Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Lon R. Cardon is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Lon R. Cardon.


Nature | 2009

Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases

Teri A. Manolio; Francis S. Collins; Nancy J. Cox; David B. Goldstein; Lucia A. Hindorff; David J. Hunter; Mark I. McCarthy; Erin M. Ramos; Lon R. Cardon; Aravinda Chakravarti; Judy H. Cho; Alan E. Guttmacher; Augustine Kong; Elaine R. Mardis; Charles N. Rotimi; Montgomery Slatkin; David Valle; Alice S. Whittemore; Michael Boehnke; Andrew G. Clark; Evan E. Eichler; Greg Gibson; Jonathan L. Haines; Trudy F. C. Mackay; Steven A. McCarroll; Peter M. Visscher

Genome-wide association studies have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with complex human diseases and traits, and have provided valuable insights into their genetic architecture. Most variants identified so far confer relatively small increments in risk, and explain only a small proportion of familial clustering, leading many to question how the remaining, ‘missing’ heritability can be explained. Here we examine potential sources of missing heritability and propose research strategies, including and extending beyond current genome-wide association approaches, to illuminate the genetics of complex diseases and enhance its potential to enable effective disease prevention or treatment.


Archive | 1992

Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families

Michael C. Neale; Lon R. Cardon

Preface. List of Figures. List of Tables. 1. The Scope of Genetic Analyses. 2. Data Summary. 3. Biometrical Genetics. 4. Matrix Algebra. 5. Path Analysis and Structural Equations. 6. LISREL Models and Methods. 7. Model Fitting Functions and Optimization. 8. Univariate Analysis. 9. Power and Sample Size. 10. Social Interaction. 11. Sex Limitation and GE Interaction. 12. Multivariate Analysis. 13. Direction of Causation. 14. Repeated Measures. 15. Longitudinal Mean Trends. 16. Observer Ratings. 17. Assortment and Cultural Transmission. 18. Future Directions. Appendices: A. List of Participants. B. The Greek Alphabet. C. LISREL Scripts for Univariate Models. D. LISREL Script for Power Calculation. E. LISREL Scripts for Multivariate Models. F. LISREL Script for Sibling Interaction Model. G. LISREL Scripts for Sex and GE Interaction. H. LISREL Script for Rater Bias Model. I. LISREL Scripts for Direction of Causation. J. LISREL Script and Data for Simplex Model. K. LISREL Scripts for Assortment Models. Bibliography. Index.


Nature Genetics | 2002

Merlin — Rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees

Gonçalo R. Abecasis; Stacey S. Cherny; William Cookson; Lon R. Cardon

Efforts to find disease genes using high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) maps will produce data sets that exceed the limitations of current computational tools. Here we describe a new, efficient method for the analysis of dense genetic maps in pedigree data that provides extremely fast solutions to common problems such as allele-sharing analyses and haplotyping. We show that sparse binary trees represent patterns of gene flow in general pedigrees in a parsimonious manner, and derive a family of related algorithms for pedigree traversal. With these trees, exact likelihood calculations can be carried out efficiently for single markers or for multiple linked markers. Using an approximate multipoint calculation that ignores the unlikely possibility of a large number of recombinants further improves speed and provides accurate solutions in dense maps with thousands of markers. Our multipoint engine for rapid likelihood inference (Merlin) is a computer program that uses sparse inheritance trees for pedigree analysis; it performs rapid haplotyping, genotype error detection and affected pair linkage analyses and can handle more markers than other pedigree analysis packages.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2008

Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges.

Mark McCarthy; Gonçalo R. Abecasis; Lon R. Cardon; David B. Goldstein; Julian Little; John P. A. Ioannidis; Joel N. Hirschhorn

The past year has witnessed substantial advances in understanding the genetic basis of many common phenotypes of biomedical importance. These advances have been the result of systematic, well-powered, genome-wide surveys exploring the relationships between common sequence variation and disease predisposition. This approach has revealed over 50 disease-susceptibility loci and has provided insights into the allelic architecture of multifactorial traits. At the same time, much has been learned about the successful prosecution of association studies on such a scale. This Review highlights the knowledge gained, defines areas of emerging consensus, and describes the challenges that remain as researchers seek to obtain more complete descriptions of the susceptibility architecture of biomedical traits of interest and to translate the information gathered into improvements in clinical management.


Nature Genetics | 2008

Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease

Jeffrey C. Barrett; Sarah Hansoul; Dan L. Nicolae; Judy H. Cho; Richard H. Duerr; John D. Rioux; Steven R. Brant; Mark S. Silverberg; Kent D. Taylor; M. Michael Barmada; Alain Bitton; Themistocles Dassopoulos; Lisa W. Datta; Todd Green; Anne M. Griffiths; Emily O. Kistner; Miguel Regueiro; Jerome I. Rotter; L. Philip Schumm; A. Hillary Steinhart; Stephan R. Targan; Ramnik J. Xavier; Cécile Libioulle; Cynthia Sandor; Mark Lathrop; Jacques Belaiche; Olivier Dewit; Ivo Gut; Simon Heath; Debby Laukens

Several risk factors for Crohns disease have been identified in recent genome-wide association studies. To advance gene discovery further, we combined data from three studies on Crohns disease (a total of 3,230 cases and 4,829 controls) and carried out replication in 3,664 independent cases with a mixture of population-based and family-based controls. The results strongly confirm 11 previously reported loci and provide genome-wide significant evidence for 21 additional loci, including the regions containing STAT3, JAK2, ICOSLG, CDKAL1 and ITLN1. The expanded molecular understanding of the basis of this disease offers promise for informed therapeutic development.


