Lonnie Smith

A Retrospective Analysis of Ezetimibe Treatment in Renal Transplant Recipients

A retrospective review was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of ezetimibe as a treatment option for renal transplant recipients. We evaluated the medical records of 34 adult renal transplant recipients receiving ezetimibe as monotherapy or combination therapy. Fasting lipid profiles were obtained at baseline and at 1–6 months post‐ezetimibe initiation. Twenty patients received cyclosporine, 12 patients received tacrolimus, 1 patient received either sirolimus or no calcineurin therapy at the time of ezetimibe initiation. Monotherapy was started in 8 patients, who had all previously failed statins, and combination therapy was utilized in 26 patients. Monotherapy or combination therapy resulted in a mean reduction in total cholesterol of 23.3%, triglycerides 40.2%, low‐density lipoproteins 16.8% and high‐density lipoproteins 4.8% after 3.1 months of therapy. Ezetimibe as combination or monotherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients without changes in calcineurin inhibitor levels or renal function.

Focus on mTOR inhibitors and tacrolimus in renal transplantation: Pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and clinical outcomes☆

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitor-containing immunosuppressive regimens have been developed as part of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization/withdrawal strategies for renal transplant recipients, with the goal of avoiding CNI-associated nephrotoxicity. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetic interactions and exposure-response relationships of mTOR inhibitors and tacrolimus (TAC), the most widely used CNI. We also discuss key randomized clinical studies that have evaluated use of this combination in renal transplantation. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that mTOR inhibitors, everolimus (EVR) and sirolimus (SRL), have a large intra- and inter-patient variability in drug exposure, and narrow therapeutic windows (trough levels [C0] 3-8 ng/mL and 5-15 ng/mL, respectively). Consequently, routine therapeutic drug monitoring of EVR and SRL is recommended to optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity in individual patients. As there is a good correlation between C0 and area under the curve (AUC), C0 can be used as a convenient and reliable measure of mTOR drug exposure. Clinical data on the use of EVR or SRL in TAC minimization strategies in renal transplantation are limited. Available evidence suggests that treatment with EVR allows early and substantial TAC minimization when used with basiliximab induction and corticosteroids, to achieve good renal function without compromising efficacy or safety. However, data comparing this combination with other regimens are lacking. Results with SRL are more mixed. SRL in combination with reduced TAC has been shown to provide less nephrotoxicity than the SRL/standard TAC combination, with comparable efficacy and safety. However, this approach has been shown to be inferior to other regimens in terms of patient/graft survival and biopsy-proven acute rejection (vs MMF/TAC) as well as renal function (vs MMF/TAC and SRL/MMF). Further studies are needed to define the therapeutic window for TAC when used in combination with mTOR inhibitors, evaluate EVR/reduced TAC versus other regimens, assess long-term outcomes, and determine efficacy and safety in high-risk patients.

Role of maintenance immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplant outcome.

Data of long-term immunosuppressive protocol comparison are lacking. The goal of this study was to compare kidney transplant outcome using three common immunosuppressive protocols. A retrospective study was performed of the graft and recipient survival using US Renal Data System data (n = 31,012) between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1999, with the follow-up through December 31, 2000, on prednisone + cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil (PCM; n = 17,108), prednisone + tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (PTM; n = 7225), or prednisone + cyclosporine + azathioprine (PCA; n = 6679). Compared with PCM, there is an increased risk for allograft failure associated with PTM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; P < 0.05) and PCA (HR 1.15; P < 0.001). Similar associations were demonstrated in the following subgroups: Early (before 1997) and late (in or after 1997) transplant periods, in living-donor transplants, and in adult and kidney-only recipients. This association also was found between PCA regimen and graft survival in the entire patient population (HR 1.15; P < 0.001) and in the studied subgroups. PCA (HR 1.15; P < 0.005), but not PTM (HR 1.01; P = 0.816), regimen was associated with increased recipient mortality in the entire patient population and in patient subgroups. Secondary outcomes (serum creatinine values at given time points, acute rejection rate, and posttransplantation malignancies) are also discussed. These data suggest that a PCM regimen is associated with lower risk for graft failure compared with a PTM regimen and with lower risk for graft failure and recipient death compared with a PCA regimen.

Factors Associated with Nonadherence to Medication in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Nonadherence in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated in this report using a questionnaire with five binary questions and one question on a continuous scale. Study participants at the University of Utah Transplant Program (n = 199) were 43.0 ± 14.2 years old; 67% were males, and 81% were White. Two questions that produced heterogeneous outcome were analyzed: ‘Do you ever forget to take your medication?’ (79% no, 21% yes) and ‘Have you ever taken your medications late?’ (67% no, 33% yes). Responses to these questions correlated (χ2 65.2, p < 0.001; correlation coefficient 0.57, p < 0.001). We performed a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the combined outcome of forgetting/not taking medications altogether or taking medications off schedule. Higher comorbidity index [odds ratio (OR) 2.19, p < 0.001], living (compared to deceased) donor (OR 2.81, p = 0.005) and full-time employment were associated with forgetting medications or taking them late (OR 3.12, p = 0.01). Recipient age tended to be associated with lower risk of nonadherence, but did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.98 per year of age, p = 0.13). Education level, smoking status, recipient race, dialysis modality, number of medications and the time since first kidney transplantation were not associated with the outcome. In conclusion, renal transplant recipients with greater comorbidity, receiving kidney from a living donor and with full-time employment reported lower levels of medication adherence.

Effect of Corticosteroid Withdrawal on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Exposure in a Randomized Multicenter Study

As corticosteroid‐sparing protocols are increasingly utilized in kidney transplant recipients, it is crucial to understand potential drug interactions between tacrolimus (TAC) and the effect of corticosteroid withdrawal as well as to characterize dose adjustments of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in this setting. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study included 397 patients who were randomized on posttransplant day 8 to receive either placebo (CSWD) or corticosteroid continuance (CCS). TAC trough levels at week two posttransplant were significantly greater in the CSWD group whereas TAC doses were comparable to the CCS group. This interaction was not observed in the African American subgroup. Higher serum creatinine and potassium levels were also observed in the CSWD group. MMF dose was significantly reduced in the CSWD group by the investigators because of decreased WBC counts, mostly outside of study protocol criteria, despite similar incidence of neutropenia and reported cytomegalovirus infection. Understanding TAC and MMF exposure in the context of corticosteroid‐sparing protocols should allow for improved dosing of immunosuppressants and better management of posttransplant patients.

No Occurrence of De Novo HLA Antibodies in Patients With Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal in a 5-year Prospective Randomized Study

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of early corticosteroid cessation on the occurrence of de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody posttransplant. Renal transplant recipients (n=37) were randomized to early corticosteroid withdrawal at day 7 posttransplant (n=21 patients), or to chronic steroids (n=16), all in combination with thymoglobulin as induction agent, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid as maintenance therapy. To establish the time course of HLA antibody appearance, sera collected pretransplant and for up to 5 years posttransplant were screened for the appearance of HLA antibodies. In this 5-year longitudinal study, only one patient in the control group developed a de novo donor-specific HLA antibody. We conclude that renal transplant recipients on steroid withdrawal by the end of week 1 are not at higher risk for developing HLA antibodies compared with a standard steroid regimen up to 5 years posttransplant.

A retrospective assessment of pre-treatment variables on the response to darbepoetin alfa after renal transplantation.

This retrospective review assesses the efficacy of darbepoetin alfa for treating anemia after renal transplantation. Patients were evaluated over a 12‐week period, and efficacy was based on achieving hemoglobin >12 g/dL. Thirty‐six patients were analyzed (53% male, 53% cadaveric allografts, median age 42.5 years). Baseline creatinine clearance ranged from ∼15 to >100 mL/min. Most patients initiated darbepoetin alfa <3 months (50%) or >12 months (44%) after transplantation, 19% were previously receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO), and 47% were on concomitant ACE inhibitors. The majority of patients received either tacrolimus‐ (53%) or cyclosporine‐ (44%) based immunosuppression. Overall, 29 (81%) patients achieved the hemoglobin target with a mean time to response of 4.4 weeks. Neither the time to anemia onset, previous rHuEPO therapy, concomitant ACE inhibitor, allograft source, immunosuppressive regimen, nor degree of renal function affected the proportion of patients achieving the hemoglobin target, time to response or darbepoetin alfa dose requirement. Patients with anemia >12 months post‐transplantation or on concomitant ACE inhibitors required a significantly longer duration of therapy. No adverse events associated with darbepoetin alfa therapy were detected. These results demonstrate that darbepoetin alfa is a safe and effective treatment for anemia in renal transplant recipients.

Lack of economic benefit with basiliximab induction in living related donor adult renal transplant recipients.

Study Objective. To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients.

Implementation of a patient-focused specialty pharmacy program in an academic healthcare system

PURPOSE The development and implementation of a systemwide specialty pharmacy program in an academic healthcare system are described. SUMMARY Although the systems pharmacy department had developed specialty pharmacy services for patients with certain conditions, it was necessary to expand and standardize those services to meet the needs of all specialty clinics because (1) many of the clinics had experienced an increased volume of prior-authorization requests due to the introduction of new specialty drugs, (2) the dispensing pharmacies were operating at maximum capacity due to the previous decentralization of specialty pharmacy operations, and (3) payers had sent notice that they would require accreditation of the specialty pharmacy program as a condition of participation in their specialty pharmacy networks. To ensure standardization of services and successful preparation for increasing numbers of specialty prescriptions, all specialty pharmacy services were centralized to the healthcare systems Pharmacy Ambulatory Clinical Care Center (PAC(3)). PAC(3) centralized the prior-authorization process to selected specialty clinics. A call center was developed at PAC(3) to provide centralized specialty pharmacy services, including 24-7 patient support, a medication adherence program, home delivery service, and patient education. The program resulted in a 137% increase in specialty pharmacy revenues over a two-year period. PAC(3) processed 1860 prior-authorization cases and enrolled approximately 700 new patients in the specialty pharmacy program within nine months. CONCLUSION A specialty pharmacy program was established along with operational and infrastructure improvements, resulting in increased revenue, systemwide services, and a fully accredited specialty pharmacy.

Building a business plan to support a transplantation pharmacy practice model

Pharmacists have been part of the multidisciplinary transplantation care team for more than four decades. The first article detailing the pharmacist’s role on the transplantation team was published in this journal in 1976.[1][1] Since the 1970s, a pharmacist’s presence within the transplantation