Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lloyd M. Robeson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lloyd M. Robeson.


Science | 2017

Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity

Ho Bum Park; Jovan Kamcev; Lloyd M. Robeson; Menachem Elimelech; Benny D. Freeman

Filtering through to whats important Membranes are widely used for gas and liquid separations. Historical analysis of a range of gas pair separations indicated that there was an upper bound on the trade-off between membrane permeability, which limits flow rates, and the selectivity, which limits the quality of the separation process. Park et al. review the advances that have been made in attempts to break past this upper bound. Some inspiration has come from biological membranes. The authors also highlight cases where the challenges lie in areas other than improved separation performance. Science, this issue p. eaab0530 BACKGROUND Synthetic membranes are used for desalination, dialysis, sterile filtration, food processing, dehydration of air and other industrial, medical, and environmental applications due to low energy requirements, compact design, and mechanical simplicity. New applications are emerging from the water-energy nexus, shale gas extraction, and environmental needs such as carbon capture. All membranes exhibit a trade-off between permeability—i.e., how fast molecules pass through a membrane material—and selectivity—i.e., to what extent the desired molecules are separated from the rest. However, biological membranes such as aquaporins and ion channels are both highly permeable and highly selective. Separation based on size difference is common, but there are other ways to either block one component or enhance transport of another through a membrane. Based on increasing molecular understanding of both biological and synthetic membranes, key design criteria for new membranes have emerged: (i) properly sized free-volume elements (or pores), (ii) narrow free-volume element (or pore size) distribution, (iii) a thin active layer, and (iv) highly tuned interactions between permeants of interest and the membrane. Here, we discuss the permeability/selectivity trade-off, highlight similarities and differences between synthetic and biological membranes, describe challenges for existing membranes, and identify fruitful areas of future research. ADVANCES Many organic, inorganic, and hybrid materials have emerged as potential membranes. In addition to polymers, used for most membranes today, materials such as carbon molecular sieves, ceramics, zeolites, various nanomaterials (e.g., graphene, graphene oxide, and metal organic frameworks), and their mixtures with polymers have been explored. Simultaneously, global challenges such as climate change and rapid population growth stimulate the search for efficient water purification and energy-generation technologies, many of which are membrane-based. Additional driving forces include wastewater reuse from shale gas extraction and improvement of chemical and petrochemical separation processes by increasing the use of light hydrocarbons for chemicals manufacturing. OUTLOOK Opportunities for advancing membranes include (i) more mechanically, chemically, and thermally robust materials; (ii) judiciously higher permeability and selectivity for applications where such improvements matter; and (iii) more emphasis on fundamental structure/property/processing relations. There is a pressing need for membranes with improved selectivity, rather than membranes with improved permeability, especially for water purification. Modeling at all length scales is needed to develop a coherent molecular understanding of membrane properties, provide insight for future materials design, and clarify the fundamental basis for trade-off behavior. Basic molecular-level understanding of thermodynamic and diffusion properties of water and ions in charged membranes for desalination and energy applications such as fuel cells is largely incomplete. Fundamental understanding of membrane structure optimization to control transport of minor species (e.g., trace-organic contaminants in desalination membranes, neutral compounds in charged membranes, and heavy hydrocarbons in membranes for natural gas separation) is needed. Laboratory evaluation of membranes is often conducted with highly idealized mixtures, so separation performance in real applications with complex mixtures is poorly understood. Lack of systematic understanding of methodologies to scale promising membranes from the few square centimeters needed for laboratory studies to the thousands of square meters needed for large applications stymies membrane deployment. Nevertheless, opportunities for membranes in both existing and emerging applications, together with an expanding set of membrane materials, hold great promise for membranes to effectively address separations needs. From intrinsic permeability/selectivity trade-off to practical performance in membranes. Polymer membranes for liquid and gas separation applications obey a permeability/selectivity trade-off—highly permeable membranes have low selectivity and vice versa—largely due to broad distributions of free-volume elements (or pores in porous membranes) and nonspecific interactions between small solutes and polymers. We highlight materials approaches to overcome this trade-off, including the development of inorganic, isoporous, mixed matrix, and aquaporin membranes. Further, materials must be processed into thin, typically supported membranes, fashioned into high surface/volume ratio modules, and used in optimized processes. Thus, factors that govern the practical feasibility of membranes such as mechanical strength, module design, and operating conditions are also discussed. Increasing demands for energy-efficient separations in applications ranging from water purification to petroleum refining, chemicals production, and carbon capture have stimulated a vigorous search for novel, high-performance separation membranes. Synthetic membranes suffer a ubiquitous, pernicious trade-off: highly permeable membranes lack selectivity and vice versa. However, materials with both high permeability and high selectivity are beginning to emerge. For example, design features from biological membranes have been applied to break the permeability-selectivity trade-off. We review the basis for the permeability-selectivity trade-off, state-of-the-art approaches to membrane materials design to overcome the trade-off, and factors other than permeability and selectivity that govern membrane performance and, in turn, influence membrane design.


Journal of Membrane Science | 2008

The upper bound revisited

Lloyd M. Robeson


Polymer | 2008

Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites

D. R. Paul; Lloyd M. Robeson


Polymer | 2013

Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: A review

David F. Sanders; Zachary P. Smith; Ruilan Guo; Lloyd M. Robeson; James E. McGrath; D. R. Paul; Benny D. Freeman


Journal of Membrane Science | 2009

An empirical correlation of gas permeability and permselectivity in polymers and its theoretical basis

Lloyd M. Robeson; Benny D. Freeman; D. R. Paul; Brandon W. Rowe


Journal of Membrane Science | 2010

Influence of temperature on the upper bound: Theoretical considerations and comparison with experimental results

Brandon W. Rowe; Lloyd M. Robeson; Benny D. Freeman; D. R. Paul


Journal of Membrane Science | 2014

Contributions of diffusion and solubility selectivity to the upper bound analysis for glassy gas separation membranes

Lloyd M. Robeson; Zachary P. Smith; Benny D. Freeman; D. R. Paul


Journal of Membrane Science | 2015

Comparison of transport properties of rubbery and glassy polymers and the relevance to the upper bound relationship

Lloyd M. Robeson; Qiang Liu; Benny D. Freeman; D. R. Paul


Macromolecules | 2014

Influence of Diffusivity and Sorption on Helium and Hydrogen Separations in Hydrocarbon, Silicon, and Fluorocarbon-Based Polymers

Zachary P. Smith; Rajkiran R. Tiwari; Michelle E. Dose; Kristofer L. Gleason; Thomas M. Murphy; David F. Sanders; Gabriella Gunawan; Lloyd M. Robeson; D. R. Paul; Benny D. Freeman


Polymer Engineering and Science | 2013

Environmental stress cracking: A review

Lloyd M. Robeson

Collaboration


Dive into the Lloyd M. Robeson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benny D. Freeman

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. R. Paul

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brandon W. Rowe

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zachary P. Smith

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David F. Sanders

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michelle E. Dose

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriella Gunawan

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jovan Kamcev

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kristofer L. Gleason

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge