Loralie J. Langman

Pharmacodynamic assessment of mycophenolic acid-induced immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

The combination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs provides a novel method for the optimization of drug dosing. We chose to investigate this with the use of mycophenolic acid (MPA), an immunosuppressive drug that mediates its effect by the inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), a key enzyme in the de novo biosynthesis of purines. The relationship between MPA concentration in plasma, IMPDH activity in whole blood, and nucleotide concentration in lymphocytes was investigated in renal-transplant recipients, who were randomized to receive either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 5) or azathioprine (AZA) (n = 7), in combination with cyclosporine and prednisone. Blood samples were collected throughout the dosing interval. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed substantial variability among the patients in the absorption and clearance of MPA. An inverse relationship was found between the MPA concentration of IMPDH activity in whole blood. The peak concentration of MPA achieved at 1 hr after dosing resulted in approximately 40% inhibition of IMPDH activity. As the MPA concentration decreased throughout the dosing interval, there was a gradual restoration of IMPDH activity. The inhibition of IMPDH activity (P < 0.05) in MMF-treated patients as compared with the AZA-treated controls was maintained for approximately 8 hr after dosing. No statistically significant (P > 0.05) difference between the predose and the 12 hr postdose activity was observed. The concentrations of guanine nucleotides, GDP and GMP, were significantly lower than in the AZA-treated group at most of the time points after dosing; however, considerable variability was observed. The measurement of the pharmacodynamic response to immunosuppressive drugs may provide not only a mechanism to predict the most appropriate dosing regimen, but also a viable alternative to traditional therapeutic drug monitoring, by assessing the overall state of immunosuppression.

Detection of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal incense products

OBJECTIVE We investigated the ability of clinical drug of abuse tests to detect synthetic cannabinoids. RESULTS A broad class GC/MS drug screening method detected JWH-018 and JWH-073 in methanolic extracts and teas steeped from herbal incense products in three of four products tested. CONCLUSIONS Synthetic cannabinoids are present in herbal incense purchased over the internet.

Effect of cytochrome P450 enzyme polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine.

This study examines the relationship between blood concentrations of venlafaxine and its active metabolite, O-desmethyl venlafaxine (ODV), and genetic variants of the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in human subjects. Trough blood concentrations were measured at steady state in patients treated with venlafaxine extended release in a clinical practice setting. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes were converted to activity scores based on known activity levels of the two alleles comprising a genotype. After adjusting for drug dose and gender effects, higher CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 activity scores were significantly associated with lower venlafaxine concentrations (P < 0.001 for each). Only CYP2D6 was associated with the concentration of ODV (P < 0.001), in which genotypes with more active alleles were associated with higher ODV concentrations. The sum of venlafaxine plus ODV concentration showed the same pattern as venlafaxine concentrations with CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes with higher activity scores being associated with a lower venlafaxine plus ODV concentration (2D6 P = 0.01; 2C19 P < 0.001). Because allelic variants in both CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 influence the total concentration of the active compounds venlafaxine and ODV, both CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes should be considered when using pharmacogenomic information for venlafaxine dose alterations.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus: A Consensus Report

Abstract: In 2014, the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology called a meeting of international experts to provide recommendations to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice. EVR is a potent inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, approved for the prevention of organ transplant rejection and for the treatment of various types of cancer and tuberous sclerosis complex. EVR fulfills the prerequisites for TDM, having a narrow therapeutic range, high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and established drug exposure–response relationships. EVR trough concentrations (C0) demonstrate a good relationship with overall exposure, providing a simple and reliable index for TDM. Whole-blood samples should be used for measurement of EVR C0, and sampling times should be standardized to occur within 1 hour before the next dose, which should be taken at the same time everyday and preferably without food. In transplantation settings, EVR should be generally targeted to a C0 of 3–8 ng/mL when used in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs (calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids); in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens, the EVR target C0 range should be 6–10 ng/mL. Further studies are required to determine the clinical utility of TDM in nontransplantation settings. The choice of analytical method and differences between methods should be carefully considered when determining EVR concentrations, and when comparing and interpreting clinical trial outcomes. At present, a fully validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay is the preferred method for determination of EVR C0, with a lower limit of quantification close to 1 ng/mL. Use of certified commercially available whole-blood calibrators to avoid calibration bias and participation in external proficiency-testing programs to allow continuous cross-validation and proof of analytical quality are highly recommended. Development of alternative assays to facilitate on-site measurement of EVR C0 is encouraged.

Interlaboratory comparability of serum cotinine measurements at smoker and nonsmoker concentration levels: A round-robin study

INTRODUCTION Cotinine, the primary proximate metabolite of nicotine, is commonly measured as an index of exposure to tobacco in both active users of tobacco and nonsmokers with possible exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS). A number of laboratories have implemented analyses for measuring serum cotinine in recent years, but there have been few interlaboratory comparisons of the results. Among nonsmokers exposed to SHS, the concentration of cotinine in blood can be quite low, and extensive variability in these measurements has been reported in the past. METHODS In this study, a group of seven laboratories, all experienced in serum cotinine analysis, measured eight coded serum pools with concentrations ranging from background levels of about 0.05 ng/ml to relatively high concentrations in the active smokers range. All laboratories used either gas-liquid chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. RESULTS All seven laboratories reliably measured the cotinine concentrations in samples that were within the range of their methods. In each case, the results for the pools were correctly ranked in order, and no significant interlaboratory bias was observed at the 5% level of significance for results from any of the pools. DISCUSSION We conclude that present methods of chromatographic analysis of serum cotinine, as used by these experienced laboratories, are capable of providing accurate and precise results in both the smoker and the nonsmoker concentration range.

The Use of Oral Fluid for Therapeutic Drug Management

Abstract:  One of the underlying tenets of clinical pharmacology is that only free drugs are pharmacologically active. It is thought that only free drugs can cross biological membranes to interact with a given receptor to alter its function, and that drug responses, both efficacious and toxic, are a function of unbound concentrations. The rationale for measuring drugs in oral fluid is that the free fraction of a drug in plasma reaches equilibrium with the drug in saliva. Although reports concerning the appearance of organic solutes in saliva have been in the literature for over 70 years, it has only been in the past 30 years that there has been emphasis on the appearance of drugs. Although many assumptions for drug level monitoring in saliva are made, the primary requisite for salivary monitoring to be useful is a constant or predictable relationship between the drug concentration in saliva and the drug concentration in plasma. Measurement of oral fluid drug levels for the purpose of managing patients and making dosage adjustments may be useful for select drugs or drug classes. However, it does not appear to be useful for the majority of drugs therapeutically monitored. Some work with antipsychotic medications has indicated that although the measurement of drug concentrations themselves may not be useful for dosage adjustment, the ratio of parent drug to metabolite may reflect altered metabolic status due to either pharmacogenetic variation or other clinical conditions. Furthermore, analysis of saliva may provide a cost‐effective approach for the screening of large populations.

Blood distribution of mycophenolic acid.

RS-61443 (RS) a morpholinoethyl ester of mycophenolic acid (MPA), can be considered a prodrug, as immunosuppressive activity is expressed only after hydrolysis to MPA upon absorption. Little is known about the blood distribution of MPA; such information would have an impact on the medium used for analysis of the drug in clinical trials. This was investigated by spiking whole blood having an initial temperature of either 4° or 22°C with increasing amounts of MPA ranging from 100 to 10,000 μg/L. These drug concentrations span the range seen when immunosuppressive doses of the RS are administered. This was followed by incubation of the blood at 37°C for 0–120 min prior to separation of the cells. The drug concentration was measured in the plasma and whole blood fractions by high-performance liquid chromatography. MPA was almost exclusively found in the plasma fraction and did not exhibit any temperature or concentration dependence. The free or unbound fraction of MPA over the same concentration range was determined by ultracentrifugation and demonstrated a concentration dependence ranging from 7.2 to 16.5% of total drug for a concentration range spanning 500–10,000 μg/L. The drug was found to be primarily associated with the non-albumin proteins in the plasma. Less than 10% of the drug was found to be bound to lipoproteins. The data suggest that from an analytical standpoint, plasma, rather than whole blood, would be the most suitable medium for analysis because of the higher concentrations of the drug found in this fraction.

Assuring the proper analytical performance of measurement procedures for immunosuppressive drug concentrations in clinical practice: Recommendations of the international association of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology immunosuppressive drug scientific committee

Abstract: Monitoring immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) in blood or plasma is still a key therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) application in clinical settings. Narrow target ranges and severe side effects at drug underexposure or overexposure make accurate and precise measurements a must. This overview prepared by the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology is intended to serve as a summary and guidance document describing the current state-of-the-art in the TDM of ISDs.

Hydrocodone in postoperative personalized pain management: pro-drug or drug?

BACKGROUND Genetic variations in enzymes that produce active metabolites from pro-drugs are well known. Such variability could account for some of the clinically observed differences in analgesia and side effects seen in postoperative patients. Using genotyping and quantitation of serum concentrations of hydrocodone and its metabolites, we sought to demonstrate the clinical effects of the metabolites of hydrocodone on pain relief. The objective of the current study was to determine whether CYP2D6 genotype and serum hydromorphone levels account for some of the variability in pain relief seen with hydrocodone in a cohort of women post-Cesarean section. METHODS In 156 post-Cesarean section patients who received hydrocodone, we assessed serum opioid concentrations and CYP2D6 genotypes. Blood samples were collected at that time for genotyping and determination of concentrations of hydrocodone and metabolites by LC-MS/MS. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the relationship between CYP2D6 genotypes, pain relief, side effects, and serum concentrations of hydrocodone and hydromorphone. RESULTS The CYP2D6 genotyping results indicated that 60% of subjects were extensive, 30% intermediate, 3% poor, and 7% ultra-rapid metabolizers. In the poor metabolizers, the mean plasma hydromorphone concentration was 8-fold lower when compared to that of ultra-rapid metabolizers. Hydromorphone, and not hydrocodone concentrations correlated with pain relief. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that hydromorphone is generated at substantially different rates, dependent on CYP2D6 genotype. Pain relief correlated with plasma concentrations of hydromorphone, and not with hydrocodone. This suggests that pain relief will vary with CYP2D6 genotype. Inability to metabolize hydrocodone to hydromorphone as seen in the poor metabolizers should alert the clinician to consider alternative medications for managing pain postoperatively.

Impact of Laboratory Practices on Interlaboratory Variability in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressive Drugs.

Abstract: The immunosuppressants cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and probably also mycophenolic acid require therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)–guided dosing to ensure that blood concentrations are kept within the target range in transplant patients. Reliable, accurate, and precise test methods are therefore essential to effectively monitor levels and to make proper dose adjustments. Data from proficiency testing programs have shown substantial interlaboratory variability. Only few attempts have been made to study the underlying causes. The aim of this study was to systematically document current practices used for immunosuppressant drug TDM in clinical laboratories and identify methodological and practice differences, which may cause the variability observed among laboratories. Data collection was primarily conducted by a structured Web-based survey. Invitations to participate in the survey were distributed to clinical laboratories providing immunosuppressant drug TDM. Surveys were completed by 76 laboratories in 14 countries. The results of our survey suggest that there are 3 main reasons for interlaboratory variability: (1) lack of standardization of laboratory procedures and workflows starting with sample collection and handling, (2) lack of use of appropriate reference materials (eg, isotope-labeled internal standards for liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy), and (3) poor compliance with internationally accepted good laboratory practice guidelines (eg, related to quality control, quality assurance, validation, training of personnel). The results of the survey also suggest that interlaboratory variability is a multifactorial problem. Technical-level consensus on laboratory operational procedures, quality systems, and personnel training will be of great importance to improve quality and interlaboratory comparability.