had been previously treated for HCV, and 20% had cirrhosis. Overall, 322 patients (96%) had a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 93 to 98), including rates of 96% (95% CI, 93 to 98) in patients with HCV genotype 1a, 96% (95% CI, 89 to 99) in those with HCV genotype 1b, and 100% (95% CI, 63 to 100) in those with HCV genotype 4. Rates of sustained virologic response were similar regardless of previous treatment or the presence of cirrhosis. Of the 13 patients who did not have a sustained virologic response, 10 had a relapse after the end of treatment. No patient had confirmed HIV-1 virologic rebound. The most common adverse events were headache (25%), fatigue (21%), and diarrhea (11%). No patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV genotype 1 or 4. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ION-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073656.).
JAMA | 2014
Mark S. Sulkowski; Susanna Naggie; Jacob Lalezari; Walford Jeffrey Fessel; Karam Mounzer; Margaret C. Shuhart; Anne F. Luetkemeyer; David M. Asmuth; A. Gaggar; Liyun Ni; Evguenia Svarovskaia; Diana M. Brainard; William T. Symonds; G. Mani Subramanian; John G. McHutchison; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; Douglas T. Dieterich
IMPORTANCE Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients also infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been limited due to drug interactions with antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) and the need to use interferon. OBJECTIVE To determine the rates of HCV eradication (sustained virologic response [SVR]) and adverse events in patients with HCV-HIV coinfection receiving sofosbuvir and ribavirin treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Open-label, nonrandomized, uncontrolled phase 3 trial conducted at 34 treatment centers in the United States and Puerto Rico (August 2012-November 2013) evaluating treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin among patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, or 3 and concurrent HIV. Patients were required to be receiving ART with HIV RNA values of 50 copies/mL or less and a CD4 T-cell count of more than 200 cells/μL or to have untreated HIV infection with a CD4 T-cell count of more than 500 cells/μL. Of the treatment-naive patients, 114 had HCV genotype 1 and 68 had HCV genotype 2 or 3, and 41 treatment experienced participants who had been treated with peginterferon-ribavirin had HCV genotype 2 or 3, for a total of 223 participants. INTERVENTIONS Treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 received 400 mg of sofosbuvir and weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks and treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 and treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 received the same treatment for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary study outcome was the proportion of patients with SVR (serum HCV <25 copies/mL) 12 weeks (SVR12) after cessation of HCV therapy. RESULTS Among treatment-naive participants, 87 patients (76%) of 114 (95% CI, 67%-84%) with genotype 1, 23 patients (88%) of 26 with genotype 2 (95% CI, 70%-985), and 28 patients (67%) of 42 with genotype 3 (95% CI, 51%-80%) achieved SVR12. Among treatment-experienced participants, 22 patients (92%) of 24 with genotype 2 (95% CI, 73%-99%) and 16 patients (94%) of 17 (95% CI, 71%-100%) achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were fatigue, insomnia, headache, and nausea. Seven patients (3%) discontinued HCV treatment due to adverse events. No adverse effect on HIV disease or its treatment was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this open-label, nonrandomized, uncontrolled study, patients with HIV who were coinfected with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3 who received the oral, interferon-free combination of sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks had high rates of SVR12. Further studies of this oral regimen in diverse populations of coinfected patients are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01667731.
The Lancet | 2015
Jean Michel Molina; Chloe Orkin; David Iser; Francisco Xavier Zamora; Mark Nelson; Christoph Stephan; Benedetta Massetto; A. Gaggar; Liyun Ni; Evguenia Svarovskaia; Diana M. Brainard; G. Mani Subramanian; John G. McHutchison; Massimo Puoti; Jürgen K. Rockstroh
BACKGROUND Although interferon-free regimens are approved for patients co-infected with HIV and genotype-2 or genotype-3 hepatitis C virus (HCV), interferon-based regimens are still an option for those co-infected with HIV and HCV genotypes 1 or 4. These regimens are limited by clinically significant toxic effects and drug interactions with antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of an interferon-free, all-oral regimen of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and HCV co-infection. METHODS We did this open-label, non-randomised, uncontrolled, phase 3 study at 45 sites in seven European countries and Australia. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) co-infected with stable HIV and chronic HCV genotypes 1-4, including those with compensated cirrhosis. Once-daily sofosbuvir (400 mg) plus twice-daily ribavirin (1000 mg in patients with bodyweights <75 kg and 1200 mg in those with weights ≥75 kg) was given for 24 weeks to all patients except treatment-naive patients with genotype-2 HCV, who received a 12-week regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment. We did analysis by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01783678. FINDINGS Between Feb 7, 2013, and July 29, 2013, we enrolled 275 eligible patients, of whom 262 (95%) completed treatment; 274 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment were 85% (95% CI 77-91) in patients with genotype-1 HCV, 88% (69-98) in patients with genotype-2 HCV, 89% (81-94) in patients with genotype-3 HCV, and 84% (66-95) in patients with genotype-4 HCV. Response rates in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 (89% [95% CI 67-99] and 91% [81-97], respectively) were similar to those in treatment-experienced patients infected with those genotypes (83% [36-100] and 86% [73-94], respectively). There was no emergence of sofosbuvir-resistance mutations in patients with HCV viral relapse. Six (2%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were fatigue, insomnia, asthenia, and headache. Four (1%) patients had serious adverse events regarded as related to study treatment. Additionally, four (1%) patients receiving antiretroviral treatment had a transient HIV viral breakthrough; however, none required changes in antiretroviral regimen. INTERPRETATION Sofosbuvir and ribavirin provided high rates of sustained virological response after 12 weeks of treatment in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients co-infected with HIV and HCV genotypes 1-4. The characteristics of this interferon-free combination regimen make sofosbuvir plus ribavirin a useful treatment option for this patient population. FUNDING Gilead Sciences.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases | 2018
Jason Grebely; Jordan J. Feld; David L. Wyles; Mark S. Sulkowski; Liyun Ni; Joe Llewellyn; Heshaam M Mir; Nika Sajed; Luisa M. Stamm; Robert H. Hyland; John McNally; Diana M. Brainard; Ira M. Jacobson; Stefan Zeuzem; Marc Bourlière; Graham R. Foster; Nezam H. Afdhal; Gregory J. Dore
Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral therapy is effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but studies are limited by small numbers of nongenotype 1 (GT1) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in HCV patients receiving and not receiving OST. Methods Ten phase 3 studies of sofosbuvir-based regimens included ION (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in GT1), ASTRAL (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in GT1-6), and POLARIS (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in GT1-6). Patients with clinically significant drug use (last 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening were ineligible. Results Among 4743 patients, 4% (n = 194) were receiving OST (methadone; n = 113; buprenorphine, n = 75; other, n = 6). Compared with those not receiving OST (n = 4549), those receiving OST (n = 194) were younger (mean age, 48 vs 54), more often male (73% vs 61%), GT3 (38% vs 17%), treatment-naïve (78% vs 65%), and cirrhotic (36% vs 23%). Among those receiving and not receiving OST, there was no significant difference in treatment completion (97% vs 99%, P = .06), SVR12 (94% vs 97%, P = .06), relapse (0.5% vs 2.1%, P = .19), adverse events (78% vs 77%, P = .79), or serious adverse events (3.6% vs 2.4%, P = .24). There was no difference in SVR12 in patients with cirrhosis (99% vs 95%, P = .25) or those with G3 (95% vs 95%, P = .77) in those receiving OST. Among patients receiving OST, SVR12 was high among those receiving methadone (95%) and buprenorphine (96%). Conclusion Sofosbuvir-based therapies are effective and safe in patients receiving OST.
Liver International | 2018
Edward Tam; Anne F. Luetkemeyer; Parvez S. Mantry; Sanjaya K. Satapathy; Peter Ghali; Minhee Kang; Richard Haubrich; Xianlin Shen; Liyun Ni; Gregory Camus; Amanda Copans; Lorenzo Rossaro; Bill Guyer; Robert S. Brown
We report data from two similarly designed studies that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and optimal duration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) ± ribavirin (RBV) for retreatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in individuals who failed to achieve sustained virological response (SVR) with prior SOF‐based, non‐NS5A inhibitor‐containing regimens.
Gastroenterology | 2014
Ira M. Jacobson; Mark S. Sulkowski; Tarek Hassanein; Liyun Ni; Hongmei Mo; Bittoo Kanwar; Diana M. Brainard; G.M. Subramanian; William T. Symonds; John G. McHutchison; Michael T. Bennett; Edward Gane
SAPPHIRE II: Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled Study of Interferon-Free, 12-Week Regimen of ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333, and Ribavirin in 394 TreatmentExperienced Adults With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Ira M. Jacobson, Stefan Zeuzem, Tolga Baykal, Rui T. Marinho, Fred Poordad, Marc Bourliere, Mark Sulkowski, Heiner Wedemeyer, Edward Tam, Paul V. Desmond, Donald M. Jensen, Adrian M. Di Bisceglie, Peter Varunok, Tarek Hassanein, Junyuan Xiong, Barbara DaSilva-Tillmann, Lois Larsen, Thomas Podsadecki
Gastroenterology | 2014
Lisa M. Nyberg; Jacob Lalezari; Liyun Ni; Brian Doehle; Bittoo Kanwar; Diana M. Brainard; G.M. Subramanian; William T. Symonds; John G. McHutchison; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres
Background: The efficacy of sofosbuvir (SOF)-containing regimens in patients who failed to achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) with SOF remains unknown. Given the lack of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to SOF in patients who did not achieve an SVR in the Phase 3 program, we designed an open-label study for relapsers to receive either a longer duration of SOF + RBV (24 weeks) or SOF + RBV with peginterferon (PEG-IFN). Methods: GT-2 and GT-3 HCV infected patients who failed either 12or 16-week regimens of SOF + RBV (Phase 3 studies: FISSION, FUSION, and POSITRON) were offered either 12-weeks of SOF (400 mg once daily) + PEG-IFN (180μg weekly) + RBV (1000-1200 mg daily) or an interferon-free 24-week arm of SOF+RBV. The choice of regimen was based upon investigator discretion. The primary efficacy endpoint is SVR12 and the secondary efficacy endpoint is SVR4. Results: A total of 97 GT-3 and 16 GT-2 patients have been enrolled. The majority of patients were male (80%) with a non-IL28CC genotype (65%) and 33% of patients had cirrhosis. To date, overall SVR4 rates are 96% (27/28) for GT-3 and 100% (6/ 6) for GT-2 infected patients. The table displays these data for patients who have reached the 4-week post-treatment visit. Conclusions: Retreatment with sofosbuvir regimens of longer duration or with the addition of PEG-IFN in prior SOF failures results in high SVR4 rates and appears to offer a viable approach for GT-2 or GT-3 HCV infected patients who fail to achieve an SVR with SOF+RBV regimens.
Journal of Hepatology | 2014
Rafael Esteban; Lisa M. Nyberg; Jacob Lalezari; Liyun Ni; Brian Doehle; B. Kanwar; Diana M. Brainard; M. Subramanian; William T. Symonds; John G. McHutchison; M. Rodriquez-Torres; Stefan Zeuzem
Gastroenterology | 2018
Eric Lawitz; Michael P. Manns; Marc Bourlière; Nelson Cheinquer; Luisa M. Stamm; Robert H. Hyland; Liyun Ni; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Diana M. Brainard; M. Subramanian; Edward Gane
Journal of the International AIDS Society | 2015
Jorge Santana; J. Rockstroh; Massimo Puoti; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; Douglas T. Dieterich; A. Gaggar; Liyun Ni; Benedetta Massetto; Evguenia Svarovskaia; Diana M. Brainard; M. Subramanian; John G. McHutchison; Susanna Naggie; Chloe Orkin; Jean-Michel Molina; Mark S. Sulkowski