Lize M. S. L. Oliveira
Petrobras
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Lize M. S. L. Oliveira.
Talanta | 2015
Paulo R. Filgueiras; Luciana A. Terra; Eustáquio V.R. Castro; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Júlio C.M. Dias; Ronei J. Poppi
This paper aims to estimate the temperature equivalent to 10% (T10%), 50% (T50%) and 90% (T90%) of distilled volume in crude oils using (1)H NMR and support vector regression (SVR). Confidence intervals for the predicted values were calculated using a boosting-type ensemble method in a procedure called ensemble support vector regression (eSVR). The estimated confidence intervals obtained by eSVR were compared with previously accepted calculations from partial least squares (PLS) models and a boosting-type ensemble applied in the PLS method (ePLS). By using the proposed boosting strategy, it was possible to identify outliers in the T10% property dataset. The eSVR procedure improved the accuracy of the distillation temperature predictions in relation to standard PLS, ePLS and SVR. For T10%, a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 11.6°C was obtained in comparison with 15.6°C for PLS, 15.1°C for ePLS and 28.4°C for SVR. The RMSEPs for T50% were 24.2°C, 23.4°C, 22.8°C and 14.4°C for PLS, ePLS, SVR and eSVR, respectively. For T90%, the values of RMSEP were 39.0°C, 39.9°C and 39.9°C for PLS, ePLS, SVR and eSVR, respectively. The confidence intervals calculated by the proposed boosting methodology presented acceptable values for the three properties analyzed; however, they were lower than those calculated by the standard methodology for PLS.
Animal Reproduction Science | 2012
A.A.N. Machado Júnior; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; A.C. Assis Neto; Flávio Ribeiro Alves; Maria Angélica Miglino; Maria Acelina Martins de Carvalho
The objective of the present research was to quantify the seminiferous epithelium cells, spermatogenesis efficiency and characterize the ultrastrucure of Sertoli cells in goats. Eighteen goats were used and divided into three groups: Group I - goats without bipartition of the scrotum; Group II - animals with bipartition of the scrotum in up to 50% of the testicular length; Group III - goats with bipartition of the scrotum in more than 50% of the testicular length. The goat testes in Group III had a greater number of primary spermatocytes (25.37 ± 4.55 cells per cross sections), spermatids (112 ± 15.12 cells per cross sections), and Sertoli cells (9.46 ± 1.74 cells per cross sections) than the animals in Groups I and II (P<0.05). The spermatogenic mitotic, meiotic, and general efficiency were greater in animals in Group III (1.25 ± 0.28; 5.12 ± 1.63; 6.44 ± 1.96) when compared to those in Groups I and II. Sheet-like processes originated from the Sertoli cell body as simple and smooth structures which involved almost all the surface of germ cells. Slender cord-like processes originated from Sertoli cells and also from the sheet-like processes. The relative frequency of the cycle stages showed differences among the groups of goats studied, and the highest frequency was in Stage 3 (20.68% for goats in Group I, 21.15% for those in Group II, and 16.89% for the animals in Group III). In conclusion, goats with bipartition of the scrotum have a greater number of germ and Sertoli cells per cross section of seminiferous tubule, that indicated a greater sperm production when compared to the other groups, and the ultrastructure of the Sertoli cell process did not present any relationship with bipartition of the scrotum.
Energy & Fuels | 2016
Paulo R. Filgueiras; Natália A. Portela; Samantha R.C. Silva; Eustáquio V.R. Castro; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Júlio C.M. Dias; Álvaro Cunha Neto; Wanderson Romão; Ronei J. Poppi
Fuel | 2016
Lucas M. Duarte; Paulo R. Filgueiras; Samantha R.C. Silva; Júlio C.M. Dias; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Eustáquio V.R. Castro; Marcone Augusto Leal de Oliveira
Energy & Fuels | 2016
Julia Rocha; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Júlio C.M. Dias; Ulysses B. Pinto; Maria de Lourdes S. P. Marques; Betina P. Oliveira; Paulo R. Filgueiras; Eustáquio V.R. Castro; Marcone A. L. de Oliveira
Fuel | 2015
Luciana A. Terra; Paulo R. Filgueiras; Lilian V. Tose; Wanderson Romão; Eustáquio V.R. Castro; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Júlio C.M. Dias; Boniek G. Vaz; Ronei J. Poppi
Fuel Processing Technology | 2016
Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Rita de Cassia P. Nunes; Isis C. Melo; Ygor L. L. Ribeiro; Leidiane G. Reis; Júlio C.M. Dias; Regina C. L. Guimarães; Elizabete F. Lucas
Microchemical Journal | 2018
Gabriela Vanini; Vinícius B. Pereira; Wanderson Romão; Alexandre O. Gomes; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Júlio C.M. Dias; Débora A. Azevedo
Energy & Fuels | 2017
Denisson Santos; Elvio Barreto de Melo Filho; Raul S. Dourado; Monique Amaral; Sofia Filipakis; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Regina C. L. Guimarães; Alexandre F. Santos; Gustavo R. Borges; Elton Franceschi; Cláudio Dariva
Fuel | 2018
Daniella L. Vale; Paula Fernandes de Aguiar; Lize M. S. L. Oliveira; Gabriela Vanini; Vinícius B. Pereira; Larissa O. Alexandre; Giovani S.C. da Silva; Luiz André N. Mendes; Alexandre O. Gomes; Débora A. Azevedo