Science | 2007

Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes

Eleftheria Zeggini; Michael N. Weedon; Cecilia M. Lindgren; Timothy M. Frayling; Katherine S. Elliott; Hana Lango; Nicholas J. Timpson; John Perry; Nigel W. Rayner; Rachel M. Freathy; Jeffrey C. Barrett; Beverley M. Shields; Andrew P. Morris; Sian Ellard; Christopher J. Groves; Lorna W. Harries; Jonathan Marchini; Katharine R. Owen; Beatrice Knight; Lon R. Cardon; M. Walker; Graham A. Hitman; Andrew D. Morris; Alex S. F. Doney; Mark I. McCarthy; Andrew T. Hattersley

The molecular mechanisms involved in the development of type 2 diabetes are poorly understood. Starting from genome-wide genotype data for 1924 diabetic cases and 2938 population controls generated by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, we set out to detect replicated diabetes association signals through analysis of 3757 additional cases and 5346 controls and by integration of our findings with equivalent data from other international consortia. We detected diabetes susceptibility loci in and around the genes CDKAL1, CDKN2A/CDKN2B, and IGF2BP2 and confirmed the recently described associations at HHEX/IDE and SLC30A8. Our findings provide insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes, emphasizing the contribution of multiple variants of modest effect. The regions identified underscore the importance of pathways influencing pancreatic beta cell development and function in the etiology of type 2 diabetes.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2001

Association study designs for complex diseases

Lon R. Cardon; John I. Bell

Assessing the association between DNA variants and disease has been used widely to identify regions of the genome and candidate genes that contribute to disease. However, there are numerous examples of associations that cannot be replicated, which has led to scepticism about the utility of the approach for common conditions. With the discovery of massive numbers of genetic markers and the development of better tools for genotyping, association studies will inevitably proliferate. Now is the time to consider critically the design of such studies, to avoid the mistakes of the past and to maximize their potential to identify new components of disease.


Nature | 2007

Replicating genotype-phenotype associations.

Stephen J. Chanock; Teri A. Manolio; Michael Boehnke; Eric Boerwinkle; David J. Hunter; Gilles Thomas; Joel N. Hirschhorn; Gonçalo R. Abecasis; David Altshuler; Joan E. Bailey-Wilson; Lisa D. Brooks; Lon R. Cardon; Mark J. Daly; Peter Donnelly; Joseph F. Fraumeni; Nelson B. Freimer; Daniela S. Gerhard; Chris Gunter; Alan E. Guttmacher; Mark S. Guyer; Emily L. Harris; Josephine Hoh; Robert N. Hoover; C. Augustine Kong; Kathleen R. Merikangas; Cynthia C. Morton; Lyle J. Palmer; Elizabeth G. Phimister; John P. Rice; Jerry Roberts

What constitutes replication of a genotype–phenotype association, and how best can it be achieved?


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2000

A General Test of Association for Quantitative Traits in Nuclear Families

Gonçalo R. Abecasis; Lon R. Cardon; William Cookson

High-resolution mapping is an important step in the identification of complex disease genes. In outbred populations, linkage disequilibrium is expected to operate over short distances and could provide a powerful fine-mapping tool. Here we build on recently developed methods for linkage-disequilibrium mapping of quantitative traits to construct a general approach that can accommodate nuclear families of any size, with or without parental information. Variance components are used to construct a test that utilizes information from all available offspring but that is not biased in the presence of linkage or familiality. A permutation test is described for situations in which maximum-likelihood estimates of the variance components are biased. Simulation studies are used to investigate power and error rates of this approach and to highlight situations in which violations of multivariate normality assumptions warrant the permutation test. The relationship between power and the level of linkage disequilibrium for this test suggests that the method is well suited to the analysis of dense maps. The relationship between power and family structure is investigated, and these results are applicable to study design in complex disease, especially for late-onset conditions for which parents are usually not available. When parental genotypes are available, power does not depend greatly on the number of offspring in each family. Power decreases when parental genotypes are not available, but the loss in power is negligible when four or more offspring per family are genotyped. Finally, it is shown that, when siblings are available, the total number of genotypes required in order to achieve comparable power is smaller if parents are not genotyped.


The Lancet | 2003

Population stratification and spurious allelic association.

Lon R. Cardon; Lyle J. Palmer

Great efforts and expense have been expended in attempts to detect genetic polymorphisms contributing to susceptibility to complex human disease. Concomitantly, technology for detection and scoring of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has undergone rapid development, extensive catalogues of SNPs across the genome have been constructed, and SNPs have been increasingly used as a means for investigation of the genetic causes of complex human diseases. For many diseases, population-based studies of unrelated individuals--in which case-control and cohort studies serve as standard designs for genetic association analysis--can be the most practical and powerful approach. However, extensive debate has arisen about optimum study design, and considerable concern has been expressed that these approaches are prone to population stratification, which can lead to biased or spurious results. Over the past decade, a great shift has been noted, away from case-control and cohort studies, towards family-based association designs. These designs have fewer problems with population stratification but have greater genotyping and sampling requirements, and data can be difficult or impossible to gather. We discuss past evidence for population stratification on genotype-phenotype association studies, review methods to detect and account for it, and present suggestions for future study design and analysis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Lon R. Cardon's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Javier Gayán

Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John C. DeFries

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Panos Deloukas

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Fulker

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge