Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Loren G. Miller is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Loren G. Miller.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2011

International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Pyelonephritis in Women: A 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Kalpana Gupta; Thomas M. Hooton; Kurt G. Naber; Richard Colgan; Loren G. Miller; Gregory J. Moran; Lindsay E. Nicolle; Raul Raz; Anthony J. Schaeffer; David E. Soper; Miami Florida

A Panel of International Experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) in collaboration with the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) to update the 1999 Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Guidelines by the IDSA. Co-sponsoring organizations include the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Urological Association, Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases-Canada, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. The focus of this work is treatment of women with acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis, diagnoses limited in these guidelines to premenopausal, non-pregnant women with no known urological abnormalities or co-morbidities. The issues of in vitro resistance prevalence and the ecological adverse effects of antimicrobial therapy (collateral damage) were considered as important factors in making optimal treatment choices and thus are reflected in the rankings of recommendations.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2004

Trends in Antimicrobial Drug Development: Implications for the Future

Brad Spellberg; John H. Powers; Eric P. Brass; Loren G. Miller; John E. Edwards

The need for new antimicrobial agents is greater than ever because of the emergence of multidrug resistance in common pathogens, the rapid emergence of new infections, and the potential for use of multidrug-resistant agents in bioweapons. Paradoxically, some pharmaceutical companies have indicated that they are curtailing anti-infective research programs. We evaluated the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases of approved drugs and the research and development programs of the worlds largest pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to document trends in the development of new antimicrobial agents. FDA approval of new antibacterial agents decreased by 56% over the past 20 years (1998-2002 vs. 1983-1987). Projecting future development, new antibacterial agents constitute 6 of 506 drugs disclosed in the developmental programs of the largest pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Despite the critical need for new antimicrobial agents, the development of these agents is declining. Solutions encouraging and facilitating the development of new antimicrobial agents are needed.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2002

A Prospective Study of Predictors of Adherence to Combination Antiretroviral Medication

Carol E. Golin; Honghu Liu; Ron D. Hays; Loren G. Miller; C. Keith Beck; Jeanette R. Ickovics; Andrew H. Kaplan; Neil S. Wenger

AbstractOBJECTIVE: Adherence to complex antiretroviral therapy (ART) is critical for HIV treatment but difficult to achieve. The development of interventions to improve adherence requires detailed information regarding barriers to adherence. However, short follow-up and inadequate adherence measures have hampered such determinations. We sought to assess predictors of long-term (up to 1 year) adherence to newly initiated combination ART using an accurate, objective adherence measure. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 140 HIV-infected patients at a county hospital HIV clinic during the year following initiation of a new highly active ART regimen. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured adherence every 4 weeks, computing a composite score from electronic medication bottle caps, pill count and self-report. We evaluated patient demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial characteristics, features of the regimen, and relationship with one’s HIV provider as predictors of adherence over 48 weeks. On average, subjects took 71% of prescribed doses with over 95% of patients achieving suboptimal (<95%) adherence. In multivariate analyses, African-American ethnicity, lower income and education, alcohol use, higher dose frequency, and fewer adherence aids (e.g., pillboxes, timers) were independently associated with worse adherence. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, those actively using drugs took 59% of doses versus 72% for nonusers, and those drinking alcohol took 66% of doses versus 74% for nondrinkers. Patients with more antiretroviral doses per day adhered less well. Participants using no adherence aids took 68% of doses versus 76% for those in the upper quartile of number of adherence aids used. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all patients’ adherence levels were suboptimal, demonstrating the critical need for programs to assist patients with medication taking. Interventions that assess and treat substance abuse and incorporate adherence aids may be particularly helpful and warrant further study.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2008

Colonization, Fomites, and Virulence: Rethinking the Pathogenesis of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection

Loren G. Miller; Binh An Diep

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is increasingly common worldwide and causes considerable morbidity and mortality. Of concern, community-associated MRSA infections are often recurrent and are highly transmissible to close contacts. The traditional tenet of pathogenesis is that MRSA colonization precedes infection. This has prompted persons involved in efforts to prevent community-associated MRSA infection to incorporate the use of intranasal topical antibiotics for nasal decolonization. However, data from outbreaks of community-associated MRSA infection suggest that skin-skin and skin-fomite contact represent important and common alternative routes of acquisition of the infecting strain. Furthermore, strain characteristics of the most successful community-associated MRSA strain, USA300, may contribute to a distinct pathogenesis. As we develop strategies to prevent community-associated MRSA infection, we must reconsider the pathogenesis of S. aureus. Reliance on models of health care-associated MRSA transmission for prevention of community-associated MRSA infection may result in the development of flawed strategies that attenuate our ability to prevent this serious and potentially deadly infection.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2007

Clinical and Epidemiologic Characteristics Cannot Distinguish Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection from Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus Infection: A Prospective Investigation

Loren G. Miller; Franciose Perdreau Remington; Arnold S. Bayer; Binh An Diep; Nelly Tan; Kiran Bharadwa; Jennifer Tsui; Joshua Perlroth; Anthony Shay; Grace Tagudar; Uzoma N. Ibebuogu; Brad Spellberg

BACKGROUND Community-associated (CA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection has become common worldwide. Some researchers have argued that empirical therapy for MRSA should be given only to patients with suspected CA S. aureus infections who have risk factors for acquisition of MRSA. However, there are no prospective data examining this approach. METHODS We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who were hospitalized with S. aureus infection, administered a detailed questionnaire, and collected clinical and microbiological information. RESULTS Of the 280 consenting patients, 180 were adults with CA S. aureus infection. Among these subjects, 108 (60%) had MRSA infection, and 78 (40%) had methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infection. MRSA infection was associated with younger age (P<.0001); skin/soft-tissue infection (P=.015); snorting/smoking illegal drugs (P=.01); recent incarceration (P=.03); lower comorbidity index (P=.01); more frequent visits to bars, raves, and/or clubs (P=.03); and higher frequency of laundering clothes in hot water (P=.05). However, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for these factors for discriminating CA-MRSA infection from CA-MSSA infection were relatively poor. Post-hoc modeling revealed that, even in a 10% (i.e., low) MRSA prevalence population, patients lacking the 3 strongest MRSA risk factors would still have a 7% posttest probability of MRSA. Most MRSA strains belonged to the ST-8/USA300 genotype, contained SCCmec type IV, and shared virulence factors commonly found in the ST1:USA400 clone. MSSA strains were genotypically heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS We found that clinical and epidemiological risk factors in persons hospitalized for CA S. aureus infection cannot reliably distinguish between MRSA and MSSA. Our findings have important implications for the choice of empirical antibiotic therapy for suspected S. aureus infections and for infection control.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2010

Serious Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Helen W. Boucher; Loren G. Miller; Raymund R. Razonable

Although first identified just >4 decades ago, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has undergone rapid evolutionary changes and epidemiologic expansion to become a major cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections worldwide. Increasing resistance to vancomycin among MRSA strains in conjunction with availability of new antibiotics, including daptomycin and linezolid, have increased treatment choices but made clinical treatment decisions more challenging. This article describes the clinical features and management issues of 2 challenging-to-treat manifestations of MRSA infection, bacteremia and/or endocarditis and osteomyelitis. It also presents a brief review of community-associated MRSA infections and preventive strategies directed against MRSA.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2002

How Well Do Clinicians Estimate Patients' Adherence to Combination Antiretroviral Therapy?

Loren G. Miller; Honghu Liu; Ron D. Hays; Carol E. Golin; C. Keith Beck; Steven M. Asch; Yingying Ma; Andrew H. Kaplan; Neil S. Wenger

AbstractOBJECTIVE: Adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy is critical for clinical and virologic success in HIV-infected patients. To combat poor adherence, clinicians must identify nonadherent patients so they can implement interventions. However, little is known about the accuracy of these assessments. We sought to describe the accuracy of clinicians’ estimates of patients’ adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy. SETTING: Public HIV clinic. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. During visits, we asked clinicians (nurse practitioners, residents and fellow, and their supervising attending physicians) to estimate the percentage of antiretroviral medication taken by patients over the last 4 weeks and predicted adherence over the next 4 weeks. Adherence was measured using electronic monitoring devices, pill counts, and self-reports, which were combined into a composite adherence measure. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians estimated 464 episodes of adherence in 82 patients. RESULTS: Among the 464 adherence estimates, 264 (57%) were made by principal care providers (31% by nurse practitioners, 15% by fellows, 6% by residents, and 5% by staff physicians) and 200 (43%) by supervising attending physicians. Clinicians’ overestimated measured adherence by 8.9% on average (86.2% vs 77.3%). Greater clinician inaccuracy in adherence prediction was independently associated with higher CD4 count nadir (1.8% greater inaccuracy for every 100 CD4 cells, P=.005), younger patient age (3.7% greater inaccuracy for each decade of age, P=.02), and visit number (P=.02). Sensitivity of detecting nonadherent patients was poor (24% to 62%, depending on nonadherence cutoff). The positive predictive value of identifying a patient as nonadherent was 76% to 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians tend to overestimate medication adherence, inadequately detect poor adherence, and may therefore miss important opportunities to intervene to improve antiretroviral adherence.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2008

Adjunctive Use of Rifampin for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infections A Systematic Review of the Literature

Joshua Perlroth; Melissa N Kuo; Jennifer Tan; Arnold S. Bayer; Loren G. Miller

BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus causes severe life-threatening infections and has become increasingly common, particularly methicillin-resistant strains. Rifampin is often used as adjunctive therapy to treat S aureus infections, but there have been no systematic investigations examining the usefulness of such an approach. METHODS A systematic review of the literature to identify in vitro, animal, and human investigations that compared single antibiotics alone and in combination with rifampin therapy against S aureus. RESULTS The methods of in vitro studies varied substantially among investigations. The effect of rifampin therapy was often inconsistent, it did not necessarily correlate with in vivo investigations, and findings seemed heavily dependent on the method used. In addition, the quality of data reporting in these investigations was often suboptimal. Animal studies tended to show a microbiologic benefit of adjunctive rifampin use, particularly in osteomyelitis and infected foreign body infection models; however, many studies failed to show a benefit of adjunctive therapy. Few human studies have addressed the role of adjunctive rifampin therapy. Adjunctive therapy seems most promising for the treatment of osteomyelitis and prosthetic device-related infections, although studies were typically underpowered and benefits were not always seen. CONCLUSIONS In vitro results of interactions between rifampin and other antibiotics are method dependent and often do not correlate with in vivo findings. Adjunctive rifampin use seems promising in the treatment of clinical hardware infections or osteomyelitis, but more definitive data are lacking. Given the increasing incidence of S aureus infections, further adequately powered investigations are needed.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2007

Hepatitis C virus and death risk in hemodialysis patients.

Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Ryan D. Kilpatrick; Charles J. McAllister; Loren G. Miller; Eric S. Daar; David W. Gjertson; Joel D. Kopple; Sander Greenland

In maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common and may be associated with poor clinical outcomes. It was hypothesized that HCV infection would be associated with high all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in these patients after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, including surrogates of malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome. A national database of 13,664 MHD patients who underwent HCV antibody serology testing at least once during a 3-yr interval (July 2001 through June 2004) was analyzed. Measurements included third-generation HCV enzyme immunoassay and routine laboratory measurements. The HCV enzyme immunoassay was reported positive in 1590 (12%) patients. In logistic regression models that included case mix and available surrogates of malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome, HCV infection was associated with younger age, male gender, black race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance, longer dialysis vintage (duration), unmarried status, HIV infection, and smoking history. In proportional-hazards regressions, the mortality hazard ratio that was associated with HCV infection was 1.25 (95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.39; P < 0.001). Mortality hazards were higher among incident (dialysis duration <6 mo) than prevalent HD patients. Subgroup analyses indicated that HCV was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality across almost all clinical, demographic, and laboratory groups of patients. Hence, in MHD patients, HCV infection exhibits distinct demographic, clinical, and laboratory patterns, including associations with higher dialysis treatment vintage, and is associated with higher mortality. More diligent efforts to prevent and treat HCV infection may improve outcomes in MHD patients.


Clinical Microbiology and Infection | 2010

Body site colonization in patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other types of S. aureus skin infections

E.S. Yang; J. Tan; S. Eells; G. Rieg; G. Tagudar; Loren G. Miller

Efforts to control spread of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) are often based on eradication of colonization. However, the role of nasal and non-nasal colonization in the pathogenesis of these infections remains poorly understood. Patients with acute S. aureus skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) were prospectively enrolled. Each subjects nasal, axillary, inguinal and rectal areas were swabbed for S. aureus and epidemiological risk factors were surveyed. Among the 117 patients enrolled, there were 99 patients who had an SSTI and for whom data could be analysed. Sixty-five patients had a CA-MRSA SSTI. Among these patients, MRSA colonization in the nares, axilla, inguinal area and rectum was 25, 6, 11 and 13%, respectively, and 37% overall were MRSA colonized. Most (96%) MRSA colonization was detected using nose and inguinal screening alone. Non-nasal colonization was 25% among CA-MRSA patients, but only 6% among patients with CA-methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) or healthcare-associated MRSA or MSSA. These findings suggest that colonization patterns in CA-MRSA infection are distinct from those in non-CA-MRSA S. aureus infections. The relatively high prevalence of non-nasal colonization may play a key role in CA-MRSA transmission and acquisition of infection.

Collaboration


Dive into the Loren G. Miller's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. McKinnell

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samantha J. Eells

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan S. Huang

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ron D. Hays

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew H. Kaplan

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol E. Golin

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larissa May

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil S. Wenger

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge